Micro 783: Adorable Thing (Day 3!)

[Hopkirk]

/pair hopkirk


You need to pick me

Sounds like a good idea.

I would have replaced out tbqh if I knew I was still in this game because I am realllllyyyy sick.
But if it's a 6p meme game I might as well stay.

I am accepting a pair offer of the first person who requests me btw.

I'm also going to be a little lower/uncertain activity at first. Starting a new job tomorrow.

[Hopkirk]

I don't need to feel guilty about my activity I guess.

VOTE: Lucky

[Hopkirk]

I don't need to feel guilty about my activity I guess.

VOTE: Lucky

What is your read on yume?

I don't have one.

hopkirk should probably quit his new job since it clearly interferes with mafia time. and more importantly, picnic time.

Funnily enough, I wasn't able to post as I was playing irl mafia after work.

Present.

Now I have one, and its confirmed scum.

[Hopkirk]

I wanted to see who'd defend Yume.
Your reaction is interesting!

[Hopkirk]

@Arch: you've voted everyone except Beeboy. You also wanted to picnic with Beeboy. Is this a coincidence, or do you like Bee?

[Hopkirk]

VOTE: Yume

[Hopkirk]

Is it announced?
UNVOTE: Yume

[Hopkirk]

VOTE: Lucky

[Hopkirk]

Not much difference between the game being locked or not really.

@Red/Arch: Why are/were you happy voting Yume but not Lucky?

[Hopkirk]

Same reason it was on lucky when I put it there in 14.
tbh was more of a RVS kind of thing than anything. I just wanted to get this game going so I wanted to start a wagon.

[Hopkirk]

What do you mean Red? Lucky never said he was busy.

[Hopkirk]

Not much difference between the game being locked or not really.

@Red/Arch: Why are/were you happy voting Yume but not Lucky?

Lucky told that they have been busy. I think they are still busy.

Does any of this still apply then?

[Hopkirk]

Main events.
Yume is unlynchable.
We're all in picnic pairs.
It's 3 days to deadline.

[Hopkirk]

Because of how he's posting, what he's posting, or what he's not posting?

[Hopkirk]

Because two of those three things look the same as RF.

[Hopkirk]

VOTE: Beeboy

[Hopkirk]

he seems kind of too playful and forced light hearted posting. I'm willing to start there.

Also what are the thoughts on Yume being unlynchable? I have some paranoia on that ability...

Not a fan of Yume's play.
Unlynchable seems strong for groupscum though. Can't lynch today anyway, so no point setup speccing today anyway.

[Hopkirk]

Specifically, not a fan of the way he did the unlynchable thing without doing anything after it.

[Hopkirk]

3 people are voting/have voted all game.
Deadline is in just over a day.

[Hopkirk]

4 to lynch feels like it's going to end in a no lynch.

[Hopkirk]

Same reason it was on lucky when I put it there in 14.
tbh was more of a RVS kind of thing than anything. I just wanted to get this game going so I wanted to start a wagon.

This is BS and too serious

WAGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON

I think you missed the fact that the entire post was a joke
The first part is setup. The second part is a word for word quote of archwing's previous comment.

If you dislike every word, why do you dislike me over the person I'm quoting?

[Hopkirk]

I follow both parts of the Hop wagon.
-Yume could be legitimately misunderstanding rather than intentionally misunderstanding.
-Beeboy wanting to survive. Not that understandable given they've not tried to contribute anything.

Happy with beeboy.

[Hopkirk]

Just kidding, there's so much fluff. I guess I hopkirks read on yume seems fake and arch wanting wagons is towny.

I wanted to see who'd defend Yume.
Your reaction is interesting!

What I'm talking about, if it wasn't clear.

Unless you're saying you think that was a solid read, rather than an RVS read, I don't really understand what you mean.

In other news, in turns out my role is bastard and no longer useful.

Thoughts on mass claiming?

[Hopkirk]

VOTE: Beeboy

[Hopkirk]

UNVOTE: Beeboy

Thought you meant you already investigated someone (which would imply you're claiming a guilty on me). Rereading 186 led me to rereading the mod iso.

[Hopkirk]

Because you two need to get along better.

What did you do to hopkirk

Think Maria stole my honey?

[Hopkirk]

You know you were already voting me?

[Hopkirk]

Oh wait, we're not even voting to lynch.

[Hopkirk]

The picnic has been assigned
Expect hoods shortly.

Also before you can lynch, you must vote for someone for a cop investigation to be performed on!
Go.

I recommend reading this. I didn't.

[Hopkirk]

I encourage everyone to post in bursts of one sentence or two at a time. Even if you can make the point in one post.

Lets get to 100 pages.

[Hopkirk]

The biggest wagon/tied biggest wagon that he voted right before deadline and hadn't talked much about before?

[Hopkirk]

I can't read it.

[Hopkirk]

We should probably sort out the investigation earlier since it looks like it doesn't have a separate deadline.
VOTE: Maria

[Hopkirk]

VOTE: Lovebird [/unvote]
Better if you have conf.town on Maria.

I light scumread Beeboy so don't really want to be inspected since scum him would probably fake the result. Gives me no information beyond where we are now. An inspect on someone else gives me something.

[Hopkirk]

Do you have good reason to think LB is town too (/is it mutual)?

UNVOTE: Lovebird

[Hopkirk]

I overlooked that it's a scumclaim yeah. I was thinking:
Fake result on me = nothing changes.
Fake result on someone else = Potential information on partners.

VOTE: Hopkirk

[Hopkirk]

Is that game over?

[Hopkirk]

This*

[Hopkirk]

If you're scum who thinks you've hammered (when we aren't voting for a lynch), you might admit it if you think you can't lose.
It's very unlikely, but it's worth asking due to how funny it'd be if it paid off.

[Hopkirk]

If you're scum who thinks you've hammered (when we aren't voting for a lynch), you might admit it if you think you can't lose.
It's very unlikely, but it's worth asking due to how funny it'd be if it paid off.

@Maria/Arch: I clearly knew it wasn't a hammer as this response to Red shows.

VOTE: hopkirk

that was kinda a shit result, I knew I should have unvoted.

Result?

[Hopkirk]

My role: Teddy bear('s picnic). I get to pick who's in what neighbourhood for the pairs d1. Either bastard since they were closed, or stolen in some way.

@Love: if Maria is town, your role confirms me as town too doesn't it?

[Hopkirk]

Love put me into a QT with him/Maria at night. Claims his role creates a new player based on his target and puts that player in the game as our child/makes a family QT.

Atm Idk whether Maria town, or a fake player (ie, scum Love created her either as a partner that he can post through, or just a dummy account he can use to copy abilities.

Evidence for Maria being an extension of love
-Account has no posts outside this game
-Created 2 days before it was needed
-Mod didn't post for replacement in a queue

VOTE: Beeboy

[Hopkirk]

Given my role seems to have been stolen, it seems like Love's ability steals powers- which is a scum role.

[Hopkirk]

There are picnics in this because I submitted a picture of a teddy bear's picnic.

Red can confirm I claimed this d1 in the neighbourhood.

[Hopkirk]

It doesn't steal powers, Maria's role is based on yours. She chose the picnics day two.

Whick probably closed mine. Hence stolen.

[Hopkirk]

My theory is that Maria might not be a real player. I'm brining it up today since people seem prone to quicklynching on this site these days.

Obviously It's a 1v1 today though.

[Hopkirk]

Looks like I'm lynched.
Town is down a member.