In post 1099, Bows and Bells wrote:Oh, wow. I'm going to defer to Typhon for posts for the next few hours, but I just wanted to interject with a quick comment for which I offer no context:
Well clearly my reads were completely fricked up.
Gonna do some thinking this day phase. I’ll be back shortly.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Water slime is busy and won't be posting for a while. Nevertheless, I managed to read remarkable 45% of the topic. Do you prefer one huge post of my astonishing catch up, or would you rather have it split into many smaller ones?
Preferably you should keep your catchup small and concise, but if you must make it huge, please put it in one post and spoiler it so I don't have to read it.
I’m gonna do some crazy here. VOTE: Jingle
This is where my gut is telling me to vote, and I’m at a loss for anything better to do with my current information. And also Jingle’s ISO seems really... weird? I dunno, it’s a long shot, but it’s better than having no game impact.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 1113, Inferno390 wrote:I’m gonna do some crazy here. VOTE: Jingle
This is where my gut is telling me to vote, and I’m at a loss for anything better to do with my current information. And also Jingle’s ISO seems really... weird? I dunno, it’s a long shot, but it’s better than having no game impact.
HURT: Inferno's amazing idea to lynch Jingle
Assume cop didn't what to break the game and investigated Jingle.
2/3 of cop being in game. Noone says anything. Jingle is 2/3 conftown.
I also don't think Jingle would call TI on himself if he were scum. Too risky.
Assume there are 2 goons - jingle has 50% of being cough day 2 in exchange for cop reveal.
Assume there is one roleblocker and one goon. Jingle must be SURE who the cop is in order to do samething he did. Is here un obvious cop?
I also find Jingle very sus, I think he was discussing only mechanics, off-topic, but almost never progressed the game. Nevertheless, because of reasons stated above, I restrained from scumreading him.
In post 1120, Austerity wrote:And if he were scum he'd have known that CoI wasn't flipping scum...
Exactly, I also feel like he would have had the most reason of anybody to take out Superfan since he seemed to be expecting RC and Katy to tunnel him. Superfan seems like an odd choice for scum to have taken out unless there was an overriding reason too. Their hard push on CoI could have potentially been used to to scumpaint them for another townie mislynch.
: You've had plenty of time to peruse my meta, given how long it took this game to start after filling. You're telling me you didn't do
any
research into who you're playing with?
Not scum indicative. Pure NAI.
Spoiler:
In post 162, Inferno390 wrote:I mean let’s talk about how you’ve responded to me so far.
There’s the fact that you said I thought you were a threat and when asked why you gave vague statements about me being on other sites or metadiving you
And how when it became clear that I had done neither, you now have crafted a narrative where I attacked you because Jingle respects your game solving ability
And the mocking
And the talking down
And the dismissal of the things I’m saying
And how every time I cockblock one bs reason you give you completely drop it, ignore it, and try to come at me from a different angle
In post 52, Inferno390 wrote:I get the feeling that Conflict is looking for points of manipulation on the players and/or dipping his toes in the water to see what he’s playing against. I’m going to parse it a little bit later, but it is definitely off.
I think VOTE: Conflict is okay for now. Not sold on it, but it’s worth a couple of looks at.
I thşnk u r town lol
-rf
Followed by silence until 115, at which point you express confusion over me scumreading you (okay) and then in the space of 3 posts without giving me anytime to respond, you hard drop your vote on me with seemingly no change (wtf).
Conflict of Interest wrote:I'm not interested in engaging your bullshit today
My bullshit?
MY bullshit?
YOU were the one who said that I might know your meta because possible offsite reasons
YOU were the one who unfoundedly said I could have metadived you based on a chat with someone in the lobby
Despite the fact that, you know, anyone who had done any sort of research on MY meta would know that I have 9% phone posted for the last year.
YOU are the one mocking me with anime JPGs
YOU are the one talking to me like I’m a little baby newbie
If anyone is putting up with bullshit, it’s me. And I’m putting up with yours.
Well it ain’t gonna work. It takes more that that to shake a ‘ferno
Overdefensive
Senate's playstyle.
Alright, it's playstyle. Scum might like to keep discussion around mechanics and off-topic, rather than getting so much attention. Slight townlean on him, since this is not a good playstyle to do as scum.
They went out of their way to point out they had no reads. That is a great way to get negative attention and pressure on you as scum, and it's completely avoidable because coming up with fake reads is very easy.
Their follow-up explanation about forgetting reads feels genuine too. Scum care a lot more about consistency whereas town just say whatever they're feeling at the time.
Stop publically announcing that you are townreading people for doing literally nothing.
Spoiler:
In post 938, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wait I forgot you changed your vote. I legit voted that so day could end and along with that your spam would stop. VOTE: Azorius
Pro...ba...bly townlean? Would scum do that? Pro..ba...bly not?
Spoiler:
In post 978, Austerity wrote:You're really good at the game as scum too, to be fair. And given how sheepy people are this game I wouldn't be surprised if scum-you can mislynch CoI and walk away without a scratch.
I'd consolidate on CoI over Azorius or TWW, to be sure, but I don't think it needs to happen yet, and especially not with a vacant slot.
Setting possible mislynch. Derailing wagoons, "town leader", I really find this post scummy.[/spoiler]
