Address what? You haven't asked me anything and you don't appear to understand the meaning of the word "ostensibly". As an example:
In post 211, Quick wrote:In the absence of not knowing if we have a vig or not, we should act as though we do NOT have a vig. So what is ostensibly right about this exactly?
Ostensibly: as appears or is stated to be true, though not necessarily so
Seems to me that saying "we can deal with this with a Vig" appears to be true, but is not necessarily true. What part ISN'T ostensibly right about this?
No worries, all is forgiven.
In post 314, Quick wrote:Don't mix PL and reads. Either PL or don't. Don't mix the two.
Meh, the logic is out there, agree with it or not, don't try to lecture me without addressing the actual logic. I also literally said "I have no read on N_M".