Disgusting.
VOTE: Srceenplay
I know you can play far better than that if you wanted to. (Completely Unoriginal comes to mind)
~tn5421
Disgusting.
And not, like, 5 scum dead? Yeah, that's a problem.In post 3649, Creature wrote:The problem is that we have 3 scum dead
Don't worry, Our Beloved Saviour And Confirmed IC, Gorkington, is on the case.In post 3652, Creature wrote:There are probably two deeplosers on the loose.
Baa!
I would say that at most the wolves have 4 anticlaim powers left, and it's likely that they only have 2.In post 3715, GreyICE wrote:Oh sweet! You mean we can make our first lynch wagon claim, and then if they do they die and we get another lynch, and if they don't we lynch them anyway?
That's super pro town
Cheeky is a she last I heard.In post 3724, GreyICE wrote:If cheeky defended himself, he'd be scum.In post 3719, Creature wrote:Hi:In post 3712, Creature wrote:Does scum!Cheeky act like this?In post 3706, CheekyTeeky wrote:Lmao well we basically have the game solved so I don't mind being sacrificed.
So cheeky doesn't defend himself so he's town
But if cheeky was scum cheeky would know this, so he wouldn't defend himself
But if cheeky knows that we know this cheeky would defend himself so that he doesn't look like scum who knows that scum cheeky wouldn't defend himself
...
The best solution is always to offer a better lynch candidate. Who do you think we should lynch? I'm partial to a Tchill wagon meself.
Ignoring the part where you sat him back to null in the meantime.In post 3734, Brian Skies wrote:In post 3727, Panopticon wrote:>was voting srceen despite not scumreading himIn post 603, Brian Skies wrote:Slight Scumlean
Srceen - My gut says otherwise, but I feel like this post is unnecessarily nitpicky (and I feel like that's more of something scum might do). I'm also not getting good vibes from his hardtunnel on the Quick slot. So it's probably more appropriate to put him here even thoughLet me know whether or not 603 comes before 1006.
What. The. Fuck.Kison wrote: has been banned for a year at his request.
Associated accounts:
Still doesn't mean it isn't shitty. I hope Mulch gets knocked down to 0 games of experience for this shit.In post 3894, Thor665 wrote:Northsidegal literally just said she'd still be running the game.
I think it's dumb but not scum behavior.
probably because that's literally what im doing D:In post 3905, Nero Cain wrote:like this is super generic. There are multiple ppl saying the Bee lurks as scum and he's flat out ignoring this. Its like he's commenting on the game from the sidelines.In post 3903, Panopticon wrote:I think it's dumb but not scum behavior.
So? I feel no pressing need to take the same super serious when the scumteam is on the ropes. Losing 3 members day one has to be close to a record.In post 3908, Nero Cain wrote:that's really dumb though.
You're pretty daft, AP.In post 4021, AP wrote:Like, PHUCK EVERYONE who says this is single ball. Ausuka's role says "Every night, you can target a player andlearn their alignment."
Now why would scum, need to learn of the alignment(s) in a bloody single ball with no SK??
Not my fault you're suffering from 'not invented here'In post 4068, AP wrote:You know, I'm going to point this out to you once and then refrain from commenting on the subject (for obvious reasons)L You maybe a good mod, but your ego is so inflated you really overestimate yourself as a player. You also have serious self-confidence issues so you like to intimidate those who "you think" are vulnerable to your abuse. In other words (and I don't mean this to be taken literally) you have a "shorty" so you're always trying to remind yourself it's "not the length if the vector that counts" although deep inside you feel lacking in the force all the same.In post 4065, Panopticon wrote:But I guess you think that it's more likely that the moderator is literally lying than someone else being more clever than you in setup design?
I suggest you try to earn yourself some respect among your fellow players rather than their sympathy, cuz you don't even get that from me.
P-edit: There you go. "far too small" is what I'm thinking indeed, my friend. But it was you who said it, not I.
The worst case is that this game is 'lolbalanced' and they can, in fact, do everything you think they can, but moreso.In post 4163, AP wrote:2 things:In post 4161, Brigand Vvulf wrote:town gunner already took a shot at cheekyIn post 4158, AP wrote:However, I'll unvote for safety.
UNVOTE:
So here's the deal: If Beeboy is faking, the Town Gunner can shoot him. If he dies, that's fine. If not, we know he's lying anyway and we can lynch him still.
1- They can do it tomorrow
2- We don't know if they can only shoot once per day
Can we draw the line on this discussion here, please? I mean, what's the worst case? The player controlling the Town Gunner dies overnight and they don't get to shoot anyone on D3? Do you think we wouldn't notice that, assuming the flip doesn't tell us they are who they are?
thirdedIn post 4178, Chickadee wrote:Samesies.In post 4177, the worst wrote:Tfw dont want to lynch un-cc'd dayvig but want to lynch beeboy :'(
In retrospect that looks terrible. What makes this even worse is that I can't remember the last time Cheeky made a post that wasn't a one liner.In post 4316, GreyICE wrote:Meanwhile Cheeky, like:Cheeky switches vote from Screenplay to me
This moved it from L-1 Screenplay/L-2 Me to L-2 Screenplay/L-1 me
Why would we leave that alive?
Actually AsgardianIn post 4417, Quick wrote:It will probably work too. LMAO.In post 4416, Thor665 wrote:My plan is to just constantly brag about it ad naseum until people give me a badge to try to shut me up.
EVERYONE, THINK OF A NEW TITLE FOR THOR, QUICK!