Deadline is 2 days and will be over in (expired on 2017-12-19 03:00:00) at 3:00 AM PST on 12/20/17.
I'm gonna go to bed now, but expect OP adjustments tomorrow. As always, any night actions should be submitted to me by PM.
Agreed on no one votes.In post 1579, Ghostlin wrote:No one votes.
I've sent my PT investigation. It should help narrow down the suspects today. I feel that scum shot Ffery because there was no chance in hell she would of voted me today after what she said Day 2. It means scum ARE banking on my mislynch for a win. We can talk about other things related to this, but no one votes in LYLO.
Oh wait no. If you hit a scum then cross voting required.In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Agreed on no one votes.In post 1579, Ghostlin wrote:No one votes.
I've sent my PT investigation. It should help narrow down the suspects today. I feel that scum shot Ffery because there was no chance in hell she would of voted me today after what she said Day 2. It means scum ARE banking on my mislynch for a win. We can talk about other things related to this, but no one votes in LYLO.
At work most of today.
Your investigation (if you’re town) should just break the game.
If you get a townie then by PoE (you, Fish, townie) >> Remainder must be scum
If you get a scum >> 2 confirmed town (you and fish) into Lylo. Scum lose.
To that end while I am at work gonna brainstorm on this.
I don’t see why scum would kill fferyllt over you given this. Like it seems like suicide. I mean logically that makes you scum but at the same time I don’t see scum being so brazen here either.
God this reeks of when Titus fake claimed cop.In post 1581, Ghostlin wrote:Also, there's going to be WIFOM that says 'but Ghostlin, YOU shot her.' To which I reply, 'Why in God's green earth, would I, as scum shoot my biggest, most vocal supporter in LYLO?' Yes, that is WIFOM too. At this point, all we've done is WIFOM. I was right about Ffery and scum knew they couldn't take Ffery, me and fishy into LYLO together, so they shot the only block in mislynching me.
I'm not Titus. My role exists in the game. There's at least TWO things right there that make this scenario different.In post 1584, MathBlade wrote:God this reeks of when Titus fake claimed cop.In post 1581, Ghostlin wrote:Also, there's going to be WIFOM that says 'but Ghostlin, YOU shot her.' To which I reply, 'Why in God's green earth, would I, as scum shoot my biggest, most vocal supporter in LYLO?' Yes, that is WIFOM too. At this point, all we've done is WIFOM. I was right about Ffery and scum knew they couldn't take Ffery, me and fishy into LYLO together, so they shot the only block in mislynching me.
In post 1552, Chip Butty wrote:Towner roles:
skitter (PT alignment inv, confirmed)
Fferylit
2 INs (inc GD)
Ghost (assuming scum PT)
Doctor (unconfirmed)
PT inv (if distinct from skitter)
Less town:
Roleblocker
1 × Messenger
Hard to call:
1 x Messenger
1 × IN
In post 1553, Chip Butty wrote:Ghost had seemed towny to me. I'm going to temporarily assume he is town to try to make sense of the setup.
If Ghost is town i think it is sensible to assume a scum PT, otherwise his role would be weak for scumhunting. Also, as noted earlier, once his role is known to scum it becomes weaker. Since INs would be expected to share information and there is likely a scum PT, I'm leaning toward an all town hood.
In post 1559, Chip Butty wrote:Not lynching fferyllt or Ghost today.
I don't think we are going to achieve clarity until we know if there are multiple roles or not. It seems multiple roles are a thing, but we don't know if that's what is happening here. The flips that will help most there are Esp and Flubber. I'm down with lynching either, but considering there is a chance either is telling the truth, it probably makes sense to lynch a neighbour rather than a possible doc. Also, Esp has been virtually death tunnelling me since he replaced in, twisting my words and making spurious and unsupported accusations.
The other two, ie MB and Fishy, also have a problem. I think at least one messenger is plausibly scum, if only because of the lack of town utility of their roles. But, again, a flip in [Esp, Flubber] might help clarify things by helping us decide if multiple roles are a thing in this game or not.
VOTE: Esp
L-1.
In post 1562, Flubbernugget wrote:Esp, even if you flip town, I'm really not seeing ghosts role as scum.
Ghost, I'm not so sure scum were/are in a good position to mislynch you if you are town. It would be pretty awkward for me, flubber, or fishy to attack you after these posts, even if at least one of us has to be scum if you are town. Also, assuming only one of fishy and flubber is scum, that's two supportive votes for you unless something changes radically, enough for you to avoid getting lynched.In post 1571, Fishythefish wrote:Urgh no no no. This is how we sort the hood:
VOTE: Chip Butty
Ghostlin's role is potentially gamebreaking. If the scum have a PT, one post from it could out both the scum. CB being informed of the role is one way to neuter that. So if we're sorting neighbours, we should absolutely also be sorting that out. Also, I think CB is way scummier.
Iirc, the main point in your favour is being pseudo cleared by Ghost. I need to look at that again. Your point about scum.me's role neutering Ghost's is bogus. It's not like cop roles routinely get neutered for balance. I think we should be sorting messengers today. There's little to no town utility in those roles.In post 1571, Fishythefish wrote:Urgh no no no. This is how we sort the hood:
VOTE: Chip Butty
Ghostlin's role is potentially gamebreaking. If the scum have a PT, one post from it could out both the scum. CB being informed of the role is one way to neuter that. So if we're sorting neighbours, we should absolutely also be sorting that out. Also, I think CB is way scummier.
Hasn't been particupating, or doesn't have a PT? There's a difference...In post 1591, Ghostlin wrote:As in, he's not been participating in any communication in a PT outside of this thread.
So unless FN has been no posting in a PT, he doesn't have one.In post 1595, Chip Butty wrote:Hasn't been particupating, or doesn't have a PT? There's a difference...In post 1591, Ghostlin wrote:As in, he's not been participating in any communication in a PT outside of this thread.