Page 9 of 60

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:19 am
by Transcend
I tr tweet, comm, storm

I don't team read Parama and implosion

I tr Parama and fos implosion

Eliminating all teams with my 4 town reads, and kain-imp
I'm left with

1. Gamma-imp
2. Gamma-Kain
3. Gamma-Syr
4. Imp-Syr
5. Kain-Syr

5 duos.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:21 am
by Transcend
Para is my weakest tr though so para-kain and para-syr are possible

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:22 am
by KainTepes
I AM TOWN TEPES!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:22 am
by Transcend
Para-Gamma as well tbh

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:23 am
by Transcend
But I'll likely not lynch Parama while implosion breathes air

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:26 am
by KainTepes
if implosion is choked he will no longer BREATHE AIR,,

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:42 am
by Syryana
I just realized that two people in my lynch pool are voting the third person in my lynchpool. Huh.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:45 am
by Transcend
Who would those be syr

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:05 am
by Morning Tweet
The first thing I have to say about Comm's walls is:
In post 74, Syryana wrote:Setup spec is worthless atm
Moving on to implosion stuff..
In post 119, CommKnight wrote:Back to Implosion. You view his unvote and vote as a discussion generation. However, if you can move past your projection unto him of your own alignment and motives and see that he did not explain why he added nothing to his unvote and vote. He claims it's to "generate healthy discussion" (after the fact), however, how can a healthy discussion be generated from nothing of substance in the vote? If I had not analyzed that lack of substance as scummy, there would've been no healthy discussion generated at all from it. Objectively speaking, everything seems to conveniently be explained well after the fact. But in that moment, he had not contributed anything. In fact if you isolate his username in the thread, you can see that between his first and second post, he said nothing at all. Then let's say it was his intention for the sake of seeing it from another light. He is still able to stay out of the main spot light unless someone (such as myself) begin picking on him constantly. Because there is nothing from him to arouse more eyes other than those looking closely at the posts themselves.
Okay, let me tell you what interested me (and I'm sure others) during that short RVS period.

First, Implosion voted Transcend randomly at the beginning.
Then, without explaining, he suddenly switched to you, right as you joined the Transcend wagon.

You claim that because he offered no reasoning for the change, it will not help discussion at all. In fact, you also say this is helping him slip into the background because he made no comment. I would argue the opposite.

Yep! It generates discussion precisely because he did not explain it. That means we have to draw our own conclusions as to why he voted you for ourselves.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:07 am
by Stormcloud
In post 181, Morning Tweet wrote:
@Comm
What information do we gain from, say, a doctor revealing his role? What does this do to spur discussion?
Tweet I love you, but I hate this question. We've established that Comm believes, rightly or wrongly, that early claims help town. Several people have provided some very good reasons why that is probably incorrect. He has stuck to his views.
I don't want to see a whole bunch of pages of discussion on the merits of claiming vs not claiming. I don't think it's going to do anything to spur on discussion. I don't believe the rest of the players are going to convince Comm that he's wrong.
He did outline why he supports claiming in a fairly detailed manner early on - I just don't think the topic deserves yet more posts devoted to it.

Unless perhaps that isn't why you're asking him that at all, and there's some deeper motivation to this question that you really think will help you determine his alignment beyond what he's said so far?

I'm just not seeing it if that's the case.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:08 am
by Stormcloud
Didn't see your latest post when I posted - I agree on the setup spec and on the rest of it - I take it you're also TRing implosion?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:10 am
by Stormcloud
I want to join both the Transcend and implosion wagons for additional pressure and intrigue but I'm not sure if anyone in this group would lolhammer, and I DO NOT want discussion cut short like that.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:12 am
by Morning Tweet
In post 157, Transcend wrote:im town
If you can convince us of that, those analysis posts you're making might actually become useful :mrgreen:
Stormcloud wrote:Didn't see your latest post when I posted - I agree on the setup spec and on the rest of it - I take it you're also TRing implosion?
No, he's in the middle for me.

I do disagree with Comm's basis for scumreading implo + really want to add Comm to my town block but have yet to see AI posts.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:12 am
by Syryana
In post 199, Stormcloud wrote:[3] Transcend (
Gamma Emerald
,
Parama
, implosion)
@Transcend: Bolded.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:13 am
by Stormcloud
In post 212, Morning Tweet wrote: I do disagree with Comm's basis for scumreading implo + really want to add Comm to my town block but have yet to see AI posts.
It's like you're reading my mind.
It's honestly slightly creepy lol.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:14 am
by Transcend
In post 211, Stormcloud wrote:I want to join both the Transcend and implosion wagons for additional pressure and intrigue but I'm not sure if anyone in this group would lolhammer, and I DO NOT want discussion cut short like that.
I'd lol hammer if i weren't the person I'd end up lol hammering.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:14 am
by Stormcloud
So you wouldn't self hammer as scum here to cut day 1 short?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:15 am
by Transcend
In post 212, Morning Tweet wrote:If you can convince us of that, those analysis posts you're making might actually become useful
Spoiler: EVIDENCE
im town


Pedit: no, i don't lol hammer myself. I only hammer myself if i give up.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:17 am
by Transcend
In post 213, Syryana wrote:
In post 199, Stormcloud wrote:[3] Transcend (
Gamma Emerald
,
Parama
, implosion)
@Transcend: Bolded.
See i think it's implosion over Parama. Walk me through scum!para?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:19 am
by Syryana
No, because I explained all this already.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:20 am
by Transcend
Oh

If it's in a wall of text then i missed it

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:41 am
by Syryana
It's not.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:04 pm
by KainTepes
In post 221, Syryana wrote:It's not.
then LINK IT PLEASE,,,,,,, with the power of THREE TOUSAND SUNDS

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:11 pm
by Syryana
I have less than 20 posts and only 2 of them are walls. I'm sure you'll figure it out.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:24 pm
by Gamma Emerald
V/LA until tuesday