In post 4375, OnTheMark wrote: In post 4373, davesaz wrote:Why is this conversation relevant?
I don't think that is a vague question at all.
I don't see any of this helping to determine anyone's alignment.
So I'm asking what is it that I don't understand.
Wilky said he was blocked.
I am and have been saying Wilky is lying.
People keep saying I could be redirected or bus driven or something and the answer is no.
Wilky said his action failed. He assumed it was your block, and apparently other people assumed that too.
This falls into the same logic hole that your block on me falls into -- it assumes there is only one possible reason for the result.
You not blocking Wilky does not imply that Wilky's action wasn't interfered with. It
could
mean he's lying about being interfered with but it doesn't
prove
it.
Wilky's action being interfered with does not imply your block caused it. It
could
mean you're lying about your target, but it doesn't
prove
it.
I think you're both probably telling the truth here, and some other reason exists for the action to fail. A redirect on Wilky or a busdrive on his target one night or the other for example.