In post 418, Klick wrote:Sorry, I'm awful. To be clear, I'm just scum lol
Couldn't resist the opportunity to troll votato a bit
I don't think I ever would have lived this down if you were town.
it would not have been your fault
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
I enjoy this group too, but I feel bad that we lamed this one out. I think if I play it again I would just play day two as normal. Maybe it might be less optimal, but I think it would make a more fun experience.
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
In post 418, Klick wrote:Sorry, I'm awful. To be clear, I'm just scum lol
Couldn't resist the opportunity to troll votato a bit
I don't think I ever would have lived this down if you were town.
it would not have been your fault
but he would have killed me.
in cold blood!!
I hammered you and we are friends. You were town then too!
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
In post 427, Tuxedo Mask wrote:I enjoy this group too, but I feel bad that we lamed this one out. I think if I play it again I would just play day two as normal. Maybe it might be less optimal, but I think it would make a more fun experience.
I feel like this might have been somewhat of an anomaly. Scum accidentally placed three players who more or less trusted each other in a small group. Had we been more paranoid of each other that would've been a lot different
Also we more or less figured that Tuxedo/Morning/Votato/Kanna were town and correctly guessed how scum would place their members! We didn't do too bad although we gamed it decently yeah
Pedit: Yeah I think either doing that or at least like a giant circle would've been better. If they're gonna go for this route, making the groups equal would have been better as well i think: TSTS + TTTT
Tbf Datisi and I should have gone with our original plan of putting everyone in pairs, with us both holding town switches
PEdit yeah. We decided it wouldn't be fun enough though.
In post 429, votato wrote:I think optimal scum play is to pair people off
And scum just hold their own switches?
that's an option, but i think not. The aggressive play is to pair yourself with someone you townread. Maybe even shade them on day 1 to give yourself an excuse
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
In post 434, Klick wrote:Tbf Datisi and I should have gone with our original plan of putting everyone in pairs, with us both holding town switches
PEdit yeah. We decided it wouldn't be fun enough though.
wow scum went for fun play and i ruined it... sorry
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
I hammered you and we are friends. You were town then too!
i didn't mind too it too much! you didn't kill me at least-- you and four people just agreed that i needed to go to time-out as a stump more or less
A cute bat-stump
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
In post 434, Klick wrote:Tbf Datisi and I should have gone with our original plan of putting everyone in pairs, with us both holding town switches
PEdit yeah. We decided it wouldn't be fun enough though.
wow scum went for fun play and i ruined it... sorry
smh
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia
We wanted one of us to be the townies in the large group. Even though the small group was towny we figured you wouldn't think we'd put 2 scum in the large group
In post 443, Klick wrote:We wanted one of us to be the townies in the large group. Even though the small group was towny we figured you wouldn't think we'd put 2 scum in the large group
The placement ended up being a tad awkward because Me/Kanna could safely be kept alive and we could test that theory of "would they really do it, well we still have a shot for the small group".
Otherwise, I think it could have worked.
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
if this person flips town, then i'll townread them. - Nahdia
Had tuxedo/votato not obvtowned so hard i wouldn't have immediately assumed 2 scum in the large.
Although I still feel like you guys did do the best scum strategy possible had we stuck to just doing majority votes-- one scum holds the switch to the town holding the partner's switch
"It is not our ignorance that will kill us, but our arrogance"
"I expect that 90% of what you say to me is one form of trickery or another" - a friend irl
ah yes, beeboy style reads;
