In post 508, u r a person 2 wrote:I do my best to sort people, but no I'm not big on meta dives. Very rarely have I gone back to try and confirm something via meta.
And because of the assumption in your question that you believe meta dives to be worthwhile, I'll expect you to confirm that.
Yeah, Meta is a useful tool to discern if something is AI - especially if you're scumreading them for it. Especially here, since we get just one Lynch.
In post 508, u r a person 2 wrote:I do my best to sort people, but no I'm not big on meta dives. Very rarely have I gone back to try and confirm something via meta.
And because of the assumption in your question that you believe meta dives to be worthwhile, I'll expect you to confirm that.
Yeah, Meta is a useful tool to discern if something is AI - especially if you're scumreading them for it. Especially here, since we get just one Lynch.
So can you spell out your reasoning in detail for him being obvscum?
In post 508, u r a person 2 wrote:I do my best to sort people, but no I'm not big on meta dives. Very rarely have I gone back to try and confirm something via meta.
And because of the assumption in your question that you believe meta dives to be worthwhile, I'll expect you to confirm that.
Yeah, Meta is a useful tool to discern if something is AI - especially if you're scumreading them for it. Especially here, since we get just one Lynch.
Yep, agreed. But I'm still not going to do it. That would be a quick trip to burning out for me, and when you meta me you will find that to be a consistent position of mine.
You'll need to give me time for that - I'm busy and on mobile.
Meanwhile, is my agreement/disagreement on that meta of Saudade your only method of sorting me?
In post 533, u r a person 2 wrote:Yep, agreed. But I'm still not going to do it. That would be a quick trip to burning out for me, and when you meta me you will find that to be a consistent position of mine.
Interesting - so if I assert that a behavior from X slot is NAI from meta, you'd just buy it?
In post 352, RadiantCowbells wrote:one of my strongest traits as town is my ability to not confbias on my own reads and to reevaluate when shown evidence that I'm wrong on something.
don't BoP my reads initially, develop your own reads and then show them to me, then when you've shown me the case sheep me if I still disagree.
hahahahaha
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
In post 385, Saudade wrote:okay ill read your reads hang on but this was funny
In post 350, Shoshin wrote:I don't have high enough IQ to follow your reasoning, MS.
I mean it's simple.
I'm town so both scum have to be in the other four slots.
Assert Saudade town: One pair in {RC, Shoshin, URAP} has to be SvS.
Eliminate all SvS pairings in {RC, Shoshin, URAP} and it contradicts the above -> confidence that Saudade is town.
you marked me town thats good I mark you town as well
I also dont follow the pairings logic as to why you decided im town though
In post 393, Saudade wrote:I bet you scumslipped you knew I'm town and just wrote what you knew instead of what you wanted to fake
HAHA
In post 400, Saudade wrote:Explain the pairing logic which concluded that I'm scum
if its sane you might be town
if it isnt...
In post 412, Saudade wrote:if you're town you should mark me town because we're both town
if you're scum just mark me town because you'll have an either time mislynching the other players
In post 420, Saudade wrote:No I'm just going to obvtown
making reads is too much effort and I'm usually wrong anyway
In post 533, u r a person 2 wrote:Yep, agreed. But I'm still not going to do it. That would be a quick trip to burning out for me, and when you meta me you will find that to be a consistent position of mine.
Interesting - so if I assert that a behavior from X slot is NAI from meta, you'd just buy it?
No, but I have a reasonable expectation that you will meta dive me, so you will find it to be true on your own.
In post 352, RadiantCowbells wrote:one of my strongest traits as town is my ability to not confbias on my own reads and to reevaluate when shown evidence that I'm wrong on something.
don't BoP my reads initially, develop your own reads and then show them to me, then when you've shown me the case sheep me if I still disagree.
hahahahaha
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
In post 385, Saudade wrote:okay ill read your reads hang on but this was funny
In post 350, Shoshin wrote:I don't have high enough IQ to follow your reasoning, MS.
I mean it's simple.
I'm town so both scum have to be in the other four slots.
Assert Saudade town: One pair in {RC, Shoshin, URAP} has to be SvS.
Eliminate all SvS pairings in {RC, Shoshin, URAP} and it contradicts the above -> confidence that Saudade is town.
you marked me town thats good I mark you town as well
I also dont follow the pairings logic as to why you decided im town though
In post 393, Saudade wrote:I bet you scumslipped you knew I'm town and just wrote what you knew instead of what you wanted to fake
HAHA
In post 400, Saudade wrote:Explain the pairing logic which concluded that I'm scum
if its sane you might be town
if it isnt...
In post 412, Saudade wrote:if you're town you should mark me town because we're both town
if you're scum just mark me town because you'll have an either time mislynching the other players
In post 420, Saudade wrote:No I'm just going to obvtown
making reads is too much effort and I'm usually wrong anyway
I don't think the posts are that scummy when taken alone. 420 especially feels town if you don't know Saudade's meta for saying the same exact thing as scum.
I don't know how 420 would look townie at all. He's not obv!towning. He doesn't seem to be on any trajectory to obv!town. The post is a deflection of RC's request for reads, which is scummy on it's own. And he's undercutting his own ability to read which is next level fence-sitting since he hasn't even picked a fence to sit on.
It's a scummy post.
This should serve as response to both of your posts
