![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
I've never played a blitz game before so I dunno if it's the norm to hammer someone on Page 2, Cloud how was Echo saying you were impatient AI?
So at the time what made you think it was AI?In post 57, CloudKicker wrote:His vote made little as scum in retrospect but it kinda pisses me
Why was anybody killed? There was so little to go off you could basically say the same about any potential NK.In post 66, Vedith wrote:My question is, why the fuck was this killed?In post 15, Hopkirk wrote:Why are you asking this?In post 12, EchoVision wrote:5 votes to kill right?
Ok, if not for scumbuddies, why was this so terrible?In post 69, CloudKicker wrote:No but he shouldve addressed litterally the qhole table voting them over me just being impatient, i do disagree anout the "but neither really is pointing it out and voting based on it while ignoring the others " not being AI, i really do think his post was terrible considering he was being voted. But yes indeed i arguably hammer too fast.In post 67, Mjollnir wrote:Ok..yes you definitely hammered very quickly.
What was so bad about what he said in your opinion that it warranted a Page 2 hammer? Why did it make you so sure he was scum that you decided to end the day there? I would agree that impatience is not AI, but neither really is pointing it out and voting based on it while ignoring the others was unless you were feeling one of the others voting for him was his scumbuddy. Did you have a team in mind at the time?
No i didnt have a scumbuddy in mind nor a team, 2 people including you didnt post at the time
As Screen says, the only one of those that would have made sense would be Ircher, as the other three were doing this during RVS, it was literally the first three votes of the game. And none of them posted after Ircher put them at L-1 so none of them can be questioned as to why their votes were still on him.In post 77, CloudKicker wrote:i would expect town to try to find scum voting them on L-1 so freaking fast and not give a fuck about me you know, town stuffIn post 75, Mjollnir wrote:Would you expect town to go to the gallows fighting then?
Yes, there was two pages of content and nobody really did anything particularly town in nature, so the NK probably had little if any reason behind it. Wouldn't surprise me if they simply went after someone they perceived to be a good player or something.In post 82, Vedith wrote:Do you actually believe this?In post 68, Mjollnir wrote:Why was anybody killed? There was so little to go off you could basically say the same about any potential NK.
Well yes but why lynch him right there rather than maybe wait for more evidence to present itself?In post 81, CloudKicker wrote:I know i do
I suppose when you put it that way you may have a point. Didn't consider that.In post 86, Vedith wrote: Considering Echo was calling Kopkirk scum, you think that there's the same amount of gain killing Hopkirk than other players in teh game?
Just to make sure you're serious here.
Ok, so which of those two scenarios would you say is more likely?In post 90, Srceenplay wrote:That sounds like a stretch to create winfom
Well I'm going to assume you have an opinion on the hammer then?In post 97, Ircher wrote:It's a blitz game and pretty much nothing was happening. What better way to get the game moving than bringing someone to L-1?
I didn't expect a hammer; I simply wanted to get the game moving.
One of the three not on the lynch? Why's that?In post 98, Srceenplay wrote:I want to lynch out of the three that wasn't on the ML.
Is this the scumhunting you were referring to in Post 38?
Why take the risk then if you truly didn't believe Echo to be scum then? I don't get it..did you seriously expect that might not be one of the possible outcomes in a game specifically advertsied as being fast-paced that someone might get a hair-trigger? Also what was wrong with the pace as it was? I mean, a page in four hours isn't quite maybe "Blitz" but what was wrong with the idea of letting it develop by itself organically or maybe just giving it a bit of time?In post 108, Ircher wrote:Not really, I just noted it was L-2 and thought I could get the game moving by doing an L-1.In post 101, Mjollnir wrote:Well I'm going to assume you have an opinion on the hammer then?In post 97, Ircher wrote:It's a blitz game and pretty much nothing was happening. What better way to get the game moving than bringing someone to L-1?
I didn't expect a hammer; I simply wanted to get the game moving.
Did you believe Echo to be scum?
As far as the hammer goes -- I was quite surprised and while I am leaning towards scum!Cloud, I'm still considering what scum!Cloud has to gain from making such a blatant move that is bound to cause him trouble the following day.
Why only come up with this when people start to question your lack of scumhunting before? Was there something wrong with your previous vote and reasoning that makes you suddenly doubt it?In post 112, Kaboose wrote:UNVOTE:
REASON:
I was going to vote srceenplay from the wagon because of them being 3rd vote. That was the only thing I had from D1.
However, i love their idea of voting off the wagon. I think that's exactly why someone on the wagon was killed.
Makes sense scum would vote too. Like if scum want to kill on the wagon, I think town should want to kill off the wagon.
VOTE: esires
You've said this before, why do you feel the need to keep re-iterating why your hammer was so innocent when nobody has asked you to?In post 111, CloudKicker wrote:Like you dont get to vote me when your push is absolutely terrible when ure L-1 and you dont try to scumhunt into your wagon
Really? The post seemed to suggest that only Ircher should have been put under scrutiny by Echo from your perspective (as obviously you had not voted for him yet). However you have previously suggested that Echo should have been suspicious of everyone in his wagon:In post 118, CloudKicker wrote: i was just approving the post
(bolding and underlining done by me)In post 69, CloudKicker wrote:No but he shouldve addressedover me just being impatient, i do disagree anout the "but neither really is pointing it out and voting based on it while ignoring the others " not being AI, i really do think his post was terrible considering he was being voted. But yes indeed i arguably hammer too fast.litterally the qhole table voting them
No i didnt have a scumbuddy in mind nor a team, 2 people including you didnt post at the time
I'm not sure what you mean, try what again? I was only saying that made sense with a caveat.In post 133, Vedith wrote:I'm in the UK. I went to bed.In post 107, Mjollnir wrote:Is this the scumhunting you were referring to in Post 38?
I suppose that makes Screen, it's probable one of them was distancing themselves from that. Only slight issue is that some of those votes were RVS, granted one is dead and the other is you so you're clearly not gonna be scumreading yourself, but there is still Vedith, who didn't post between L-1 and hammer so didn't get a chance to unvote when it started looking serious.
Try again.
Sure,In post 122, Srceenplay wrote:Mjollnir seems like he's asking questions to seems busy. I wonder if he can summarize what all he's gained from the questions.
May I ask what's keeping you from voting him then?In post 144, Srceenplay wrote:Well it looks like kaboose is were I want to vote.
I agree with this sentiment.In post 153, CloudKicker wrote:Theres like 2 days before lynch, i think everyone should be outing their reads ish and then make a vote today before tomorow, heres mine
And you signed up for a Blitz game to be in a game you weren't expected to post every day in?In post 159, Vedith wrote:I've been on my other accounts tonight and not posted in majority places on this account.
Try again.
Sorry if I seem dumb for asking questions, but this is kind of my job here. It's not like you had mentioned any potential reasoning on them prior to this post here so unless you consider everyone without mind-reading powers stupid. Your posts up to me having to ask you for your reads were completely full of fluff and had no real opinion about any living player in this game.In post 160, Vedith wrote:And do you want me to answer the question on esires or screen, because right now I'm assuming you're playing dumb?
Maybe so, but that would only possibly cover one of my points against him. Even if I were to dicsount the defensiveness (and reading through a few of his other comments in other completed games where he was town, he did not seem to be so defensive as he is now, so I'd say it half takes it away possibly).In post 166, esires wrote:@Mjollnir - Vedith is a bit of a dick so unfortunately it's NAI, he was horribly anti-town in our previous game together and was willing to gamethrow because he was pouty. TBH I just don't really read his posts anymore.
And who's wincon is that? Lynching town is ALWAYS directly against town interests.In post 172, CloudKicker wrote:And yes im willing to lynch someone whos town if it serves my wincon
If we lynch town again today, I would caution against vigging anyone, because if you also vig wrong then scum win automatically. I'd say the wiser thing to do would be to wait for any potential investigative role to come forward with information.In post 188, Srceenplay wrote:I'm vig-ing someone not on the lynch tonight
Yeah, nice equation. The only thing missing from it is a little thing called reasoning. If you're gonna be like this about me asking why you read people as scum, then I'd be better off asking why you read those people as town, so I'll do that.In post 197, Vedith wrote:Well, since you find it hard to understand, there's 7 players alive. I'm town, I think 4 others have potential as town.
That equals 5. 7 minus 5 is 2.
There are 2 players that I don't town read.
2 is the number of Scum... omg math is amazing.
So yes, that was a dumb question from you.
Looks like we make a fine pair, I can't do maths and you can't read. It's Post 164 where I explain myself in case you genuinely missed it though. Screen I read as town because he's contributing and looks like he's scumhunting, so I believe his claim.In post 201, Vedith wrote:There we go sweet heart, you finally understood.
Cloud doesn't hammer there as Scum.
Ircher is obvious Scum when Scum
Kaboose is genuine in trying to sort the game, I don't believe that Kaboose votes 3rd as Scum while Scum. I've seen a few of his games, he's not too bright.
And yours if only a gut town lean
Now explain your reads.
Then why the extra justification of your vote on Esires? Why not just say this to begin with? It comes across as dishonest.In post 209, Vedith wrote:I'll vote either with the mist votes out of those 2.
In post 215, Vedith wrote:Vedith \o/
These are your own words you are calling lulz:In post 223, CloudKicker wrote:Mjolnir should be town, his push on me is fair but the wifom arguement is just lolz
VOTE: esires
L-1 people
(bolding and underlining done by me)In post 130, CloudKicker wrote:but, overall theres wasnt a single scum gain for me to put myself on the light to just hammer a random guy with subpar posts who could very well be a mislynch down the road from a scum pov. Quickhammering a shitposter because he scumread me with abysmal logic isnt how extremely calculating scum!Cloud proceed, go and read my scum games if youre curiousAlso this is wifom territory and i expect people to disagree
So, someone along the lines of Kaboose or Ircher? Kaboose you say you townread based off I assume his post explaining his decision to go with someone off wagon?In post 261, CloudKicker wrote:i think scum is just hiding since d1 and not participating much
I don't understand why this is so though, I like to do my own research and I don't see why others wouldn't either.In post 267, CloudKicker wrote:In post 265, CloudKicker wrote:Also people dont tend to lie on meta like so im somewhat comfortable using it for my own read atm
Honestly, it's pretty much already all laid out in one of my earliest posts. I'll quote it here for convenience and exposure:In post 280, CloudKicker wrote:Can you make me a decent vedith case and i promise ill try to consider it
Vedith has since demonstrated he is a bit of a tit, which half renders my first point on him a bit less damning than I first thought, however the rest of it is still solid I feel.In post 164, Mjollnir wrote:And you signed up for a Blitz game to be in a game you weren't expected to post every day in?In post 159, Vedith wrote:I've been on my other accounts tonight and not posted in majority places on this account.
Try again.
Sorry if I seem dumb for asking questions, but this is kind of my job here. It's not like you had mentioned any potential reasoning on them prior to this post here so unless you consider everyone without mind-reading powers stupid. Your posts up to me having to ask you for your reads were completely full of fluff and had no real opinion about any living player in this game.In post 160, Vedith wrote:And do you want me to answer the question on esires or screen, because right now I'm assuming you're playing dumb?
Also I believe esires' case against Cloud is more than simply the NK. That reasoning alone would be fairly WIFOM but he also mentioned the hammer and that pocketing thing too.
Right now I would be happy lynching either Vedith or Cloud. Vedith because a lot of his posts have come across needlessly defensive (see him attacking me for asking questions, "try again" etc), his posts being fluff before I had to drag his reads out of him, his reason for not posting here to face questions makes little sense and his vote on esires comes across as opportunistic given the reasoning is flawed and there is already anti-esires sentiment in the thread. Cloud for reasons already outlined in Post 156. If nothing dramatic happens overnight my vote will probably go on Vedith tomorrow morning.
I pushed you on this because I believe your reasoning for this is flawed, and when I did you changed to simply being OK with voting whomever had the most votes at the time. What happened to having a specific reason for preferring esires over Screen?In post 163, Vedith wrote:VOTE: Esires
I suggest here today. Due to the fact they are voting Cloud and making a reason simply because if the night kill as if it was planned to setup Cloud.
Easy game, easy money.