Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 8:59 pm
Particularly since he was on the wagon and jumped off and implied he would happily hammer after cc.
I'm happy with one more push to claim considering I know I'm town but I understand where you are coming fromIn post 524, BananaNSFW wrote:I fail to see the case on FS.
I'd rather not make the PR pool any smaller though.
I'm not sure what you are trying to claim. I was not "trying to set up on MM" after a red Belisarius flip. Instead, I was stating that I personally think MM is more likely to be scum if Belisarius flips scum.In post 481, FireScreamer wrote:Wah. Guess MM thought I was coming for them today and decided to come out guns blazing. I wanted maker today.
I pushed at MM early and then pushed Tenshi for tunneling me when others agreed with my logic.
I consolidated onto Beli afterwards. I don't see how any of this is scum behaviour greater than Makers attempt to counterwagon as well as set up on MM on a red Tenshi flip
Again, I pushed my scumreads. A Townie is not normally expected to vote their Townreads.In post 485, FireScreamer wrote:I just woke up and I am phoneposting. Maker when I made my early push on you agreed with it in thread and pushed me in that direction over Beli but didn't hop on himself. He then tried to build counterwagons to Beli all day before setting up on you when it was clear Beli was flipping
This is much closer to actually setting up a mislynch, but I think it comes from a more Town perspective. You are probably Town here because if you do indeed follow through with your plan, you lose instantly if scum. If you are Town, you do not lose instantly and you leave Town with what you think will win for them. While this reads Town, it's bad Town. You seem very confbiased. If you are Town and we follow your plans, we will end up in LyLo. As for the UB, there are 6 Townies alive today (one of which is presumably the UB) and there will be 2 at LyLo so there is a 2/3 chance the UB is already dead by then. This is not a good plan for Town.In post 507, FireScreamer wrote:You know. With another tracker entirely hidden it's not terrible play for me to just self hammer and cut the day off now. Yall powerlynch maker tomorrow while the tracker picks up clears elsewhere. Id rather maker today but the fight might not be worth it
of course you dropped off the wagon that was losing attention and hopped onto the new leading wagon
Why Echo?
^^^ this is scumpostingIn post 531, EchoVision wrote:of course you dropped off the wagon that was losing attention and hopped onto the new leading wagon
first off if I were scum why would I be on a wagon where I'm the only one? scum here quite obviously pushes for a mislynch and hops onto wagons that have a ton of traction and the potential to grow and end in a mislynch, they don't chill on wagons with zero votes other than their own.In post 534, MarioManiac4 wrote:^^^ this is scumpostingIn post 531, EchoVision wrote:of course you dropped off the wagon that was losing attention and hopped onto the new leading wagon
he isn't actually evaluating whether this is indicative of wisdom's alignment it's just noting a new thing he can push on
A compromise compared to what?
lynching a claimed VT
first paragraph is scumposting that we should be lynchingIn post 537, EchoVision wrote:first off if I were scum why would I be on a wagon where I'm the only one? scum here quite obviously pushes for a mislynch and hops onto wagons that have a ton of traction and the potential to grow and end in a mislynch, they don't chill on wagons with zero votes other than their own.In post 534, MarioManiac4 wrote:^^^ this is scumpostingIn post 531, EchoVision wrote:of course you dropped off the wagon that was losing attention and hopped onto the new leading wagon
he isn't actually evaluating whether this is indicative of wisdom's alignment it's just noting a new thing he can push on
Also did you not see my vote on him and reasons that I previously mentioned on why he's scum? chances are if I have my vote on him and scum read him thenI'm pointing out scum behavior to further my case
i knowIn post 544, FireScreamer wrote:We ain't pushing both to a claim