In post 11, Nero Cain wrote:VOTE: SCREENPLAY
That typo in the username.In post 25, Mulch wrote:CheekyTeeky(2) ~ Nero Cain(2)
What a flawless defense.
In post 11, Nero Cain wrote:VOTE: SCREENPLAY
That typo in the username.In post 25, Mulch wrote:CheekyTeeky(2) ~ Nero Cain(2)
Why would you think this would happen?In post 38, beeboy wrote:awww I was hoping my vote would redirect to a player.
I think I'm being buddied.In post 46, Ausuka wrote:early reads are that creature is town, brian probably is too.
I'm town, I just don't think I've done anything worthy of a townread.In post 68, Ausuka wrote:was I wrong, Brian?In post 56, Brian Skies wrote:I think I'm being buddied.In post 46, Ausuka wrote:early reads are that creature is town, brian probably is too.
Why is this good?In post 69, Hopkirk wrote:These are good.In post 53, Brigand Vvulf wrote:scumpostIn post 40, Brian Skies wrote:Why would you think this would happen?In post 38, beeboy wrote:awww I was hoping my vote would redirect to a player.
VOTE: brian
Should I be voting you?In post 72, Ausuka wrote:then why are you making remarks instead of voting me?In post 70, Brian Skies wrote:I'm town, I just don't think I've done anything worthy of a townread.In post 68, Ausuka wrote:was I wrong, Brian?In post 56, Brian Skies wrote:I think I'm being buddied.In post 46, Ausuka wrote:early reads are that creature is town, brian probably is too.
I only said I thought you were buddying me, which I'm unsure of.In post 79, Ausuka wrote:if you scumread me, which you claim to, it follows you should be voting me.In post 76, Brian Skies wrote:Should I be voting you?In post 72, Ausuka wrote:then why are you making remarks instead of voting me?In post 70, Brian Skies wrote:I'm town, I just don't think I've done anything worthy of a townread.In post 68, Ausuka wrote:was I wrong, Brian?In post 56, Brian Skies wrote:I think I'm being buddied.In post 46, Ausuka wrote:early reads are that creature is town, brian probably is too.
Wolf and Bins don't have a common letter though. What do you have to say to that?In post 152, Panopticon wrote:Both words are 4 letters long and share a common letter, must be the closest match~!
In post 180, Hopkirk wrote:I feel like there's going to be mafia and werewolves and when mafia flips people will say 'it's multiball' and other people will say 'they're clearly the same team due to mafia gunner'.
You may be onto something here.
You were clearly trolling me. How should I have followed up when there was nothing in your response to me to make me want to bother to continue talking to you?In post 190, Hopkirk wrote:Spoiler:
Not following up here is why I voted brian btw. Gave minor impression he was asking qs without followng up.
In post 53, Brigand Vvulf wrote:scumpostIn post 40, Brian Skies wrote:Why would you think this would happen?In post 38, beeboy wrote:awww I was hoping my vote would redirect to a player.
VOTE: brian
In post 69, Hopkirk wrote:These are good.In post 53, Brigand Vvulf wrote:scumpostIn post 40, Brian Skies wrote:Why would you think this would happen?In post 38, beeboy wrote:awww I was hoping my vote would redirect to a player.
VOTE: brian
Why is my post wolfy?In post 219, Toranaga wrote:very wolfyIn post 40, Brian Skies wrote:Why would you think this would happen?In post 38, beeboy wrote:awww I was hoping my vote would redirect to a player.
In post 402, Brigand Vvulf wrote:asking questions that don't really go anywhereIn post 397, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why does 67 come from scum?In post 384, Spiffeh wrote:Ok I'm all caught up
Brian Skies is easily the scummiest player in the game and should be wagoned/lynched
asking questions without really looking for a meaningful answer
In post 57, beeboy wrote:Mafia Gunner
You control the account “Mafia Gunner” that’s in the game. It can’t be lynched, or targeted., can vote, and during the first 5 minutes of every day can take a 20% dayvig at someone. It will be announced who it is shooting at. It will be announced during the start of the game that mafia have this role and it counts for parity and can’t be voted or targeted. You can vote with it twice per day- just let me know. If you die, it dies.It counts for parityTown Gunner
You control the account “Town Gunner” that’s in the game. It can’t be lynched, or targeted., can vote, and during the first 5 minutes of every day can take a 20% dayvig at someone. It will be announced who it is shooting at. It will be announced during the start of the game that a towns person has this role and it counts for parity and can’t be voted or targeted. You can vote with it twice per day- just let me know. If you die, it dies.It counts for parity
So these are the gunner role pms when amrock last modded this game.
The reason why I asked about parity is because the role PM's Beeboy quoted state the gunners count for parity. However, the rules for this game state that they don't. There is a difference between the two games, and I was curious if this was important.
In post 576, Nero Cain wrote:In post 572, Panopticon wrote:Give me a reason that I should be voting Brian over Quick.
~The ObserverIn post 162, Brian Skies wrote:Is anyone else bothered by the fact mafia are flavored as wolves this game, but it's a mafia gunner and not a wolf gunner?willful misdirection?
I was making a joke regarding the Mafia Gunner's name. I think this is blatantly obvious by what I wrote and how I said it and Panopticon managed to figure out what I meant here.
In post 198, Brian Skies wrote:In post 180, Hopkirk wrote:I feel like there's going to be mafia and werewolves and when mafia flips people will say 'it's multiball' and other people will say 'they're clearly the same team due to mafia gunner'.You may be onto something here.
But I'd rather not think about stuff like this unless we actually have a reason to.
You did the same thing in Gay Mafia and we were both town. Learn a new trick or I'm voteparking you.In post 384, Spiffeh wrote:Ok I'm all caught up
Brian Skies is easily the scummiest player in the game and should be wagoned/lynched
I like this because I felt similarly regarding my interactions with her.In post 480, Toranaga wrote:and now this. I don't like ausuka's progression. calls brian town, brian wonders if he is being pocketed, which is inherently a towny thought to have, and after an interaction in which brian does not appear particularly wolfy ausuka is voting brian? that's something now isn't it. not that I like brian's posts otherwise, but this ausuka progression is wolfy. townreads from nowhere, OMGUSing when convenient. kinda wolfy?
Probably because my avatar is based on his.In post 602, Quick wrote:Why do I feel like Brain is Mathdino?
I'm fine with the different responses because I feel like the circumstances for the two situations are different.In post 605, Quick wrote:In post 79, Ausuka wrote:if you scumread me, which you claim to, it follows you should be voting me.In post 76, Brian Skies wrote:Should I be voting you?In post 72, Ausuka wrote:then why are you making remarks instead of voting me?In post 70, Brian Skies wrote:I'm town, I just don't think I've done anything worthy of a townread.In post 68, Ausuka wrote:was I wrong, Brian?In post 56, Brian Skies wrote:I think I'm being buddied.In post 46, Ausuka wrote:early reads are that creature is town, brian probably is too.OK sure...In post 592, Ausuka wrote:that depends on your other reads.
I'm guessing you have the worst ISO in the game on a cursory search.
VOTE: Ausuka
This is particular seems like a weird thing to say.In post 589, GreyICE wrote:Assuming roles are randomly distributed, surely you have as much chance of drawing scum as I do
Wth? Why do you say this as if I don't deserve it or something?In post 640, Toranaga wrote:yes, including brian.
Just because you did something as town before doesn't mean you're town for doing the same thing here. That's not how this game works and I don't think you really believe this should be the case.In post 688, Spiffeh wrote:Maybe you should do town things if you're townIn post 600, Brian Skies wrote:You did the same thing in Gay Mafia and we were both town. Learn a new trick or I'm voteparking you.In post 384, Spiffeh wrote:Ok I'm all caught up
Brian Skies is easily the scummiest player in the game and should be wagoned/lynched
Also interesting that you'd vote park me for behaving similarly to a game where I was town
Also your opinion that I'm not doing town things is a pretty subjective one and I don't even think that's the case here? Like, this feels like you're just making a throwaway comment to overgeneralize my play and shade me or that you're just not reading my posts.In post 688, Spiffeh wrote:Maybe you should do town things if you're town
I already explained why I didn't believe she'd be townreading me there, and her quick 180 without explaining why she did furthers my point.In post 690, Spiffeh wrote:I agree with Toranaga awhile back who said that your immediate jump to "I'm being buddied" sounded like fake paranoia
I don't really understand why that was your thought process rather than Ausuka just sharing some of her early reads. It's not like her town read on you looked all that confident. The way you reacted seems like an easy way for scum to look like they're "suspicious" of someone and I don't see why you'd jump to that conclusion so early over something so trivial as town.
I'm scumreading this slot. Tell me why I'm wrong.In post 731, Brigand Vvulf wrote:p much agree /w this except i would be comfortable lynching brian and screenplayIn post 640, Toranaga wrote:weak townlean from ISO
could really be anything, but feel is town.
I think... ausuka/greyice/centipede are the scummiest, and then 0 posters are probably scumheavy.
so this is game so far. I'm basically townreading everyone that posted anything reasonable outside of these 3. yes, including brian.
there's so much noise to parse through reading quick is giving me seizures
Lynchbait.In post 734, Quick wrote:If everyone could give their stance on me that would be great, thanks.
1) Because your accusations on Nero and I weren't that developed and the instant we both pushed back and engaged you, you backed off and just said we were town (or in my case just indicated that you thought I was). This is what I mean by poking and running away.In post 780, Hopkirk wrote:Don't really get this vote.
1.) please explain where you think I'm placating in a mixture of your own words and my words (quotes of how). Most interested in why I'd push someone to say they scumread me, then 'placate' them when they aren't making the read independently.
2.) I explained my read on you and my intention and sort of answered that question. What didn't you like with my explination?
Why sketchy on Ausuka/Cheeky?
I just don't like to read through quote walls.In post 799, Panopticon wrote:I don't like how you went out of your way to avoid mentioning us. You really must not like us or something.
Ausuka, are you an alt?In post 856, Quick wrote:This is Scum.In post 116, Ausuka wrote:Notes so far;
38 from Maria is really reachy.
44 feels pretty scummy too. 59/63 is a huge overreaction to the push at that point.
I townread Cedrick and katherine.
Creature hasn't really posted enough to be sorted yet. If this keeps going for a while he can be town.
What kts did can come from either alignment and I haven't found anything to sort him with.
Extra-Special Townbloc of Happy Friends
Ausuka, Cedrick
Candidates For Promotion
Katherine
Watchlist For Meaniness
brassherald, Creature, Gamma Emerald, Mumble, Killthestory, implosion
Wanted for Bullying and General Sad Crimes
MariaR, Tchill13
VOTE: Tchill
Took me literally less than a minute to meta dive this read.
I actually don't really care about your early townread of me. It's become less about you and more about other people, like Spiffeh.In post 871, Ausuka wrote:felt like you were trying to be pro-town without trying to look pro-town.
no idea why you're trying to hold my page 2 reads to this high of a standard.
That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.
Heh. Not my first guess but I'll take it.In post 947, Ausuka wrote:Yeah. We played together in alisae's beneath the mask game, where I was in the chikoritas hydra with echovision, and we were masons with davesaz.In post 946, Brian Skies wrote:That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.
1) Because it makes it seem look like you're engaging and trying to sort people. Or that maybe they should townread you or ignore you when you back off before risking any serious pushback or engagement when they interact with you.In post 952, Hopkirk wrote:1.) Why does scum me push people then 'back off'? What do I gain there? Think about actual scum motivation before saying it's scummy since scum have no incentive to do that. You're scumreading style rather than motive.
Why can't town me like responses? Why do I not move on to other people when I'm happy with what I have?
2.) The initial engagement wasn't leading anywhere. Not sure why you think it's scummy to try and make it something meaningful.
Alisae, but I'm not sure why.In post 974, Ausuka wrote:just out of curiosity, who was your first guess?In post 969, Brian Skies wrote:Heh. Not my first guess but I'll take it.In post 947, Ausuka wrote:Yeah. We played together in alisae's beneath the mask game, where I was in the chikoritas hydra with echovision, and we were masons with davesaz.In post 946, Brian Skies wrote:That posting style Quick quoted looks familiar to me. Would I be accurate if I said we've played together before?In post 911, Ausuka wrote:well, this is the account I use permanently now, but yeah.
Uhhh, you know this doesn't make sense from the side you're arguing right? Like, if scum you doesn't want to risk getting scumread, then it would make sense for scum you to back off before a discussion gets serious.In post 999, Hopkirk wrote:Scum me doesn't bother wasting time trying to get scumread.
Never know unless you try.
:/In post 1106, Hopkirk wrote:@Brian: I don't want to answer questions that should be super easy, so let's try again later.
In post 1118, Hopkirk wrote:I feel if you were unsatisfied with my answers then you'll be unsatisfied with the same thing but with more words.
I have no idea why my early townlean on Brigand matters whatsoever? I said at the time it was very light and there's actually relevant stuff to talk about.
I think the entire reason was because I liked 53.
Scumreading you initially was because... nope it was less than ten pages in. Why do you think it had solid logic.I gave the entire reason a while back in 190. You didn't follow up on something. That made you a decent person to push. 222, that ended with a read formed and I moved on.Not sure what you're looking for, my motivation is literally just what's obvious from using ctrl f in my iso for your name and stopping at 222. Nothing else to it there.
To the first point about 'backing off', it's shooting as much stuff out as possible and trying to form as many reads as possible on as many people as possible as quickly as possible. That's how I'm trying to approach games atm. That's why I listed I think 6 townreads pretty quickly. 100% playstyle.
In post 190, Hopkirk wrote:Spoiler:
Not following up here is why I voted brian btw. Gave minor impression he was asking qs without followng up.
VOTE: Quick
Look, dude.In post 222, Hopkirk wrote:This is the town response I was imagining.In post 218, Brian Skies wrote:You were clearly trolling me. How should I have followed up when there was nothing in your response to me to make me want to bother to continue talking to you?In post 190, Hopkirk wrote:Spoiler:
Not following up here is why I voted brian btw. Gave minor impression he was asking qs without followng up.
My response was selfish, but useful I think.
Why was this so hard for you?In post 1138, Hopkirk wrote:I kind of agreed with 53 at the time so I liked it.
Nah, I like that post.In post 1196, Toranaga wrote:If tchill is somehow town this post is tmi afIn post 1194, Panopticon wrote:No thanks.In post 1175, Toranaga wrote:sheep me then loltorwhen I'm wrong. how easy is that? it won't even be your fault.
Seems like you're baiting me into a mislynch.
VOTE: Toranga
-V
This is way funnier than it should be.In post 1233, Toranaga wrote:that's the eloquence I expect from a lannisterIn post 1231, Tchill13 wrote:Also why me doesn't equal fry me or else nobody would say why me.
I'm also not a fan of his immediate reaction to Thor.In post 603, Brian Skies wrote:Slight Scumlean
Srceen - My gut says otherwise, but I feel like this post is unnecessarily nitpicky (and I feel like that's more of something scum might do). I'm also not getting good vibes from his hardtunnel on the Quick slot. So it's probably more appropriate to put him here even though
All he's done is push Quick and called Thor's push on him 'bs'. So...?In post 1294, Panopticon wrote:In post 1293, Brian Skies wrote:Because I think he's scum.sigh
Why do you think he's scum? Surely there is a reason or two, and that issomething you could ask him about.
AKA: What you could be engaging or interacting with him about.
So why do you seem to think you havenothingto engage or interact with him about?
This also isn't cheerleading?In post 1288, Panopticon wrote:Your iso would seem to indicate that you'd like to vote Hopkirk but you're actually voting....srceenplay? right now?In post 1285, Brian Skies wrote:What exactly am I cheerleading?
But you haven't interacted with him at all for a while unless I'm fuckin blind.
~The Observer
I regret nothing.In post 1370, Hopkirk wrote:Hey Tchill, I asked you one question and you didn’t answer it. I dislike it when people don’t answer my questions. (ok Brian)
???In post 1380, Hopkirk wrote:Gork has a good point on counterwagons.In post 1344, Quick wrote:OK, so yesterday I was thinking Ausuka, cheeky, Hop, Nero, and beeboy were all in a hood.
UNVOTE: Pan
How does this make sense to you?In post 1554, Nero Cain wrote:I mean maybe he was bussing Tchill and it threw me off but as soon as something else pops up he's all for it while trying to goad me into voting Tchill. No way this is town.
In post 1279, Nero Cain wrote:I guess I could be wrong and this is SCFTWR but I still feel like the reasons for said wagon were kinda lame but I agree that his reactions aren't great though.
Both of these look like one thought process, so not understanding Quick's argument.In post 1284, Nero Cain wrote:or maybe I'm right and the Sith that deals in absolutes (Grey) is sheeping a horrible wagon.