This is the LUV slot, right? I can get behind this lynch.
VOTE: Mordin
Both of these unvotes look suspicious to me. Gamma, why did you call out Nos, but not Fire?
This is the LUV slot, right? I can get behind this lynch.
Both of these unvotes look suspicious to me. Gamma, why did you call out Nos, but not Fire?
I don't think Gamma and Mordin can be on the same team.In post 1385, Ausuka wrote:Not all of you are scum for sure, but I think 1-2 of you are, probably 2. You've all been scummy individually.
OK, but I don't think you're wrong on Mordin.In post 1381, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I’m wrong on Mordin, then it’s probably Nosf or texcat as the third
I'm saying I don't think you are SvS (It doesn't look like you are bussing to me). And because I'm scum reading Mordin, I don't think you can be TvT. Of course, if Mordin flips town, I'm going to have to start over from scratch with all my reads.In post 1393, Gamma Emerald wrote:Are you saying we're TvS or not SvS?In post 1391, texcat wrote:I don't think Gamma and Mordin can be on the same team.In post 1385, Ausuka wrote:Not all of you are scum for sure, but I think 1-2 of you are, probably 2. You've all been scummy individually.
Nope. Doesn't anyone read the OP/rules anymore?In post 1417, TwoInAMillion wrote:If votes are tied it is a no lynch, which is obviously not a good option.
I don't feel like Beefster is fully invested in the game yet. I haven't liked his votes particularly, but nothing has stood out as super scummy either.In post 1429, Archwing wrote:Its okay we can sort beef tomorrow.
@texcat,
How do you feel about Beefster?
Inferno, I'm sorry I just don't understand this. Can you quote where 2iam lied? I must have missed the lie somewhere and now I keep seeing you tell me about it, but I can't find the quote.In post 1433, Inferno390 wrote:I just read through the rest of the VC ISOs. And guess what?
Not A SINGLE PERSON has gotten onto the TIAM wagon and remained on it without moving their vote up to this point.
#BlatantLies
#LynchThis
WTF does this mean?In post 1702, Theta Alpine wrote:i do not think redflavor is important enough for a lynch
In post 1153, Beefster wrote:Quick looked scummy before the whole policy vote thing, but I find the wagon unsettling. There are probably at least 2 scum on it and FL is probably not one of them. I'm going to stay far away from a wagon that has grown by sheer opportunism.
VOTE: 2iam
Valid counterwagon.
FoS: Mulch
I feel like he's throwing a lot of ideas around but not really scumhunting.
We're 13 days from the deadline. Why does it matter now?
VOTE: Theta AlpineIn post 1744, texcat wrote:WTF does this mean?In post 1702, Theta Alpine wrote:i do not think redflavor is important enough for a lynch
Thanks for at least acknowledging my existence. I was beginning to feel invisible.In post 1924, Theta Alpine wrote:generic response heretexcat wrote:I wish yall would take a look at Theta Alpine. I'm still stuck on that statement about RedFlavor not being important enough to lynch. I guess they changed their mind about it, since they are now voting Red, but Theta never responded to me.
also seriously just ask mulch or anyone else who has played with me before if that statement actually means anything coming from me