Mafiascum.net

Alright I'm at the end of page 3 and literally the only interesting thing I have so far is that I don't like Slaxx's tone.

Btw

I don't like Eragons p5 either

Lazyreads is town.

Okay Invisibility is town too

And I'm caught up.

In post 245, lazyreads wrote:

In post 238, Slaxx wrote:Ok cool not moving my vote.

This isn’t a play style difference or him having a different approach than others. He’s pretty obviously doubling down on this without good reason.

Also the claim that he was being up front enough to take at face value is lol

what would his reason be as scum

Not knowing how to organically manufacture a new vote with focus on him.

Or, teammate is under fire and they don’t want to talk about that and so keep focus on Izzy.

Wanting to focus on the wheat issue because they’re having trouble conjuring reads but still want to look like they’re contributing (similar but distinct from first one)

Or, see the playerlist and decide Izzy might be an easier push than Skitter, Me, etc. Although this is less likely I think because they are returning to the site.


So yeah, a myriad of reasons. Any reason they’d do it as town?

Slaxx what are your other reads? I don't remember seeing any from you

I'm especially interested in your Ausuka read.

In post 162, Slaxx wrote:We should be doing the wheat crop.

(Vizzy, Lazy)
(Skitter)
(PB, Ausuka)
(Eragon)
(Tosser)

/grow our wheat crop

Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?

In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?

Do you think there's an outside reason for this?

In post 251, Ankamius wrote:Btw

Harvest the wheat crop

Also what the fucking shit is this

I said wait

Like I want it to go to the person we all agree is town so unless you think the pair is Vizzy+Me I don’t get why the hell you wouldn’t just listen to me.

In post 260, Ankamius wrote:

In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?

Do you think there's an outside reason for this?

I don’t get the question, so I guess no. I think it’s this-game-related.

Because when I first started reading the game, it was already derailing the game and I don't see a reason for it to be relevant to the game in the first place?

In post 263, Slaxx wrote:

In post 260, Ankamius wrote:

In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?

Do you think there's an outside reason for this?

I don’t get the question, so I guess no. I think it’s this-game-related.

Eh I just worded it wrong

Do you think he did that specifically on purpose, or I guess I'm more asking if you think he ignored it because it's Eragon.

In post 264, Ankamius wrote:Because when I first started reading the game, it was already derailing the game and I don't see a reason for it to be relevant to the game in the first place?

I really don’t know how much more blatant I can make it.

Also if it was distracting wouldn’t the best thing be to do is ignore it?

Obviously harvesting would illicit a reaction.

You know about the wheat don’t you?

In post 265, Ankamius wrote:

In post 263, Slaxx wrote:

In post 260, Ankamius wrote:

In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?

Do you think there's an outside reason for this?

I don’t get the question, so I guess no. I think it’s this-game-related.

Eh I just worded it wrong

Do you think he did that specifically on purpose, or I guess I'm more asking if you think he ignored it because it's Eragon.

No because as I said Tosser is recently returned so I don’t think it has much to do with his perception of players outside the game.

In post 266, Slaxx wrote:

In post 264, Ankamius wrote:Because when I first started reading the game, it was already derailing the game and I don't see a reason for it to be relevant to the game in the first place?

I really don’t know how much more blatant I can make it.

Also if it was distracting wouldn’t the best thing be to do is ignore it?

Obviously harvesting would illicit a reaction.

You know about the wheat don’t you?

I can make educated guesses, such as that there is no reason to believe that harvesting does anything other than decrease the amount of wheat there is just solely based on how the mechanic was worded.

Plus the flavor would indicate that it's actually bad for town to have the number be too high, but I think it's a lot more likely that the entire thing is a red herring and therefore a distraction.

Until I see evidence otherwise, I don't see much of a reason to humor the mechanic that much.

In post 267, Slaxx wrote:

In post 265, Ankamius wrote:

In post 263, Slaxx wrote:

In post 260, Ankamius wrote:

In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?

Do you think there's an outside reason for this?

I don’t get the question, so I guess no. I think it’s this-game-related.

Eh I just worded it wrong

Do you think he did that specifically on purpose, or I guess I'm more asking if you think he ignored it because it's Eragon.

No because as I said Tosser is recently returned so I don’t think it has much to do with his perception of players outside the game.

Let me try one more time

Do you think he ignored it because they are scumpartners

In post 268, Ankamius wrote:

In post 266, Slaxx wrote:

In post 264, Ankamius wrote:Because when I first started reading the game, it was already derailing the game and I don't see a reason for it to be relevant to the game in the first place?

I really don’t know how much more blatant I can make it.

Also if it was distracting wouldn’t the best thing be to do is ignore it?

Obviously harvesting would illicit a reaction.

You know about the wheat don’t you?

I can make educated guesses, such as that there is no reason to believe that harvesting does anything other than decrease the amount of wheat there is just solely based on how the mechanic was worded.

Plus the flavor would indicate that it's actually bad for town to have the number be too high, but I think it's a lot more likely that the entire thing is a red herring and therefore a distraction.

Until I see evidence otherwise, I don't see much of a reason to humor the mechanic that much.

And yet you were the first to harvest it.

After everyone else seemed to be fine letting it get to 100.

Soooo

In post 269, Ankamius wrote:

In post 267, Slaxx wrote:

In post 265, Ankamius wrote:

In post 263, Slaxx wrote:

In post 260, Ankamius wrote:

In post 259, Slaxx wrote:Also as I read back to page 5 re:Eragon I realized tosser was pressuring Vizzy for empty content posts which is basically what Eragon was doing on that very page. So yeah. Not confbiasing I don’t think?

Do you think there's an outside reason for this?

I don’t get the question, so I guess no. I think it’s this-game-related.

Eh I just worded it wrong

Do you think he did that specifically on purpose, or I guess I'm more asking if you think he ignored it because it's Eragon.

No because as I said Tosser is recently returned so I don’t think it has much to do with his perception of players outside the game.

Let me try one more time

Do you think he ignored it because they are scumpartners

Yes I think Tosser scum increases the likelihood of Eragon scum.

What about the flavor indicates letting the number get high for town is bad?

In post 270, Slaxx wrote:

In post 268, Ankamius wrote:

In post 266, Slaxx wrote:

In post 264, Ankamius wrote:Because when I first started reading the game, it was already derailing the game and I don't see a reason for it to be relevant to the game in the first place?

I really don’t know how much more blatant I can make it.

Also if it was distracting wouldn’t the best thing be to do is ignore it?

Obviously harvesting would illicit a reaction.

You know about the wheat don’t you?

I can make educated guesses, such as that there is no reason to believe that harvesting does anything other than decrease the amount of wheat there is just solely based on how the mechanic was worded.

Plus the flavor would indicate that it's actually bad for town to have the number be too high, but I think it's a lot more likely that the entire thing is a red herring and therefore a distraction.

Until I see evidence otherwise, I don't see much of a reason to humor the mechanic that much.

And yet you were the first to harvest it.

After everyone else seemed to be fine letting it get to 100.

Soooo

So?