FFIX best FF tho I did get the FFI reference.In post 405, the worst wrote:Did you prefer the FFI or FFIX ref Ceejay? V important
Btw I want to hear from you on why Oxy is scum.
FFIX best FF tho I did get the FFI reference.In post 405, the worst wrote:Did you prefer the FFI or FFIX ref Ceejay? V important
This is bunk becauseIn post 417, Sando wrote:No I'm saying a confident town-read early in the game is anti-scum. Scum don't want to clear people, and they don't want to put a spotlight on their scumpartners, the easiest and simplest way to do this is to say little of note about them. One of the hardest and probably most dangerous for scum ways to do this is to give confident townreads.In post 411, Oxy wrote:So you're town reading him for giving a town read without explanation in a confident fashion?
And this is bunk because the vote was based on a potential town slip being misunderstood to be a scum slip (or a reaction test, w/e) and the only reasonable view from either alignment is that the vote was bad.Sando wrote:165 is a strong push against a quick wagon who had one of his townreads already on it, this is what I'm getting at with anti-groupthink
You want to talk about my not having sorted you yet?In post 426, the worst wrote:Oof...IV is my favourite. Guess I'm foreveralone.
I'll have a better read of Oxy when he talks to me (if he isnt scared of me. ). Pardon me for being dismissive but any case or explanation I give now would be lacking compared to one I can give shortly.
In post 416, the worst wrote:This is starting to ping me.In post 410, Oxy wrote:I'm concerned that your biggest concern seems to be my read on you.
Why do you think this is a concern and not a topic?
In post 413, the worst wrote:Yo talk to meIn post 410, Oxy wrote:the worst, asking them for the posts that make you look town is an exercise to both to help me sort you, and to continue building my reads on them. The game is long, and I'll get to different slots as I get to them.
I'm concerned that your biggest concern seems to be my read on you.
This game has been quiet, you and I have posted a lot. I'm also pretty introverted so get very strong feelings based on how players interact with me.
Give me a strong read and justify it with textual evidence. :3
Your read list was bad for a few reasons which I'll go into shortly~
In post 408, the worst wrote:Oxy I'm concerned you stated a nullread on me yet keep quizzing people on me while ignoring your other nullreads.
I believe you have a read on me. Your readslist was shonky and I do not believe it stated how you actually feel about players. cough up buddy
here's a stanceIn post 373, Oxy wrote:This is not the game of scum!fumuki claiming scum
claiming slayers
Executing the switch from trolly posts to more serious posts, back to a middle ground in an emotionally and tonally manner consistent with town.
They gave a reads list with explanations, you are being unreasonable.In post 435, the worst wrote:I'm charismatic? ^_^ thankyou!
Not actively coaching someone I'm starting to scumread though, I'm sorry. If you're town show me your townie gamesolving mindset!
I hate being condescending but I am curious to see your stance. You strike me as a generally clever individual. What do you define as concern vs. topic?
pedit: and another one pls
Have strong reads - You're too confident in your reads! You must be scum because only they could be that confidentIn post 437, the worst wrote:See thats a big problem. I notice you've got townreads/leans on a number of players, but it feels like every reason you give comes with a reason you could be wrong. This is a scummy behaviour. It indicates avoiding accountability which comes from a survival>gamesolving mindset.
I disagree.In post 440, the worst wrote:Another concern I have is that you don't seem to find it easy to talk to your townreads. You've made no effort to reach out to Fumuki/Sando/Korina to discuss the goings on of the game and yet you reached out to our favourite Renaissance artist? It's just very strange unconscious behaviour.
I agree strong reads are only valuable when you actually believe them but evasive reads which contain reasons to withdraw them later are a far better scumtell than confidence!In post 439, Oxy wrote:Have strong reads - You're too confident in your reads! You must be scum because only they could be that confidentIn post 437, the worst wrote:See thats a big problem. I notice you've got townreads/leans on a number of players, but it feels like every reason you give comes with a reason you could be wrong. This is a scummy behaviour. It indicates avoiding accountability which comes from a survival>gamesolving mindset.
Don't have strong reads - You don't have strong reads! you must be scum because they benefit from not having strong reads
Both lines of argument are awful at this point. Turns out, the strength of my reads are determined by the town tells other people give off in a particular game, and my ability to pick up on them.
K...In post 427, Oxy wrote:This is bunk because
a) there's really no downside to having a strong town read D1.
b) wifom
c) if it becomes convenient to try and mislynch/bus, there will be more recent posts to allow changing a read
d) there's not actually any evidence that he held you as a strong read at that point
e) wifom
So hang on, duckling points out why someone was wrong (and you agree he's correct), but I'm wrong to think that gives him townpoints?In post 427, Oxy wrote:And this is bunk because the vote was based on a potential town slip being misunderstood to be a scum slip (or a reaction test, w/e) and the only reasonable view from either alignment is that the vote was bad.
So yeah, my conclusion from this exercise is that I should be very careful to check your work before sheeping any of your reads, even if you end up conf!town.
The intent behind readslists is = important to the content of the listIn post 445, ceejayvinoya wrote:Why are we dragging scumtells out of reads lists? Asking why a person is tr or sr is fine I guess. But to go and say "I don't like this list. You're scum" won't help us.