Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:56 am
i don't really think i can explain it to you, it's just how i feel about his posts.In post 421, Slaxx wrote:How is Tosser frustrated town? That makes zero sense.
i don't really think i can explain it to you, it's just how i feel about his posts.In post 421, Slaxx wrote:How is Tosser frustrated town? That makes zero sense.
QUOTE SPECICIFIFC POSTS IT COMES ACROSS IN please :)))In post 450, Ausuka wrote:i don't really think i can explain it to you, it's just how i feel about his posts.In post 421, Slaxx wrote:How is Tosser frustrated town? That makes zero sense.
In post 227, tosser wrote:it wasn't a well thought out scumread but it wasn't entirely random. i found his contributions hollow and his inordinate enthusiasm phoney, and i don't like how he's doubling down on me now abd getting into stupid semantic arguments about whether i phrased a question explicitly or not.In post 137, skitter30 wrote:serious vote or rvs vote?
if serious, what does 'far too excitable' mean, and why is scummy?
tosser how much mafia experience do you have?
i specifically find your vizzy vote strange because a) i think he's town and b) i don't know what it means that he's 'far too excitable' or why that's scummyIn post 120, tosser wrote:i was questioning what you found scummy with the three quoted posts. i'll try and be more direct since if i'm not explicitly asking a question apparently it can't be considered that i'm pressing for an answer
re: experience, i haven't played a mafia game on this site fully since 2014 but i don't consider myself inexperienced
In post 228, tosser wrote:that whole question episode is ridiculous nitpicking it doesn't take a PHD in english to gather that i wanted invis to address my post
In post 229, tosser wrote:if you read me as non-confrontational after my start then its perhaps you that have problems evaluating problemsIn post 203, Pink Ball wrote:Sorry, it doesn't bother me, didn't want to imply that. It pings me as scummy in a psychological level, like you're giving your opinions but with a pinch of salt in order to avoid being pushed for themIn post 201, Ausuka wrote:That's just how I write, I can stop if it bothers you. And also I'm saying the complete opposite of that - I'm saying that the quotation mark isIn post 197, Pink Ball wrote:Why do you use interrogation marks when you're stating your opinion
/water our wheat cropsnotalways necessary for an interrogation, not that it always is. In any case I can't see how tosser is scummy for thinking that you don't need a quotation mark.
/water our wheat crops
independant of eragon's alignment if she's scum here she's boxing herself in for future days?In post 437, Ankamius wrote:Ausuka and Eragon are my two scumreads atm and Ausuka is positioning to hardbus Eragon in a gamestate where it doesn't make sense to. If they're scum together, she's setting up a hardbuswhile townreading literally everybody but me, which is not really a situation that you want to be in as scum if your partner has any risk of being lynched, which is entire possible here
hello!In post 439, schadd_ wrote:vedith does that
you are most probably
that sequence didn't really feel townie to me tbhIn post 458, Invisibility wrote:oh dang i kinda see it
i don't see itIn post 464, Vedith wrote:181 and 208 just feel planned between them.
what are you basing your metaread on me from?In post 466, Vedith wrote:I like how Skitter interacts with her Scum reads. Mainly talking about comments to PB.
Skitter is normally a player I like as town, with pulling out that meta card is proving I'm this game that she's trying to sort players early.
A lot of what I read from the game as a whole is NAI or really slow paced to what is should be. Skitter is actively trying to push the game forward.
I mean that she is seeing herself up for a very difficult solo scum game if they are scum together since she would have to find a way to restructure her reads to still be able to get enough mislynches to reach endgame. If Eragon is town here, then there's a lot more wiggle room since there's one less mislynch needed and she has a partner to help mold town's reads into that direction.In post 467, skitter30 wrote:independant of eragon's alignment if she's scum here she's boxing herself in for future days?
or am i missing something here?
What are you current scum/Scum lean reads?In post 404, Pink Ball wrote:I have no good reads at this point, sorry.