Micro 730: Yet Another uPick (Over)
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
In post 44, esires wrote:L-1 on page 2 seems a little excessive...
Nevermind Eddie, we found scumbutts. UNVOTE: Eddie Cane VOTE: EsiresIn post 45, esires wrote:Which is to say I'm not gonna vote him-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
The logic was obviously you care too much about your self image to meme a lynch.In post 53, esires wrote:Also if your theory is that I'm scum I'd assume the supporting logic is I don't want to vote my partner, which would be Eddie, who you were already voting for... #shitcase
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Seagull-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
Yo this is some really scummy shit right here.In post 53, esires wrote:Also if your theory is that I'm scum I'd assume the supporting logic is I don't want to vote my partner, which would be Eddie, who you were already voting for... #shitcase
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Seagull
--
What kind of question even is this.In post 76, skitter30 wrote:
Hi esires!!!In post 45, esires wrote:Which is to say I'm not gonna vote him
Would you have voted him if it wouldn't have been a L-1 vote?
--
This is bad and opportunistic.
I mean like
you could ask them about it
and ya know
scumhunt
but ok
--
This is also some really scummy shit.In post 85, skitter30 wrote:I'm trying to figure out why I don't like that vote . . . let me try to put it in words.
Like, esires's coming from a newbie that I just played with him where votes didn't move nearly as quickly. I don't think he was quite expecting for there to be the opportunity to put someone at L-1 quite that early. We definitely didn't approach that in our game.
His caution, compared to that game, is vaguely townie to me. He was scum there, and was a lot quicker with his vote then. I'm not like proclaiming him to be a townread right now, but it does seem a bit different then how he played in that game, so I'm keeping an eye on him. Part of my read is going to depend on his answer to 76
I can see why you/seagull feel like he's being too self-conscious, but I personally didn't get that vibe from him.
And the game was out of RVS at that point, and Hiraki's vote just seemed like he was trying to add force to a wagon that already had some steam. I see no indication that he doesn't actually like what esires said. It seems like he hopped on just because it was a wagon that's happening.
--
Yeah.In post 91, skitter30 wrote:That was . . . incredibly enlightening.
Hey Giggles.
Let me put this in huge letters and in bright red so you don't miss this.
Continue the annoying anti-town gimmick and I will lead a policy lynch on you, because I can't tell if it's 1:36am, or if your posts are just straight up unreadable.
--
Lol this is bullshit.In post 98, skitter30 wrote:DoctorPepper's was still RVS.
The fact that Hiraki announced the L-2 signified that his vote was serious, which is why I took it to be a real vote, and not an RVS vote. He apparently found *something* he didn't like about esires, but didn't feel bothered to share, and that's why it seemed opportunistic.
There is no way to look at that vote and say "hey, that's real" or "hey, that's RVS" unless you scumhunt it.
--
I don't really know what Narna's thought process was when he made the vote at the time. I'm also kinda sleepy so it's not like I agree/disagree with it.]In post 114, skitter30 wrote:I know you're a hydra, but I can't tell who's posting what.
But the game was very clearly out of RVS at that point, with lots of people talking about esires. The vote from you and seagull were serious. Hiraki hadn't made an RVS vote. He suddenly voted on a wagon that already had serious votes. He wasn't voting at the time, so the timing and intent of his vote seemed serious. But he said basically nothing beforehand, and certainly nothing to show that he found esires scummy.
Like, are we arguing over whether or not that vote was RVS?
Cuz, if you wanna argue it's RVS, it was a very strange place to put his vote at that time.
p-edit: you guys write a lot lol.
--
This is still some really scummy shit.In post 122, esires wrote:Yeah I forgot to list JJ as a player who isn't posting much. JJ was also quick to pull their vote off me but it was RVS so not too crazy.
On my wagon - no, nothing really strikes me as too scummy about the build up. I can see where it came from in reflection. Hiraki would be the one I'd eye as sus from the buildup due to jumping on at an opportune time without providing reasons but it seemed like wagoning for pressure to me.
If your concern is genuine, investigate it.
Ask him a question.
He'll see it.
--
This is also some really scummy shit.In post 128, esires wrote:Simply because I haven't moved my vote yet. I don't have a strong read on Seagull but the reason for voting me was legit so I'll unvote for now and make up my mind on someone tomorrow - it's sleep time now.
UNVOTE:
Basicly because you suddenly decide to have the though process of unvote now as opposed to waiting for one of us to post. It's not really genuine.
Like
why are you unvoting here when you can use your vote to apply pressure and sort your reads.
Like
do you actually want to sort me?-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
tbh Trans
I'm not really surprised you don't agree with my reads considering I was in sync with Frog most of the time over you, so I don't really know if this has to do with alignment or not.
But I can talk about it sure.
I kinda hate 53 mostly because I feel like his justification for his vote is really bad. First off it's RVS, so even then while us voting him is a good way to get us out of the RVS, he seems to take it way too seriously. Secondly, the reasoning he made up was just sorta just really why Narna probably wasn't voting him, especially since no one puts theories out like that on page 2. Like, it's completely silly tbh.
jjh's 132 is sorta exactly how I feel about esires' 122.
I find esires' unvote scummy mostly because we didn't get much interactions with him, so he was never able to really form a read, and the unvote just seems like random. If they're town I'd expect they'd want more from us atleast before unvoting like that. I don't buy the progression being natural.-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
I need to see jjh post more content.In post 146, Chairman Doggo wrote:not really interested in voting either of those two. how do you feel about jj?
also are you a doublevoter?
And you could litterally look at any of ThinkBig's VCs.
You'll see we'll have one vote in place and another not voting.
That's not error and Narna was kinda salty about it since we both had a plan, I was like whatever.
So yeah, on Odd Day's That don't start with "L" and end with "yLo" and don't start with "M" and end with "yLo" we're a Doublevoter-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
This is the modIn post 150, ThinkBig wrote:
that gives us a doublevoter
and uses a automated vote counter
FOR A MICRO
Puts our 2nd vote as not voting for most of the game.
And then when we USE our 2nd vote doesn't even include it on the vcs
VOTE: Skitter30
HELLO-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
In post 174, Chairman Doggo wrote:In post 173, Seagull wrote:UNVOTE: esiresVOTE: jjh927 Esires I don't get your progression on us. You were cool with our earlier vote on you because it was supposedly seriousspoiler: I was fishing for reactions, but then hate vote us when it gets more serious.Spoiler:
?
why are you unvoting him then? i dont mind the jj vote but i dont really see where your head is at from this
~gigglesSpoiler:
I'm picking up the noobtown vibes that Esires is putting down. Ali, not so much. His vote on us is omgus, and I'm trying to get him to look elsewhere.-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
SurprisinglyIn post 153, Chairman Doggo wrote:☭FULLY☭AUTOMATED☭LUXURY☭GAY☭SPACECOMMUNISM
alisae does this work better for you?
con amor,
giggles
☭FULLY☭AUTOMATED☭LUXURY☭GAY☭SPACECOMMUNISM
this is a lot better for tiregull.
Thanks
--
Hey jjhIn post 157, jjh927 wrote:
This sounds like justifiable reasoning so I'll take it.In post 149, esires wrote:@JJ - Like I said, it doesn't worry me much since it was RVS. But basically, I could see it being possibly being a ploy to try to show how little you care about throwing your vote around (essentially to avoid being accused of what I was accused of, being too reluctant to vote and appearing scummy as a result).
I actually care with extremely varying amounts about throwing my vote around.
UNVOTE:
Do something.-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
Ok seriously, wtf is wrong with you?In post 208, Vedith wrote:Hi, this is my first game of Mafia in over 10 years so I might be a little rusty.
I am town andafter reading the game 6 times over, it is obvious who scum is.
VOTE: Chairman Doggo
The way they cased Hiraki was scum motivated and had nothing to do with their alignment or the posts that they quoted.
DoctorPepper is obvious town so the whole spat between them and Doggo on page 3 and 6 was SvT meaning that Doggo has to be scum here.
I also think 63 wasa scum slip from Doggo where they didn't realise town knew they have scum day talk.What makes it worse is when Cassandra tries to defend Doggo for the slip on 78
Therefore I think Cassandra is also scum here.
I'm not a fan of only having pre flip scum tells, and Cassandra's 82 was a bad attempt at claiming Night 3 doctor.
I like to look at the motives of things, and Doggo pushing Cane and Eddie is very town motivated, considering that Eddie isn't an IC, and neither is Cane. More people should be putting pressure on Cane and Eddie for this reason alone imo because as of right now, I'm doubting both or their alignments.
jjh927, esires and Seagull need to stop talking about what roles are in the game, and stop trying to claim that the mason claim is scum just because the game is classed as "bastard".Seagull and jjh debate is TvT,butboth need to realise that they actually agree on Doggo being scum and should just vote there.
Seagull 6 was very town. The reads match mine and looks to be fully scum hunting.
That leaves skitter30. Constantly defending Doggo, fake read lists and even tried to pull of both a fake day vig and fake day cop just to get a lynch. This is also where I would consider scum.
40 where skitter30 says "Who are we killing tonight, Doggo?" I believe to be scum posting in the wrong thread, because 41 skitter30 says "Wrong thread".
Just to confirm
VOTE: Chairman Doggo-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
Are you even reading Vedith posts? Who cares about what either of us are saying?In post 218, Chairman Doggo wrote:☭FULLY☭AUTOMATED☭LUXURY☭GAY☭SPACECOMMUNISM
I don't like anything Alisae does
But i don't scumread them for the swap.
I just don't agree with it.
☭FULLY☭AUTOMATED☭LUXURY☭GAY☭SPACECOMMUNISM-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
Smoke another line of crack, and reread any of your posts, then get back to me.In post 231, Vedith wrote:In post 230, Seagull wrote:Ok seriously, wtf is wrong with you?
What do you mean?-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
why?In post 247, jjh927 wrote:Not really sure. Not a big fan of doctor pepper right now if I had to give my best guess.-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
Not until you explain anything in Vedith's #208In post 256, Chairman Doggo wrote:☭FULLY☭AUTOMATED☭LUXURY☭GAY☭SPACECOMMUNISM
scumread on jj intensifying.
doctorpepper is also still kinda shitty.
alisae/narna whoever is running the head rn can you put one of your votes back on jjh?
☭FULLY☭AUTOMATED☭LUXURY☭GAY☭SPACECOMMUNISM-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
Seagull Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 188
- Joined: July 2, 2017
In post 357, Seagull wrote:#356 legit pings me bad
Oh nevermind. . . Now it's just lameIn post 364, Hiraki wrote:
If you have meta'd me, you should understand that this is how I play.In post 358, Eddie Cane wrote:u have a long post. very few parts of that post had any reason to be posted. air doesn't help scumhunt. yes I just confbiased the fuck out of that post. but that doesn't matter. it is me showing u why ur posts are hollow and fairly useless.
no. referred to your number-
-
Seagull
-
-
Seagull Goon
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-