Last I looked at Hockey I pointed out a few decent posts.
96,
118,
145.
They do look decent on the surface. That hasn't changed.
I will say though, that:
"Tbh, I feel like scum![Galron] would at least some opinion on one of Koba/toxic and
maybe pocket one of them
"
preceded by
"Toxic only one im confident in putting as town, They had no reason to make 27 as scum imo"
and followed by
"Scum!toxic did not have to say that lol. Scum care alot more about thier self-image"
doesn't seem like nothing. Could be genuine read, could be scum!Hock pocketing toxic.
Might as well look at his read on me first. Let's start with what came before the vote.
In post 96, HockeyFan wrote:Ember- She has had 4 posts so not really sure how to read her. Her taking toxic's side in this over "having similar thoughts" seems a bit eh, could be scum pocketing toxic the town? Eh, probs another slight SL
In post 222, HockeyFan wrote:nothing has changed from 96 tbh. Also, her agenda against Koba seems meh, not much game-moving content on other players too, and low activity(this is not AI but its worth pointing [out])
So, let's back up. At time of post
96, I had four posts. Sure.
Hockey points out, saying nothing has changed, that I don't have much content on other players. That's just false.
197 was the first "real" post I made that wasn't heavily Koba-focused. But if you actually read the Koba case from
80, you can gleam a lot of my reads and thoughts on other players. Just because it's not game-moving, or frequent in activity, doesn't mean my posts are devoid of content.
I noticed Hockey vote STD for voting toxic. I made a point that Koba linked a whole offsite game to toxic, who they're calling scum, to explain Koba's own Hockey read. Instead of looking at the chainsaw defense vote and pressuring/asking about that.
I'm pointing out connections. Lim one player in this pool and you'll have more to go off of.
Post 90. I imply townleans on cows and STD when Koba asked me about other players, and neutral reads off Galron and Enchant. It might not be "game-moving", but why not push me on these reads? Why vote me, and just follow up with "but
she
isn't moving the game along"? It seems hypocritical to ask for that effort but not put it in yourself.
So that's all before post 96. Let's see where things "changed".
I clarified my townlean on cows. I directly stated by read on toxic - "could be rusty town" - because I did not make it clear earlier. Nullread on STD. And wanting to hear more from Galron/Enchant - Galron because he had defended me and I had an eye on that, and Enchant for not posting much. I said Hockey's vote looked sketchy while toxic's looked less so, because toxic had some redeeming posts. I started bringing up odd interactions between Hockey and Koba in how they're talking to / reading each other / interacting around other players when it involves them.
Like. I have reads. I've been providing thoughts and content.
So 96 overall says, slight scumread for pocketing toxic. Hockey really had no other opinions on any of my other reads/thoughts I gave?
Well. He said my Koba case "seems meh". I don't know what else to say to that without more descriptors on his part.
---
I'm just gonna hit post on this before giving more thoughts, because that paragraphs sums up my reads to the point of that part of the game. If I flip today, that might help y'all later.
I guess my overall reads list before I continue. May have to switch to mobile access soon but I'll see what I can crank out.
Ember
cows / Galron
STD / Enchant
toxic
Hockey / Koba
)