Page 14 of 31

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:33 pm
by Slaxx
Uh.... yeah

I don’t think it’s that hard to adjust or over adjust

I mean come on pink I literally did that as doc last game

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:34 pm
by skitter30
to clarify: his game is different
i don't know if that's because his alignment is different or because he's purposefully trying to get read as a different alignment here by playing differently to that game

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:35 pm
by Slaxx
I’m gyrating on my pink read

As one does

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:36 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 321, lazyreads wrote:
In post 313, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
I'm not following any of what she's said at this point. She says there is one scum in a group that seems random (why Slaxx, Ank and me? What's the correlation there?) and between another group that seems random, finishing with saying who probably is scum: me, who she has been pushing for the stupidest thing she can take, and Eragon who I'm townreading and explicitly said I was. In fact, is the only read I've stated. So this whole things seems off and like pushing an agenda.
pushing what agenda

what does you townreading eragon have to do with me or anything
If you separate people into two groups, you can go an mislynch one, then the other and then the other. Let's say all from my group are town: if you say "on of the three is scum" it implies aligning lynches and scum wins. Then there's the option of one being your scumpartner; you just leave him/her for the end of the lynch order. That's the agenda.

Eragon has to do because I'm townreading him and I know I'm town so I see you're pushing one player I know you're wrong and other player I think you're wrong. 0/2

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:36 pm
by skitter30
In post 312, lazyreads wrote:its really fun piecing togethre conversations by looking at what each person said one at a time
(if you're who i think you are i don't think you set up the game weirdly as scum or repeatedly blase-ly call attention to this or like purposefully make the game difficult to read)

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:37 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 325, Slaxx wrote:Uh.... yeah

I don’t think it’s that hard to adjust or over adjust

I mean come on pink I literally did that as doc last game
I asked you why do you think that makes him scum. I'm saying i don't think he could do it; that would make him town. You say he could: that doesn't make him scum. Being able to doesn't mean hest doing it

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:39 pm
by lazyreads
In post 328, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 321, lazyreads wrote:
In post 313, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
I'm not following any of what she's said at this point. She says there is one scum in a group that seems random (why Slaxx, Ank and me? What's the correlation there?) and between another group that seems random, finishing with saying who probably is scum: me, who she has been pushing for the stupidest thing she can take, and Eragon who I'm townreading and explicitly said I was. In fact, is the only read I've stated. So this whole things seems off and like pushing an agenda.
pushing what agenda

what does you townreading eragon have to do with me or anything
If you separate people into two groups, you can go an mislynch one, then the other and then the other. Let's say all from my group are town: if you say "on of the three is scum" it implies aligning lynches and scum wins. Then there's the option of one being your scumpartner; you just leave him/her for the end of the lynch order. That's the agenda.

Eragon has to do because I'm townreading him and I know I'm town so I see you're pushing one player I know you're wrong and other player I think you're wrong. 0/2
you could do that as scum i guess. you could also do that by just saying "i think scum are in a b c d" and theres really nota difference so i find it hard to believe that you believe this

do you also really think that because i have voted two people wohm you say are town that is a reason for someone to be csum

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:39 pm
by skitter30
pink ball you feel scummy to me but you always feel scummy to me so idk how i feel about you rn

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm
by skitter30
In post 328, Pink Ball wrote:Eragon has to do because I'm townreading him and I know I'm town so I see you're pushing one player I know you're wrong and other player I think you're wrong. 0/2
are you basically scumreading her for having bad reads?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm
by lazyreads
In post 329, skitter30 wrote:
In post 312, lazyreads wrote:its really fun piecing togethre conversations by looking at what each person said one at a time
(if you're who i think you are i don't think you set up the game weirdly as scum or repeatedly blase-ly call attention to this or like purposefully make the game difficult to read)
no..... i'm no tthat person......... i'm the other person. . . no, not that one.
that one.

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:41 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 308, lazyreads wrote:
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
this was dumb btw
Also, posting after that this post was dumb pings me too. Almost as if you knew you would get pushed for it

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:41 pm
by Slaxx
In post 330, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 325, Slaxx wrote:Uh.... yeah

I don’t think it’s that hard to adjust or over adjust

I mean come on pink I literally did that as doc last game
I asked you why do you think that makes him scum. I'm saying i don't think he could do it; that would make him town. You say he could: that doesn't make him scum. Being able to doesn't mean hest doing it
So we both say the same thing without reasoning but yours is more valid than mine?

I literally presented an argument (my doc play last game) as an example of someone making an overadjustment to their play.

Eragon fleeced me as scum last game, and skitter.

So, is he capable? Uh, yeah.

Do you genuinely not believe that?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:41 pm
by skitter30
i'm thinking of the other one. (i think?)

i'm actually a little confused as to who you're referring to there

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:42 pm
by skitter30
In post 335, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 308, lazyreads wrote:
In post 297, lazyreads wrote:based off of things i would guess that there is one scum in pink ball, slaxx, ankamius and one scum in skitter, Eragon, tosser

not really sure on the first group, maybe pink ball, second group i would guess eragon
this was dumb btw
Also, posting after that this post was dumb pings me too. Almost as if you knew you would get pushed for it
uh if she knew she was going to get pushed for it why post it at all ... ?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:42 pm
by lazyreads
In post 337, skitter30 wrote:i'm thinking of the other one. (i think?)

i'm actually a little confused as to who you're referring to there
ok on the list of people you thin ki am

im the third one down

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:43 pm
by lazyreads
VOTE: pink ball[/b]

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:43 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 333, skitter30 wrote:
In post 328, Pink Ball wrote:Eragon has to do because I'm townreading him and I know I'm town so I see you're pushing one player I know you're wrong and other player I think you're wrong. 0/2
are you basically scumreading her for having bad reads?
I think it's pretty clear I'm scumreading her for that post about two groups that doesntt correlate at all, and because the only two players she has pushed in the game happens to be in different groups and say they're probably scum

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:43 pm
by skitter30
there's only two people on that list tho :lol:

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:43 pm
by lazyreads
VOTE: pink ball

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:44 pm
by Slaxx
He’s capable of that change.

And idk, I’m having a hard time believing that someone who is being less solvey than their scum game is town. You have to act town as scum right? So he obviously has a benchmark he was playing to.

I think this game after the loss last game he is adjusting and that’s why he’s posting a lot of passive and filler content.

Sorry Eragon, I’m not trying to crap on you or anything. I enjoy playing with you. PB just doesn’t or won’t get it.

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:45 pm
by lazyreads
In post 341, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 333, skitter30 wrote:
In post 328, Pink Ball wrote:Eragon has to do because I'm townreading him and I know I'm town so I see you're pushing one player I know you're wrong and other player I think you're wrong. 0/2
are you basically scumreading her for having bad reads?
I think it's pretty clear I'm scumreading her for that post about two groups that doesntt correlate at all, and because the only two players she has pushed in the game happens to be in different groups and say they're probably scum
ok. so you think that i am scum and just made soething up completely and didnt say anythign about the reasoning for somer eason

instead of like voting tosser

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:45 pm
by lazyreads
In post 342, skitter30 wrote:there's only two people on that list tho :lol:
exactly

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:45 pm
by skitter30
In post 341, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 333, skitter30 wrote:
In post 328, Pink Ball wrote:Eragon has to do because I'm townreading him and I know I'm town so I see you're pushing one player I know you're wrong and other player I think you're wrong. 0/2
are you basically scumreading her for having bad reads?
I think it's pretty clear I'm scumreading her for that post about two groups that doesntt correlate at all, and because the only two players she has pushed in the game happens to be in different groups and say they're probably scum
i'm not following, sorry

you're saying: lol-making two groups of random players is scummy
and pushing one person of each of the two groups and saying they're scum (two people who you incidentally know/think are town) makes her scummy?

can you explain this again? i don't get it

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:46 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 336, Slaxx wrote:
In post 330, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 325, Slaxx wrote:Uh.... yeah

I don’t think it’s that hard to adjust or over adjust

I mean come on pink I literally did that as doc last game
I asked you why do you think that makes him scum. I'm saying i don't think he could do it; that would make him town. You say he could: that doesn't make him scum. Being able to doesn't mean hest doing it
So we both say the same thing without reasoning but yours is more valid than mine?

I literally presented an argument (my doc play last game) as an example of someone making an overadjustment to their play.

Eragon fleeced me as scum last game, and skitter.

So, is he capable? Uh, yeah.

Do you genuinely not believe that?
No no dude, not talking about whose point is more valid, is just a logic statement: if Eragon is not capable of changing his scum game from one game to another, then he's town. If he's capable, then he could be either town of scum. That's why I'm asking you: if he's capable of doing it, what makes you think he's scum here?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:46 pm
by skitter30
like i don't know why splitting the pl in two groups makes her scummy