4: notta jumbles is a vt
3: infernodragon18 is a coop
7: tinexkksi is a vt
2: yvottacat is a goon
8: vorkuta is a vt
9: pvturist is a vt
1: volxen is a goon
6: nonny is a vt
5: tw is a vt
Last edited by schadd_ on Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:19 pm, edited 5 times in total.
I feel like you're constantly shading slots without making any effort to sort them. You're appearing suddenly at peculiar times to paint people's posts in negative lights, but not offering much insight as to where your reads are at. (a friend of mine calls these appearances "wolfy pop-ins" and that figure of speech has been ringing in my head wrt like 50% of your posts so far)
Town wins this game by working out who's town, and who's scum. Scum wins this by not being lynched (trying not to do/say the wrong thing or have their posts look inferior to anyone else's are very natural temptations to this end), and also by ensuring that townies become mislynched--which you do by regularly painting things people are saying in a negative light.
I think you're playing pretty transparently to a scum win condition, and after reaching out I'm not really satisfied that you were interested in proving me wrong/working with me.
If I'm on the right track let me know? If you can show me where in your posts I'm seeing the wrong thing, I'd really appreciate it.
i was reading this from the bottom up and excitedly thought it was about yyotta because i thot he was gnna be able to sort her
In post 75, Vorkuta wrote:I'll provide a full and proper readlist in a few days.
Right now, I would love to see the pretzel-folding logic that is going on in Yyotta's head. Scumslip much?
In post 321, Vorkuta wrote:People who're playing this game: the_worst, PvtUrist, foodcoats
People who've promised to play this game in a bit: Nonny, Volxen
People who aren't playing this game: YottaCat, InfernoDragon18, NotAJumbleOfNumbers
3 replacements in, and I'm trying to judge whether the scum points carry over.
That's an activity list, below which you said you'd give a real one. You're actively avoiding ranking reads and that looks bad.
it reads to me like that list is intended to be that - i think that's something possible to pick up on
cheeky is open to re-evaluating in a way that looks towny
i think jumbly numblies is in a tough spot since they are just trying sincerely and are being pushed by towny people but just have awkward presentation - i like to think there is a chance i would be seeing town in them
Last edited by schadd_ on Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In post 481, pinturicchio wrote:I think Yvotta could be scum, but I'm not so sure 'cause she reacts poorly either as town or scum; I want to push her to see if I can sort that out, since this is the best time to do it.
In post 484, Vorkuta wrote:I'd like to think a readlist is kind of sacred and accurately tl;dr's my opinion on this town. I can't vouch for the integrity OF my readlist without (as of an hour ago) putting in 3/4 nullslots in there, and in my eyes null >= all the scum points.
Like yyotta- she's as you so aptly put it "stonewalling" the thread (I like that term). Where do I put her?
I've my position regarding this clear but I'll reiterate:
Regardless of how scummy a player is acting, how they're trying to tunnel/wagon/bluff/redirect/ANYTHING, town can react to this. There's possibility/potential for counter play.
There's NO COUNTER-PLAY to silence/against the background wall. None at all.
Thus the activity list is essentially my lynch list.
i don't really understand this, in such a way that it is town-indicative
i'm not sure i recall a read springing from a reaction test that wouldn't have probably happened anyway and i remember a few times where people have put undue confidence in them - i find that people can adapt to me if i make it somewhat clear what i'm looking for, or that i'm looking for something
like usually my trick is to ask things without a strong goal in mind and accidentally happen upon alignment-indicative analysis. which is uh hard to model oneself after but That's How I Do It
Prior to replacing in I read my predecessor's ISO. After replacing in I read most of Pin's ISO because he was the largest wagon. I then moved on to Vortuka because that's where old me left his vote.
Please rephrase any concerns
this post doesnt logically read very alignment-indicative but its the sort of thing that has been feeling soultown to me lately after modding a bunch of games
i think pintu is kind of engaging with the hefty argument happening between every towny but not in the midst of it - i think tw is kind of in that space as well
yyotta i guess i wouldnt know how to find a wolf in by this argument if you don't already notice her as scum that can't produce content in a vibrant game
i feel like this would be a reasonably strong vca game actually, as much as i tend to advocate against it
i don't think there is any pattern indicating a counterwagon or even like an urgent wagon and everybody is voting freely which i think indicates that town is making wagons on town
In post 1037, the worst wrote:"your narrative is ill-conceived"
ah yes sorry my mistake, I speak to my townreads who I'm trying to solve the game with like that all the time.
:facepalm:
that sounds like something id say in a dead thread, take that how you will tonally
In post 1059, foodcoats wrote:The only thing that confuses me in their ISO is why they freaked out when Cheeky voted for them. They were already a wagon at that point, and I'm not sure what caused Jumble to have an outburst at Cheeky specifically.
i think confusing play without obvious wolf motive is generally a quality of town
like notice pint hasn't really done anything illegible or controversial
yyotta might be an outlier on the other end of the spectrum but has painted a somewhat clear picture explaining her lack of content
