do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 335, bugspray wrote:cook can get yeeted but i'm interested why he's in jim's townreads when that's literally the only mention of cook in his entire iso
Yeah, sorry. I just don't see the case against cook. Feel free to change my mind :)
there is never a case day 1. to come up with an actual correct case on scum day 1 takes an exceptionally bad scum player.
all logic based wagons day 1 are bunkum, either powered by bad town or members of the mafia
In post 340, geraintm wrote:all logic based wagons day 1 are bunkum, either powered by bad town or members of the mafia
Do you think the wagon on Cook was powered by bad town or mafia?
I dont know. How am I meant to know that yet?
later if I bus cook need to point out these associative reads
i don't want to tell cook to make associatives with gera because i feel like he'll do it awkwardly
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
if we elim jim i need to talk about how andres looks bad because he hopped on the stupid polaris wagon and then was instrumental in eliminating town
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me