In post 320, Banakai wrote:even 200 posts in he's still advocating for RVS votes. Why do you want people to vote so bad? idk seems kinda scummy to me. Usually town wants to hold off lynching someone until close to the deadline.
Is he advocating for RVS votes though? People placing votes and seeing how the wagons develop is useful when looking back. I don't see how encouraging it is scummy.
Penguin, I am very confused on what your read on Dann is supposed to be.
I think that’s pretty damned obvious.
I asked this before I got to the readlist.
What are you getting so flip floppy aggressive on me all of the sudden for anyway?
In post 320, Banakai wrote:even 200 posts in he's still advocating for RVS votes. Why do you want people to vote so bad? idk seems kinda scummy to me. Usually town wants to hold off lynching someone until close to the deadline.
Is he advocating for RVS votes though? People placing votes and seeing how the wagons develop is useful when looking back. I don't see how encouraging it is scummy.
Penguin, I am very confused on what your read on Dann is supposed to be.
I think that’s pretty damned obvious.
I asked this before I got to the readlist.
What are you getting so flip floppy aggressive on me all of the sudden for anyway?
What? How am I’m being “flip floppy”? And how is this even remotely “aggressive”? I obviously didn’t know you hadn’t seen the readslist when you posted that. Why so defensive?
In post 320, Banakai wrote:even 200 posts in he's still advocating for RVS votes. Why do you want people to vote so bad? idk seems kinda scummy to me. Usually town wants to hold off lynching someone until close to the deadline.
Is he advocating for RVS votes though? People placing votes and seeing how the wagons develop is useful when looking back. I don't see how encouraging it is scummy.
Penguin, I am very confused on what your read on Dann is supposed to be.
I think that’s pretty damned obvious.
I asked this before I got to the readlist.
What are you getting so flip floppy aggressive on me all of the sudden for anyway?
What? How am I’m being “flip floppy”? And how is this even remotely “aggressive”? I obviously didn’t know you hadn’t seen the readslist when you posted that. Why so defensive?
it's just a part of it. You went from liking my catch up and more or less agreeing with me, thinking my thoughts on BS were valid, to voting me. And given the context of 393 (as I was catching up on the last few pages chronologically) I think it was pretty obvious that I hadn't seen the readlist yet. Just felt like a snide remark with the hopes of discrediting me, even if only a little bit.
In post 365, Blatant Scum wrote:I made some reads, cause town to lose the game, decided to change strategy from reader to mech player.
Right now my strategy is to find a strong town read and then sheep it.
I will probably sheep Dennflor this game.
Just curious, why aren't you voting sheep with me at this time then? Are you waiting to get a stronger read?
In post 320, Banakai wrote:even 200 posts in he's still advocating for RVS votes. Why do you want people to vote so bad? idk seems kinda scummy to me. Usually town wants to hold off lynching someone until close to the deadline.
Is he advocating for RVS votes though? People placing votes and seeing how the wagons develop is useful when looking back. I don't see how encouraging it is scummy.
Penguin, I am very confused on what your read on Dann is supposed to be.
I think that’s pretty damned obvious.
I asked this before I got to the readlist.
What are you getting so flip floppy aggressive on me all of the sudden for anyway?
What? How am I’m being “flip floppy”? And how is this even remotely “aggressive”? I obviously didn’t know you hadn’t seen the readslist when you posted that. Why so defensive?
it's just a part of it. You went from liking my catch up and more or less agreeing with me, thinking my thoughts on BS were valid, to voting me. And given the context of 393 (as I was catching up on the last few pages chronologically) I think it was pretty obvious that I hadn't seen the readlist yet. Just felt like a snide remark with the hopes of discrediting me, even if only a little bit.
A) That was prior to Psyche replace in and B) I’m not or ever claimed to be a goddamned mindreader, so why do you think I should know it was “obvious”? You’re basically calling me a liar here, so if anyone is doing any discrediting here, it isn’t me.
why does someone need to "sell you" on voting on someone other than someone that you "just feel weird about idk"?
Because contrary to your misinterpreting of my posting, I’m sincerely trying to figure out the best vote. It comes down to a question of POE and you are one of the slots currently lowest on my list. Does this mean I’m confident on it? Of course not but I am just way more confident about higher reads.
In post 320, Banakai wrote:even 200 posts in he's still advocating for RVS votes. Why do you want people to vote so bad? idk seems kinda scummy to me. Usually town wants to hold off lynching someone until close to the deadline.
Is he advocating for RVS votes though? People placing votes and seeing how the wagons develop is useful when looking back. I don't see how encouraging it is scummy.
Penguin, I am very confused on what your read on Dann is supposed to be.
I think that’s pretty damned obvious.
I asked this before I got to the readlist.
What are you getting so flip floppy aggressive on me all of the sudden for anyway?
What? How am I’m being “flip floppy”? And how is this even remotely “aggressive”? I obviously didn’t know you hadn’t seen the readslist when you posted that. Why so defensive?
it's just a part of it. You went from liking my catch up and more or less agreeing with me, thinking my thoughts on BS were valid, to voting me. And given the context of 393 (as I was catching up on the last few pages chronologically) I think it was pretty obvious that I hadn't seen the readlist yet. Just felt like a snide remark with the hopes of discrediting me, even if only a little bit.
A) That was prior to Psyche replace in and B) I’m not or ever claimed to be a goddamned mindreader, so why do you think I should know it was “obvious”? You’re basically calling me a liar here, so if anyone is doing any discrediting here, it isn’t me.
Considering my posts were referencing things in posting order and my next post was referencing the readlist, I thought it was pretty obvious.
Me saying that something felt like a snide, discrediting comment is different than me accusing you of actually doing it. I was explaining my POV. Who's being defensive again?
In post 408, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:@Ethos, @Banaki, can you please link me to some town and scum games of yours? Tyvm.
Anything I could link you could be selective and I could just play by/against whatever meta it is to influence how you see me though? Like why don't you just look for it yourself?
In post 320, Banakai wrote:even 200 posts in he's still advocating for RVS votes. Why do you want people to vote so bad? idk seems kinda scummy to me. Usually town wants to hold off lynching someone until close to the deadline.
Is he advocating for RVS votes though? People placing votes and seeing how the wagons develop is useful when looking back. I don't see how encouraging it is scummy.
Penguin, I am very confused on what your read on Dann is supposed to be.
I think that’s pretty damned obvious.
I asked this before I got to the readlist.
What are you getting so flip floppy aggressive on me all of the sudden for anyway?
What? How am I’m being “flip floppy”? And how is this even remotely “aggressive”? I obviously didn’t know you hadn’t seen the readslist when you posted that. Why so defensive?
it's just a part of it. You went from liking my catch up and more or less agreeing with me, thinking my thoughts on BS were valid, to voting me. And given the context of 393 (as I was catching up on the last few pages chronologically) I think it was pretty obvious that I hadn't seen the readlist yet. Just felt like a snide remark with the hopes of discrediting me, even if only a little bit.
A) That was prior to Psyche replace in and B) I’m not or ever claimed to be a goddamned mindreader, so why do you think I should know it was “obvious”? You’re basically calling me a liar here, so if anyone is doing any discrediting here, it isn’t me.
Considering my posts were referencing things in posting order and my next post was referencing the readlist, I thought it was pretty obvious.
Me saying that something felt like a snide, discrediting comment is different than me accusing you of actually doing it. I was explaining my POV. Who's being defensive again?
I also never called you a liar or implied it.
I said I didn’t know you hadn’t seen Penguin’s readlist. Do you believe me or not?
In post 408, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:@Ethos, @Banaki, can you please link me to some town and scum games of yours? Tyvm.
Anything I could link you could be selective and I could just play by/against whatever meta it is to influence how you see me though? Like why don't you just look for it yourself?
Why would it be “selective” if you’re town? And because it’s less work.
