Page 19 of 31

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:56 am
by Ausuka
In post 421, Slaxx wrote:How is Tosser frustrated town? That makes zero sense.
i don't really think i can explain it to you, it's just how i feel about his posts.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:59 am
by Ausuka
is actually quite towny i think and i townlean ankamius for it which means that scum are probably in a pool of {skitter, slaxx, eragon} and of that pool i think i'm inclined to think slaxx is town? so i'll look to see if skitter/eragon is viable here.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 4:04 am
by Ausuka
eragon what are your reads right now?

looking through era's iso i still feel that he's scum; like he's not really making any pushes and doesn't feel interested in scumhunting at all and says it's because it's earlygame even though it's not and he's even putting effort into the game, it's just that as far as I can tell it isn't going into scumhunting.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:45 am
by Ankamius
What a fun game

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:14 am
by schadd_
prodding lazyreads & pink ball

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:16 am
by Invisibility
ASFLJESIJVMNCVMNASLKFJDSF

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:17 am
by Invisibility
In post 450, Ausuka wrote:
In post 421, Slaxx wrote:How is Tosser frustrated town? That makes zero sense.
i don't really think i can explain it to you, it's just how i feel about his posts.
QUOTE SPECICIFIFC POSTS IT COMES ACROSS IN please :)))

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:18 am
by Ausuka
In post 227, tosser wrote:
In post 137, skitter30 wrote:
In post 40, tosser wrote:VOTE: Invisibility

you seem far too excitable
serious vote or rvs vote?
if serious, what does 'far too excitable' mean, and why is scummy?

tosser how much mafia experience do you have?

In post 120, tosser wrote:i was questioning what you found scummy with the three quoted posts. i'll try and be more direct since if i'm not explicitly asking a question apparently it can't be considered that i'm pressing for an answer
i specifically find your vizzy vote strange because a) i think he's town and b) i don't know what it means that he's 'far too excitable' or why that's scummy
it wasn't a well thought out scumread but it wasn't entirely random. i found his contributions hollow and his inordinate enthusiasm phoney, and i don't like how he's doubling down on me now abd getting into stupid semantic arguments about whether i phrased a question explicitly or not.

re: experience, i haven't played a mafia game on this site fully since 2014 but i don't consider myself inexperienced
In post 228, tosser wrote:that whole question episode is ridiculous nitpicking it doesn't take a PHD in english to gather that i wanted invis to address my post
In post 229, tosser wrote:
In post 203, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 201, Ausuka wrote:
In post 197, Pink Ball wrote:Why do you use interrogation marks when you're stating your opinion

/water our wheat crops
That's just how I write, I can stop if it bothers you. And also I'm saying the complete opposite of that - I'm saying that the quotation mark is
not
always necessary for an interrogation, not that it always is. In any case I can't see how tosser is scummy for thinking that you don't need a quotation mark.

/water our wheat crops
Sorry, it doesn't bother me, didn't want to imply that. It pings me as scummy in a psychological level, like you're giving your opinions but with a pinch of salt in order to avoid being pushed for them
if you read me as non-confrontational after my start then its perhaps you that have problems evaluating problems

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:20 am
by Invisibility
oh dang i kinda see it

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:22 am
by Invisibility
well honestly he didnt even double down i dont think, just never unvoted and conversed when people confronted him about it?
ok i townlean the slot

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:22 am
by Invisibility
ew it feels so gross to just say that but its not like tosser can just act more frustrated or anything

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:04 pm
by Invisibility
VOTE: eragon
iso'd and the posting was lazy
gonna need to iso my other nullreads

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:07 pm
by Invisibility
btw we can necromance this game donot give up

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:42 pm
by Pink Ball
Whoops sorry, I have nothing new to say tho, I was expecting Slaxx to answer my question but it didn't happen.

Eragon could be scum, yeah. Maybe I townread him tol easily

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 1:38 pm
by Vedith
Okay. I've done a read through at last. Yay Vedith \o/
I really like Invisibility Ank and Skitter as town. Which is odd as I don't normally town read easily.
Eragon and PB are pinging my finger tips. PB town reading Eragon for a weak reason and now all of a sudden back tracking?
Eragons posts to PB all look pre planned or faked.
and just feel planned between them.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:00 pm
by Ankamius
Where's the skitter townread coming from? I still haven't seen any particularly strong reasons to townread her

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:22 pm
by Vedith
I like how Skitter interacts with her Scum reads. Mainly talking about comments to PB.
Skitter is normally a player I like as town, with pulling out that meta card is proving I'm this game that she's trying to sort players early.

A lot of what I read from the game as a whole is NAI or really slow paced to what is should be. Skitter is actively trying to push the game forward.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:32 pm
by skitter30
In post 437, Ankamius wrote:Ausuka and Eragon are my two scumreads atm and Ausuka is positioning to hardbus Eragon in a gamestate where it doesn't make sense to. If they're scum together, she's setting up a hardbus
while townreading literally everybody but me
, which is not really a situation that you want to be in as scum if your partner has any risk of being lynched, which is entire possible here
independant of eragon's alignment if she's scum here she's boxing herself in for future days?
or am i missing something here?

==
In post 439, schadd_ wrote:vedith does that
hello!
In post 446, Vedith wrote:Okay I will read. But in the morning while at work.
Who is Scum?
you are most probably

==

vizzy is still town in case anyone is wondering

==
In post 458, Invisibility wrote:oh dang i kinda see it
that sequence didn't really feel townie to me tbh

==
In post 464, Vedith wrote:181 and 208 just feel planned between them.
i don't see it

==
In post 466, Vedith wrote:I like how Skitter interacts with her Scum reads. Mainly talking about comments to PB.
Skitter is normally a player I like as town, with pulling out that meta card is proving I'm this game that she's trying to sort players early.

A lot of what I read from the game as a whole is NAI or really slow paced to what is should be. Skitter is actively trying to push the game forward.
what are you basing your metaread on me from?
(also since like ~wednesday when the game kinda started stalling i'd argue that i haven't been trying ot push the game forward)

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:44 pm
by Vedith
I probably see it different as I read the game in one sitting rather than being in the game day by day.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:46 pm
by Ankamius
In post 467, skitter30 wrote:independant of eragon's alignment if she's scum here she's boxing herself in for future days?
or am i missing something here?
I mean that she is seeing herself up for a very difficult solo scum game if they are scum together since she would have to find a way to restructure her reads to still be able to get enough mislynches to reach endgame. If Eragon is town here, then there's a lot more wiggle room since there's one less mislynch needed and she has a partner to help mold town's reads into that direction.

It's a subtle difference but the impact is pretty big

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:46 pm
by skitter30
I also dont know if either of them are the sort to pre-plan exchanges

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:47 pm
by skitter30
@ank fair enough

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:56 pm
by Vedith
In post 404, Pink Ball wrote:I have no good reads at this point, sorry.
What are you current scum/Scum lean reads?

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:04 pm
by schadd_
;

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:04 pm
by schadd_
;