Micro 737: Chosen Mafia (Day 4)

Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 4:58 am

Post by tman2nd »

Good morning.
VOTE: PMysterious
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #19 (isolation #1) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 7:20 am

Post by tman2nd »

That's L-1.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #21 (isolation #2) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 7:49 am

Post by tman2nd »

I don't like that he didn't announce that that was L-1.
VOTE: Bulbazoor
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #24 (isolation #3) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 8:05 am

Post by tman2nd »

Are you aware that that puts Bulbazoor at L-1?
Pedit:ninja'd
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #28 (isolation #4) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 8:32 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 26, Keychain wrote:Hi!

VOTE: tman2nd

You've been the third vote on a wagon that reached L-1, twice, pointed out when it was at L-1 but didn't think it worth unvoting even though scum could very well be angling for a quickhammer on a chosen townie. You seem like you're trying to slip under the radar by following popular opinion.
As long as people are aware it's L-1, a quickhammer would be very scummy. Scum who is quickhammering wouldn't be able to pretend that they didn't notice.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #33 (isolation #5) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:07 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 16, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Good catch Dunn!

Not following your Bulbazoor vote however.
When LUV said this, I assumed it was because they hadn't noticed that they had put PMysterious at L-1 and now realized it when Dunn unvoted.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #36 (isolation #6) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:30 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 34, Keychain wrote:
In post 28, tman2nd wrote: As long as people are aware it's L-1, a quickhammer would be very scummy. Scum who is quickhammering wouldn't be able to pretend that they didn't notice.
Depends on the scumteam - they might think it would still leave them in a better position, since their major obstacle is removed from the game. You're giving them the opportunity to make that choice - scum can quickhammer if it puts them in a better position, or they can not. But it's not a cut and dried "they definitely won't so it's fine" kind of situation.
I suppose mafia could think it's a good idea to trade a mafia for a chosen townie (I wouldn't), but this would always be a possibility when someone is at L-1. I'm not opposed to people being at L-1, my concern was with people being at unanounced L-1.
In post 35, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 28, tman2nd wrote:As long as people are aware it's L-1, a quickhammer would be very scummy. Scum who is quickhammering wouldn't be able to pretend that they didn't notice.
In post 33, tman2nd wrote:
In post 16, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Good catch Dunn!

Not following your Bulbazoor vote however.
When LUV said this, I assumed it was because they hadn't noticed that they had put PMysterious at L-1 and now realized it when Dunn unvoted.
Image
I'm not sure what the contradiction there is. One post is talking about a case where it has been made clear that someone is at L-1, while the other is talking about a case where it hasn't.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #37 (isolation #7) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:34 am

Post by tman2nd »

By the way, I'm going to be V/LA from the 20th to the 23rd.
Acknowledged
- Um
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #40 (isolation #8) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:33 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 15, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4, Umlaut wrote:
Bulbazoor replaces Sulfur, effective immediately.
VOTE: Bulbazoor
Why did this make you want to vote Bulbazoor?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #51 (isolation #9) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 7:24 pm

Post by tman2nd »

@Bulbazoor:
Expanding on Keychain's question, where you aware that PM was at L-1? If so, why did you put him there without announcing it?
In post 48, Gorny wrote:Yes I do think Dunn's posting is suspicious. I had considered asking if post restrictions was allowed or not based on the rules, but then realized, I might not get an answer from the mod either way. So I can't be sure. I've seen post restrictions before, but never saw a rule in a game allowing them or not, so you never know when someone is faking it.
I don't think you can have a post restriction in an open setup without it being part of the rules of that set up, because a post restriction is part of your role.
In post 49, Keychain wrote:So to clarify - you think it's suspicious because it could be feigning a post restriction? I can see that.

However I think the actions he's taken and points he's made have been reasonably towny, regardless of whether he expressed them in pictures or words.
What about what Dunn has "said" has been towny to you?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #53 (isolation #10) » Mon Aug 14, 2017 7:29 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 52, Gorny wrote:
In post 51, tman2nd wrote:
@Bulbazoor:
Expanding on Keychain's question, where you aware that PM was at L-1? If so, why did you put him there without announcing it?
In post 48, Gorny wrote:Yes I do think Dunn's posting is suspicious. I had considered asking if post restrictions was allowed or not based on the rules, but then realized, I might not get an answer from the mod either way. So I can't be sure. I've seen post restrictions before, but never saw a rule in a game allowing them or not, so you never know when someone is faking it.
I don't think you can have a post restriction in an open setup without it being part of the rules of that set up, because a post restriction is part of your role.
In post 49, Keychain wrote:So to clarify - you think it's suspicious because it could be feigning a post restriction? I can see that.

However I think the actions he's taken and points he's made have been reasonably towny, regardless of whether he expressed them in pictures or words.
What about what Dunn has "said" has been towny to you?

As t the bolded: I've played games where post restrictions could be inflicted by a player onto another player (through the mod) and not mentioned in the rules if there was or was not a post restriction in game. So I can never be sure one way or the other.

Night.
I don't think that would be an open setup. We know what all the roles in the game are. It's just Mafia, Vanilla Townies, and Chosen Townies.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #57 (isolation #11) » Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:13 am

Post by tman2nd »

In the first post, I'm talking about the reason why I'm not worried about someone being at L-1 if people know that that's the case.

In the second post, I was saying that the reason I hadn't voted LUV for putting someone at L-1 unannounced was because It seemed like they had already acknowledged that that had happened, so I didn't have any reason to push in that direction. With Bulbazoor, they put PM at L-1 didn't say anything, and still hasn't said anything about it.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #64 (isolation #12) » Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:08 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I guess LUV could be scum trying to sneekily put someone at L-1, but I didn't think that at the time. In fact, when Bulba made his L-1 vote, I initially just pointed out the L-1. I didn't really think to vote him until Jin did in . Since Bulba has still not responded to anything about all this, that's where I want to keep my vote right now.

@Dunnstral

So, have any conclusions based on the questions you've been asking me that you'd like to share?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #70 (isolation #13) » Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:21 pm

Post by tman2nd »

So, I see Bulbazoor has explained himself. I'm going to still vote him because the unannounced L-1's are the most suspicious things that have happened so far. And yes, I know this applies to LUV and PM as well, but I only have one vote. I'll also echo that I would also like to see more substance from Dunn. Like I said in an earlier post, does he have anything to say based on the questioning he's given me for example?
In post 69, Gorny wrote:I'll admit, I don't have anything to add yet, other than following or commenting on the wagons on Bulbazoor and PMysterious. Though i am suspicious of Dunn for communicating solely by pictures from the 1930's.
When did you comment on the wagons?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #72 (isolation #14) » Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:45 pm

Post by tman2nd »

Are you going to?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #79 (isolation #15) » Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:12 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 76, Gorny wrote:Either Dunn is scum and ids BTD's partner - or Dunn bought BTD's line of reasoning.
Why would Dunn be have BTD's partner as scum?
If Dunn is scum, then staying odd Pm's wagon if it goes to lynch would be a good thing.
That's true. I think this gives Dunn town points.
Also, I'm not sure how Dunn catching the fact that Bulb replaced Sulfur is a "good catch" since it happened in pre game and not once the game started, it's not like people ere talking about Sulfur already and then Dunn points out Sulfur isn't playing.
I interpreted that as referring to Dunn unvoting because it was L-1.
@LUV
clarification on this?
Also noting that Bulba hasn't answered any questions directed at him (post]38[/post],
40 wasn't directed at Bulba.
he posted in "Dunn feels towny", then was asked by LUV in , "Why don't you suspect him?" to which there really was no response, other than "I hadn't seen that it was L-1" , and no answer on why he why he sees Dunn in a more town light. Seems like a generalized answer to me.
I think that's a valid answer to the questions (aside from the one about his town read of Dunn). It doesn't make his L-1 vote less suspicious, but it does answer the questions.
So after that I'm more suspicious of Bulba than anyone and only slightly as far as Dunn and BTD are concerned.
Why BTD?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #80 (isolation #16) » Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:13 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 79, tman2nd wrote: Why would Dunn be have BTD's partner as scum?
I mean have BTD as a partner.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #86 (isolation #17) » Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:18 pm

Post by tman2nd »

@LUV Thoughts on anything?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #88 (isolation #18) » Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:15 pm

Post by tman2nd »

So, what did you get from the reactions?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #90 (isolation #19) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:51 am

Post by tman2nd »

I just noticed. The first post still says the game hasn't started.
Noted, will update -- Um
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #95 (isolation #20) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:11 am

Post by tman2nd »

I would really like to hear more from these five players:
Lil Uzi Vert
BTD6_maker
Secret Agent Jin (or rather his replacement) Pedit: Looks like their here.
Bulbazoor
Dunnstral

PMysterious seems kind of town to me. His arguments on Bulbazoor seem natural.
Not sure about Gorny. His suspicions of BTD confuse me. But, he could be town. Null.
I've liked what I've seen from Keychain. She's made well reasoned posts. So, a bit of a town read here.
Dunnstral hasn't really made any actual stances. He's only really pointed to things. But, the unvote at L-1 does nudge him into the town camp for me. I'd like to see more though.

Bulbazoor is my biggest suspicion right now. The accidental L-1 vote is possible for town, but it does suggest scumminess. That plus their lack of any real content makes them my top lynch candidate.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #96 (isolation #21) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:12 am

Post by tman2nd »

I mean they're
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #99 (isolation #22) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:15 am

Post by tman2nd »

I think he would do that as scum because of the chance of an accidental hammer.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #102 (isolation #23) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:22 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 87, Bulbazoor wrote:Here's where I didn't unvote to get reactions. I saw all of you asking me to unvote prior but left the vote up for a bit longer in case I could gauge some reactions out of you guys since the game is still at an early stage. That's why I didn't respond to the votes at that particular time.
I think he explained your second question here.

I wouldn't know how likely a a tactic that is because I only have a few completed games on this site.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #105 (isolation #24) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:29 am

Post by tman2nd »

Well, I'm not all that confident in a town read on PM. I just could see where he was coming from as town. So, a slight lean in that direction.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #107 (isolation #25) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:32 am

Post by tman2nd »

By the way, when I included the lack of content as part of my reason for suspecting Bulba. It's not because he put a naked town read or anything. It's just that he hasn't done anything useful after he responded to the questions about his L-1 vote.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #109 (isolation #26) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:35 am

Post by tman2nd »

Like I said it's only a slight leaning. Scum could have made those posts too.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #111 (isolation #27) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:46 am

Post by tman2nd »

I guess the lack of content part is less a reason that he is suspicious and more of a reason I want to pressure him to make more content. Like, what good is making a wagon on someone if you're just going to let them get out of it by not saying much. They did respond, but just to the accusations and they haven't said anything about anyone else.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #116 (isolation #28) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:15 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 113, Keychain wrote:
In post 70, tman2nd wrote:So, I see Bulbazoor has explained himself. I'm going to still vote him because the unannounced L-1's are the most suspicious things that have happened so far. And yes, I know this applies to LUV and PM as well, but I only have one vote.
This sort of thing is why.

tman:
Assuming Bulba is being honest about not realising his vote was L-1, that means that LUV's unannounced L-1 vote was
very nearly a quickhammer
. If Dunn hadn't unvoted, that would have been Day 1 over right there.

So if you're voting people for unannounced votes, that means that LUV's vote was the one that came the closest to the actual situation you claim to be worried about.

Why does this not concern you?
The main reason I choose to vote Bulba is first off because I hadn't thought about how LUV also qualified for that reasoning. And then later, when it was pointed out, Bulba is the one who had votes on them, so it would be easier to pressure him. Plus, isn't LUV V/LA and with an end date that is right after I go V/LA? But, that is a good point how in that scenario, LUV's vote did nearly lead to that situation I was worried about. I just can't easily pressure them when I'm going to be V/LA once I'm not.
And why are you using a policy (not announcing L-1) to determine your vote instead of looking for scum?
I'm not using policy. Unannounced L-1 is just the most suspicious thing I've seen so far.
In post 115, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 95, tman2nd wrote:Dunnstral hasn't really made any actual stances. He's only really pointed to things.
Image
:neutral: ...
In post 114, Keychain wrote:
In post 112, Mulch wrote:That's true. But although you are right about the wagon being pointless, don't you think he would want to get out of it if he's scum, and be more apathetic as town? Considering the game state.
Early on, it seems someone could potentially try and lurk away a wagon because it's unlikely to go through based on lack of content.
This.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #117 (isolation #29) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:19 am

Post by tman2nd »

Why aren't you voting me Mulch?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #123 (isolation #30) » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:28 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I should take a look at that math by BTD. I might have had the wrong idea about how good it would be for mafia to trade for a chosen townie.
In post 118, Keychain wrote:
tman2nd wrote: The main reason I choose to vote Bulba is first off because I hadn't thought about how LUV also qualified for that reasoning. And then later, when it was pointed out, Bulba is the one who had votes on them, so it would be easier to pressure him. Plus, isn't LUV V/LA and with an end date that is right after I go V/LA? But, that is a good point how in that scenario, LUV's vote did nearly lead to that situation I was worried about. I just can't easily pressure them when I'm going to be V/LA once I'm not.
That makes sense, if you choose your votes primarily for the purpose of pressuring someone for content. I don't really, so this could be a theory disagreement on this point.
No, I'm not voting to pressure for content per se. It's just that when three people have done the same scummy thing, voting for the one who is more likely to respond is best assuming there's nothing else to push me in a different direction.
But this post does echo my earlier concern and the original reason for my vote - you are following popular opinion. You are staying on a wagon because there are other people on it. Why?
Once again, that's not the reason I'm voting him. It's the reason I choose to remain on him rather than switch to a different player who made an unannounced L-1.
In , you listed a bunch of people that you wanted to hear more from. Then you reiterated your vote on Bulba was for "lack of any real content", as well as being scummy within the small amount of content given.

You've picked a single one of a number of potential candidates, without really looking at the others.
The list of people I wanted to hear more from was not a list of candidates for lynching. It was just a list of players I wanted to here more from. The list of candidates would be the people who made unannounced L-1 votes. The lack of content aspect of my statement there was because Bulbazoor had only responded to the questions about his L-1 vote and hadn't done anything like actually come to any conclusions based on the reactions he got.
What do you think about the content BTD6 has provided so far?You've given thoughts on and/or interacted with everyone else, but very little on BTD6.
Until just now, he hadn't really made any stances (aside from the PM vote in his very first post). That's why I listed him as people I want to hear more of. He still really hasn't really made any clear stances with his recent post.
More on LUV as well, please. He and Bulba are pretty similar with regards to content. The V/LA is not a good reason to withhold a scumread - is there something else?
LUV has less content than Bulba the only thing I can say about LUV is his L-1 vote. That does lean him into scum territory, but I don't have anything else to say.
In post 119, Gorny wrote:
In post 97, Mulch wrote:Gorny, mysterious, and tman are the scummiest after a quick read. Gorny, why do you think bulbs would be so blatantly putting people at l-1 as either allignment? Like, assume he's town and then that he's scum. Why would he do these things?
l
Don't know. Only he can answer that question and I bet he won't do so.

Random guess, if he's town, he might be trying to get a reaction out of people.

If he's scum...well.

:?:
I thought you where scumreading him? You're voting him after all. That doesn't seem to match up with you not being able to come up with a scum motivation for his actions.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #129 (isolation #31) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:51 am

Post by tman2nd »

I think he answers your questions here.
In post 87, Bulbazoor wrote:Here's where I didn't unvote to get reactions. I saw all of you asking me to unvote prior but left the vote up for a bit longer in case I could gauge some reactions out of you guys since the game is still at an early stage. That's why I didn't respond to the votes at that particular time.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #131 (isolation #32) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:21 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 130, Keychain wrote:Oh hey. I don't know if you're talking to me or PM, but I think I just needed to think about that a bit longer. I thought that quote contradicted , but maybe it's just confusingly worded. So he deliberately didn't unvote in in order to get reactions?

Questions on what reactions he got still stand.
That's what it seems like to me. But, yeah I would like what he got from the reactions as well.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #136 (isolation #33) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:52 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 134, Mulch wrote:I'm extremely sorry but I may have to push this once again. I may be able to do stuff in like 2 hours
Could you answer my question in ?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #137 (isolation #34) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:53 pm

Post by tman2nd »

Sorry I meant to quote Gorny there.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #138 (isolation #35) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:58 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 132, Bulbazoor wrote:When I get around to it, I'll post a list with my reads.
I hope you get around to it before I have to go early tomorrow morning.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #140 (isolation #36) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:35 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I will be back late on Wednesday, so if a lynch hasn't been decided by then, I will be there probably at least 5 hours before the deadline. At most probably 7. So, I might have a chance to change my vote if I need to.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #150 (isolation #37) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:30 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 143, Mulch wrote:TBH Tman did two things that I consider a pretty decent scumtell in being too self aware in explaining votes, and quoting someone's post and saying "this." like, in .
What do you mean by being too self aware in explaining votes?

The thing really scummy for me here is the deflection on how they didn't respond to the UZI point, by saying "I could pressure him but not him."

I mean, I guess that could be a valid explanation. But really? You didn't even think someone else was scummy based on pressure? The things aren't really related to each other.

not the most incriminating thing though.
I didn't think any lone was scummy because of pressure. Pressure was just the reason I have kept my vote on Bulba rather than switching to a different player who did the same L-1 thing.
In post 147, Mulch wrote: reads as pretty fake to me btw. Anyone else get that vibe?
I don't know if that's fake. But, I'm losing my town read on him.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #151 (isolation #38) » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:35 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 149, Mulch wrote: 2) I've been getting gut town vibes from him too.
But, in you were pointing out some things you thought was scummy about me. Is this gut read, in contrast to that?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #153 (isolation #39) » Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:40 am

Post by tman2nd »

So, I'm about to be out of range for a while. It doesn't seem like Bulba is a likely lynch today. So, I'm voting Gorny because that has some possibility and a couple of things he's said hasn't made sense to me. Like his read on Bulba. Also his earlier read on BTD.

I might get back in time change my vote, but maybe not.

VOTE: Gorny
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #193 (isolation #40) » Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:27 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 154, Mulch wrote:I'm on mobile but in terms of abstaining myself from guilt, I don't know what you mean, I can promise I just don't want to feel like shit if I white knight a scum.


The vibe of confidence and paranoia I am scum is what's getting him the gut vibe.

I think overall mysterious will be my ideal lynch for today. But I'm not sure yet. Want to reread the game.


Town reads on Uzi Keychain and maybe a slight one on dunnstrral and bulbs.
I'm back. I don't want to lynch PM. I don't find him very scummy. And BTD has not contributed well. I agree with Keychain's case on them. So, between those two, I would prefer to lynch BTD. I would still like to lynch Gorny as well, so if the votes swing back that way, I will put my vote back there. But, it looks like I'm now the only one voting him.

VOTE: BTD6_Maker
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #194 (isolation #41) » Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:28 pm

Post by tman2nd »

oops that uote shouldn't have been there.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #195 (isolation #42) » Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:28 pm

Post by tman2nd »

*quote
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #196 (isolation #43) » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:13 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 154, Mulch wrote:I'm on mobile but in terms of abstaining myself from guilt, I don't know what you mean, I can promise I just don't want to feel like shit if I white knight a scum.


The vibe of confidence and paranoia I am scum is what's getting him the gut vibe.

I think overall mysterious will be my ideal lynch for today. But I'm not sure yet. Want to reread the game.


Town reads on Uzi Keychain and maybe a slight one on dunnstrral and bulbs.
i've got to go to sleep. good night,.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #197 (isolation #44) » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:14 pm

Post by tman2nd »

Oops, I did it again.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #203 (isolation #45) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:19 am

Post by tman2nd »

BTD6_maker and Mulch are all unlikely to be scum because they had the power to prevent PM from getting lynched, but didn't. And, I think bussing is a much riskier move in this set up because you can lose without being ever lynched yourself.
Bulbazoor no longer is suspicious for the unannounced L-1 because it was on mafia. Of course, now that we know it was a mistake, it could have been a mistake as mafia as well.
In post 201, Gorny wrote:
BTD6:
First vote on PM, never unvoted. It's possible he's PM's scum partner and voted him first as a cover, that way if PM ended up lynched, BTD doesn't look scummy where the wagon is concerned.
Thing is, if he hadn't done this, PM wouldn't have been lynched.
Dunn:
Second vote on PM, then unvoted in and voted Bulba in . It looks innocent, but since I am already suspicious of the "post restriction", it looks more suspicious in that light. Also of note is his and . Since Dunn is only posting images, it seems like he was trying to push the wagon on PM, this doesn't really fit with Dunn being PM's scum partner, but I'm noting it nevertheless.
isn't pushing any lynch. It's just answering Keychain's question in . Also, is my post.
LUV
4th vote on PM - of note is his Where he says he's comfortable lynching PM
Check out the day start.
Jin
Voted bulb, nothing else.
Jin is Mulch now.

Mulch
I think - the last vote on PM before end of day. Noting his , , . .
Out of the above, it's possible PM's scum partners are among:

Keychain
BTD
Dunn
Tman
Why BTD? Are you saying that their vote on PM makes them more likely to be mafia? Because that's all you've mentioned about them in this post.

-----

I'm gonna take a closer look at Gorny, Dunn and Keychain now.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #204 (isolation #46) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:21 am

Post by tman2nd »

Also, the first vote count lists Secret Agent Jin rather than Mulch.
Corrected
- Um
Last edited by Umlaut on Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #206 (isolation #47) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:51 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 205, Gorny wrote:I was going in order of posts.
Hmm?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #208 (isolation #48) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:22 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 207, Gorny wrote:
In post 206, tman2nd wrote:
In post 205, Gorny wrote:I was going in order of posts.
Hmm?

Counting the lynch votes as they happened, not by how they were in final total.
And that is a response to?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #210 (isolation #49) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:18 am

Post by tman2nd »

I've come around on Gorny. I think he's town. A couple reasons. He moved away from the Bulbazoor wagon onto Dunnstral which could doesn't mean too much because PM wasn't in much danger at the time, but he decided to stick on that vote which wasn't gaining any traction even after PM was in danger. Then today, he seemed a bit mixed up on the fact that LUV was killed last night. It could be an act, but It doesn't seem like it to me.

At this point, I'm thinking PM's partner was on the BTD wagon. I know it's not me, so I'm thinking one of Dunnstral or Keychain. Haven't quite decided who I think is more likely.

@Gorny: Why?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #212 (isolation #50) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:49 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 210, tman2nd wrote: @Gorny: Why?
I meant to say Mulch here.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #214 (isolation #51) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:46 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 160, PMysterious wrote:
Keychain wrote:
PMysterious wrote:
Wouldn't putting someone at L-1 without reason give the most reaction?
(bolding mine)

Can you give your opinion on any other players? You jumped on Bulba pretty early. Though if you're town, I suppose you've got more reason than anyone else to be paranoid that he was trying to quickhammer a Chosen townie.
I'd also like more explanation on the bolded - I have no idea what you mean here.


For the bold part (which I put by itself), I meant that he put me at L-1 without giving any real reason for the vote. Notice how Bulba was looking for reactions (in his earlier posts), but he didn't know he put me at L-1. So, that could mean he was expecting to hammer with the post, or he just wanted to see how I react under pressure, and he decided to add extra pressure.

Now, onto my reads as of now, besides Bulbafake (since he's scum).

Lil Uzi Vert: Null (Nothing that screams town or scum to me, and he's on V/LA as of now. It would be best to ask of him to say some more once he gets off.

tman22: Town (Pretty active, and town like to me. While also V/LA, he's communicated a lot more than Lil Uzi Vert, and plenty of others in this game.)

Gorny: Null/Scum (Active, yet suspicious. Mostly targeting someone for a speech thing that is going on with Dunn, more so than actual scumhunting.)

BTD6_maker: Null (Not very active, but he's under V/LA anyway at the moment, and he did start the wagon against me, but I'm not one to hold grudges unless you are really suspicious, and his reasoning was understandable, given the circumstances of this game.)

Keychain: Town (Very active, engaging with the other players, and just all around a solid guy at the moment. I don't really see any more scum elements.)

Mulch: Null/Town (Can't say much at the moment of making this, but Mulch might be more Town than scum, as throughout the 2 days he has played, he's given quite the input.)

Dunnstral: Town (They say a picture is worth a thousand words, and Dunn has pointed out quite a few things, with good reactions to boot. Can't really say anything negative about Dunn, as pointing stuff out that might have been missed is always something that is useful to look into.)
That makes sense.

VOTE: Dunnstral

Looking at the end of the day when the BTD wagon was formed, both Keychain and Dunnstral made sense in how they formed the wagon. So, it's coming down to how scummy/towny they seem to me. Keychain still looks like to town to me. Even when I've disagreed, her thought process has made sense.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #215 (isolation #52) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:47 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I did it again! Disregard that quote. I was going to quote something from there, but changed my mind.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #220 (isolation #53) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:33 pm

Post by tman2nd »

Gorny wrote:
In post 210, tman2nd wrote:I've come around on Gorny. I think he's town. A couple reasons. He moved away from the Bulbazoor wagon onto Dunnstral which could doesn't mean too much because PM wasn't in much danger at the time, but he decided to stick on that vote which wasn't gaining any traction even after PM was in danger. Then today, he seemed a bit mixed up on the fact that LUV was killed last night. It could be an act, but It doesn't seem like it to me.

At this point, I'm thinking PM's partner was on the BTD wagon. I know it's not me, so I'm thinking one of Dunnstral or Keychain. Haven't quite decided who I think is more likely.

@Gorny: Why?

Are you asking me who is more likely scum between Dunn and Keychain?
No, that was a mistake.
In post 216, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 198, Umlaut wrote:
Official Vote Count 1.08 (Final)


PMysterious
(3): , ,
BTD6_maker
(3): , ,
Bulbazoor
(1):
Dunnstral
(1):

Not Voting
(1):

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Notes
  • BTD6_maker is V/LA through 8/25.
In post 198, Umlaut wrote:
Bulbazoor
(1):
Image
I see that PM didn't make it in time to save himself. What is your point?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #224 (isolation #54) » Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:42 pm

Post by tman2nd »

But, PM's last post was when BTD only had one vote. He could have joined the Gorny wagon then. Does that make Gorny mafia? The fact that BTD parked their vote on PM makes me think that it's more likely that PM just wasn't around in time.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #228 (isolation #55) » Sun Aug 27, 2017 8:44 am

Post by tman2nd »

Why Bulbazoor?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #232 (isolation #56) » Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:11 am

Post by tman2nd »

So, BTD and Bulbazoor. Any thoughts on who could be the mafia?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #236 (isolation #57) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 6:36 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 233, Keychain wrote:Oh god Dunnstral is still only posting in pictures. I'm laughing but I'm also crying.

In post 202, Gorny wrote: There's no one correct way to play Mafia Keychain :)
Very true. If there was, it would be a terribly boring game! That said, I don't really know why you chose to respond this way to my post and why you thought it was relevant at daystart.

In post 209, Mulch wrote:I think I'm a chosen townie :good:
In post 213, Mulch wrote:1) I have good tonwncred position

2) I wasn't nightkilled

3) Agent Jin was very likely one of the people NOT chosen to be not chosen.
:igmeou:
VOTE: Mulch
There is only one member of the scum team left. They are going to be very keen on keeping themselves alive. This sounds like you're trying to make yourself unlynchable and it concerns me.
This is ridiculous. Busing is much worse for scum in this set up because they can lose without ever being lynched. Note how Mulch basically made the PM lynch happen.

VOTE: Keychain
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #241 (isolation #58) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:07 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 238, Keychain wrote:
tman2nd wrote: Busing is much worse for scum in this set up because they can lose without ever being lynched.
How does this follow?

I know Mulch made the PM lynch happen. But if he can then sell himself as a chosen townie because of things like not getting NKed and not being a likely veto, the bus becomes worthwhile, and Mulch is someone I can see trying to pull it off.

But how does only having one scum mean they're more likely to somehow get endgamed?
It's not that they're more likely to be endgamed. It's that benefit of busing, being viewed as town, is less effective, because you can lose even if people don't think you're mafia.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #245 (isolation #59) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 2:16 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 243, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: tman2nd
hmm?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #246 (isolation #60) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 2:17 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 244, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 240, BTD6_maker wrote:Thus scum would likely try to drive a lynch on a Chosen on Day 1, even at the cost of one member.
Image
In post 171, Gorny wrote:I think Dunn's posting images only is a cover. If he's mafia that gives him some help in staying under the radar while saying nothing at all. Worth a lynch in my opinion.
I don't understand what you're saying here.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #250 (isolation #61) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 2:23 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 247, Gorny wrote:I did not believe Dunnstral's posting in pictures bit day one, and I still don;t believe it. I stuck with my vote then and I might as well re apply it.

VOTE: Dunnstral
What do you mean by you "don't believe it"?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #254 (isolation #62) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 4:58 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I'm not asking why. I'm asking what you mean when you say that you don't believe it. You don't believe what?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #256 (isolation #63) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 5:25 pm

Post by tman2nd »

He doesn't have a post restriction. No one does. This game doesn't have any post restrictions. This is obviously something self imposed.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #258 (isolation #64) » Mon Aug 28, 2017 6:09 pm

Post by tman2nd »

What do you mean by you don't believe his tactic? Are you saying that you don't believe he would do that as town?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #268 (isolation #65) » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:49 am

Post by tman2nd »

But, doesn't viewing someone as suspicious mean you think they're acting like they're scum? Also known as viewing it as scum whoever?

@Keychain:
Explain to me. Why would Mulch vote how he did as scum? Also, why do you think I'm doing great?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #274 (isolation #66) » Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:58 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I just think that that is such a risky play in this set up. I really do not want to lynch Mulch.

I'm gonna sort out my thoughts and reread some of the game now. I'm a bit conflicted right now.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #288 (isolation #67) » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:08 pm

Post by tman2nd »

Sorry for procrastinating on this game. I'll get back into it in the morning.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #289 (isolation #68) » Sat Sep 02, 2017 10:55 am

Post by tman2nd »

@BTD what do you think of Mulch?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #290 (isolation #69) » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:01 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 269, BTD6_maker wrote:At the moment pressuring Dunnstral is probably the best idea. They refuse to do anything useful or even post text.

I don't have much time now; however, I will analyse the Gorny/Keychain interactions when I get the chance.
Have you done this?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #293 (isolation #70) » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:10 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 291, Dunnstral wrote:the way his opinion on me goes from me probably not being scum to thinking I'm scum for posting images is pretty disingenuous.
When did he ever say that you were probably not scum?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #295 (isolation #71) » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:51 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 294, Keychain wrote:
tman2nd wrote: When did he ever say that you were probably not scum?
Yeah... don't make it
too
obvious that you didn't read , it might hurt my feelings.
He may have said that he was less suspicious, but he never said he wasn't suspicious at all.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #296 (isolation #72) » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:52 pm

Post by tman2nd »

UNVOTE:
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #297 (isolation #73) » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:07 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I originally was thinking BTD was town because they kept their vote on PM, but since they was V/LA in the later part of the day and wasn't available to unvote, that doesn't really clear them like I was originally thinking. I want to hear a bit more from them before I decide on this wagon. But, even if they haven't said anything, I'll come to some decision tomorrow.

Dunn could be mafia, but I'm not finding much reason to think he's mafia beyond being on the counter wagon to PM, and that's not enough. There are multiple people on the wagon including me after all. I don't town read him either though.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #303 (isolation #74) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:33 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 301, Bulbazoor wrote:I don't want Dunn voted. I'll vote gorny because he's far scummier.


VOTE: gorny
What do you think of BTD? And could you explain any of your reads?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #305 (isolation #75) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:58 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 289, tman2nd wrote:@BTD what do you think of Mulch?
In post 290, tman2nd wrote:
In post 269, BTD6_maker wrote:At the moment pressuring Dunnstral is probably the best idea. They refuse to do anything useful or even post text.

I don't have much time now; however, I will analyse the Gorny/Keychain interactions when I get the chance.
Have you done this?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #307 (isolation #76) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:43 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 306, Bulbazoor wrote:Dunn actually stopped posting in images and I like tman so far because he seems interested in solving the game
Why did you vote Gorny over BTD?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #308 (isolation #77) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:52 am

Post by tman2nd »

So BTD doesn't seem scummy to me. Neither does Dunnstral, but since Dunnstral was on the counter wagon to scum while BTD was on the wagon on scum, that breaks the tie for me. Everyone else, I'm thinking are town.

VOTE: Dunnstral

That's L-1.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #312 (isolation #78) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:53 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 308, tman2nd wrote:
So BTD doesn't seem scummy to me. Neither does Dunnstral, but since Dunnstral was on the counter wagon to scum while BTD was on the wagon on scum, that breaks the tie for me.
Everyone else, I'm thinking are town.

VOTE: Dunnstral

That's L-1.
It comes down to POE to you and BTD, and I think you are more likely.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #314 (isolation #79) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 11:11 am

Post by tman2nd »

You're already voting BTD.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #317 (isolation #80) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 11:23 am

Post by tman2nd »

Wait. I'm confused. What did you mean when you said BTD is more likely?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #319 (isolation #81) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:10 pm

Post by tman2nd »

VOTE: BTD6_maker

Ok. You've convinced me. Dunnstral does seem town.

This is now L-1 on BTD.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #322 (isolation #82) » Sun Sep 03, 2017 6:22 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 320, Gorny wrote:but I'm not going to hammer without at least saying something about it.
:facepalm:
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #327 (isolation #83) » Wed Sep 06, 2017 4:26 am

Post by tman2nd »

VOTE: Keychain

Keychain was pushing for the lynch of BTD both days. On day 1 this was also to protect PM. She specifically wanted BTD over LUV over here:
In post 178, Keychain wrote:Why LUV instead of BTD6, though? Their actions have been scummier in general - before they went on V/LA, all they contributed was theory spec. Then they left an RVS vote in place when they left.

The more I think about it, the more I get suspicious, ugh. Too much like someone just watching a town pull itself apart.
VOTE: BTD6_maker
She even tried to push on Mulch the other chosen townie, even when he had been very town with his vote on day 1.

I think she's had some good town reads of people, but that's because she knows everyone else is town. I still think she made good points on Dunnstral being town. It's just her reason for that argument was to get us to lynch a chosen townie over a normal one. I've had some paranoia over her town read of me, and now I think that's justified.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #328 (isolation #84) » Wed Sep 06, 2017 4:32 am

Post by tman2nd »

Plus, I think everyone else is town.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #331 (isolation #85) » Wed Sep 06, 2017 10:25 am

Post by tman2nd »

In post 330, Keychain wrote:
tman2nd wrote:VOTE: Keychain

Keychain was pushing for the lynch of BTD both days. On day 1 this was also to protect PM. She specifically wanted BTD over LUV over here:
In post 178, Keychain wrote:Why LUV instead of BTD6, though? Their actions have been scummier in general - before they went on V/LA, all they contributed was theory spec. Then they left an RVS vote in place when they left.

The more I think about it, the more I get suspicious, ugh. Too much like someone just watching a town pull itself apart.
VOTE: BTD6_maker
She even tried to push on Mulch the other chosen townie, even when he had been very town with his vote on day 1.

I think she's had some good town reads of people, but that's because she knows everyone else is town. I still think she made good points on Dunnstral being town. It's just her reason for that argument was to get us to lynch a chosen townie over a normal one. I've had some paranoia over her town read of me, and now I think that's justified.
So tell me:
Why do you say you think I had good town reads when you were also paranoid of my town read on you?
Why is this a contradiction?
Same question I asked Mulch - scum only need one Chosen townie lynched, so why would I have been pushing both? How does that make me more likely to be scum?
On day 2, you initially pushed Mulch, but then there was an opportunity to switch to BTD when Mulch voted there.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #333 (isolation #86) » Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:43 pm

Post by tman2nd »

Hmm?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #336 (isolation #87) » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:08 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 334, Keychain wrote: It's not a contradiction. Maybe I should have asked it the other way around. Why were you paranoid of my townread on you when you think my townreads were good? I'm worried that you're just chucking that out now because paranoia is generally a town trait. Can you give me any evidence of that paranoia before this post?
It's why I questioned it in VOTE: 268. Other than that I didn't really voice anything in that way.
If I was waiting for an opportunity to vote a Chosen townie, why didn't I wait for an opportunity to vote for Mulch? If you're trying to paint a picture of me being nervous scum unwilling to make the push on a Chosen townie on my own, there seems to be quite a lot to contradict that.
That's not the picture I'm trying to paint. You weren't waiting for an opportunity. But, regardless of whether you are town or scum, you did take an opportunity when it appeared to vote BTD. As town, you're taking the opportunity to vote someone you suspect. As mafia, you're taking the opportunity to vote for a Chosen Townie. In any case, you taking or waiting for opportunities is not the point of my argument. It was more about how you were pushing for the lynches of Chosen Townies whether you started the wagon or not.
tman2nd wrote:Plus, I think everyone else is town.
Why?
Gorny:
Dunnstral: You yourself gave good reasons in . The main one for me is how he didn't stop posting pictures when he was being pushed on it.
Bulbazoor: His interactions with PM don't seem to be between scum buddies.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #352 (isolation #88) » Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:17 am

Post by tman2nd »

Ok. Well, now I'm sure it's Keychain. I just don't see it being Bulbazoor.

Why did Gorny have to go be so scummy yesterday? If I had been around before it ended, I would have likely changed my mind and voted Gorny.

I'll make some arguments later.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #353 (isolation #89) » Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:58 am

Post by tman2nd »

@Bulbazoor What was your reason for voting Gorny?
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #355 (isolation #90) » Sun Sep 10, 2017 2:38 pm

Post by tman2nd »

In post 354, Keychain wrote: tman, why did you vote BTD6 in - despite not finding them scummy in ? I don't think you ever gave a reason that they
would
be scum, apart from PoE, and that's too easy for scum to fake for me to find it entirely trustworthy.
In post 308, tman2nd wrote:So BTD doesn't seem scummy to me.
Neither does Dunnstral,
but since Dunnstral was on the counter wagon to scum while BTD was on the wagon on scum, that breaks the tie for me.
They were null to me, but so was Dunnstral at the time. I didn't have any scumreads at the time. (Except some small doubts about you but at the time I overall considered you to be town.) So, yeah it was POE.
In addition, why did you not want PM lynched in when you only had a "slight lean" on him being town in ? Like you didn't seem to have a very good reason at all and it feels like you might have been trying to give PM the opportunity to save himself.
In post 193, tman2nd wrote:And BTD has not contributed well. I agree with Keychain's case on them.
It wasn't only that I didn't want to lynch PM. I also agreed at the time that BTD was scummy. At the last few hours of the day there, there were basically two options, BTD and PM. BTD looked scummier. (This changed the next day because the argument against BTD relied on PM being town.)

-----

Part of the reason I had some unvoiced suspicions of you day 2 despite my overall townread was your townread of me. The stuff you mention about my day 1 stuff around PM does look bad. During night 1 and the start of day 2, I was thinking someone would suspect me for it. Your townread of me made me wonder if you were mafia who knew I was town. Or if you were just reading me well as town.

In general, you've been well reasoned which is why I've wanted to townread you, but now I think you are just good at that, and since you are mafia, you know who all the townspeople are and so you've been able to notice things well which make people town, and so the townreads have been "genuine".
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #356 (isolation #91) » Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:23 pm

Post by tman2nd »

VOTE: Keychain

I'm confident in this.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #359 (isolation #92) » Sun Sep 10, 2017 7:27 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I'll respond to you tomorrow. I started typing stuff up but I'm tired.

Don't vote until I get chance to do that, Bulbazoor!
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #361 (isolation #93) » Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:15 pm

Post by tman2nd »

PEDIT: Why!! I asked you to wait! Good job Keychain.
In post 357, Keychain wrote: In , he does something incredibly scummy - despite having just a town lean on PM he is willing to jump on the wagon on BTD6 (who turned out to be a Chosen townie) for no real reason at all apart from not wanting PM to be lynched.

Except that's not the only reason. I thought BTD was scummy as well.
The only times he mentioned BTD6 during the day he avoided committing to a read, presumably while he worked out which Chosen townie would be easiest to lynch.
Why would I avoid a read on a Chosen Townie?
Then the next day he kicks off by saying that BTD6 and Mulch - both Chosen townies - are unlikely to be scum, and defended BTD6 from Gorny. But in he inexplicably backpedals and decides BTD6 is an option.
It's not inexplicable. You can see the explanation in that post.
In he votes Dunnstral despite not finding him scummy...

...yet in he switches to BTD6, a Chosen townie that he also didn't think was scummy, because he found my argument "convincing". No reason why he thought BTD6 was scum. Just hopped on the wagon for the second time.
My reason was POE.
Even more impressive is how you've somehow managed to retcon a scumread on me. You say you've been suspicious of me for a while, but I don't see any evidence of that. You're fabricating excuses for me to be scum and pretending you held them before now to try and give them weight, because you actually stated a
townread
on me. In . No sign of suspicion. If you were using process of elimination, eliminating me makes no sense if you suspected me, which makes me think you're making it up now.
I never actually scumread you until BTDs flip. (Except briefly for when I voted you right after you voted Mulch on Day 2). Other than that, I did townread you; I just had suspicions. It started during the first night when I was thinking about who could be scum. I ruled out Mulch, LUV, BTD, and Bulbazoor. That left Gorny, Dunnstral, and you. I particularly thought it might be you or Dunnstral because you two had been on the counter wagon. I also saw that the way things played out I looked bad in Day 1. I wondered how people would respond to that. That's why when you said that I was "doing great" that made me wonder if you were mafia trying to pocket me. I still thought you were town and your answer made sense. When you went for Mulch, that got me to vote you because that push made no sense to me. In , part of what I was conflicted about was whether you were town or not. I decided you were and I unvoted you. When you voted for BTD, I wondered if BTD was chosen and if you were mafia who had been trying to get them lynched Days 1 and 2. But, that was based on too much conjecture, and I still considered you town. When I eventually joined you on BTD, I was still feeling paranoid that he was chosen, but I decided I was just being paranoid. When he flipped, that's the moment I decided that you were mafia.
In post 358, Keychain wrote:
In post 355, tman2nd wrote:
In post 193, tman2nd wrote:And BTD has not contributed well. I agree with Keychain's case on them.
It wasn't only that I didn't want to lynch PM. I also agreed at the time that BTD was scummy. At the last few hours of the day there, there were basically two options, BTD and PM. BTD looked scummier.
To this point in particular - PM had not contributed well. Bulba had not contributed well. Your reasoning for voting BTD6 was pretty bad, and I've definitely had scum jump on my misguided pushes on townies before.
I thought there was a difference between how PM had contributed and how BTD had. PM had taken stances on things. BTD basically hadn't. He'd only talked a little theory.
If you think my townreads have been well reasoned because they're genuine, why have you also apparently been seeing my scumreads as such? This is not a good argument for me being scum.
Gorny was easy to scumread. He played awkwardly.
BTD's lack of actual positions made him easy to scumread as well. Plus there were things that Dunnstral pointed out that you could use.
Mulch is a scumread that didn't make sense to me.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #362 (isolation #94) » Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:15 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I was town.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #363 (isolation #95) » Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:17 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I definitely looked really scummy.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #364 (isolation #96) » Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:25 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I wish I hadn't switched onto BTD.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #368 (isolation #97) » Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:18 pm

Post by tman2nd »

You did a good job of sounding reasonable and townlike.
User avatar
tman2nd
tman2nd
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
tman2nd
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: December 16, 2013

Post Post #370 (isolation #98) » Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:23 pm

Post by tman2nd »

I wasn't trying to convince you. I was hoping to convince Bulbazoor.

I didn't feel very good about my chances that last day. Although, I had some hope when I noticed that the last thing Bulbazoor had said about me was positive.

Return to “Mayfair Club [Micro Games]”