Gunner Mafia [Endgame]


User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3511 (isolation #200) » Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:50 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3510, Srceenplay wrote:I don’t want to die.
VOTE: grey
Disgusting.
VOTE: Srceenplay

I know you can play far better than that if you wanted to. (Completely Unoriginal comes to mind)

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3516 (isolation #201) » Tue Apr 24, 2018 12:40 pm

Post by Panopticon »

He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3637 (isolation #202) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 6:47 am

Post by Panopticon »

Ok, so basically most of my reads so far are/were bad. Ausuka, MariaR, Srceenplay all scum. I have a lot to re-evaluate.

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3640 (isolation #203) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 6:50 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3638, Mulch wrote:
Gorkington has been ressurected!


Welcome back, glorious ICified Gorkington.

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3651 (isolation #204) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:18 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3649, Creature wrote:The problem is that we have 3 scum dead
And not, like, 5 scum dead? Yeah, that's a problem.

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3654 (isolation #205) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:21 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3652, Creature wrote:There are probably two deeplosers on the loose.
Don't worry, Our Beloved Saviour And Confirmed IC, Gorkington, is on the case.

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3713 (isolation #206) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:12 am

Post by Panopticon »

It's safe to say that the other wolves have one shot anticlaim powers, as well.
In post 3679, Gorkington wrote:oh and while im here
vote: cheeky
Baa!

VOTE: CheekyTeeky

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3716 (isolation #207) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:15 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3715, GreyICE wrote:Oh sweet! You mean we can make our first lynch wagon claim, and then if they do they die and we get another lynch, and if they don't we lynch them anyway?

That's super pro town
I would say that at most the wolves have 4 anticlaim powers left, and it's likely that they only have 2.

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3725 (isolation #208) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:21 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3724, GreyICE wrote:
In post 3719, Creature wrote:Hi:
In post 3712, Creature wrote:
In post 3706, CheekyTeeky wrote:Lmao well we basically have the game solved so I don't mind being sacrificed.
Does scum!Cheeky act like this?
If cheeky defended himself, he'd be scum.
So cheeky doesn't defend himself so he's town
But if cheeky was scum cheeky would know this, so he wouldn't defend himself
But if cheeky knows that we know this cheeky would defend himself so that he doesn't look like scum who knows that scum cheeky wouldn't defend himself
...

The best solution is always to offer a better lynch candidate. Who do you think we should lynch? I'm partial to a Tchill wagon meself.
Cheeky is a she last I heard.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3727 (isolation #209) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:24 am

Post by Panopticon »

>was voting srceen despite not scumreading him

>when you scumread srceen you weren't voting him
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3728 (isolation #210) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:24 am

Post by Panopticon »

I forgot you got a scum role pm this game, thanks for reminding me.

VOTE: Brian Skies
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3737 (isolation #211) » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:41 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3734, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 3727, Panopticon wrote:>was voting srceen despite not scumreading him
In post 603, Brian Skies wrote:Slight Scumlean
Srceen - My gut says otherwise, but I feel like this post is unnecessarily nitpicky (and I feel like that's more of something scum might do). I'm also not getting good vibes from his hardtunnel on the Quick slot. So it's probably more appropriate to put him here even though
In post 1006, Brian Skies wrote:VOTE: srceenplay
Let me know whether or not 603 comes before 1006.
Ignoring the part where you sat him back to null in the meantime.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3767 (isolation #212) » Sat Apr 28, 2018 4:16 am

Post by Panopticon »

I'm pretty sure that scum was on my wagon outside of Screen, especially given how screen got on out of self-admitted survivalism.

-obserVed
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3772 (isolation #213) » Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:09 am

Post by Panopticon »

Sounds like I should report you all for using a trust tell.

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3848 (isolation #214) » Sun Apr 29, 2018 3:38 pm

Post by Panopticon »

Probably because nobody is talking about their reasoning for it, and is plainly sheeping the conftown player. Myself included ofc.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3849 (isolation #215) » Sun Apr 29, 2018 3:38 pm

Post by Panopticon »

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3891 (isolation #216) » Mon Apr 30, 2018 9:47 am

Post by Panopticon »

Subject: Ban/Restriction Announcements
Kison wrote: has been banned for a year at his request.

Associated accounts:







What. The. Fuck.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3895 (isolation #217) » Mon Apr 30, 2018 9:51 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3894, Thor665 wrote:Northsidegal literally just said she'd still be running the game.
Still doesn't mean it isn't shitty. I hope Mulch gets knocked down to 0 games of experience for this shit.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3898 (isolation #218) » Mon Apr 30, 2018 9:55 am

Post by Panopticon »

My vote is on the wagon I want it to be on and it's not leaving it for a random lurker lynch.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3903 (isolation #219) » Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:00 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3899, the worst wrote:Good for you

Thoughts on the wagon anyway?
I think it's dumb but not scum behavior.

pedit: I'm sure you can let beeboy go for another day. If bee is still lurking d3, on the other hand....
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3907 (isolation #220) » Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:10 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3905, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 3903, Panopticon wrote:I think it's dumb but not scum behavior.
like this is super generic. There are multiple ppl saying the Bee lurks as scum and he's flat out ignoring this. Its like he's commenting on the game from the sidelines.
probably because that's literally what im doing D:
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #3909 (isolation #221) » Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:13 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 3908, Nero Cain wrote:that's really dumb though.
So? I feel no pressing need to take the same super serious when the scumteam is on the ropes. Losing 3 members day one has to be close to a record.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4065 (isolation #222) » Tue May 01, 2018 1:54 pm

Post by Panopticon »

In post 4021, AP wrote:Like, PHUCK EVERYONE who says this is single ball. Ausuka's role says "Every night, you can target a player and
learn their alignment.
"

Now why would scum, need to learn of the alignment(s) in a bloody single ball with no SK??
You're pretty daft, AP.
It's clearly to trick trackers and lie-detectors and anything else of the sort. It's a power they can use to look town.
Imagine it's Day 4 and you're like "OH I HAVE INNOS" or, heck, even guilties. You'd be able to be 'confirmed' as telling the truth by other players.
But I guess you think that it's more likely that the moderator is literally lying than someone else being more clever than you in setup design?

-obserVed
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4067 (isolation #223) » Tue May 01, 2018 1:58 pm

Post by Panopticon »

If you think that there aren't claim-related powers on both sides of the alignment fence, you're thinking far too small.

-obserVed
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4069 (isolation #224) » Tue May 01, 2018 2:13 pm

Post by Panopticon »

In post 4068, AP wrote:
In post 4065, Panopticon wrote:But I guess you think that it's more likely that the moderator is literally lying than someone else being more clever than you in setup design?
You know, I'm going to point this out to you once and then refrain from commenting on the subject (for obvious reasons)L You maybe a good mod, but your ego is so inflated you really overestimate yourself as a player. You also have serious self-confidence issues so you like to intimidate those who "you think" are vulnerable to your abuse. In other words (and I don't mean this to be taken literally) you have a "shorty" so you're always trying to remind yourself it's "not the length if the vector that counts" although deep inside you feel lacking in the force all the same.

I suggest you try to earn yourself some respect among your fellow players rather than their sympathy, cuz you don't even get that from me.

P-edit: There you go. "far too small" is what I'm thinking indeed, my friend. But it was you who said it, not I.
Not my fault you're suffering from 'not invented here'

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4070 (isolation #225) » Tue May 01, 2018 2:49 pm

Post by Panopticon »

Ay man, maybe you can just admit that you're being blind to possibilities in the setup.
I never claimed to be a good player, either. I blow ass at this game.
Keep being wrong, though.

-obserVed
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4164 (isolation #226) » Wed May 02, 2018 2:20 pm

Post by Panopticon »

In post 4163, AP wrote:
In post 4161, Brigand Vvulf wrote:
In post 4158, AP wrote:However, I'll unvote for safety.

UNVOTE:

So here's the deal: If Beeboy is faking, the Town Gunner can shoot him. If he dies, that's fine. If not, we know he's lying anyway and we can lynch him still.
town gunner already took a shot at cheeky
2 things:

1- They can do it tomorrow
2- We don't know if they can only shoot once per day

Can we draw the line on this discussion here, please? I mean, what's the worst case? The player controlling the Town Gunner dies overnight and they don't get to shoot anyone on D3? Do you think we wouldn't notice that, assuming the flip doesn't tell us they are who they are?
The worst case is that this game is 'lolbalanced' and they can, in fact, do everything you think they can, but moreso.

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4166 (isolation #227) » Wed May 02, 2018 2:24 pm

Post by Panopticon »

Doesn't mean that multiball isn't a possibility.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4176 (isolation #228) » Wed May 02, 2018 4:03 pm

Post by Panopticon »

The gunner itself can't be lynched but I'm sure that the one controlling it can.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4179 (isolation #229) » Wed May 02, 2018 4:05 pm

Post by Panopticon »

In post 4178, Chickadee wrote:
In post 4177, the worst wrote:Tfw dont want to lynch un-cc'd dayvig but want to lynch beeboy :'(
Samesies.
thirded
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4181 (isolation #230) » Wed May 02, 2018 4:08 pm

Post by Panopticon »

on the other hand, does town have any anticlaim powers against scum? I kind of doubt it personally.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4317 (isolation #231) » Thu May 03, 2018 12:19 pm

Post by Panopticon »

In post 4316, GreyICE wrote:Meanwhile Cheeky, like:
Cheeky switches vote from Screenplay to me


This moved it from L-1 Screenplay/L-2 Me to L-2 Screenplay/L-1 me

Why would we leave that alive?
In retrospect that looks terrible. What makes this even worse is that I can't remember the last time Cheeky made a post that wasn't a one liner.
To be fair, I do the same thing, but I'm also self aware at how crappy my reads are, vs Cheeky displaying nothing but confidence, even when self-voting.

In short: Not valuable enough to keep alive.

VOTE: CheekyTeeky

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4383 (isolation #232) » Sat May 05, 2018 5:40 pm

Post by Panopticon »

Hey, I managed not to shit everything up completely.
Good stuff, town.

Huuuge thanks to NSG for stepping in to mod.
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
User avatar
Panopticon
Panopticon
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Panopticon
Goon
Goon
Posts: 284
Joined: October 12, 2015

Post Post #4418 (isolation #233) » Sun May 06, 2018 8:40 am

Post by Panopticon »

In post 4417, Quick wrote:
In post 4416, Thor665 wrote:My plan is to just constantly brag about it ad naseum until people give me a badge to try to shut me up.
It will probably work too. LMAO.

EVERYONE, THINK OF A NEW TITLE FOR THOR, QUICK!
Actually Asgardian

~tn5421
He who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, becomes the principle of his own subjection.
Locked

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”