Micro 39 - WUPBBYORGRMM!!! - D2

Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
Locked
User avatar
drmyshotgun
drmyshotgun
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
drmyshotgun
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6838
Joined: January 24, 2012
Location: Far

Post Post #50 (ISO) » Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:15 am

Post by drmyshotgun »

Uh. You have nothing better to do than to just check my partial claim out?
VOTE: Rubick
My GTKAS!
100% Win Rate in Micro: 10 Games!!
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #51 (ISO) » Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:41 am

Post by Rubick »

Where do you think my vote would be better placed?
User avatar
Klick
Klick
Flash Forward
User avatar
User avatar
Klick
Flash Forward
Flash Forward
Posts: 12848
Joined: September 1, 2012

Post Post #52 (ISO) » Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:14 pm

Post by Klick »

V/LA until Saturday.
User avatar
IceGuy
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3390
Joined: January 29, 2011

Post Post #53 (ISO) » Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:52 pm

Post by IceGuy »

In post 49, Rubick wrote:Hm.

VOTE: drmyshotgun

I feel like he wouldn't lie, but might as well.


Is that a counterclaim?
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:01 am

Post by Rubick »

I am not hated, loved, or miller.
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:33 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Klick wrote: Ah.

I only want to know a specific one, and it isn't Positive. Not going to say which right now.


Why do I have serious doubts that revealing the two players who picked from a column that is not Positive will help you find scum since picks were made BEFORE alignment was determined so there is no way that you could have information that is alignment relevant from the picking process?

--

Iceguy wrote: L-2 actually isn't a big deal.


Well actually it is given the potential combination of Hated with possible Vote Stealing powers. I see you are happy to not engage higher reasoning as usual but know that isn’t an alignment tell.

--

Rubick wrote: Hm.

VOTE: drmyshotgun

I feel like he wouldn't lie, but might as well.


Look … pointless movement of votes is pointless. Reads as Faux-Town busywork posting to me.

Rubick wrote: Where do you think my vote would be better placed?


The question remains – why did you move your vote to Shotgun specifically to test his claim while explicitly saying you didn’t think he would like when you ostensibly have a scum suspect in Sala?
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:04 am

Post by Rubick »

Yes, to test his claim.

Why is Klick scum for stating that L-2 isn't a big deal, as opposed to the same statement coming from Iceguy being non-indicative of alignment? How do you feel about L-2 now that you know the Mod's VCs take loved/hated into account to determine L-#?
User avatar
IceGuy
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3390
Joined: January 29, 2011

Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:25 am

Post by IceGuy »

In post 54, Rubick wrote:I am not hated, loved, or miller.


Why do you believe Gunny could be lying?
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:43 am

Post by Rubick »

Because I didn't receive his role PM.

Testing his claim is like getting $10 for..standing up. What's so hard about that? No thanks, you say. I'm so rich, I think I'll keep my seat.
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #59 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:54 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Rubick wrote: Yes, to test his claim.


And this is why it is Faux-Town busywork. There is zero point to testing his claim. If someone wants to counter-claim him today then there are discussions to be had. But otherwise it is a pointless action that I suspect you made to look like you were taking a Pro-Town action when in reality you were not.

Rubick wrote:Why is Klick scum for stating that L-2 isn't a big deal, as opposed to the same statement coming from Iceguy being non-indicative of alignment? How do you feel about L-2 now that you know the Mod's VCs take loved/hated into account to determine L-#?


That’s not the reason why Klick is scum. There is certainly more to that quote than just his "L-2 is not a big deal" . Why do you assume that is it?

Once we get through a whole day without evidence of a Vote Thief I will feel much better about trusting I know where people sit re:lynch.

Why do you think it wasn’t a warranted position to take before the Vote Count and Hated claim gave us some clarity on the situation?

Why was your Sala vote a ‘serious vote’?
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
IceGuy
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3390
Joined: January 29, 2011

Post Post #60 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:00 am

Post by IceGuy »

In post 58, Rubick wrote:Because I didn't receive his role PM.

Testing his claim is like getting $10 for..standing up. What's so hard about that? No thanks, you say. I'm so rich, I think I'll keep my seat.


Why would anybody fake that claim when they would be immediately counterclaimed?
User avatar
Salamence20
Salamence20
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Salamence20
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10366
Joined: September 7, 2010

Post Post #61 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:01 am

Post by Salamence20 »

VOTE: Rubick

Holy fuck.

Kondi lynch tomorrow Plox.

GNR is town.
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:14 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Yes, I can agree with a Rubick lynch ...

UNVOTE: Klick
VOTE: Rubick
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #63 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:33 am

Post by Rubick »

In post 60, IceGuy wrote:Why would anybody fake that claim when they would be immediately counterclaimed?

In post 59, MagnaofIllusion wrote:And this is why it is Faux-Town busywork. There is zero point to testing his claim. If someone wants to counter-claim him today then there are discussions to be had. But otherwise it is a pointless action that I suspect you made to look like you were taking a Pro-Town action when in reality you were not.

As far as I'm concerned, there is a non-zero possibility he is fake claiming until he's Mod-confirmed. Perhaps I have a little more reason to be skeptical about negative role claims than the rest of you. There's no harm in double-checking, I don't require my vote to ask questions so I feel my scumhunting ability is unimpeded.
In post 59, MagnaofIllusion wrote:That’s not the reason why Klick is scum. There is certainly more to that quote than just his "L-2 is not a big deal" . Why do you assume that is it?

Once we get through a whole day without evidence of a Vote Thief I will feel much better about trusting I know where people sit re:lynch.

Why do you think it wasn’t a warranted position to take before the Vote Count and Hated claim gave us some clarity on the situation?

Why was your Sala vote a ‘serious vote’?

I haven't read Think Twice, so if it's a reason from that game I'm unaware. I read the exchange as "Woah, L-2 already? That's a big deal, slow down bro" "No it isn't, man" "Yea it is, I'm voting you now" The only other part of the quote is saying that votes put pressure on players, and that pressure is good. Is that the part you don't agree with? Clarify why you were voting him.

It's fine to be worried about L-2 when you consider the hated player, but now we are aware that all L-#'s are genuine. So being worried about L-2 is an unwarranted position
after
the clarity.

The Sala vote was serious because of his contradiction.
User avatar
AurorusVox
AurorusVox
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
AurorusVox
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9257
Joined: March 12, 2010
Pronoun: He/Him
Contact:

Post Post #64 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:12 am

Post by AurorusVox »

Day 1 | Vote Count 4


saulres
(0)
IceGuy
(0)
Guy_Named_Riggs
(0)
MagnaofIllusion
(1) - IceGuy [L-4]
drmyshotgun
(1) - Rubick [L-3]
Salamence20
(2) - Guy_Named_Riggs, Klick [L-4]
Klick
(0)
Rubick
(3) - drmyshotgun, Salamence20, MagnaofIllusion [L-2]

Not Voting (1) - saulres



Activity

  • Saulres is V/LA until Thursday
  • Klick is V/LA until Saturday


With 8 alive, it is 5 to lynch

Deadline is
9:00pm GMT, 9th October 2012
. That's in (expired on 2012-10-09 20:00:00).
Last edited by AurorusVox on Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
THE LEMON LIVES! - Cabd
User avatar
IceGuy
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
IceGuy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3390
Joined: January 29, 2011

Post Post #65 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:16 am

Post by IceGuy »

Pseudovote: Rubick
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #66 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:17 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

In post 64, AurorusVox wrote:MagnaofIllusion (1) - IceGuy [L-5]


MOD - Please confirm this is correct ....


UNVOTE: Rubick

Mod error! Sorry!
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
AurorusVox
AurorusVox
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
AurorusVox
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9257
Joined: March 12, 2010
Pronoun: He/Him
Contact:

Post Post #67 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:22 am

Post by AurorusVox »

Edited VC to reflect above derpish mod error
THE LEMON LIVES! - Cabd
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #68 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 7:36 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Rubick wrote: It's fine to be worried about L-2 when you consider the hated player, but now we are aware that all L-#'s are genuine. So being worried about L-2 is an unwarranted position after the clarity.


This is a nice explanation except questioning Klick about his actions made BEFORE said clarity is perfectly valid. Clarity did not exist when Klick made his vote.

Any reason you are defending him so strongly?

VOTE: Rubick

Rubick wrote: I haven't read Think Twice, so if it's a reason from that game I'm unaware.


Well then here is a link for you.

Micro 32 Think Twice

Make yourself aware of the game circumstances. It should not take long as the whole game is less than 2 pages long ….

Rubick wrote: The Sala vote was serious because of his contradiction.


Elaborate on the contradiction then. I haven’t seen you do so to this point.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #69 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:36 am

Post by Rubick »

I didn't have a problem with you voting Klick until after Iceguy made a similar statement about L-2, which you found to be non-indicative of alignment. This was after the clarity surrounding loved/hated. If I had a problem with it before Iceguy's post, I would have spoken up.

Klick's play is lulztastic in Think Twice. Bad hammer D1 (Klick's part) and bad LyLo form (town's part) on D2 made it an easy win for scum. I think I see the connection clearly now. He received heat in that game for a hammer before everyone checked in, while in this game it was just L-2? If this assessment is inaccurate, tell me why you voted him.

Salamence's contradiction occurs when he votes to NL, and later criticizes you for not voting anyone. I also feel like he's backtracking by claiming it was a gambit. He still hasn't even answered saulres, I doubt he's reading the thread.

VOTE: Salamence20
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #70 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:45 am

Post by Rubick »

Hah, I knew I remembered something important. Salamence has no idea what gambit actually means.
User avatar
Salamence20
Salamence20
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Salamence20
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10366
Joined: September 7, 2010

Post Post #71 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:53 am

Post by Salamence20 »

Believe me when I say I've learned from my past mistakes.
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #72 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:55 am

Post by Rubick »

Why are you ignoring saulres?
User avatar
Guy_Named_Riggs
Guy_Named_Riggs
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guy_Named_Riggs
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2489
Joined: July 28, 2011

Post Post #73 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:03 am

Post by Guy_Named_Riggs »

Okay, reads so far

Town

MoI
Ice Guy

Null

Salamence
Saulres
Klick
drmyshotgun

Scum

Rubick

MoI and Ice Guy and Rubick are mainly gut because I don't see a whole to go off of. The difference is MoI and Ice Guy's post seem way more townie than Rubicks.

drmy and Saul there isn't a whole lot to go on

Klick, I'm just not sure

Sal... who knows. I need more time to figure him out

My biggest issue with Rubick is his vote on drmy just to test it, when earlier he was voting Sal as a serious vote (and then goes back to it). Why would anyone leave a serious vote, just to test a claim? I don't like it.

This is an intent to hammer. Would you like to claim now or post game?
User avatar
Rubick
Rubick
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rubick
Townie
Townie
Posts: 46
Joined: September 22, 2012
Location: solo mid

Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:09 am

Post by Rubick »

...

Trolled Ascetic Psychic Redirector

I chose no action N0. I was so concerned with confirming Hated status I am "trolled" by any player I target and acquire their negative component.

Being a Redirector also means there is no Vote Thief in the game.
Locked

Return to “Mayfair Club [Micro Games]”