Micro 813 - Game Over

Antihero · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:23 am

neat

VOTE: oka

OkaPoka · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:25 am

oh wait you think im scum?

well that's where ur wrong kiddo

Antihero · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:28 am

/shrug, i called you scum. you didn't correct me.

you also didn't correct me when i said my treatment of invis wasn't scummy

OkaPoka · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:31 am

you are entitled to your own opinions

Antihero · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:32 am

but atp the mud sling kind of only makes sense if invis is a bus and you need to chain a mislynch off of it

BUT HEY i'm sure that's way off base and there really is something sketchy about how i'm reading invis

...right?...

OkaPoka · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:33 am

okay what's your scumteam guess

GuiltyLion · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:38 am

i'm only worried about the third partner if Invis is somehow town (in which case he should be far more worried about finding the scumteam in general)

if Invisibility flips scum then we're going straight to MafMen for general scumminess (WK of Manatee, lack of scumreads, hammer and then immediate out of character apologizing for hammer), plus the awkward distancing between the two (null/scum reading eachother all game, but lack of vote when push comes to shove and both are dueling wagons)

Antihero · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:39 am

In post 267, Antihero wrote:reviewing...

still think oath is town

still leaning town on guiltylion (and this game's p fucked if he's not given the ciphers here)

mafmen i would feel a lot better on if he just hammered wo apology bc even given that korina was town i still think it was a good hammer. the recoil kind of nixes that for me bc now i'm wondering if the knowledge that korina was town was what caused mafmen's freak-out

still scumreading oka's lamist posting

burning the rest of my reads list and resetting.

VOTE: oka

In post 336, Antihero wrote:
In post 312, GuiltyLion wrote:yah I'm good with an Invisibility lynch first I decided. He's been posting elsewhere on-site and not here, despite being the most likely lynch
hmmmmm...... yeaaaaah...

[otter, invisibility, manatee-slot, mafmen, oka]

^whoever's town in there needs to step it up

if your question is an attempt at good faith interaction, you're failing

OkaPoka · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:40 am

gimme three names not 5

Antihero · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:48 am

In post 358, OkaPoka wrote:gimme three names not 5

oh... ok

Spoiler:

Antihero wrote:BUT HEY i'm sure that's way off base and there really is something sketchy about how i'm reading invis

...right?...

at this point i'm just assuming that's a "no"

OkaPoka · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:50 am

i don't even know what you want me to respond to in that question.

feel like you are being snarky so meh

and that response is def snarky

Antihero · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:58 am

In post 342, OkaPoka wrote:unless anti is invis scumbuddy?

you picked the fight and now you're going to pretend you don't know what i'm talking about?

OkaPoka · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:00 am

what do you want me to say? im just stating possibilities. im not going to push you until we get invis flip lol

Antihero · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:06 am

OkaPoka wrote:worst case scenario imo is scum!antihero because he can argue his way out of being scum and probably get us to lynch anyone else while we are at it lol

i'd say you're less "just stating possibilities" and more "actively trying to sew paranoia"

Antihero · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:08 am

and the fact that the above quote was TOTALLY unsolicited from anyone else kind of belies this already:

In post 362, OkaPoka wrote:im not going to push you until we get invis flip lol

OkaPoka · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:09 am

did u click the iso button on me?

OkaPoka · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:10 am

In post 345, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm still a lil tempted to pivot to Mafmen

like given the game state, who are being active posters vs who is inactive, and the consensus scumreads on Invis/Maf, the only way this game state really makes sense is if third scum is Otter/Manatee and the team as a whole has given up

worst case scenario where town!Invisibility and scum!Oka or scum!Oath, then Invisibility mislynch would be setting us up for chaos tomorrow

that's why we need content from those Otter/Manatee slots

In post 347, OkaPoka wrote:worst case scenario imo is scum!antihero because he can argue his way out of being scum and probably get us to lynch anyone else while we are at it lol

MafMen · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:20 am

In post 356, GuiltyLion wrote:i'm only worried about the third partner if Invis is somehow town (in which case he should be far more worried about finding the scumteam in general)

if Invisibility flips scum then we're going straight to MafMen for general scumminess (WK of Manatee, lack of scumreads, hammer and then immediate out of character apologizing for hammer), plus the awkward distancing between the two (null/scum reading eachother all game, but lack of vote when push comes to shove and both are dueling wagons)

i apologised because i cut discussion time short, not because i hammered them in general

i scumread them so ofcourse im going to vote them, but i didnt think it was l-1

when push comes to shove ill vote someone

hell im voting oka rn

Antihero · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:23 am

In post 366, OkaPoka wrote:
In post 345, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm still a lil tempted to pivot to Mafmen

like given the game state, who are being active posters vs who is inactive, and the consensus scumreads on Invis/Maf, the only way this game state really makes sense is if third scum is Otter/Manatee and the team as a whole has given up

worst case scenario where town!Invisibility and scum!Oka or scum!Oath, then Invisibility mislynch would be setting us up for chaos tomorrow

that's why we need content from those Otter/Manatee slots

In post 347, OkaPoka wrote:worst case scenario imo is scum!antihero because he can argue his way out of being scum and probably get us to lynch anyone else while we are at it lol

did GL ask you for your opinion on me? did anyone...?

no?

unsolicited then

you. picked. this. fight.

GuiltyLion · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:26 am

In post 367, MafMen wrote:hell im voting oka rn

why is Oka more likely to be scum than Invisibility

Antihero · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:27 am

is there a reason why you're not saying why i would be scummy if invis is scum...

instead of acting like you never said anything and desperately wanting me to drop it?

OkaPoka · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:28 am

person 1:"pancakes are best food"
person 2:"waffles where its at man"
person 3: "fuck you person 2 for stating what you think, person 1 didn't ask for your opinion so fuck off"

yeah i guess i picked this fight but its reliant on invis flipping scum, whats so hard to understand. im not going to duel you until i get an invis flip

im just putting the thought out there because i feel like you are faking frustration at reading invis

Antihero · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:30 am

...whereas the other ppl here NOT frustrated at reading invis...?

you know something everyone else doesn't?

OkaPoka · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:31 am

and in the scenario if invis/mafmen/antihero scumteam, you really want to mislynch me and force me to duel you because you know we only need 2 scum lynches to win.

so you are just going to waste time rn trying to sidetrack town, you don't give a fuck if it attracts attention because your posting style makes it pretty hard to win an argument against you

pedit: we are all frustrated at reading invis but i think ur faking it

Antihero · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:34 am

ok i recall very vividly why i stopped playing this game