Product Placement Mafia (Game over!)
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
In post 3, Untrod Tripod wrote:the game will begin when the market decides
You need more time to strategize with your buddies or something?In post 4, xRECKONERx wrote:i am the market- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Friends! My first town read!In post 25, Gamma Emerald wrote:bruh I'm tryna see what's in ur otha tabs and I ain't seein' shit- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I'm just shamelessly sheeping my townread in hopes he can help me in my attempts to usurp Vecna from his unbridled position of authority. Don't mind me.In post 139, CheekyTeeky wrote:Brian your empty opportunistic jump on is noted.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Okay. Who do you think we should have recalled instead?In post 146, Firebringer wrote:This wagon is dumb
Cheeky is town
Don’t be confused by her awkward her try hard play- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
What FOS thingy?In post 206, Vaxkiller wrote:Also can someone explain why this FOS thingy is scum?- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I didn't really think Cheeky was scummy. I just voted her because Gamma sheeped me for like half a minute and I wanted to sheep him back. Firebringer said she was townish and I can kinda sorta see that so I unvoted her.In post 233, northsidegal wrote:
why'd you unvote?In post 172, Brian Skies wrote:UNVOTE: Cheeky
NSG is on V/LA.
@Fire: Is there a particular reason you could go for Gammagooey?
is there any correlation between those first two lines there?
There's no correlation between the two lines. I think T-Bone voted you and I wasn't interested in starting a wagon on someone that hasn't checked in yet and might not be around to defend him/herself.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I don't understand why you're asking about this.In post 218, Vaxkiller wrote:In post 211, Brian Skies wrote:
What FOS thingy?In post 206, Vaxkiller wrote:Also can someone explain why this FOS thingy is scum?In post 98, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Awkward. FoS.In post 67, brassherald wrote:
What if I'm illiterate?In post 66, PenguinPower wrote:
I will be using a series of word to convey my thoughts and opinions. If you read these words in the order I write them (from left to right, unless I starting writing in Japanese), you should be able to do a reasonable job of reading me.In post 51, Vaxkiller wrote:Penguin. It's been a while since I played with you. Remind me how to read you?
I may also do a few rainbow reads depending on my mood.
Side note, hello everyone, I am here.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
So, which ones aren't random?In post 293, mutantdevle wrote:^^ roughly 9 of those are real, the rest are random.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Because I'm also having difficulty garnering reads this game, so it resonates with me a bit. I also haven't really gotten a lot from a lot of slots to sort either way (either because they haven't posted or they haven't broken away from the RVS trolling enough), which is kind of frustrating. But if scum don't want to risk making waves, then I'm perfectly fine waiting for people to do things I think are townish and just lynch through POE.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Please don't encourage them.In post 324, Firebringer wrote:Outing them is fine I think regardless of alignment.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Why do you say this as though we're in some sort of a rush?In post 385, Vaxkiller wrote:As a counter point, we have to lynch SOMEONE. You think it's a better plan to lynch waht then?
Also,
While I get that I made a statement and not a question, I was actually asking you to explain your thought process here.In post 282, Brian Skies wrote:
I don't understand why you're asking about this.In post 218, Vaxkiller wrote:In post 211, Brian Skies wrote:
What FOS thingy?In post 206, Vaxkiller wrote:Also can someone explain why this FOS thingy is scum?In post 98, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Awkward. FoS.In post 67, brassherald wrote:
What if I'm illiterate?In post 66, PenguinPower wrote:
I will be using a series of word to convey my thoughts and opinions. If you read these words in the order I write them (from left to right, unless I starting writing in Japanese), you should be able to do a reasonable job of reading me.In post 51, Vaxkiller wrote:Penguin. It's been a while since I played with you. Remind me how to read you?
I may also do a few rainbow reads depending on my mood.
Side note, hello everyone, I am here.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Why does your lolcase stop just as Gamma starts voting and playing the game?
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I have no idea how to read <Reck, Gooey, Pine>.
I don't understand the wagon on Firebringer.
I haven't played with Mutant before.
With that said, I don't have a particular issue with Mutant pointing out a potential vig soft claim. His sudden spurt of activity afterwards is interesting though. I think it's likely he realized he hadn't done anything of value up to that point and decided to start contributing instead of becoming a vig target. Survivalism? Could be, but is that really something only scum are capable of? Everything he's done though is a constant stream of 'wtf am i reading?'.
I'm gutreading Hiplop as town.
I'm townreading Vax.
NSG's lolcase on Gamma is still odd and I'm scumreading her for it. NSG's defense of Mutant is sketchy (and yes, I'm reading it as a defense because what else would it be?).
I would townread T-Bone if he were more insightful instead of just being reasonable. The only thing I like from him so far is his vote on NSG, but that's still somethign that was originally done randomly and I'm pretty sure he's indicated in some way that he's not really scumreading her.
I don't really think AA9 is scummy. But I did think it was possible she was scum avoiding the game, hence the vote.
Vecna continues to be useless. I stand by my bid to impeach him and take his place.
I hope UT's executive decision to give us a VoteCount doesn't count against our total.
I don't have time to read through and figure out 60 billion Gerald posts right now.
Cheeky, why are/were you townreading Gamma?- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I'm rejecting this unless he starts doing towny things.In post 708, CheekyTeeky wrote:In regards to the VC thing I think Vecna likely town for it. If he was using his VC for scum deception purposes I don't think he would've been so obvious with his abuse of power/memeing early game. I agree that it only really serves as a way for Vecna to give his vote but think it also gives the game another layer of added WIFOM.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Woo!In post 772, Gamma Emerald wrote:You know what the grace period is motherfucking over
VOTE: northsidegal
her scumread on me is absolute dogshit and she hasn't addressed my criticism of it at all ever
I believe!- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
In post 789, northsidegal wrote:
i fundamentally disagree that the posts after where i stopped and before my case could be considered "playing the game".In post 431, Brian Skies wrote:Why does your lolcase stop just as Gamma starts voting and playing the game?
i'm literally on v/la. my activity is meaningless.In post 784, Brian Skies wrote:Also, you respond to this but ignore the game while Cheeky gets wagoned for who knows how long?
Because you made a conscious decision not to comment on these posts and I wanted to know why. I've included every post that Gamma posted inbetween the last post of his you commented on in your 'lolcase' and when you actually decided to post it.In post 790, northsidegal wrote:And what is that second quote even supposed to mean? Like, i spent almost all of my time the last time i actually sat down with this thread just engaging t-bone on why he was only talking about cheeky there when i think she's pretty likely to be town.
Spoiler: Gamma Posts
Not to mention that this is the last quote you commented on in your 'lolcase,' which indicates he was just starting to get serious about the game, but you completely ignored this because it didn't fit your narrative.In post 132, Gamma Emerald wrote:
yeah real talk Cheeky is my first scum read for the FoS thing, comes off as too focused on getting out readsIn post 113, T-Bone wrote:Well, you DID just bitch me out for something Gamma did, said I failed, and did the ol' hilarious "FOS" thing.
So seriously. You tell me.
VOTE: CheekyTeeky
There wasn't really anything between you and T-Bone that made me lean either way on you, and if you think Cheeky is town, why are you so determined to respond to Gamma's vote on you but completey content with seeing your 'townread' get wagoned and maybe lynched?- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Fair.In post 802, northsidegal wrote:
I don't like you framing this in a "i'm so determined to respond to gamma's vote on me" way (and when i say "i don't like" here, i don't mean in a "it makes me think you're scum" way, i mean it in a "i don't think it's fair for the discussion we're having" way). first of all, i literallyIn post 796, Brian Skies wrote:There wasn't really anything between you and T-Bone that made me lean either way on you, and if you think Cheeky is town, why are you so determined to respond to Gamma's vote on you but completey content with seeing your 'townread' get wagoned and maybe lynched?hadn'tresponded to gamma's case before this. so, to call me "determined to respond to it" doesn't seem accurate. i'm responding to it because i scumread gamma and he started voting me, and hopefully i can demonstrate to everyone else how what he's saying is nonsense.
i'm not "content" with cheeky getting lynched at all. i don't have a strong enough townread on her that i'd claim an inno or something to prevent her lynch, but i'd definitely try to convince people to go elsewhere, and that's something i've undoubtably done before? like, i'm fairly confident that me doing that is in my ISO.
By 'determined to respond to it,' I was mostly meaning you were determined to address the push on you, not necessarily his response to your case.
I personally feel like Gamma made a change in his play starting at 132, but I guess I can see it being rather weak or unsubstantial.
I sadly don't remember most of what I've read since I'm been filing most things this game as nonsense (and because a lot of the attention I've been hoping to devote to this game is being siphoned elsewhere). I don't remember if you've defended Cheeky or not, but I'm acknowledging that I probably need to sit down and reassess things.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Nah, I'll just reread the game.In post 812, northsidegal wrote:would you like me to go through the posts following 132 and before my case and describe my thoughts on each one individually?- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Not even close to the same play he had there and I don't understand the comparison.In post 856, Vecna wrote:Pine is giving me some flashbacks to civ mafia, just packaged different. Id jump on that bandwagon anytime.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
This is the first time I've seen TBone give a stance on anyone this game (unless you want to count his hyung vote which mostly just felt opportunistic to me). While I'm unopposed to an AA9 lynch, there's nothing about his vote there that makes me feel good about him.
His sudden stance that NSG is scummy for posting VC's (really?) and Cheeky for not answering a simple question feel pretty superficial to me as well.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Is this based on experience you have with her or...?In post 931, Gamma Emerald wrote:In addition there's some flaws I've spotted in her logic, like her attacking me for not following up on things, which has come up as a point against me before, and I was town then. So her using it now points to her not considering past history and using anything she can to finger me as a suspect.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
In post 37, Vaxkiller wrote:So t bone pretty much has to be town with that role.
Idk what this is and TBone's response mostly seems like a joke, so it doesn't count.In post 42, T-Bone wrote:The easiest way to my heart (and my town pile) is having a town read on me, yes. I'm glad we're on the same page.
In post 102, T-Bone wrote:
What is the purpose of this post?In post 99, CheekyTeeky wrote:
What was the purpose of this post?In post 95, Gammagooey wrote:
(when everyone actually gets in here and posts at least once I'll probstop shitpostingdo things in addition to shitposting)In post 111, T-Bone wrote:
What is the purpose ofIn post 104, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Ok to be clear. Why do we need to know that you will produce actual content when everyone has posted? Simple answer is that we don't need to know that and you're overly self aware about your need to contribute something real.In post 102, T-Bone wrote:
What is the purpose of this post?In post 99, CheekyTeeky wrote:
What was the purpose of this post?In post 95, Gammagooey wrote:
(when everyone actually gets in here and posts at least once I'll probstop shitpostingdo things in addition to shitposting)
You fail. FoS.thispost??In post 113, T-Bone wrote:Well, you DID just bitch me out for something Gamma did, said I failed, and did the ol' hilarious "FOS" thing.
So seriously. You tell me.In post 123, T-Bone wrote:I would also like to unsubscribe, these latest posts have been terrible and completely missed the forest and the trees. 0/10 would not recommend.In post 166, T-Bone wrote:
VOTE: northsidegalIn post 157, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Because I can't assess votes I don't get reasons for.In post 151, PenguinPower wrote:
I like wagons. You refused to join mine on brass and used a yucky FoS instead, so I'm joining yours. You have like 3 or 4 votes...why care so much?In post 147, CheekyTeeky wrote:Are you guys just PLing me for being a VI or do you care to add reasons?In post 184, T-Bone wrote:Be less sensitive on page 6. It'll do you wonders.In post 190, T-Bone wrote:Let's get some facts straight here. I was trying to start a meme, for the record, since it would have given the game as much meaning as the question you asked GooeyGamma (someone else was supposed to quote me and ask what the post means). Then you quoted me and freaked out.
Then you also made a statement about how you can't assess votes people don't give a reason for. So I quoted that post and voted for a random player.
I don't like it when people post things for the sake of posting. That was like, your entire ISO up to that point. It isn't about you being new, or the fact that I have a green name so I somehow think I am superior to all you plebs (this isn't Team Mafia, after all). It is about content that I perceive to be empty, and thus, I'm going to mock it every single time.
Maybe you did it because you are insecure about your own abilities as a player. Maybe you did it because you are scum and you feel like "this is what town-me should do." I don't know.
At no point did I ever make a judgment about your alignment (or anyone else's for that matter). At no point have I suggested we lynch you.
Be the player you want to be, if you're town I want you to be your best.
At the same time, I think you should have the awareness to let other players be who they are at the moment. Let the game come naturally. Don't be that guy who has to react to everything as some sort of slight against them.In post 209, T-Bone wrote:Because, either I can say
But voicing the obvious and using it to make a read is the kind of empty thinking that doesn't really help as town. You know, the type of thing I mocked you for. Yeah, it's fucking obvious that you could be town or scum. Just like every other player in the game.Maybe you did it because you are insecure about your own abilities as a player. Maybe you did it because you are scum and you feel like "this is what town-me should do."
(and I'm not criticizing your playstyle so much as I am voicing my thoughts and explaining why I do the things I do)
A complete mess of pushing back and forth on Cheeky that culminates with teh response: 'At no point did I ever make a judgment about your alignment (or anyone else's for that matter). At no point have I suggested we lynch you.' Which begs the question of what exactly was the purpose of TBone's interactions with Cheeky in the first place.In post 219, T-Bone wrote:Did you (Cheeky) just drop a buzzword to describe something I said, becauseyou(Cheeky) lost the context of the conversation? A conversation which the context was super clear and easy to follow. Really?In post 323, T-Bone wrote:
Penguin, what the hell are you allowing to be taught in the newbie queue that this question STILL gets asked in 2018?In post 275, CheekyTeeky wrote:Gooey pitch to me why outing crumbs makes sense as a play from scum?
SIGH
The answer to ALL questions that ask "why would scum...?" is ALWAYS to make someone ask "why would scum...?"
This is a public service announcement, funded by PepsiCo.
If you're legit confused that's fine. Here is the sequence of events. You did some things which I had commented on quite a few times. I then said, "at no point did I ever make a judgment about your alignment". You said, "Why not". And I said "Maybe you did it because you are insecure about your own abilities as a player. Maybe you did it because you are scum and you feel like "this is what town-me should do."" And then I explained that since voice that "you could be scum or town" amounts to empty content, it is not worth exploring...because everyone can be scum or town. And if I'm going to criticize players for empty content either now or in the future, I can't do it myself...because it isn't helpful for me or anyone else to find scum. Does that make sense?In post 220, CheekyTeeky wrote:Wut? O_o'
Is waffling the buzzword? And I'm cereal about not getting what it is you're getting at. >.<
Hey whilst you're here. What do you make of xRECKONERx determining to vote you EOD? I find it "interesting" that you haven't even flinched or shown curiosity as to why that may be.
As for Reck, he can do what he wants, it isn't my job to worry about whether someone is going to vote for me or not. It is my job to determine people's alignment and find scum. The statement by itself doesn't move the needle for his alignment to me, so I didn't react to it.
I don't feel that I (or any player, especially if they are also town) need to react to every single thing. It is okay to let other people play the game too.
(please keep in mind I am still not accusing you of anything, I am explaining my thought processes)In post 323, T-Bone wrote:
Penguin, what the hell are you allowing to be taught in the newbie queue that this question STILL gets asked in 2018?In post 275, CheekyTeeky wrote:Gooey pitch to me why outing crumbs makes sense as a play from scum?
SIGH
The answer to ALL questions that ask "why would scum...?" is ALWAYS to make someone ask "why would scum...?"
This is a public service announcement, funded by PepsiCo.
If you're legit confused that's fine. Here is the sequence of events. You did some things which I had commented on quite a few times. I then said, "at no point did I ever make a judgment about your alignment". You said, "Why not". And I said "Maybe you did it because you are insecure about your own abilities as a player. Maybe you did it because you are scum and you feel like "this is what town-me should do."" And then I explained that since voice that "you could be scum or town" amounts to empty content, it is not worth exploring...because everyone can be scum or town. And if I'm going to criticize players for empty content either now or in the future, I can't do it myself...because it isn't helpful for me or anyone else to find scum. Does that make sense?In post 220, CheekyTeeky wrote:Wut? O_o'
Is waffling the buzzword? And I'm cereal about not getting what it is you're getting at. >.<
Hey whilst you're here. What do you make of xRECKONERx determining to vote you EOD? I find it "interesting" that you haven't even flinched or shown curiosity as to why that may be.
As for Reck, he can do what he wants, it isn't my job to worry about whether someone is going to vote for me or not. It is my job to determine people's alignment and find scum. The statement by itself doesn't move the needle for his alignment to me, so I didn't react to it.
I don't feel that I (or any player, especially if they are also town) need to react to every single thing. It is okay to let other people play the game too.
(please keep in mind I am still not accusing you of anything, I am explaining my thought processes)
Also not a stance.
He then continues to mock Cheeky without committing to a read either way on her and then feels the need to tell her that he's still not accusing her of anything.
In post 331, T-Bone wrote:
I'm explaining my thought processes and why I do things...but you can do what you want. I assume you have some level of autonomy.In post 329, CheekyTeeky wrote:
...Am I the only one seeing these things? Noone else can see it?In post 326, T-Bone wrote:I've literally accused you of none of those things.
Yeah but I'm voting for you <3northsidegal wrote:@T-Bone – why are you like only talking about or to Cheeky?
What would you like to talk about?In post 334, T-Bone wrote:So...you didn't want to talk to me...while criticizing me for only talking to Cheeky. Why is the burden on me to open a dialogue with people? Be the change you want to see.
, and is as good a player to start with as any. Do you feel anyone else has produced more than a post's worth of game relevant content? Because I don't. I feel most players are just floating along, or throwing stuff at a wall to see if anything sticks.As for WHY I am talking to her...it is because I am trying to determine her alignment, and I feel out of all the players so far, she has produced the most 'game relevant' content
I voted for you because I quoted a post of hers where she said essentially she didn't like votes without an explanation...to which I then voted you without explanation. I picked you randomly (and in fact, you hadn't even checked in). As for why I haven't moved the vote...it isn't harming anyone. Unless you feel pressured by it? In which case I guess it is pulling some unintended utility.In post 335, T-Bone wrote:Also, when I started engaging with Cheeky I was trying to start a bit where multiple people quote a post adding the question "what is the purpose of this post?" over and over again, but Cheeky immediately responded unfavorably and now here we are, talking about why I was only talking to her.In post 337, T-Bone wrote:You've effectively made my point, by the way. Thank you.In post 352, T-Bone wrote:In post 334, T-Bone wrote: Do you feel anyone else has produced more than a post's worth of game relevant content?Because I don't.In post 336, northsidegal wrote:eh, i'm bored and gamma's iso is short, going to do a mathdino-style full iso "lolcase"nothing game relatedtotally NAI.NAI,still nothing game relatedI don't think that's a scumtell in its own right but i don't see why gamma wouldn't just come out and say it or actually just use it to form a read on penguin and mention the tell.nothingprobably not a sound conclusion but this is a lolcase so -shrug-don't really like these votes
Ummm...yeah i don't really feel like continuing thisbut you get the gist, not really seeing any sorting or effort at sorting there
I know I'm deleting a lot of the post, but yes you make my point that not a lot of game relevant content has happened...but pointing it all out in your lolcase on Gamma.northsidegal wrote: 2 Yes, i do disagree, hence my votes.
Yes, I do appreciate that you are throwing stuff at a wall and seeing if it sticks. That is totally fine and I wouldn't usually criticize something like that at this stage of the game. I don't get why you don't appreciate that I would want to spend time on something I feel is productive instead (which is sorting a player who has a lot of serious content)?
By the standard you are trying to impose, would it be fair to point out that my attempt to sort Cheeky is productive for the town (specifically for me)...but your 'lolcase' on Gamma is complete nonsense...by virtue of you handwaving everything you say with "but this is an lolcase"? I think it would be very fair for me to say that I'm doing something productive, and you aren't in these examples.
If you think it is scummy, so be it. But when you say "it is not a debate, I'm just noting a scumtell". Seems like you're inviting a debate to me, and one I am happy to have. Especially if you want to question something you find scummy...while simultaneously doing something scummy AND pointless.
Totallyis this your normal philosophy when it comes to voting? just checking.
Completely
and
Unequivocally
Claims Cheeky has the most game-relevant content, but once again, no stance.In post 368, T-Bone wrote:Not saying you did anything scummy. I am having a conversation with you. (you know, the thing I do to try and sort people's alignment)
Admits his North vote was completely random. Ends the conversation with: 'I don't think you did anything scummy,' which begs the question of half his conversation with NSG and once again, not a stance.
In post 374, T-Bone wrote:Vax, have you considered that someone can make a post, and it not be motivated by, or otherwise indicate their alignment?
Have you considered that players can make more than 1 post like this? More than 2? Most of their ISO?
Honestly, mutant has done really only one thing that I would honestly look at and think "what is he trying to accomplish? Is he doing this because he's scum?" And it is far and away not the "i feel like it" comment.In post 380, T-Bone wrote:The only thing I might consider is the post where he reacts to Cheeky for pointing out the non-crumbs...but even then I feel that is a stretch.Alright Vax, I do disagree. I don't think he's done anything to really indicate his alignment.
For reference, I also think players as a whole, do very few things that betray them as scum.
Responds to Vax and talks about Mutant.In post 442, T-Bone wrote:I'm not trying to persuade you that mutant is town. I don't know that he is, and I don't have a strong feeling either way. I'm saying that of all his posts, I think so far almost none of them have to do with his alignment at the moment. And of the one post that might, I could see it as either way.
No stance on either.
Meh. One stance I guess. Although I'm unsure as to whether he's just continuing it on from the 'probably just a joke' from the beginning of the game or if there's actual reasons for this.In post 442, T-Bone wrote:I'm on the same side as Town!Vax so don't take things that I say as an attack. You wanted discussion and I tried to give it to you.
Didn't really say anything beyond this and didn't vote her with me.In post 490, T-Bone wrote:
I endorse this service and or product.In post 487, Brian Skies wrote:Let's all wagon AA9 before she prod dodges again.
Buries this in a spoiler tag, but doesn't go into why he townreads Cheeky or fight against her lynch in any way.In post 533, T-Bone wrote:2) At this point, I think you're probably town. O.O
Eh. I guess this isn't a completely awful vote. But there isn't anything that makes me believe TBone believes this will flip scum.In post 709, T-Bone wrote:Well, won't you look at that! I just did!
And it counts!
Do you need another vote count to see?
Also, while I don't want to encourage VC burning, I just feel that scum blatantly going through them would be a completely unclassy move to make.
If I've somehow missed one of TBone's amazing stances this game, enlighten me.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
And yet her reads below that line are somewhat consistent with what I remember from her.In post 941, Firebringer wrote:
This is ridiculous.In post 934, CheekyTeeky wrote:Current lynchpool:
Hyung, FB, Reck, NSG, Tbone, Pine
People who I wouldn't mind getting lynched (policy):
AA9, Hiplop, mutant, brass
--------------------
People I might lynch tomorrow:
Gooey, Penguin, Vax, Brian
Never lynching:
Gemerald, Vecna
The lynchgroup is interesting though. Why are both FB and Reck being scumread?
Why is Gemerald so high?- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
I'm going to be honest though, my main issue isn't so much just the lack of stances, but you making the effort to get into these long drawn out conversations without explaining what you've gotten out of it. And then, you feel the need to back off by claiming 'oh btw, I'm not or wasn't scumreading you," which just feels like you either backtracking or trying not to rock the boat. It's like, if you don't think it's alignment indicative or worth pursuing, then wtf were you doing? Posting for the sake of posting?- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
Oh, you think so? I kind of gloss over her posts.In post 957, Gammagooey wrote:hey brian
do you think cheeky could be a scums
because i think cheeky is a scums
I was actually okay with the wagon on her during my reread since it seemed like she was bouncing around without any rhyme or reason (and I can see scum doing that and others scumreading her for that sort of behavior, although I'm unsure if that's why most of you were voting her). I was kind of okay with her in the last few pages in regards to Reck, but I don't remember why I was.
I didn't like her Vecna townread, and I haven't bothered to check if she's indeed scumreading everyone who votes her (which is just lol if this is the case because I think she's admitted to trying to pull attention to herself).- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
This is untrue. We've only used half of them.In post 965, CheekyTeeky wrote:He used up our VCs so now we only have 1 official one left.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
¯\_(ツ)_/¯In post 980, T-Bone wrote:I DIDN'T WANT YOU TO FEEL LEFT OUT SHEESH
I standby my claim of having no idea how to read Pine.In post 939, T-Bone wrote:And I would put my criticism of Pine in the same place I put mine of northsidegal. Content that is easily faked and lacks meaning beyond the surface.
But I definitely feel like NSG should be a person more capable of making good content and I don't think I've seen that yet.
She's still on V/LA though, but god forbid I call her out and have her break her V/LA again.
LOL.
What is your read on NSG any way? And what do you think of people just sorting her as town as if she's done something majorly alignment indicative?
Also, for the record, every time I open Cheeky's iso, I still get the same "I don't really want to lynch this, this doesn't really look scummy to me," but everyone keeps saying she's scummy and that's the only reason I doubt myself.- Brian Skies
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies
- Brian Skies