In post 8, Porkens wrote:None of you could possibly have a reason against lynching this slot. So either vote in your first post to lynch this, or explain your argument against punching it.
Forced. The insertion of the second line feels like a very awkward and unnatural way to attempt to get laughs.
In post 58, Porkens wrote:Sure it’s Rvs anyway so politically it won’t matter down the line one way or the other. Lots of people are saying it can only help me. You know that better than anyone and I fully intend to comply
Porkens is a veteran. Dismissing RVS pings me because he shouldn't be acting like it isn't universally considered a way to create or generate information in a low information environment.
In post 89, ejjinami wrote:actually, ok, lol, that's hypocritical... I don't know who to vote myself
P.Edit.
Porkens wrote:Hfs VOTE: ejjonami is flagrant scum
I’ll go after the son.
"flagrant"?
and elaborate
You are floundering and working as hard as you can to stay above water, but too many of us already suspect you. Your best shot at this point would be to die quietly and quickly. Self vote and let your partner slide into day 2.
Why wouldn't she? She's town and town have just as much an obligation to look town as scum do in order to survive, and further help with scum hunting and building a strong town block.
In post 108, Porkens wrote:She entered and defended the rvs target and went up and down about it. Then she got super defensive and ran her mouth all over when I called her on it. There was no good reason to defend djt
Just a lot of IIoA. Hardly a case that justifies how hard Porkens is pushing my predecessor here.
In post 8, Porkens wrote:None of you could possibly have a reason against lynching this slot. So either vote in your first post to lynch this, or explain your argument against punching it.
Forced. The insertion of the second line feels like a very awkward and unnatural way to attempt to get laughs.
In post 58, Porkens wrote:Sure it’s Rvs anyway so politically it won’t matter down the line one way or the other. Lots of people are saying it can only help me. You know that better than anyone and I fully intend to comply
Porkens is a veteran. Dismissing RVS pings me because he shouldn't be acting like it isn't universally considered a way to create or generate information in a low information environment.
In post 89, ejjinami wrote:actually, ok, lol, that's hypocritical... I don't know who to vote myself
P.Edit.
Porkens wrote:Hfs VOTE: ejjonami is flagrant scum
I’ll go after the son.
"flagrant"?
and elaborate
You are floundering and working as hard as you can to stay above water, but too many of us already suspect you. Your best shot at this point would be to die quietly and quickly. Self vote and let your partner slide into day 2.
Why wouldn't she? She's town and town have just as much an obligation to look town as scum do in order to survive, and further help with scum hunting and building a strong town block.
In post 108, Porkens wrote:She entered and defended the rvs target and went up and down about it. Then she got super defensive and ran her mouth all over when I called her on it. There was no good reason to defend djt
Just a lot of IIoA. Hardly a case that justifies how hard Porkens is pushing my predecessor here.
OMG IM SO SORRY I DIDNT KNOW THAT YOU HAD OMGUS ARMOR ON OMG OMG IM SORRY IM SCUM I DIDNT MEAN TO MY PARTNER IS LUV WE WERE GOING TO NK YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE 39483984398 IQ ADJFLASKJDFLASJELFIJACVNALSRIOEj
In post 8, Porkens wrote:None of you could possibly have a reason against lynching this slot. So either vote in your first post to lynch this, or explain your argument against punching it.
Forced. The insertion of the second line feels like a very awkward and unnatural way to attempt to get laughs.
In post 58, Porkens wrote:Sure it’s Rvs anyway so politically it won’t matter down the line one way or the other. Lots of people are saying it can only help me. You know that better than anyone and I fully intend to comply
Porkens is a veteran. Dismissing RVS pings me because he shouldn't be acting like it isn't universally considered a way to create or generate information in a low information environment.
In post 89, ejjinami wrote:actually, ok, lol, that's hypocritical... I don't know who to vote myself
P.Edit.
Porkens wrote:Hfs VOTE: ejjonami is flagrant scum
I’ll go after the son.
"flagrant"?
and elaborate
You are floundering and working as hard as you can to stay above water, but too many of us already suspect you. Your best shot at this point would be to die quietly and quickly. Self vote and let your partner slide into day 2.
Why wouldn't she? She's town and town have just as much an obligation to look town as scum do in order to survive, and further help with scum hunting and building a strong town block.
In post 108, Porkens wrote:She entered and defended the rvs target and went up and down about it. Then she got super defensive and ran her mouth all over when I called her on it. There was no good reason to defend djt
Just a lot of IIoA. Hardly a case that justifies how hard Porkens is pushing my predecessor here.
Ur full of crap luv
If I’m wrong, please explain your behavior and why you did what you did as town. Actually make an honest attempt to show my concerns don’t hold water instead of dismissing them as crap.
In post 119, Not Known 15 wrote:
if you look at the ISO of invisibility their posts contain:
-rvs/useless posts
-unexplained townread on ejj early on<---also possible nightkill target crumb?
-Vote NK, without any reasons(not even "I agree with X")
... and one question to MaryJo("Who is scum") that anyone could ask anywhere and that - at that point - is a bit strange(why would town ask this that early - normally people say their reads without being asked, and as town you normally ask only if people keep silent - and I see no real reason for this question but to appear as a "useful player".
Their behaviour looks to me like mainly non-committal play trying to avoid attention while still trying to look like an actually
useful contributor
.
We don't have any power roles. That means that this is scum indicative. VOTE: Invisibility
Let's just pretend that it was good things that you heard about me! 
