In post 1083, T3 wrote:PoE and also just not even doing much in the way of like... actual content.
So when asked about redtea, your answer is "Idk they haven't done actual content" (which isn't really true)
In post 1085, T3 wrote:There may be some funny = town bias. Honestly I haven't really noticed redtea that much.
and when asked about flow the first thing that comes to mind is that he's funny
Like T3 is capable of having reads, he can show at least some thought process but this game it justs sounds like you're making stuff up and havent actually been following along and solving
So uh
Honestly redtea was in my PoE so I kind of made up reasons. Honestly I'm self conscious about how my readlists look as both alignments. I know this sounds scummy af but *shrug*
Wait wait wait, so you made up reasoning to scumread redtea and upon being called out for it you're now admitting it
You could have just said you don't remember redtea's content but instead you said
In post 1083, T3 wrote:PoE and also just not even doing much in the way of like... actual content.
I mean... you're self conscious about how ppl read you to the point where you make up reads? Making up reads is what scum does
In post 1083, T3 wrote:PoE and also just not even doing much in the way of like... actual content.
So when asked about redtea, your answer is "Idk they haven't done actual content" (which isn't really true)
In post 1085, T3 wrote:There may be some funny = town bias. Honestly I haven't really noticed redtea that much.
and when asked about flow the first thing that comes to mind is that he's funny
Like T3 is capable of having reads, he can show at least some thought process but this game it justs sounds like you're making stuff up and havent actually been following along and solving
So uh
Honestly redtea was in my PoE so I kind of made up reasons. Honestly I'm self conscious about how my readlists look as both alignments. I know this sounds scummy af but *shrug*
Wait wait wait, so you made up reasoning to scumread redtea and upon being called out for it you're now admitting it
You could have just said you don't remember redtea's content but instead you said
In post 1083, T3 wrote:PoE and also just not even doing much in the way of like... actual content.
I mean... you're self conscious about how ppl read you to the point where you make up reads? Making up reads is what scum does
Not making up reads, making up or greatly exaggerating reasons.
In post 1035, Esooa wrote:I've played with t3 before and I didn't struggle to find them in any way at all. They were my town core day 1 both games. They can give reads as town, and I haven't seen that this game
???
I have been giving reads this game.
So do you have reads on players or are were those all made up?
In post 1109, Dannflor wrote:T3, can you go a little in depth on your town lean of me?
Tiny brainme doesn't have any clue how to read you. So I look at your meta and I found that you get scumread by other players as scum.
what games did you look at t3
I think a mini normal and a large theme.
I'm also a little suspect you actually did this or put that much thought into it because I've historically performed fairly well as scum barring a single large theme game recently
In post 1109, Dannflor wrote:T3, can you go a little in depth on your town lean of me?
Tiny brainme doesn't have any clue how to read you. So I look at your meta and I found that you get scumread by other players as scum.
what games did you look at t3
I think a mini normal and a large theme.
I'm also a little suspect you actually did this or put that much thought into it because I've historically performed fairly well as scum barring a single large theme game recently
I'll check now but I think the games I looked at were Flavor vs. Hectic or something like that and Mini Normal 2169?
In post 1138, T3 wrote:Ywah I get why you're voting me that sequence sounded scummy.
if you're town you've gotta slow down and explain to me with a little more detail how you formed your read on me
I don't feel like you're being completely honest right now and I'm struggling to see town motivations for retroactively adjusting your read
So I earlier gutread you as towny. Then I got less sure so I looked at your meta. Your tone felt weird and you generally got scumread. I realized these were both bad reasons so I didn't mention them until asked.
In post 1119, Morning Tweet wrote:Flow and T3 immediately voting Farren ?.? How convenient that such memey players just happen to have probably the most viable elimination as their chief scumread
I'll have you know being memey is a strategy :3
I just don't like not voting anyways
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
In post 1087, redtea wrote:i consistently post in giant unmissable blocks there is no excuse except laziness
Lazy is NAI
clearly
Not true. Town!me is usually passive and blurts things out meanwhile scum!me actively engages with discussions. Also, town!me often will skim over walls andnot respond to them.
MT #1123
gotcha. Makes sense.
I honestly was probably gonna vote flowtrap for a possible heaven 2 before dann anyway (if neither you nor farren want to go again), but ill just cement that now.
In post 1133, T3 wrote:When making that readlist there were players who I thought wre scum but wasn't sure why based on play so I exaggerated reasons.
There.
...and....you could've just said... they were mild gut reads