In post 525, Mulch wrote:But then any time a player lurks after receiving a warning they would be confirmed mafia
This is a bit much :/
Not really
<Mulch lurks
<presumably, Mulch gets warned
<Mulch starts lurking in next game. MafiaMulch.
<Mathdino: I did a comprehensive search of consisting of the entirety of your games on MS, and found out that you LURKED LAST GAME. You must have been warned. Why are you lurking again? Don't you care?
<Mullch:
Eh, there’s a difference between "lurking" and "not playing the game."
I would probably define a lurker as someone who posts below a certain frequency threshold. It's possible to post infrequently, but have every post have content.
I think the latter may be more of the issue but not playing is sadly a play style on this site.
In post 530, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Eh, there’s a difference between "lurking" and "not playing the game."
I would probably define a lurker as someone who posts below a certain frequency threshold. It's possible to post infrequently, but have every post have content.
I think the latter may be more of the issue but not playing is sadly a play style on this site.
I define lurking as a type of not playing the game, it's why active lurking exists
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
I can safely say I have never seen them playing in the same game together and because anecdotal evidence is clearly all we need to call something fact, that must make it true!
People should make use of blacklists more. Also, having a blacklist thread where people can see who is blacklisting who and for what reasons might make people play better if they see a lot of people are not letting them into games.
When I was actively modding games I had a blacklist of serial flakers, serial lurker non-contributors and players who for other reasons I did not want to Mod. I never shared it because that’s really IMHO not necessary as long as Mods are policing their own games.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
In post 540, CooLDoG wrote:having a blacklist thread where people can see who is blacklisting who and for what reasons might make people play better if they see a lot of people are not letting them into games.
isn't this why the initial geriatric idea (the kids these days thing) was a problem?
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 541, MagnaofIllusion wrote:When I was actively modding games I had a blacklist of serial flakers, serial lurker non-contributors and players who for other reasons I did not want to Mod. I never shared it because that’s really IMHO not necessary as long as Mods are policing their own games.
I definitely intend to keep a serial flaker blacklist from now on
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
Routine day with a dirt cheap brush
Then a week goes by and it goes untouched
Then two, then three, then a month
Then the rest of your life, you beat yourself up
Amrock#3784
