Coaching?
VOTE: Index Chan
Coaching?
I art good. How art thou?In post 33, InfernoBrafin wrote:Hey acyron, how art thou?
I agree actually.
In post 72, Raskolnikov wrote:In post 44, Joey_ wrote:Lets play a game
Someone officially and actually scumtold, if anyone finds the line im talking about gets a townread for a dayAlso this is scummy grandstandy
Agree it is paranoidspec/reaching. Games can be hard enough to read through sometimes with people using normal colors.In post 102, Raskolnikov wrote:maybe paranoidspec/reaching but feeling this level of mad over yellow as unrealisticIn post 24, Index Chan wrote:VOTE: InfernoIn post 23, InfernoBrafin wrote:Kokichi is prob scum, pint is trying to start conversation
Serious vote lets go.
Also don't use fucking yellow thats hard as fuck to read on MafSilver and MafSepia.
So are you telling me you really expected the Inferno wagon, which was clearly largely built on RVS, was potentially going to devolve into a forced claim scenario?In post 129, pinturicchio wrote:Unvoting Is doing something. Unvoting for a wagon that is getting momentum and could lead to an L-1 situation where a claim could be done is doing something. And last but not least, unvoting for someone you are not scumreading is absolutely doing something.In post 126, acryon wrote: What is the point of taking off your RVS vote but then not actually doing anything?
VOTE: pinturicchio
What do you want me to do? I have no good reads atm, like no reads at all. Should I vote randomly for someone again?
Also not big on Kokichi.In post 130, Beefster wrote: What's the deal with this? These votes look lazy and opportunistic.
VOTE: Kokichi Oma
Ok I see what you're talking about here now, and you haven't really pinged me yet, but this is so trash that it's hard for me to believe that you really believe it.In post 131, InfernoBrafin wrote: Can't explain why Arcyon is prob-scum here. That would be rules violation.
Do you think the vote was legit or semi-RVS?In post 164, Joey_ wrote:I think they want me to dead because he's under the assumption that it is beneficial to his win condition
Your play has been pretty obvtown so far. You know how sometimes you see someone play and you just know they're town? That's you.In post 168, MariaR wrote:Why do people tr me even I don't feel like I've done much...not that I'm complaining please keep tring me (hehehehehe fools all of you)
If you think he's scum, why is your vote on beef and not him?In post 170, Joey_ wrote:legit, i think he thinks im mefiaIn post 166, acryon wrote:Do you think the vote was legit or semi-RVS?In post 164, Joey_ wrote:I think they want me to dead because he's under the assumption that it is beneficial to his win condition
You're totally right. I misread this post. Ignore my question Joey.In post 173, pisskop wrote:Thats a silly question.
He implies the townread on him. The real questionis why he's wasting energy on it.
In post 164, Joey_ wrote:I think they want me to dead because he's under the assumption that it is beneficial to his win condition
Because your statement was more hypothetical. Now it's clear you believed that was happening in actuality. That being said I didn't actually realize it was already at L-3 when you unvoted, so I guess I can see you believing that.In post 180, pinturicchio wrote:I saw a lot of people saying they were seriously voting for James390 and I felt I should take my vote out because my vote wasn't serious as theirs, and yes, I saw it was going to a force claim scenario, that's exactly what I said in my post. What's the point of refrasing what I said and making it a question if the answer is already there?In post 136, acryon wrote:So are you telling me you really expected the Inferno wagon, which was clearly largely built on RVS, was potentially going to devolve into a forced claim scenario?In post 129, pinturicchio wrote:Unvoting Is doing something. Unvoting for a wagon that is getting momentum and could lead to an L-1 situation where a claim could be done is doing something. And last but not least, unvoting for someone you are not scumreading is absolutely doing something.In post 126, acryon wrote: What is the point of taking off your RVS vote but then not actually doing anything?
VOTE: pinturicchio
What do you want me to do? I have no good reads atm, like no reads at all. Should I vote randomly for someone again?
Is there anyone you think deserves towncred?In post 182, pinturicchio wrote:Are you implying that you have a gun? Show me yours and I'll show you mine!
But for real, I would say Index. Their "Quick RVS readlist" pings me, because they have James390 as scum (the biggest wagon built at this point) and give towncred to a lot of people who may or may not deserve it, maybe to start distancing with their scumpals or to pocket townies. Also, they called me Pinocchio. BUT! Not worth a vote yet, I'm still sorting and reading again their read list to see any weird interaction with someone who could be their partner.
Did you really think he was being serious? Also why is beef scum?In post 187, Joey_ wrote:pinnochio is a 1st level kind of guy
Did you really think he was being serious?
Fair.In post 207, pisskop wrote:Unlike some, I didnt miss him answering the question. I knew he was making an attempt at humor. Its the joke thats scummy.
I guess but why are you PR-spec'ing?In post 210, Joey_ wrote:Meat is scum because i am a vegetarian, also yes pinocchio’s line about the gun was especially awk/strange but not in a scummy way, the vig crumb isnt an idea that far fetched
In post 215, Joey_ wrote:Good question, i have a bad habit of outing pr reads/tells because i thinks its fun
Outing PR's is explicitly anti-town, which is the best reason I've found so far to have a vote on someone.In post 219, Joey_ wrote:You think this is ai?In post 217, acryon wrote:In post 215, Joey_ wrote:Good question, i have a bad habit of outing pr reads/tells because i thinks its fun
VOTE: Joey
Nothing personal.
Surely you understand how that's a convenient bad habit as scum.In post 223, Joey_ wrote:But it just said its a bad habit implying i do that as either alognement. If i could show propf of that would it sway you or you arent the type to take new infos into account?
And so am I by voting himIn post 222, pisskop wrote:Pistachio and Joey can have some time to provide more stuff if you want. But I mean Joey's progressing the game.
I understand that. But by definition of anti-town, the mafia benefits from it so it's probably in the town's best interest to lynch people that are helping out the mafia. Worst case we lynch a detriment to town.In post 225, Joey_ wrote:Also anti-town doesnt mean mafia, it means anti-town
Well if mafia do not have day-chat, then they have a vested interest in getting a vig lynched during the day, since it's the one role that can still do you damage even if you NK.In post 231, Joey_ wrote:Acrlyc, tell me why would i need to out said read? What is convenient about it in this game? I could sureley tell my mefia partner at night or day if they have chatIn post 228, acryon wrote:Surely you understand how that's a convenient bad habit as scum.In post 223, Joey_ wrote:But it just said its a bad habit implying i do that as either alognement. If i could show propf of that would it sway you or you arent the type to take new infos into account?
And so am I by voting himIn post 222, pisskop wrote:Pistachio and Joey can have some time to provide more stuff if you want. But I mean Joey's progressing the game.
Agree, except change the 2nd part to lean-scum.In post 239, pisskop wrote:Your style says town, your posting says null
Ok, again this assumes they have day-chat. Not sure the actual site percentage, but I've played about 50/50 games with day-chat and games without.In post 242, Torque wrote:*coming out of flaking*
Joey is town for pointing out the soft or whatever lol
a wolf would just say it in their chat
1. There are 2 people that help mafia: mafia, and detrimental town. The first we really really want to lynch, and the 2nd is better than many other alternatives, so not a bad loss if we're wrong.In post 247, Torque wrote:1. that lynching a detriment to town mentality is so wolfy holy shit
2. idk if mafia has day chat but i don't think pointing out some one is softing a village role helps mafia lynch them at all
Not quite. This early in the day it's an off-hand comment to the town. 10 IRL days from now, no one is going to hold against him that he mentioned someone was softing vig that early on.Torque wrote:because if buddies see it then the village sees it tooIn post 249, acryon wrote:1. There are 2 people that help mafia: mafia, and detrimental town. The first we really really want to lynch, and the 2nd is better than many other alternatives, so not a bad loss if we're wrong.In post 247, Torque wrote:1. that lynching a detriment to town mentality is so wolfy holy shit
2. idk if mafia has day chat but i don't think pointing out some one is softing a village role helps mafia lynch them at all
2. How does it not help to signal to partners that you think someone is a PR that needs to be lynched?
it's telling villagers "hey this guy is a vig don't lynch him"
I'm worried I'm playing with a bunch of trolls in which case town might as well quit now. Can't imagine a better environment for scum to thrive.
I think we have different definitions of trolling I'm presenting what I believe to be a realistic scenario. The rest of the town can decide whether they agree with me or not.In post 256, Joey_ wrote:Funny part is you are the troll arguing on a behavior scum wouldnt do, that I do as eother alognement and you are campaigning to lynch a slot voting for mefia whos anti town now?!In post 254, acryon wrote:I'm worried I'm playing with a bunch of trolls in which case town might as well quit now. Can't imagine a better environment for scum to thrive.
Well I'm certainly not going to start by targeting people that look town...Joey_ wrote:Have you seen pirate of ghe caribeans? Its ppl who are pro town you should be suspicious about because you mever know when they will turn wolfy!
I also don't believe that he was immediately trying to start up a wagon on him. I think it was possibly a signal to his other partners that he may be a good ultimate target for the day.Torque wrote:honestly the way Joey pointed it out was so clear to everybody in game that he doesnt think pistachio should be lynched
Why would a townie say something like this? To hopefully get people to start playing for real? Ironically, in the line literally right before you asked this seems to imply you would be on my side in this: "This game was full of jokes and nonsense; now we have something real to start the witch hunting."In post 269, pinturicchio wrote:Gotcha.In post 254, acryon wrote: I'm worried I'm playing with a bunch of trolls in which case town might as well quit now. Can't imagine a better environment for scum to thrive.
My joke was not softing a PR, but a reaction test. This game was full of jokes and nonsense; now we have something real to start the witch hunting.
This post of yours is ridicously scummy: too LAMIST to come from town. Why would a townie say something like this?
VOTE: acryon
What is your problem with InfernoBraf?In post 267, pisskop wrote:but w.e. Ive never turned down a wagon. And you guys are failing me on inferno.
VOTE: beef
Silly is usually a nice way of saying stupid, but I'm glad you at least see where it's coming from.In post 270, Joey_ wrote:Can you vote meat pliz ? crayola is a bit silly but i think hes town
Why do you even make that first point? I would hope you wouldn't avoid a wagon because you don't want people to think you are bussing...In post 273, pinturicchio wrote:Then if I vote him now it would look like I'm bussing because of this, as I already said that I don't see the scumread everyone is seeingIn post 272, Joey_ wrote:No, absolutely not at all and the lack of content is actually telling pinnocchio, his wagon is not wierd because it's on mefia and mefia don't like mefia being wagoned
1. Well I'm not going to apologize for voicing my opinion, so we can agree to disagree on that.In post 276, pinturicchio wrote:1.- Yes, I agree that I want the rest to start playing for real, but your "impatience" on this subject doesn't feel real; it seems you tried to get some towncred by replicating something towne could be thinking but not saying.
2.- I'm not "avoiding" the wagon, I'm not jumping on it because I don't see what Joey sees about Beefster, and he said in a post before "could you change your vote please?". The post you quoted was a joke, don't you see the emoji at the end of it? Joey's tone is funny, I replied like that.
This is my style (admittedly as either alignment). I play mafia for fun, but from the standpoint that it's fun to investigate. If I want to have silly fun, I can mess around with people I know IRL, so you won't see me do that much here. I don't want to create the impression that I hate fun or being silly, but I also will do my best to keep the game from goingIn post 297, pinturicchio wrote:I believe acryon has played consistenly as a "serious" guy in a game where almost everyone else is being troll af. That's a good alibi
My point was more-so to others than you, but your post was the most recent of a ton of "jokey" posts. So it was just me trying to preempt the aforementioned going off the rails.In post 318, Torque wrote:ya know crayon's "im playing with trolls" and whatever was a response to one of my posts. I mean I don't see any relationship between that comment and my post, I'm sure there was something, not just like "look at me being serious while everyone is trolling xdxd"
Want him to explain what the purpose of that comment was but I don't think scumreading him based on that is a thing really
I agree with this.In post 320, Torque wrote:not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game
Haven't gathered much from your posts. Any reads thusfar?In post 328, Dunnstral wrote:me too
I don't particularly buy into it right now, but I also don't have enough of an issue with it to challenge people on it. His few posts alone aren't enough to sway me one way or the other.In post 334, Joey_ wrote:Why arent you voting the meat boi ? Why arent you even commenting on the wagon itself when you seems to react to the rest of the content
You should likely have some conviction behind your reads, yes.In post 336, Gamma Emerald wrote:Would you rather me be locked into my reads and have terrible ones like in Railgun?In post 320, Torque wrote:not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game
If you're not fishing, then how about you just say? How are guessing games helpful for anyone?In post 338, Gamma Emerald wrote:I give everyone one post to tell me what's wrong with acryon's last post (and btw I already very much know what I'm saying so don't bother screaming anything about me fishing for reasoning)
Haven't had to use this one in a while.In post 341, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because I'm wanting to see if anyone else can see how obviously bad what I'm looking at is
Because I want to make sure you know I'm not using it lightly.
I'm allowed to dislike the play of someone that's voting me, and I'm not going to avoid saying so just because it looks OMGUS-y.In post 346, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Joey not it.Of course he agrees with them because I'm voting him, this feels completely unnecessary and as such for show.In post 333, acryon wrote:I agree with this.In post 320, Torque wrote:not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game
I typically do a catch-up post each morning where I go through and add things to one post as I encounter them/think about them. I can understand your other point about how it looks like posturing though. Maybe I should've added a FoS? Just not something I typically do.In post 349, Joey_ wrote:I always hated mid-post unvote, it feels as if the person is basically unvoting in reaction to whatever he quoted mid-post, i hate that
I was voting Joey at that point, who I no longer felt was scum. I wanted to re-vote, but after realizing he was V/LA, I figured I would give Rask a chance to catch up. I think a vote is a lot more meaningful when a person is around to react to it.In post 351, InfernoBrafin wrote:Brafin
@Gamma
Cause he's waiting, but wants to revote him. He should have just kept his vote there in the first place.
They're actually pretty close. They've both done similar bad things I think (i.e.72,130), but Rask just has a little more content for me to pick up tone from.In post 358, Torque wrote:@crayon whys rask wolfier than beefy
Well I think he's close to on par with Rask, which is almost wolfy enough to receive a serious vote, but not wolfy enough to be a 4th vote. Hence me not adding onto the wagon, but also not taking too much of an issue with people on it.In post 360, Torque wrote:#339 implies you don't think beef is wolfy tho
Who did you think was the scum bussing?In post 472, Joey_ wrote:i was genuinely mistaken, i 100% thought this was a bussed scum flip and im also surprised at the flip
I'm inclined to agree with this thought-process based on the same sample that obviously couldn't be mentioned D1. It did feel quite different from that game.In post 488, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk I feel like town him cares a lot more, though that's possibly based of a biased sampleIn post 487, MariaR wrote:I didn't see why a scum beef acted so lazy and "meh" about the gamestate if he was scum getting wagoned seemed like a big fuck you to his scum partner if he was scum also don't see him posting 431 as scum.
This is probably better for town then the reverse.In post 490, MariaR wrote:3 tr's and a ton of scumleans whew what a fun game
I KNEW someone else mentioned me with Index and PK before. Although it wasn't who I expected.
How do we not start with Kokichi here? That hammer was horrible.In post 21, Index Chan wrote:my guess for the scumteam is either me acryon and pisskop
I think I would be. If Beef was scum, wouldn't that be a great spot for scum to hammer since it gets them instant cred?In post 495, Joey_ wrote:To be fair, i enabled the quick hammer because.. well beef was incredibly scummy, its also easy to blame someone or blame a hammer when it is flipping read, hindsight is 20/20. You wouldnt be voting him rn if beef was indeed mafia
Not necessarily. I think it's way more likely to have come from scum with Beef as town then it is for it to come from scum if Beef was scum. I don't give him town-credit for telling us what he was going to do beforehand. It's more likely just posturing transparency to me.In post 499, Joey_ wrote:So basically you are saying that you are voting for a behavior that couldve happen as either alignement ?
Kokichi not just quick hammered, he also incited ppl to give him hammer which is a nuance over a blatant scum quick hammer out of the blue (in the case beef fliped mefia)
Given this thought process, what do you feel about Kokichi?In post 530, InfernoBrafin wrote:In post 526, Joey_ wrote:@Brafin[/b]
That lynch on Beef was a blatant, scum-driven: How and why ? Why was it blatantly scum driven?TOWN does not push a quick lynch within a week of starting the game. Only scum. Town is not stupid; they want days to last as long as possible.
Aside from me, who do you think is scum and why? You clearly thought Beef was scum, but haven't been able to tell much else from you in reads.In post 540, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yeah, Acryon might be scum looking for an easy push
The flip is relevant information; trying to figure out reasoning behind a kill is just as likely to lead us astray as it is to lead us to scum. I've played many games as scum where I literally chose the exactIn post 528, InfernoBrafin wrote: Before I continue, I'd like to say 2 things: Piss response about "not trying to figure out why Rask was lynched" is scummy as frack. That is the only way we catch scum today, is by finding the motivation for last night's kill. That and the lynch is the only info we have.
In post 545, InfernoBrafin wrote:That being said: Players, it's just mafia. just play!
I know you're not on board with Kokichi-scum, but what is your town-read on him based on? Also why the townread on Index?In post 576, Joey_ wrote:fixedIn post 575, Joey_ wrote:Le reads le 100% accurate by le joey
InfernoDuck Beta Emerald Cuckichi Pinocchio Torque ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓ PROB▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓Le grill Index Dun Acrylic Piss ??? VT ??? ??? ??? ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
Oh whoops. Well same question to him regarding you then.In post 580, Gamma Emerald wrote:He's not townreading Koki, he's townreading me
I have had a hard time determining whether or not Index's posts feel town or scum. I think they feel genuine, but you seem to have a better idea than me. I'm asking you to help me understand.In post 583, Joey_ wrote:while being scumread makes it easier to find mefias, i find it rather annoying that im asked to explain all my reads regularly. Also my "read list" is much a tool i am using than a list i want ppl to react to every timeIn post 582, acryon wrote:Oh whoops. Well same question to him regarding you then.In post 580, Gamma Emerald wrote:He's not townreading Koki, he's townreading me
FWIW, you're only further proving my point.In post 591, MariaR wrote:You haven't tried to buddy me yet.
Plus your reaction to brain isn't the way you'd react as scum given we've went overreactions and stuff in our scum pt before. I think you're just town and yeah you've tricked me before but it feels correct here if not oh well
I also don't like how crayon just said "Oh Maria you're just obv town cause you are" Wtf I'm never obv town I'm always like lynchbait and shit and I didn't even post much to be tr when he made that statement it felt weird to me
I can buy this, but it's interesting that you and Joey feel so opposite on it.In post 592, MariaR wrote:Like I can get Alisae feeling upset that this isn't rolemad upick but I don't think they'd get as upset as they're acting rn. It feels way over the top to not read/make excuses
What?? "Accept you weren't a part of that bad thing that happened." In what way do I benefit by saying I was "there in spirit" as a part of a mislynch?In post 609, pisskop wrote:What even is this saying? 'I was there in spirit'. what a copout. Accept you weren't on it. I don't like this.In post 477, acryon wrote:That hammer was very bad. I thought the vote from Rask was even worse because he knew the hammer was going to come.
I didn't vote Beef in the end, but I was there in spirit, so I'm hard-pressed to give anyone much crap for being on it.
That hammer was very bad. I thought the vote from Rask was even worse because he knew the hammer was going to come. I didn't vote Beef in the end, but I was there in spirit, so I'm hard-pressed to give anyone much crap for being on it.
I did not, although I mentioned early on I didn't really like him.In post 609, pisskop wrote:Did you even pressure kokichi? I don't recall anyone even really engaging him.
I feel like you're better than sheeping this. I mentioned early on I didn't like him. If you can't understand why a quickhammer wouldn't make me feel better about him, then I can't help you.In post 610, pisskop wrote:Yes.In post 540, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yeah, Acryon might be scum looking for an easy push
"Feels" implies an element of gut. The whole back and forth reads more like blown up misunderstanding than intentional misrepresentation.In post 610, pisskop wrote:How? They are talking past one another. thats not indicative. Their pushes could just be probes. One of them is town, though, at least.In post 542, acryon wrote:Either way I'm inclined to say it feels like TvT.
OMGUS, that's why.In post 621, Joey_ wrote:im pretty sure crayola is town, why do you scumread him kokichi
This is my point. I would have been on the beefwagon; I just wasn't interested in being on it at a point where it was close to a lynch. I wasn't ready to end the day.In post 627, pisskop wrote:Im talking to more than just you about the comments re:beefwagon. What do you make of the people saying scum were on the beefwagon? Do you think scum would pass up such a beefwagon, and hide off it? Why were youIn post 625, acryon wrote: What?? "Accept you weren't a part of that bad thing that happened." In what way do I benefit by saying I was "there in spirit" as a part of a mislynch?noton the beefy wagon? what made you on the beffwagon 'in spirit' instead of 'in practice'? Can I find more ways to say 'beefwagon'?
Because there were bigger fish to fry, and I hadn't seen enough else from him.In post 627, pisskop wrote:Y U NO DO THIS THENI did not, although I mentioned early on I didn't really like him.
So if you have a gut feeling that he is playing quite a bit differently, why are you not looking into that more?In post 627, pisskop wrote:Just poking the proverbial bear. I feel like you can give me more. Kokichi is lurking, and I don't particularly enjoy it. My only other game with him he was much, much more involved, albeit he had a bunch of other dangerrump friends with him.I feel like you're better than sheeping this. I mentioned early on I didn't like him. If you can't understand why a quickhammer wouldn't make me feel better about him, then I can't help you.
Not at this point. Their play feels earnest, although way off the mark in some ways. It's not too dissimilar from the last game I played with them. Fairly solid townread for me ATM.In post 627, pisskop wrote:I disagree. It could be TvT, but I don't feel the need to dismiss it. not when one of them is a scumread, and one a townread. Would you be willing to vote Inferno? Why or why not?"Feels" implies an element of gut. The whole back and forth reads more like blown up misunderstanding than intentional misrepresentation.
Well my two biggest scumreads from yesterday are dead. Kokichi is my number one now because his early play yesterday pinged, the quickhammer was bad, and his play today has been uninspiring to say the least. I could see scum!Gamma, because there just doesn't seem to be a lot of content in his play, but that's a very slight read. Dunnstral has essentially said nothing; could easily see scum in that spot.In post 627, pisskop wrote:Sell me his policy? Who else can eat rope? Wanna wagon somebody? Let's move this hellgame forward. The giant hand demands blood.Starting out by voting Kokichi makes sense. It's the most anti-town thing that was done thusfar IMO, aside from Rask who directly enabled it, but he is dead. I was more than happy to move off of Kokichi as the day went on if he decided to start scumhunting, but it's clear he doesn't have interest in that, so I think it's probably fine where it is.
Posts like 372 and 641 feel like town thought-process. Obviously his thought-process is off, similar to InfernoBrafin, but I can see it coming from town.
Kokichi. He doesn't look like he is actually trying to solve the game. He is voting me because I "look like scum trying to push an easy wagon", yet when he was called out by Beefster for having lazy and opportunsitic votes, his response was:In post 631, pisskop wrote:Who is the big fish now?In post 628, acryon wrote:Because there were bigger fish to fry, and I hadn't seen enough else from him.
While not the exact same scenario, guess how many votes were on Kokichi when I voted?In post 153, Kokichi Oma wrote:How? No one is even voting the last 2In post 130, Beefster wrote:What's the deal with this? These votes look lazy and opportunistic.
See the point above. I don't think Kokichi is trying to solve the game. Day 1 consisted of chaos and impatience. Day 2 consists of OMGUS.In post 631, pisskop wrote:Honestly? he's on your wagon with me. Number 3 slot doesnt have to be scum, and since I didnt expect your wagon to explode I don't see it as opportunistic. How do you feel about his 'naked' vote?In post 628, acryon wrote:So if you have a gut feeling that he is playing quite a bit differently, why are you not looking into that more?
My mind can be changed if someone can give me a good reason based on their posting that they are scum, but right now my read-through and my gut tells me it's town.In post 631, pisskop wrote:is vomiting in my mouth a little a tell? I think atp they are one of the better lynches today.In post 628, acryon wrote: Not at this point. Their play feels earnest, although way off the mark in some ways. It's not too dissimilar from the last game I played with them. Fairly solid townread for me ATM.
Dunn yes. Gamma maybe not. Gamma is a lean-scum read based purely on PoE and unfamiliarity in his play.In post 631, pisskop wrote:Please get a readslist up. Or some suspects at least. I may not be set on you being scum, but your lack of definitive content will make you an easy mark for apathetic playerlists.In post 628, acryon wrote:Well my two biggest scumreads from yesterday are dead.
So we can agree on dunn and gamma?
Nope. Do you think Kokichi is town? Why?In post 639, pinturicchio wrote:Let's put InfernoBrafin and acryon in the ring!! That way, whichever the loser, we will lynch scum, and it will be funny to see which of them is better bussing his partner
I don't see how saying you were going to do something beforehand means you can't be scum for doing it? But even if that were true, you're scum not for the quickhammer but because you aren't trying to solve the game.In post 663, Kokichi Oma wrote:So kiana is telling me, I'm scum for saying I'd hammer it beef reached L1 and then did it. Even though I said it way beforehand.
What do you think about the allegation that he doesn't appear to be trying to solve the game?In post 659, Joey_ wrote:awe cmon, you guys are annoying at least vote him for something else
I can understand that argument, but then we have him trying to appear like he is. For instance:In post 667, Joey_ wrote:while this seems and might be true to some extent, its also an observation that could apply to a bunch of other slot and thus doesnt look like its valid to find mefiaIn post 666, acryon wrote:What do you think about the allegation that he doesn't appear to be trying to solve the game?In post 659, Joey_ wrote:awe cmon, you guys are annoying at least vote him for something else
And then we have no follow up. Instead he just OMGUS's me. Then doesn't actually even try to expound at all on why I'm scum, and instead is defensive.In post 443, Kokichi Oma wrote:Joey is a suspicious cat. May have to look over him tonight in rereading.
Nope.In post 677, MariaR wrote:If you tr me you tr Kokichi. Back off
1) I mentioned day 1 I didn't like Kokichi.In post 675, MariaR wrote:The fact acryon is pushing Kokichi too makes me fine with having him in the scum pile considering I'm his top townread for "gut feelings" that just sounds like bs. It's interesting that he started pushing Kokichi right when he started getting heat.
D) Town who is just wrong. Lots of people have strong reasons and are wrong.In post 679, MariaR wrote:Okay look at it this way acryon I am either
A) Scum with Kokichi
B) Scum who is defending town Kokichi
C) Town with a very strong reason to tr Kokichi
What one is more likely?
Oh did you mean I pushed Kokichi right when Kokichi started getting heat, or right when I started getting heat? FWIW, I disagree with both as neither of us were really getting heat.In post 680, MariaR wrote:I see a lot of people building up to vote him.In post 678, acryon wrote:Nope.In post 677, MariaR wrote:If you tr me you tr Kokichi. Back off
1) I mentioned day 1 I didn't like Kokichi.In post 675, MariaR wrote:The fact acryon is pushing Kokichi too makes me fine with having him in the scum pile considering I'm his top townread for "gut feelings" that just sounds like bs. It's interesting that he started pushing Kokichi right when he started getting heat.
2) Do you think a single vote = heat? Hint: it does not.
You could try reading the other reasons I've posted. See 670. The quickhammer was just the catalyst.In post 683, MariaR wrote:Let's take out the heat part then I don't think anything Kokichi has done is really scummy sure quickhammering was anti town but scum doing that is ???
So your primary reason for saying the quickhammer was NAI is because from your experience with him he would do it as either alignment. So how are people scummy for scumreading him for it when your only real reason is personal experience? I don't have that same experience with him as you do.In post 755, MariaR wrote:I don't think Kokichi as scum openly goes for Joey_ at the start
the quick hammer bit is NAI as fuck he'd do it as town or scum but the fact a few people are scumreading him for it makes red alarms go off in my head
Just because I was wrong on things D1 (pretty much everyone was BTW) doesn't mean I'm going to give up my future reads and just sheep someone I think is town.In post 755, MariaR wrote:crayon having me as lock town for barely any posts (at the time) felt weird cause I didn't really do much I think? So when I asked on it he was like "oh you're just obv town" and the fact he won't believe my tr on Kokichi for calling me "wrong" when he's been the wrong one so far is suspect as fuck to me
This is how I feel, although POE is telling me I may be wrong.In post 875, MariaR wrote:and I mostly tr torque on tone and his convo with me felt legit he doesn't seem to really have an agenda he's just explaining his reads
I agree actually. I've had him as a town-read, and his D1 play felt townish, but he has just been doingIn post 894, Gamma Emerald wrote:what was different?In post 893, Joey_ wrote:i dont know who to flip honestly, i hardtownread pinnochios then scumread his lines d2, maybe i should reread
Literally never said this or considered it.In post 918, pinturicchio wrote:He even said he would consider replacing out... I mean come on.In post 915, Wisdom wrote:so basically his playstyle
That's fair enough.In post 923, pinturicchio wrote:Sorry @acryon, got it wrong, you said "town might as well quit now", I remembered incorrectly, thought you said "in which case I might as well quit now".In post 254, acryon wrote:I'm worried I'm playing with a bunch of trolls in which case town might as well quit now. Can't imagine a better environment for scum to thrive.
Torque actually explained it in a way that I struggled to put into words of my own:
Today has been weirder to be sure with the hardline defense of Kokichi, but overall in the absence of scummy content, I base my reads on tone, and MariaR's tone has always felt town to me.In post 375, Torque wrote:harumaki is playing the game like she has no agenda which is villagery
I agree with this. It is not necessarily scum. It is anti-town. Made sense to start the day voting someone who did something anti-town. Doesn't seems crazy to me. Good enough place to start as any IMO.In post 928, MariaR wrote:Quickhammering in and of itself is NAIIn post 917, acryon wrote:So your primary reason for saying the quickhammer was NAI is because from your experience with him he would do it as either alignment. So how are people scummy for scumreading him for it when your only real reason is personal experience? I don't have that same experience with him as you do.
quick hammering can come from town it can come from scum it's an anti town action yes but that doesn't auto=scummy it's how the person did it and acted around said quick hammer and correct me if I'm wrong you're sring him for the quick hammer itself (the nai part) not the reasons/actions he did around it (the AI part)
I don't think I'm doing that. But I'm not going to just take your unconfirmed word for it that he is town. It's my reasons and gut against yours.In post 929, MariaR wrote:Mafia is about teamwork at the end of the day between the town. If you just keep going "I'm gonna keep going and not listen to anyone else" especially your top townread that isn't gonna get you far. It makes it seem like you want a ML.In post 917, acryon wrote:Just because I was wrong on things D1 (pretty much everyone was BTW) doesn't mean I'm going to give up my future reads and just sheep someone I think is town.
It's more about using logic in my determination of where to begin scumhunting, but ok.In post 933, Wisdom wrote:this just sounds like you care more about having justified votes than finding scumIn post 931, acryon wrote:I agree with this. It is not necessarily scum. It is anti-town. Made sense to start the day voting someone who did something anti-town. Doesn't seems crazy to me. Good enough place to start as any IMO.