In post 449, UglyDuck wrote:yes it is.In post 447, skitter30 wrote:Well, idk if I phrased them as questions so much as made observations that I was kinda expecting you to make some sort of response to, but maybe I didn't convey that well so that might be on me, idk. So like, don't feel bad or anything <3In post 443, the worst wrote:I feel bad and confused if I've ignored things you've specifically directed at me. I don't necessarily feel the need to comment on every post you make but I definitely don't intend to ignore anyone.
(I was worried for a minute that I had done something to like make you feel bad on like a personal level or something, which is not what I want to do like at all)
So this was one of the things that I had brought up earlier in 350. You had oringally said his vote on you felt like 'good ol' fashioned scumfuckery' so I'm trying to understand why you stopped thinking that the vote was scummy and why you're now saying his early game was probably NAI.In post 443, the worst wrote:Espe dead null. Disliked his early content but on the balance of things not really an AI distaste. Need more content when he's available.
I have a *slight* (ie like *tiny*) townlean on NM and theoretically I'd be down to pl him but this setup only allows for one mislynch if wolves don't crosskill so a pl probably isn't the best idea here.
--
he's basically saying that he wanted scum to get lynched in his absence and the connotation is that he still maintains the same scumread that he had earlier, which I think is the one on tw.In post 445, UglyDuck wrote:what does this mean? I get you are aknoledging you were prodded... but skum aint dedded means?In post 405, Espeonage wrote:sup, prodded but scum aint dedded yet.
aside, is english your first language?
this...... is not english
but also thank you for the clarification.