Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:33 pm
What’s the reason for this swap?
While this is definitely better, it kind of concerned me that your read on me was in anyway linked to Hectic. I liked his reaction to being dumped from the coalition but I can understand that’s not enough to justify keeping him in it.In post 597, YOUAREGREAT wrote:@NC
i didn't clarify it very well in my catch-up post, but i'm starting to feel that you are town. i think your evaluation of LUV's alignment was solid and well-articulated, and i think my initial evaluation of your play was too harsh. on top of that, your interaction with hectic made me feel like it wasn't likely you were teamed. since hectic is my top scumread, that's another reason why i'm changing my read on you.
a better question would be: do you have any reason to think that i'm not town?In post 552, RC most awesomest wrote:@youaregreat
we have a pretty good amount of overlap in our coalitions. why should i townread you
-nsg
You’re not tr RCMA? Like if they were scum here, you’d see RC continue to post and nsg flake.
I’d like to know that too.
Holy fuck, we better get this settled.
I’m still tr Alchemist but but having no consensus coalition is proscum. @nsg, I want a reason for your 180 because I think removing Alchemist is a mistake but there isn’t enough time left to fight you, so I’ll sheep this.
In post 577, RC most awesomest wrote:maybe you forgot that when i said "4 spots in my coalition", the fifth spot was me?
in fact, i don't think you actually read the post that you're replying to.
it's really interesting to me to see you go gung-ho about a coalition that doesn't include you, though. if i'm to continue my spiral of confirmation bias when it comes to your being scum, obviously it would point towards your partner being among one of those people. i think even from a standpoint of not previously scumreading you, an argument could be made that that interpretation makes sense – after all, you were just talking about paranoid you were of everyone. passing a coalition that doesn't include you doesn't seem to me like the actions of someone who only trusts themselves, but that's just me.
-nsg
Wait, why NC 39 and not GREAT?
Why? I could say the same of many pairs of people.In post 605, EspressoPatronum wrote:Doesn't sit well with me that Spangled and Great have each other in their coalitions.
I mean, I don’t mind this; I think they’re probably both town, but I do feel better on GREAT than on NC 39. What is the reasoning here?
Yeah, no, I copied it straight thinking (for whatever reason) that it was nsg’s actual coalition rather than 1-exclude-list. I’m excluding myself because nsg’s force of personality (and reputation, or something) is much greater than mine — a coalition with me in it will not go through while nsg is semi-blindly scumreading me.In post 579, Alchemist21 wrote:Why are you putting in all 5 of those names when NSG was trying to figure out which one to exclude? They’re not going to exclude themselves and it’s weird you’re excluding both yourself and the player’s list you’re copying but including a guy you’re not cool with adding. It just doesn’t make sense.In post 574, Spangled wrote:This is the coalition that we’re doing, I think — I am not cool adding Alch in.In post 561, Spangled wrote:Look, if you’re cool taking Alch out of there, I can get behind that coalition.In post 553, RC most awesomest wrote:so i think i have about 5 people to fill 4 spots in my coalition so basically i need to exclude one person
luv, espresso, gamma, alchemist, youaregreat
haven't really put in the effort to read nancy at all this game and it might be too late to do that (or thats just an excuse for me being lazy)
hopefully at most only one scum is in that group or i shall look Foolish
anyways i guess right now i lean towards excluding youaregreat. maybe i should reread alchemist
-nsg
HURT: EspressoPatronum, NC 39, RC most awesomest, Spangled, YOUAREGREAT
HEAL: luv, espresso, gamma, alchemist, youaregreat
Let’s go; we gotta get it moving.
You and GREAT are both practically chomping at the bit to string up Hecking. I don’t sr Hecking and neither does Espresso. Who else are either of you sr rn?In post 616, Spangled wrote:Is there a reason we’re all ignoring lynching?
So... you think Hectic will be a mislynch?In post 619, NC 39 wrote:You and GREAT are both practically chomping at the bit to string up Hecking. I don’t sr Hecking and neither does Espresso. Who else are either of you sr rn?In post 616, Spangled wrote:Is there a reason we’re all ignoring lynching?
I mean, you even have a post, trying to determine his buddy - before the dude’s even flipped.
We only get a finite number of mislynches, I read in one of the linked games, that’s 3, that’s why I’m tr Alchemist, he has the correct focus - on coalition > lynching.
You should be far more concerned with the level of towniess of the coalition. What is your opinion on the NC/Espresso/RC/ Gamma/LUV coalition? If you’re tr both GREAT and me, why is it my slot in particular you’d want to switch?
Or even if you don’t want to talk to me about that you could at least try and engage with me rather than levelling of a few sarcastic posts my way and otherwise ignoring me. I do not get why you’re doing this, especially as you’ve admitted you’ve been ‘confbiasing’ toward scum!me.In post 618, Spangled wrote:@nsg
Could you elaborate on your reasons for scumreading me? It doesn’t have to be toDay; we’re pressed for time, I get that, but at some point could you talk about why you scumread me in great detail.
shrugIn post 611, NC 39 wrote:@nsg, are you ever planning to answer my Hecking question?
How is it that you have a read on everyone else but him?
i'm not trying to be sarcastic towards you, sorry if that's how i'm coming across.In post 621, Spangled wrote:Or even if you don’t want to talk to me about that you could at least try and engage with me rather than levelling of a few sarcastic posts my way and otherwise ignoring me. I do not get why you’re doing this, especially as you’ve admitted you’ve been ‘confbiasing’ toward scum!me.
that was RC, not me. (i'm still signing my posts)In post 622, NC 39 wrote:I’m very frustrated with nsg. She makes reads without ever explaining them, which would be really helpful.
Why did she swap me and Alchemist? I have absolutely no clue. This is probably setup realated since she was a lot more forthcoming in other games she’s been in.