Page 13 of 31

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:22 pm
by skitter30
ank do you know anything about the last micro schadd ran?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:31 pm
by Ankamius
In post 300, skitter30 wrote:ank do you know anything about the last micro schadd ran?
Nope

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:35 pm
by skitter30
cool cool
last game's setup was kinda funky (but really cool!) and i wanted to know if you had any sense of what a 'schadd funky setup (tm)' might look like before you softed things

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:48 pm
by Ankamius
I kinda figured something was up when I saw the role I got, it's... bizarre lol

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:22 pm
by Invisibility
UNVOTE:

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:53 pm
by Eragon
In post 231, skitter30 wrote:ok, suppose i tell you that his inordinate enthusiasm and hollow posting is fairly typical for town!vizzy and i've never seen scum!vizzy post that way - he's much more stilted and frozen as scum in my experience, and has much more trouble faking reads and opinions

(source: three towngames with town!vizzy that i correctly pegged him in rvs, and two scumgames where i was partnered with scum!vizzy)

i don't think the semantic argument is much ai honestly, although i can understand why you're annoyed about it
idk in the Worst Upick game he was able to make pretty good reads, but i actually found he was a lot more focused on playing and like, "Showing progression" instead of making posts, as you call them "hollow" (not a bad thing)
In post 233, skitter30 wrote:either way i'm pretty sure this is town!vizzy here
agree
In post 234, tosser wrote:well as i said my original vote was just because i felt his style annoying it wasn't a scumread. i don't feel like unvoting now though based on how he reacted and the subsequent obfuscation when i prodded him
so you voted him because you thought he was annoying?
also, can you elaborate on the "reaction" that you think is scummy?
and what the shit does obfuscation even mean lmao.
In post 242, lazyreads wrote:VOTE: eragon
do you have any explanation?
In post 253, Ankamius wrote:I don't like Eragons p5 either
what about P.5 specifically?
In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?
my empty content posts are not empty content they are just empty game content :lol: :lol: :lol: how dare you suggest i'd make empty content posts /s
In post 267, Slaxx wrote:
In post 265, Ankamius wrote:
In post 263, Slaxx wrote:
In post 260, Ankamius wrote:
In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?
Do you think there's an outside reason for this?
I don’t get the question, so I guess no. I think it’s this-game-related.
Eh I just worded it wrong

Do you think he did that specifically on purpose, or I guess I'm more asking if you think he ignored it because it's Eragon.

No because as I said Tosser is recently returned so I don’t think it has much to do with his perception of players outside the game.
i'll just state this for clarification
I have never played with or heard of tosser until I started this game. so unless he is an alt, then no outside influences.
In post 273, Invisibility wrote:VOTE: ank
can you explain this vote?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:58 pm
by Eragon
In post 292, Ankamius wrote:Either way, Ausuka and Eragon had the scummiest responses to the mechanic. Invisibility is town for other reasons and I'm not entirely sure about Skitter. Tosser I'm unsure about since he was almost reluctant to fuel the wheat farm, which can go both ways.
i dont even remember my response, can you explain what it is and why its scummy?
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
how do these groups correlate at all
In post 302, skitter30 wrote:cool cool
last game's setup was kinda funky (but really cool!) and i wanted to know if you had any sense of what a 'schadd funky setup (tm)' might look like before you softed things
does this mean that you think Ank is town b/c if they were scum w/out previous knowledge they would have not claimed such a "bizarre role"?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:02 pm
by lazyreads
In post 299, skitter30 wrote:i think town: vizzy, lazyreads, slaxx, probably in that order

so scum is in: eragon, pink ball, tosser, ank, ausuka
i agree but townread ank

so im gonna see if you or ausuka will be the fifht in my coalitiinon

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:03 pm
by lazyreads
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
this was dumb btw

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:14 pm
by skitter30
In post 305, Eragon wrote:idk in the Worst Upick game he was able to make pretty good reads, but i actually found he was a lot more focused on playing and like, "Showing progression" instead of making posts, as you call them "hollow" (not a bad thing)
i, uh, literally have no memory of him bieng in that game, whoops
i'll have to refresh my memory of that game and see what his game looks like at some point because i honestly don't remember him there at all
In post 306, Eragon wrote:does this mean that you think Ank is town b/c if they were scum w/out previous knowledge they would have not claimed such a "bizarre role"?
i think she's less likely to have made up the role if she wasn't aware of the prior setup; if she had some sense of what the setup was i'd be more suspicious of her claiming a weird role. idk if i explained that well, does that make sense?
In post 305, Eragon wrote:and what the shit does obfuscation even mean lmao.
making things confusing on purpose in order to frustrate and/or confuse the other person so that they dont' understand your true meaning
In post 307, lazyreads wrote:
In post 299, skitter30 wrote:i think town: vizzy, lazyreads, slaxx, probably in that order

so scum is in: eragon, pink ball, tosser, ank, ausuka
i agree but townread ank

so im gonna see if you or ausuka will be the fifht in my coalitiinon
i think the soft is for a real role, and i think the way she softed it is very slightly +town but not enough for me to like townread her or anything

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:14 pm
by Pink Ball
VOTE: lazyreads

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:16 pm
by skitter30
??? why

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:18 pm
by lazyreads
its really fun piecing togethre conversations by looking at what each person said one at a time

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:22 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
I'm not following any of what she's said at this point. She says there is one scum in a group that seems random (why Slaxx, Ank and me? What's the correlation there?) and between another group that seems random, finishing with saying who probably is scum: me, who she has been pushing for the stupidest thing she can take, and Eragon who I'm townreading and explicitly said I was. In fact, is the only read I've stated. So this whole things seems off and like pushing an agenda.

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:23 pm
by Slaxx
Okay

Little tilted but I’ll bite

Eragon town WHY pb

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:25 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 211, Pink Ball wrote:'cause in our last game together you tried to be a town leader with strong and thoughtful reads. You not doing that is either 1. You trying to change your scumgame in order to deceive the players who recently played with you; or 2. You're probably town not worried to accomplish an agenda. For instance, I would expect at least a solid townread of anyone in order to start getting some thread pressence

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:26 pm
by Pink Ball
Why are you tilted by the way?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:26 pm
by Slaxx
Oh skitter remember the thing I told you to remind me about

It’s Pink’s #1 there

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:27 pm
by Slaxx
Oh

I suck at millennial slang

Buzzed is a better word

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:29 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 317, Slaxx wrote:Oh skitter remember the thing I told you to remind me about

It’s Pink’s #1 there
Come again for big fudge?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:30 pm
by Slaxx
In post 319, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 317, Slaxx wrote:Oh skitter remember the thing I told you to remind me about

It’s Pink’s #1 there
Come again for big fudge?
I think Eragon is doing #1

Which is why I don’t buy the “different than his scum game” argument

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:30 pm
by lazyreads
In post 313, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
I'm not following any of what she's said at this point. She says there is one scum in a group that seems random (why Slaxx, Ank and me? What's the correlation there?) and between another group that seems random, finishing with saying who probably is scum: me, who she has been pushing for the stupidest thing she can take, and Eragon who I'm townreading and explicitly said I was. In fact, is the only read I've stated. So this whole things seems off and like pushing an agenda.
pushing what agenda

what does you townreading eragon have to do with me or anything

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:32 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 320, Slaxx wrote:
In post 319, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 317, Slaxx wrote:Oh skitter remember the thing I told you to remind me about

It’s Pink’s #1 there
Come again for big fudge?
I think Eragon is doing #1

Which is why I don’t buy the “different than his scum game” argument
What makes you think that? Do you think Eragon is capable of doing that so quickly? I mean we have just started the game, I think we would notice at least some common factor from the last game and this

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:33 pm
by skitter30
In post 299, skitter30 wrote:i'm aware that i've never played with town!him and that i don't know what his towngame looks like, and that he might be trying to change his playstyle if he's scum again here given that there's a fair amount of overlapping player list
@slaxx yeah i noted that that might be a thing

earlier i was basically noting that his game was different
i don't think that's inherently townie

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:33 pm
by lazyreads
am i really "pushing" you anyways

thats a real question i cant see all of my opsts but i personally wouldnt call what ive done pushing