VOTE: ZZZX
not even a silly reason. how saddening.northsidegal wrote:VOTE: dovetail
so for you to make that conclusion as town, you would probably have come at it from a different angle.
my alignment. I'll explain more clearly, since the bolded emphasis in 13 may not have been clear enough. I'm talking about 7, you're talking about 4.In post 19, northsidegal wrote:your alignment or your role? because, assuming you're the same alignment as me, why would that mean that i would come to a different conclusion? what you're saying here only makes sense to me if you're basically scumclaiming right now.In post 13, Dovetail wrote:because my reasoning requires knowing my alignment
In post 14, TheGoldenParadox wrote:?In post 10, northsidegal wrote:also, "hot take" – screenplay is hard town.
Also, I believe dovetail is scum. Not going to say why yet.
[v[dovetail[/v]
L-1 but withholding reasons is shite but also draws a lot of attention. is there scum wanting to hammer but too scared to make the leap?~
scrape for towncred by not hammering while simultaneously voicing support for the wagon you have the opportunity to hammer looks very awkward.In post 18, GuiltyLion wrote:not hammering so I'm basically conftown
I agree 6 is a fairly scummy opening post
that's fine, different players have different opinions. it's an early read.In post 40, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Let's say, by some manner, I was an Informed Townie and knew you were town. In that scenario, I still wouldn't believe srceen is town for "latching on" to a townie. However, this looks very much like newbie town play, since I take it this is your first game on the site with 7 posts?
he wasn't really pushing, but he was committing majorly early and as scum there's not too much reason to do that. his reversal has weakened my townread on him somewhat though.In post 45, northsidegal wrote:@dove, i've always disagreed with the idea that "scum wouldn't go so hard in pushing a townie". i also think both you and paradox are silly for taking guilty's comment as anything but a joke.
oh myArchwing wrote:
what made you unvote? and why did you commit so hard to your vote on me in the first place?
?
uhh yes I do believe that. I gather you disagree.In post 74, northsidegal wrote:do you really believe this?In post 37, Dovetail wrote:scrape for towncred by not hammering while simultaneously voicing support for the wagon you have the opportunity to hammer looks very awkward.In post 18, GuiltyLion wrote:not hammering so I'm basically conftown
I agree 6 is a fairly scummy opening post
also, what do your reads look like now?
tbh I don't care about your interactions and relative alignments at this point at all. I'm looking for independent scumminess.GuiltyLion wrote:Frankly I don't see a lot of thought in your reads here. Why does scum!Guilty open the game with an "awkward" support for your wagon but then move you to a townread? What would have been the point of that? And if you're both scumreading ZZZX and myself then how are you looking at our interactions? SvS?In post 87, Dovetail wrote:?
uhh yes I do believe that. I gather you disagree.In post 74, northsidegal wrote:do you really believe this?In post 37, Dovetail wrote:scrape for towncred by not hammering while simultaneously voicing support for the wagon you have the opportunity to hammer looks very awkward.In post 18, GuiltyLion wrote:not hammering so I'm basically conftown
I agree 6 is a fairly scummy opening post
also, what do your reads look like now?
I'm townreading you and tgp. srceen less so but still up there, though he is being kind of odd.
don't feel strongly either way about arch.
scumreading zzzx and guilty. guilty moreso.
VOTE: GuiltyLion
In post 49, GuiltyLion wrote:that said, I think Archwing townreading me looks more fake than Dovetail or TGP scumreading me. Slightly townreading NSG for calling him out about it
VOTE: Archwing
but suddenly kick up a fuss when I actually vote you looks like you're not really interested my reasons at all because then they would have bothered you in the first place. I didn't vote you in 37 because zzzx still hadn't posted, and I wanted to see their entrance before moving my vote off them. now I can compare you both, and I find you scummier.
god forbid I vote my top scumread who I had already expressed my scumread on!TheGoldenParadox wrote:
This seemsextremelyoppurtunistic. This slot should be analyzed later if we get a guilty townflip. If it's scum, it's less indicative, but still decently likely scum.
Honestly I have nothing much to contribute here, except the L-1 VOTE: Archwing
I feel this slot is scum, and I'll compromise if we're willing to lynch Guilty tomorrow.
...did you honestly fall for the same trick twice? I don't know if I can believe that.TheGoldenParadox wrote:oh god this scared me
why?In post 92, Archwing wrote:Tgp is conf scum btw. Partner is either dovetail or srceenplay.
voting for the mod is a selfvote apparently lolIn post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:
uh, okay. I don't. so why would you expect me to know this? I was at L-1, townreading my whole wagon, and you stood out as making the moves I'd expect from scum in that situation.In post 114, GuiltyLion wrote:The idea that I was "angling to hammer" on page 1 is ridiculous,anyone who knows meknows that I take as much time as possible before deciding to lynch and that I would never hammer early D1.
how sweet. not sure on that tgp vote though. what are your thoughts on guilty?Srceenplay wrote:I like your thoughts Dove.
UNVOTE: