Id rather you didn’tIn post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm gonna try something: for this I'm gonna lurk out the first irl day or so
VOTE: Gamma
Id rather you didn’tIn post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm gonna try something: for this I'm gonna lurk out the first irl day or so
I played with Thor recently and he said RVS is really Low information voting stage rather than purely randomIn post 23, Nosferatu wrote:why would it be random voting then?In post 21, Theta Alpine wrote:hey all
VOTE: beefster
you are at least supposed to have a reason in rvs
at least i think so
Fake p editIn post 36, Nosferatu wrote:Just because it's redundant doesn't make it wrong. Mods make shit like that all the time just to make a role hard to claim outright. He also hasn't fully expanded on the nature of his role. It could be an X-shot ascetic miller. Or ascetic comes with some heavy asterisks. Or he's just paraphrasing his role name. There's a lot of possibilities.In post 35, Nictis wrote:I completely failed to respond to that post. Ascetic Miller isn't overkill for a fakeclaim, it's just wrong. "You can't visit me but if you could I would come up as scum," doesn't make sense.
You are romantically involved with one of the other players in the game?In post 40, northsidegal wrote:i have something to say but i'm waiting to say it.
Ah so that’s why you claimed AsceticIn post 85, Flavor Leaf wrote:Gamma and I finished a game recently where we were in a neighborhood together, I was scum, he wanted to mason claim with me, and 3p lylo we lynched a rolecopped confirmed Miller.In post 83, profii wrote:Everyone is talking about the miller bit and I do t see anyone mentioning that Gamma gave himself a reason to get out the way and not react to being outed as a neighbour to this baloney
It kinda makes me think Gamma was prepped for this which doesn’t make FL a miller but the neighbourhood bit might be a thing
@Gamma - you get to bring up my “forgot I was Vig not SK” story, I get to bring up this one.
How many scum should we expect in a 20p gameIn post 116, TwoInAMillion wrote:The odds of this being an all town neighborhood are very low.
We played that newbie game where you were JK right? I don’t know who James isIn post 110, Inferno390 wrote:I've got to ask. How many people here have played in a game with James or I?
Is fire in the town committee because you are actually masons or was that RVS stuff just for lolsIn post 210, Pine wrote:@Firebringer: Yeah. Town committee = Pine, Gamma, Fire, Flubber.
Inferno and TIAM are likely Town too, but not up to par.
I feel like I'm forgetting someone though.
yea the last sentence of my post is me agreeing with all of your postIn post 303, Nictis wrote:Eh, even if it is just a joke claim (Which I hear he does on a regular basis) it's one that makes it a bit more unlikely for him to get copped. Plenty of other people for the cop to check instead of the guy who's saying he can't be investigated or will turn up guilty if he is.In post 302, profii wrote: So I’m giving him a chance here. I guess his gambit is make himself so untrustable he gets himself copped and has the luxury of being conf town until scum decide we can’t have a conf town in the game.
Idk but overall if you are intentionally putting yourself in the position of “you are all so unsure of me you need to cop me” then I am guessing town
But idk because that is the weirdest claim
Right now I mostly don't like how he claimed that I was saying something I never did.
why?In post 364, Inferno390 wrote:I'm OMGUSING you.
I think he has forgotten the game where he replaced out with me as well I town read his replacement almost immediately after as well heh.In post 588, Firebringer wrote:Don’t forget the game you got kicked from because you went to far in a 1v1 that mod forced you out
Only game I have ever seen where scum got force replaced for being toxic without getting a ban
In post 560, profii wrote:@NSG
Do an ISO of me plus Inferno together
I think the lol-tunnel started after I said hey you’re not lol-tunneling.That felt like he is actively trying to do something different which seems like a scum play to me.
So I also feel like he is trying to revert to his town play now that he’s been picked up on it
Seeing as you were in that newbie game with us, does that read make sense? I think I’m spot on
Is that a chainsaw I see?In post 665, Firebringer wrote:Why r u voting a person with no posts?In post 662, TwoInAMillion wrote:Based on what?
fundamentally UCV has been active on site and not posted. this is bad for the game.In post 716, Pine wrote:Yeah, except Profii was impugning possible motivations for the wagon, suggesting a false dichotomy. 1) Chainsaw defense of UCV, which is ridiculous or 2) UCV is Town and something about a late joiner is scum this one didn't actually make any damn sense. I was proffering a 3) No, I actually just think you're scum, and your vote is irrelevant.
Come on, Gamma. It was a turn of phrase, not an insight.
never seen it happen before... is there some kind of random role that would explain this?In post 721, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:profii, have you ever pushed somoene who has confirmed but not posted before? I’m failing to understand the paranoia.
How will things develop if you don’t vote?In post 933, Inferno390 wrote:We should be lynching in either of the Flavors, Profii, TIAM, and to a lesser extent Mulch and Beef unless something drastic happens, I doubt I'll be voting anywhere else today. I'm not going to be placing a vote at this point however. I want to see what else develops.
I also agree with Quick that Gamma feels wooden, but it doesn't feel "scum" wooden. Just odd.
well that sits nicely under lynch all liarsIn post 1097, Archwing wrote:I think you'd be surprised about what people lie about. Also, interpretation matters. Thats why I wanted another opinion.Egg wrote:I kinda doubt he'd lie when people can come in and verify like that.In post 1086, Archwing wrote:Can someone else in the hood please confirm/deny this?In post 1082, Flavor Leaf wrote:Quick said he wasn’t aware when he replaced in, yet in the neighborhood he brought up trying to policy before I even started posting. He then made a case on me.
@profii,
quick was allegedly pushing a policy lynch on Flavor Leaf. before he said, in game thread, that he didn't realize Flavor was in this game?
kinda fucky.
and that, ladies and gents, is enough to warrant my first vote of the game.
VOTE: Quick
Yea I thought they might have meant more than 1 from the hood rather than not sure if he or she
I've got it asIn post 1156, Flubbernugget wrote:I think this depends on whether or not flavor is lying about what happened in the hood. I think the hood is 3p so he probably isn't.In post 1104, Nosferatu wrote:you say this like its completely impossible for him to have signed up to replace in, not looked at playerlist, confirmed his role pm, checked the neighborhood, see like 40 flavor posts and then go "aw fuck"
y'all really think he was totally aware that a blacklisted player of his was in a game, he chose to then replace into it, made comments on policy lynching said blacklisted player, and then decided "y'know what, fuck it" and left the game...for what? Because he willingly replaced into a game with someone he obviously has a vehement distaste for?
Are you guys on shrooms or something?
So Quick has asked to replace out because he didn’t know that FL was here when he came in. Now that I can believe - I’ve replaced in just because I was bored and wanted to play, rather than cherry picking a slotIn post 1082, Flavor Leaf wrote:Quick didn’t replace out because he’s scum, he replaced out because he’s scum on my blacklist, and I read him as scummy.
Quick said he wasn’t aware when he replaced in, yet in the neighborhood he brought up trying to policy before I even started posting. He then made a case on me.
He left after I started pushing back.
Replacement is NAI, but the stuff said around it is scummy to me
I feel like Quick tried to push some policy on FL to resolve the 1v1 and because it failed he stepped out the game as he is probably going to say the 1v1 will drag on and hurt the game.In post 1164, Inferno390 wrote:The problem with this though (and I'm not sure how you missed this) is that Quick tried to force a PL on Leaf in the hood threadIn post 1163, profii wrote:I went back to highlight my lynch all liars policy on Quick and found this
So Quick has asked to replace out because he didn’t know that FL was here when he came in. Now that I can believe - I’ve replaced in just because I was bored and wanted to play, rather than cherry picking a slotIn post 1082, Flavor Leaf wrote:Quick didn’t replace out because he’s scum, he replaced out because he’s scum on my blacklist, and I read him as scummy.
Quick said he wasn’t aware when he replaced in, yet in the neighborhood he brought up trying to policy before I even started posting. He then made a case on me.
He left after I started pushing back.
Replacement is NAI, but the stuff said around it is scummy to me
So for FL to post the above means Quick might have just joined and _then_ realised he was in a game with FL
Now he isn’t posting so I’m assuming that is what was meant
So I don’t think I have enough for lynch all liars, it could just be that after realising who was in the game, he then had an issue.
UNVOTE:
Firebringer was on this wagon and just said policy, what policy please?
Also be interested to see how TIAM reads all thathoursbefore he said he wanted to replace out. Which makes it really hard to believe that he wouldn't have replaced out already, considering the fact that he basically knew Leaf was in the gamefrom the moment he arrived. It's not like he missed the fact that Leaf was in the game when he started posting in the game thread. He had to have known. Which is why his response doesn't make any sense.
im saying for someone who wants the lynch you are not as forthcoming as one might expectIn post 1171, TwoInAMillion wrote:Profii literally just said that he doesn't like that I'm not posting like another player.In post 1170, Inferno390 wrote:That might just be because I'm a tryhard lol.profii wrote: I also don’t like that TIAM isn’t posting alon the lines of what you just said so I’m kinda stuck between 2 wagons rn
As for the policy lynch, his reasoning was because Leaf has "a horrible playstyle." Which is both AtP and shit reason for a PL, soprofii wrote: What policy was Quick even trying to push? Lynch a fake claim?
Wow. This coming from TIAM this game? Really?TwoInAMillion wrote: You don't like that I have my own opinions?