alsoIn post 485, Conflict of Interest wrote:Finally someone stopped thisIn post 168, RadiantTroubadour wrote:can you guys stop tvt'ing for a bit
why is TN so ReLiEvEd that someone stopped the ConFlIcT when TN thinks that Inferno is scum???
alsoIn post 485, Conflict of Interest wrote:Finally someone stopped thisIn post 168, RadiantTroubadour wrote:can you guys stop tvt'ing for a bit
oh lookIn post 830, Conflict of Interest wrote:I also noticed a huge amount of possibly scum reluctance to lynch you.
DONT LYNCH TEAM WORLDWIDE TODAY
We need to deal with the lynchbait NOW, or he's gonna coast to endgame.
Gladiator: AzoriusSenate
~tn
In post 833, Conflict of Interest wrote:If anyone quick hammers TeamWorldWide I'm treating it as an open scum claim.
~tn
oh lookIn post 834, Conflict of Interest wrote:Unless they, you know, flip red.
Let's be honest, no it isn'tIn post 923, Ether Superfan Coalition wrote:also the "let's be honest"
which
let's be honest
is a scum phrasing
wig
i think i'm pretty good at the game and i'm also in a hydra so it doesn't count against my winrate if we mislynch instead of correctly lynching the scum that I called out, soIn post 931, Austerity wrote:Let's be honest, no it isn'tIn post 923, Ether Superfan Coalition wrote:also the "let's be honest"
which
let's be honest
is a scum phrasing
In all seriousness though I think this is a player dependent tell, so unless you have meta on the specific person who posted that, I don't agree. I think this is true for most of the arguments you've just given.
so you're saying you tried to quickhammer someone that a person whose reads you have a great deal of faith in (me) just disagreed with my hydra partner's read on?In post 938, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wait I forgot you changed your vote. I legit voted that so day could end and along with that your spam would stop.
VOTE: Azorius