Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
Last edited by Not_Mafia on Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
okay, i kept thinking about this day one but i figured you knew your role better than me – you're still alive, kublai? that makes this game so much easier.
In post 440, garaputo wrote:I'm not liking this just vote without discussion thing much. I'm also not able to do much rereading right now. I should have time later tonight.
Widsom has been voting northsidegal without a reason and hopped on the Radical Rat wagon without a reason.
In post 441, Wisdom wrote:tbh we can just keep lynching until we win
scum dont seem like they can kill after all
My thought exactly, but does anyone else think if UCV is scum we're just screwed? I am not prepared to suspect him. With the exception of Khan and UCV, I will lynch everyone else one by one.
tbh Khan I wouldn't be shocked if nsg were scum, and it's not like wisdom will vote for himself.
In post 443, BuJaber wrote:My thought exactly, but does anyone else think if UCV is scum we're just screwed? I am not prepared to suspect him. With the exception of Khan and UCV, I will lynch everyone else one by one.
tbh Khan I wouldn't be shocked if nsg were scum, and it's not like wisdom will vote for himself.
what? why is ucv your number one townie, the one you'd take into a 3 person lylo along with the ic? just yesterday you were completely prepared to lynch him – what changed?
in fact, i still think i'd prefer lynching ucv over wisdom.
Hmm.. Nobody else vote of a second. I just want to verify that UC Voyager was being truthful. If 7 votes are at play in the game, then the mod would still list it as 4 to lynch.
@UC Voyager: Could you write a post where you vote for someone twice just to make sure your double vote is gone?
@northsidegal: I'm not sure why you'd want to lynch UC Voyager. He's been truthful (assuming..) and if he were scum, he doesn't appear to have an ability to kill.
In post 445, Kublai Khan wrote:@northsidegal: I'm not sure why you'd want to lynch UC Voyager. He's been truthful (assuming..) and if he were scum, he doesn't appear to have an ability to kill.
??? because i think he's scum? it was never about wanting to get rid of the double vote just in case it was scum.
In post 445, Kublai Khan wrote:@northsidegal: I'm not sure why you'd want to lynch UC Voyager. He's been truthful (assuming..) and if he were scum, he doesn't appear to have an ability to kill.
??? because i think he's scum? it was never about wanting to get rid of the double vote just in case it was scum.
But you can't just ignore setup stuff because it's inconvenient.
i don't understand what's inconvenient about it – i get that he's not lying about being a day one double voter, i've always got that. what i'm asking is why that precludes him from being scum?
In post 448, northsidegal wrote:i don't understand what's inconvenient about it – i get that he's not lying about being a day one double voter, i've always got that. what i'm asking is why that precludes him from being scum?
As scum, he had incentive to lie but didn't. That has to be taken into some account.
I grant that he could possibly be honest scum, but that makes him way less scum than Wisdom.