Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:14 pm
Vote count 1.5
wheat crops: 31
with 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch. day 1 ends february 22nd at 15:30 central US time; in (expired on 2019-02-22 15:30:00)
- skitter is vla fridays. and saturdays.
why is your rvs vote better than the weird pings you're getting from tosser? and like as far as I can tell you don't have many scumreads so why wouldn't you want to pay more attention to this?In post 209, Eragon wrote:frankly i havent really been paying attention that much.In post 195, Ausuka wrote:i don't really get the tosser wagon.
this doesn't have a question mark but like, it still comes across as a question? it's pressing invis about the farming. it could have been more direct but i don't see any scum motivation for him to put it this way, and i also don't see any scum motivation to call something you said a question if you don't think it's a question.In post 91, tosser wrote:don't know why Invisibility is so invested in farming
I don't think tosser actually pushed invis as scum for this and I don't see why scum!tosser gives Vizzy trouble in an alignment neutral way.In post 149, Slaxx wrote:By the way, my issue with Tosser is that they read as intentionally opaque then gave Vizzy trouble for understanding them.
Eragon what are your thoughts on tosser?
Like, i've got some weird pings, but weird pings could just be playstyle
I'll actually have to look at the posts deeper + its still early
Yeah you're pointing out the flaws (the second one didn't really come off as just questioning the intent, with the line "If you think its a bad thing, why, and why are you not talking about anyone else invested in farming?") but it feels more like you're asking these questions because you feel obligated to look like you're scumhunting, and it doesn't seem like you're particularly looking at the scum motivation in what tosser is saying. What I'm trying to say is, you saw some obviously flawed posts and pointed out those flaws but it didn't come off as a real attempt to catch scum.In post 210, Eragon wrote:uhh i mean on of them was me questioning tosser if i was understanding the intent right and the other was me saying that tosser asked the same question about what he himself is doing, so i dont really think either of those are picking at flawsIn post 196, Ausuka wrote:so far i want this:
HEAL: lazyreads
VOTE: Eragon
Lazy mainly gutreads as town here? like she feels like she's genuinely going through the thread and looking for scum in a gimmick alt way.
Eragon's content posts feel off to me? Like I feel like 111 is picking at flaws in tosser's posts but not in a scumhunting way if that makes sense, like he isn't really interested in if tosser is scum or not.
I don't think anyone said this so that post was addressed to me, not to you.In post 229, tosser wrote:if you read me as non-confrontational after my start then its perhaps you that have problems evaluating problemsIn post 203, Pink Ball wrote:Sorry, it doesn't bother me, didn't want to imply that. It pings me as scummy in a psychological level, like you're giving your opinions but with a pinch of salt in order to avoid being pushed for themIn post 201, Ausuka wrote:That's just how I write, I can stop if it bothers you. And also I'm saying the complete opposite of that - I'm saying that the quotation mark isIn post 197, Pink Ball wrote:Why do you use interrogation marks when you're stating your opinion
/water our wheat cropsnotalways necessary for an interrogation, not that it always is. In any case I can't see how tosser is scummy for thinking that you don't need a quotation mark.
/water our wheat crops
i don't get the point about not being able to organically manufacture a new vote. it doesn't strike me as something you need to learn how to do. and i don't think tosser was under that much pressure when he started talking again.In post 256, Slaxx wrote:Not knowing how to organically manufacture a new vote with focus on him.In post 245, lazyreads wrote:what would his reason be as scumIn post 238, Slaxx wrote:Ok cool not moving my vote.
This isn’t a play style difference or him having a different approach than others. He’s pretty obviously doubling down on this without good reason.
Also the claim that he was being up front enough to take at face value is lol
Or, teammate is under fire and they don’t want to talk about that and so keep focus on Izzy.
Wanting to focus on the wheat issue because they’re having trouble conjuring reads but still want to look like they’re contributing (similar but distinct from first one)
Or, see the playerlist and decide Izzy might be an easier push than Skitter, Me, etc. Although this is less likely I think because they are returning to the site.
So yeah, a myriad of reasons. Any reason they’d do it as town?
Why?In post 292, Ankamius wrote:Either way, Ausuka and Eragon had the scummiest responses to the mechanic.
why? i'd understand posting this if you'd already talked about it but you've said nothing about me the whole game so far so i don't get it.
Whoops sorry m'lady.In post 414, Ausuka wrote:I mean there's also very real scum motivation to do the gambit, if what Ank says about scum wanting high wheat levels is true and scum is aware of that.
(i'm a she btw.)
what do you mean genuineIn post 412, Ausuka wrote:tosser feels like town doubling down like out of fustration; i don't think scum behaves like he does. pink ball felt genuine recently.
my read on you is essentially null, i instinctively wanted to put you as town because your posting is efforting but that's nai and like reading over your posts there's nothing I really wanted to townread you for so i decided to seperate you and slaxx off.
if shes not lying then why wouldnt that be a reason to townread her. why would scum reveal that high wheat is bad for town if its actually bad for townIn post 410, Ausuka wrote:{invis, lazy} are probably town. {toss, pb} can be townleans. {slaxx, skitter} seem like easy townreads i'd usually make but i don't actually think they've done anything towny. {Ank} is null to me - she's not lying about the wheat thing but that doesn't make her town. eragon is the only sr i have right now.
Pink Ball feels genuine, especially around 375, he seems convinced that the srs are him are playstyle and not a food read.In post 417, lazyreads wrote:what do you mean genuineIn post 412, Ausuka wrote:tosser feels like town doubling down like out of fustration; i don't think scum behaves like he does. pink ball felt genuine recently.
my read on you is essentially null, i instinctively wanted to put you as town because your posting is efforting but that's nai and like reading over your posts there's nothing I really wanted to townread you for so i decided to seperate you and slaxx off.
If it's not that big of a deal and she thinks towncred she can gather will be worth the cost.In post 418, lazyreads wrote:if shes not lying then why wouldnt that be a reason to townread her. why would scum reveal that high wheat is bad for town if its actually bad for townIn post 410, Ausuka wrote:{invis, lazy} are probably town. {toss, pb} can be townleans. {slaxx, skitter} seem like easy townreads i'd usually make but i don't actually think they've done anything towny. {Ank} is null to me - she's not lying about the wheat thing but that doesn't make her town. eragon is the only sr i have right now.
bolded: really? i did get that he's frustrated and doubling down but i'm not sure why you think that's more likely to come from town; his insistence on his vizzy vote actually feels scummy to meIn post 412, Ausuka wrote:tosser feels like town doubling down like out of fustration;i don't think scum behaves like he does. pink ball felt genuine recently.
my read on you is essentially null, i instinctively wanted to put you as town because your posting is efforting but that's nai and like reading over your posts there's nothing I really wanted to townread you for so i decided to seperate you and slaxx off.
i don't particularly have a problem with her read on me; i just didn't understand the wording the first time around so i askedIn post 413, Pink Ball wrote:Agree with ausuka in his read on you, Skittles. You usually scumread me, I usually townread you. We should both be paranoid about the other. Same with Slaxx, but his gambit to draw the nightkill sounds exactly like town!Slaxx