In post 746, Hectic wrote:It's possible to catch scum out if they're diseased and didn't claim they were.
Brilliant timing.In post 748, Not_Mafia wrote:Diseased WatcherIn post 745, Hectic wrote:What's your role, Not Mafia?
In post 746, Hectic wrote:It's possible to catch scum out if they're diseased and didn't claim they were.
Brilliant timing.In post 748, Not_Mafia wrote:Diseased WatcherIn post 745, Hectic wrote:What's your role, Not Mafia?
I'm thinking the same thing.In post 751, Morning Tweet wrote:Actually Saladman didn't claim diseased did he
If I were to guess, that means just NM carries the disease in their partnership. Or maybe Saladman lied and didn't notice the whole disease test thing
I'll let you guys decide whether I'm the one to be tested or if not. If it makes Hectic trust me more, then by all means!
what townie gets pointed to as scum and says this and NOTHING elseIn post 734, Saladman27 wrote:Yeah, I'm actually a multishot bulletproof diseased grenadier JOAT. Nah, I'm just Vanilla, as always
did u just give multiple reasons to convince Hectic why he isn't a serial killerIn post 759, boring wrote:There's no reason to play out a thousand obscure what-ifs when the path of least resistance aligns with the most likely scenario. You and Morning are both gunless. If you were serial killer, you would have NK'd the conf town from my hard soft (Morning) (not to mention, we'd have seen multiple NKs). If Morning was scum, she'd have NK'd me and used my hard soft to be conf. town today.
I wanted to make sure he was convinced.In post 761, Morning Tweet wrote:did u just give multiple reasons to convince Hectic why he isn't a serial killer
Thank youIn post 762, Hectic wrote:Don't worry, boring; I'm not drinking that much wine. It's 80% Saladman + Not_Mafia. I just want them both to come back to see what they have to say, but I won't drag this out for too long.