Micro 789 - Alternating 9p - Mafia wins

ZZZX · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:52 am

In post 57, Raskolnikov wrote:Christopher n_m and zzzx have been posting onsite and should really get involved here (major otoh looks like replace)
iconeum feels pretty mediocre but let's see how he responds about his thing, zzzx i kinda thought would say more but maybe he does today

I would love if you don't speak words out of your ass thou, Lets keep it at that.

ZZZX · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:53 am

I just feel people trying to talk about people not posting enough or not giving enough content at the 2nd (or 3rd?) day is really... fake

Lets keep it at that

VOTE: Raskolnikov

Fake

Raskolnikov · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:55 am

have you considered the possibility that you not being present could give you a different outlook because you didn't pick up the feeling or gamestate at the time

ZZZX · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:56 am

In post 77, Raskolnikov wrote:have you considered the possibility that you not being present could give you a different outlook because you didn't pick up the feeling or gamestate at the time

Have you considered we are 4 pages in and my last post was not even 24 hours ago when the deadline is in 2 weeks?

ZZZX · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:57 am

I can see a billion reasons to push that are legit, You picked the wrong one.

Lovebird · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:58 am

Guess I'm used to a faster pace. Though, my last game was pretty slow.

Lovebird · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:59 am

In post 79, ZZZX wrote:I can see a billion reasons to push that are legit, You picked the wrong one.

Did rask push inactivity as scum?

ZZZX · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:01 am

In post 81, Lovebird wrote:
In post 79, ZZZX wrote:I can see a billion reasons to push that are legit, You picked the wrong one.
Did rask push inactivity as scum?

He is pretending to give content by doing that while he is just adding noise

Raskolnikov · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:06 am

I won't say it's content, but I also don't think it's noise. This game is objectively very slow and this is a lot less pages than usual by this time frame.
I think you might be defensive too as it feels like you're taking it as a direct scumread or shade on you but I don't feel like that's how it is.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:07 am

VOTE: ZZZX

I'm okay with this for now.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:11 am

I should bring up I like to POE and this kind of gamestate is not so has not been good for that.
I suspect through how most people are that 1 scum is uninvolved because I usually have more scumreads by now. I don't think this prediction is like bujabers though because I feel like this is based on (hopefully not inaccurate) reads and not whatever his was based on (I'm still not sure).

ZZZX · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:11 am

In post 83, Raskolnikov wrote:I won't say it's content, but I also don't think it's noise. This game is objectively very slow and this is a lot less pages than usual by this time frame.
I think you might be defensive too as it feels like you're taking it as a direct scumread or shade on you but I don't feel like that's how it is.

A scum read on me wouldn't be what I call it, But if its about being defensive then, yea. I feel this is the best way to get what I need to get from people. It ends up working.

Plus people have jobs and schools and whatnot. If I got a week without posting content point that out, When the game just started and I didnt even get close to a third of the prod range then it just feels like its just pretending to be the "person" to push the game to activity or something which is arguable a lie at this stage.

ZZZX · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:12 am

In post 84, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: ZZZX

I'm okay with this for now.

Way to cover up an OMGUS

again nothing wrong with OMGUS, But town would be honest about it wouldn't they huh.

Only feeling better about my vote

ZZZX · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:13 am

In post 85, Raskolnikov wrote:I should bring up I like to POE and this kind of gamestate is not so has not been good for that.
I suspect through how most people are that 1 scum is uninvolved because I usually have more scumreads by now. I don't think this prediction is like bujabers though because I feel like this is based on (hopefully not inaccurate) reads and not whatever his was based on (I'm still not sure).

Anyone who has more than 1 or 2 solid reads at this stage is plain lying and talking bullshit or making up reads.

Plain Simple and to the point.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:14 am

Ehh, it's partially omgus I guess.

ZZZX · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:17 am

In post 89, Raskolnikov wrote:Ehh, it's partially omgus I guess.

Fair enough.

Ima go sleep now. While I think ur scum my opinion of you is a lil better from this small exchange., GN

Raskolnikov · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:20 am

VOTE: not mafia
Fuck it, I want to wagon not mafia now.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:35 am

Vote Count

Raskolnikov - 2 - BuJaber, ZZZX
Iconeum - 1 - Lovebird
Christopher - 1 - Greenliquid
Not_Mafia - 1 - Raskolnikov
BuJaber - 1 - Iconeum

Not Voting - Not_Mafia, Christopher, Major Minor

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch

Deadline is April 2 at 1pm EST

Raskolnikov · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:37 am

In post 71, Lovebird wrote:Vote iconeum pls.

I forgot about this.

Why iconeum. His entrance was meh but I have reasons to think he's town now.

Iconeum · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:20 pm

In post 51, Lovebird wrote:VOTE: Iconeum

In post 71, Lovebird wrote:Vote iconeum pls.

These are literally the only mentions Lovebird has about me.
Care to explain at least the scumread on me?

Iconeum · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:22 pm

In post 76, ZZZX wrote:I just feel people trying to talk about people not posting enough or not giving enough content at the 2nd (or 3rd?) day is really... fakeLets keep it at thatVOTE: Raskolnikov

While I agree that activity is NAI, I Feel Rask has made enough other posts to not scumread him.

BuJaber · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:22 am

In post 68, Raskolnikov wrote:Why did my opening ping you however?

I knew it pinged me but now I don't remember why. I may have misread it because I read it again now and nothing is pinging me.

I think my prediction is still solid though. I want to lynch one of you 3 but I promise I won't factor in the opening and my RVS vote. Whoever I find the most scummy today I will vote for from GL/Rask/Love.

Major Minor · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Fri Mar 16, 2018 4:50 am

I am here! Apologies. I was away this week for travel.

Let me read up.

Major Minor · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:01 am

In post 15, Iconeum wrote:
In post 5, Christopher wrote:Hi. Who’re the goons?

In post 7, GreenLiquid wrote:VOTE: Christopher for not having an avatar. You're the goons!
Obvious townslip by Christopher, GL fell for it.
GGEZ

VOTE: GreenLiquid

Can you elaborate on this? I don't know why knowing the setup is a town slip.

Rask seems town for the way he's engaging with the game. The poking & prodding to dig out even the tiniest morsel of content from someone screams town this early. The way he also threw his vote around onto Not_Mafia just felt really town in my gut? I hate gut reads, it's hard to explain, but it was the lack of pretense that pinged me as town. There's no show to put on, nobody to impress with his vote switch, it's just what it is.

Iconeum's push on BuJaber seems weak and phony. It basically comes down to "you didn't stop and rewrite your post to avoid possibly being read as scum for the contradiction" -- which, IMO, is a reason to point to Bu being TOWN, not mafia. Town doesn't have to go through that extra layer of thought because they aren't trying to hide who they are -- Mafia do. Would love to hear a response to this. The rest of Iconeum's stuff feels null at worst.

I dislike Lovebird's empty push on Iconeum, though. No reasons or anything? Feels opportunistic.

ZZZX's push on Rask is out of left field. He's voting Rask for pointing out the number of lurkers... while completely ignoring all the rest of Rask's content? And there's a LOT there to be ignoring.

VOTE: Iconeum

Christopher · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Fri Mar 16, 2018 7:40 am

In post 72, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 70, Christopher wrote:
In post 69, Raskolnikov wrote:@Christopher what do you think of the love, me, and GL interaction
In post 47, Raskolnikov wrote:As for lovebird. What she did was definitely pro-town in what it accomplished, but as a tell I think it's complicated. For a newer player I would absolutely townread that because new scum do avoid attention and also aren't even necessarily aware they'd get townread for being pro-town/lamist. OTOH giving lovebird that would be careless, she has some scum games already here with competent level of play and is from offsite before that (not to put paranoia on her either though which would be unfair). That said the thought process itself adds up and 37 is some nuance at least so even if it's "graspy" I don't think it's shallow and don't feel it's scummy.
On the whole I agree with your 47.

I think Lovebird's 37 is pro-town, and I kind of respect the hunt. I see where he was going with it, but I read it more of an integration between RvS and day 1 as opposed to a genuine read. It's similar to how I read Bu's opening.

On the substantive anxious/bored vs checking profiles before-or-after the day started, it's NAI for me.

In post 22, Not_Mafia wrote:Sup

In post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:The more things seem to change, the more they stay the same
I want to focus on this from Not_Mafia. Even after we were moving on from RvS during the whole love read, Not_Mafia comes in with this? And then follows up with that? Hi Not_Mafia. How are you?
Sup, I'm well, how are you?

gucci, my dude.

VOTE: Not_Mafia