Mini 2014: Succinct Mafia (Over)

Pine · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:14 pm

What what bitchessssssss

Pine · Post Post #7 (isolation #1) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:19 pm

Ummmmm...
VOTE: Mastina
VOTE: SirCakez
VOTE: Hiraki
VOTE: Dunnstral
VOTE: Kokichi Oma
VOTE: Momrangal
VOTE: TheBrie
VOTE: EeveeLution Army (Assuming I know the primary of this alt)
VOTE: ArcAngel9
VOTE: Wisdom
VOTE: havingfitz

Pine · Post Post #9 (isolation #2) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:20 pm

I agree with Dunn.

That said, with this playerlist I don't think we're going to have a problem.

Pine · Post Post #15 (isolation #3) » Mon May 28, 2018 7:25 pm

Disappointing result in a recent Resistance game. Brie snowed us all the way to endgame. Not a single Townie suspected her for like, a minute.

Pine · Post Post #17 (isolation #4) » Tue May 29, 2018 12:56 am

Are you not an alt?

Pine · Post Post #19 (isolation #5) » Tue May 29, 2018 4:17 am

I dunno I just know most people on site and figured you were an alt. My bad.

Hello new friend!

Pine · Post Post #22 (isolation #6) » Tue May 29, 2018 6:30 am

VOTE: Dunn

Lies.

Pine · Post Post #35 (isolation #7) » Tue May 29, 2018 5:50 pm

In post 27, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:
In post 7, Pine wrote:Ummmmm...
VOTE: Mastina
VOTE: SirCakez
VOTE: Hiraki
VOTE: Dunnstral
VOTE: Kokichi Oma
VOTE: Momrangal
VOTE: TheBrie
VOTE: EeveeLution Army (Assuming I know the primary of this alt)
VOTE: ArcAngel9
VOTE: Wisdom
VOTE: havingfitz
You realized I am town which is a good start. Than again you could be scum and thats why you know Iam town. Hmmmm. I am a bit diasppointed I didnt draw scum this game as it would be fun given the rules

Also I am the town Potato. I cant tell you if I am baked, mashed or fried as it goes against my win con

This is reaaaaally LAMIST.

VOTE: FuzzyLogic

In post 30, mastina wrote:
In post 23, mastina wrote:
In post 10, Hiraki wrote:
Quick question here - quoting doesn't contribute to the word count, right?
Correct, but keep rule spirit in mind; naked quoting a 500 word post 10 times may follow the letter of this rule, but would violate the spirit and be appropriately warned.
<<< For some clarity here on acceptable vs. unacceptable: >>>

Example Post A
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote2 wrote:Pellentesque pulvinar, lectus in facilisis blandit, orci libero tempor erat, sed auctor tortor lectus in felis. Aenean fermentum consequat pretium. Praesent bibendum rutrum metus, sit amet tempor ex pharetra sit amet. Nulla vehicula, mauris sit amet venenatis consequat, urna urna rhoncus libero, vitae faucibus nisl nunc et libero. Sed id enim orci. Etiam viverra purus erat, convallis porta massa facilisis et. Aenean mattis, nisl vitae facilisis laoreet, tortor mauris tristique tellus, sed ultrices tellus quam at ex. Quisque consequat neque nulla, quis tristique neque faucibus ut. Donec accumsan justo elit, eu efficitur risus sagittis in. Vestibulum aliquet lectus in convallis fringilla. Nam sed augue vel elit viverra dictum. Nunc semper arcu eu vulputate ultricies. Sed sapien nisl, fringilla a elit ac, gravida mattis erat.

Quote3 wrote:In non congue lorem. Curabitur semper lectus vel ipsum suscipit pellentesque. Nunc semper aliquet erat sed placerat. Ut gravida accumsan dolor ut rhoncus. Praesent id dapibus elit. Integer at felis condimentum, malesuada tellus in, pharetra risus. Vivamus tempor dignissim arcu, non semper purus ultricies et. Cras ipsum eros, fermentum ac vehicula sit amet, rhoncus id tortor.

Quote4 wrote:Praesent augue diam, ornare sed leo nec, condimentum facilisis metus. Nullam sed fringilla lacus. Donec id leo tempus, placerat risus in, commodo leo. Curabitur vel lorem metus. Sed nec turpis facilisis, rhoncus dolor non, pretium turpis. Ut pellentesque dolor quis erat imperdiet aliquet. Vivamus finibus, quam quis fermentum malesuada, tellus est rhoncus ex, sed vehicula sem dolor at lorem. Vivamus a turpis nibh. Etiam dignissim sem eget nunc facilisis ultricies in non leo. Quisque dignissim, augue a maximus condimentum, quam risus dictum tortor, porta blandit risus nisl non turpis. Fusce egestas felis eget augue viverra, vestibulum ornare lacus mattis. Aenean et lorem ut tellus porta porttitor nec in risus. Aenean nunc arcu, auctor ut laoreet at, hendrerit sit amet erat. Cras libero erat, suscipit sed mauris ac, imperdiet rhoncus purus. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus.

Quote5 wrote:Praesent rhoncus luctus elit, vitae tempor felis pulvinar ac. Vivamus quis ligula ante. Nullam ac molestie urna. Sed vitae ipsum varius, tincidunt mauris in, ultricies quam. Phasellus vel mi ut enim pellentesque tincidunt. Nulla facilisi. Cras eu pulvinar felis. Vestibulum efficitur ullamcorper nunc, sed efficitur sem tempor a. Sed ac consequat nulla, ut tempus tellus. Cras in sem hendrerit, placerat tellus in, efficitur velit. Vivamus rhoncus, arcu sed sodales laoreet, urna lorem feugiat ante, lacinia volutpat libero nisi nec purus.

Quote6 wrote:In aliquet convallis sodales. Mauris mollis vel lacus vitae semper. Cras vitae libero non nisi viverra venenatis id sit amet ipsum. In viverra faucibus ligula mollis porta. Mauris sed ligula nunc. Pellentesque pretium venenatis orci. Nullam condimentum sed mauris eget condimentum. Vestibulum maximus non sapien eget mollis. Integer lacinia purus sit amet dolor mollis, sit amet auctor nibh egestas. Suspendisse tincidunt in elit non viverra.

Quote7 wrote:Nulla nec velit hendrerit, cursus lectus semper, pulvinar ante. Cras accumsan felis vel dolor convallis pulvinar. Nunc id tortor sed eros suscipit scelerisque. Etiam ultrices fermentum condimentum. Aliquam vulputate vehicula nulla, ut aliquam erat tempus et. Maecenas consequat neque eget ante tristique mattis. Aenean vitae dignissim justo. Nulla imperdiet dictum odio ac venenatis. Proin sit amet lorem lorem. Morbi rhoncus faucibus neque at tempor.

Quote8 wrote:Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Donec nec gravida justo. Curabitur scelerisque elit ligula, vitae pretium sapien venenatis non. Cras id ultricies dui. In nisi massa, rutrum id luctus fringilla, malesuada non est. Suspendisse faucibus risus in ligula consectetur sagittis a ut erat. In congue eros nec nunc feugiat rhoncus. In cursus, orci at pharetra vulputate, justo urna volutpat diam, vitae imperdiet purus urna nec leo. Donec vel auctor tellus. Pellentesque nisi enim, maximus at sagittis ut, semper a sapien. Vestibulum convallis dui et magna tempus, in dapibus risus commodo. Sed nec leo neque. Etiam neque ligula, lobortis eu nulla non, luctus vehicula risus. Duis euismod, enim a auctor scelerisque, quam risus ultricies justo, varius iaculis purus mauris rutrum augue. Pellentesque ornare turpis neque, sit amet ultrices leo ultrices ut. Sed tristique eu diam scelerisque feugiat.

Quote9 wrote:Nunc porttitor diam lacus, ut mollis nunc porta ac. Vivamus lacinia ipsum at dui rhoncus posuere. Morbi sit amet aliquet eros, quis ultrices nisi. Nullam nec metus sagittis, tempor dui ac, rutrum turpis. Donec elementum nisi at mauris bibendum, in dapibus lectus hendrerit. Suspendisse tincidunt nisi rhoncus odio blandit venenatis. Duis neque lacus, bibendum nec risus at, molestie interdum quam. Aliquam non diam vel nisl consequat auctor. Nulla elementum nisi vestibulum ligula condimentum pretium. Curabitur commodo eget ligula sit amet tincidunt. Donec a nisl sit amet felis pulvinar fringilla. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.

Quote10 wrote:In porta quam ac quam imperdiet luctus. Donec ullamcorper aliquet tempus. Aenean ultricies non leo condimentum ullamcorper. Aliquam tempor nunc ut urna finibus malesuada. Suspendisse nisl turpis, ornare nec tristique quis, imperdiet eu augue. Nam dignissim nibh ac purus ultricies consequat quis et dolor. Pellentesque non dolor in ligula suscipit sollicitudin eget ac turpis. Curabitur rutrum leo sit amet justo cursus iaculis. Praesent consectetur est pretium iaculis interdum. Maecenas ultrices leo justo, eu finibus massa posuere sed. Vivamus nibh nulla, gravida quis malesuada finibus, rhoncus quis enim. Maecenas ullamcorper lorem vitae lorem mollis ultrices. Fusce pharetra euismod neque vel pretium.

<<< This is a valid post. (Though it may be advisable for you to use a spoiler= tag.) >>>

Example Post B
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.
Comment.

Quote2 wrote:Pellentesque pulvinar, lectus in facilisis blandit, orci libero tempor erat, sed auctor tortor lectus in felis. Aenean fermentum consequat pretium. Praesent bibendum rutrum metus, sit amet tempor ex pharetra sit amet. Nulla vehicula, mauris sit amet venenatis consequat, urna urna rhoncus libero, vitae faucibus nisl nunc et libero. Sed id enim orci. Etiam viverra purus erat, convallis porta massa facilisis et. Aenean mattis, nisl vitae facilisis laoreet, tortor mauris tristique tellus, sed ultrices tellus quam at ex. Quisque consequat neque nulla, quis tristique neque faucibus ut. Donec accumsan justo elit, eu efficitur risus sagittis in. Vestibulum aliquet lectus in convallis fringilla. Nam sed augue vel elit viverra dictum. Nunc semper arcu eu vulputate ultricies. Sed sapien nisl, fringilla a elit ac, gravida mattis erat.
Second comment.

Quote3 wrote:In non congue lorem. Curabitur semper lectus vel ipsum suscipit pellentesque. Nunc semper aliquet erat sed placerat. Ut gravida accumsan dolor ut rhoncus. Praesent id dapibus elit. Integer at felis condimentum, malesuada tellus in, pharetra risus. Vivamus tempor dignissim arcu, non semper purus ultricies et. Cras ipsum eros, fermentum ac vehicula sit amet, rhoncus id tortor.
Third comment.

Quote4 wrote:Praesent augue diam, ornare sed leo nec, condimentum facilisis metus. Nullam sed fringilla lacus. Donec id leo tempus, placerat risus in, commodo leo. Curabitur vel lorem metus. Sed nec turpis facilisis, rhoncus dolor non, pretium turpis. Ut pellentesque dolor quis erat imperdiet aliquet. Vivamus finibus, quam quis fermentum malesuada, tellus est rhoncus ex, sed vehicula sem dolor at lorem. Vivamus a turpis nibh. Etiam dignissim sem eget nunc facilisis ultricies in non leo. Quisque dignissim, augue a maximus condimentum, quam risus dictum tortor, porta blandit risus nisl non turpis. Fusce egestas felis eget augue viverra, vestibulum ornare lacus mattis. Aenean et lorem ut tellus porta porttitor nec in risus. Aenean nunc arcu, auctor ut laoreet at, hendrerit sit amet erat. Cras libero erat, suscipit sed mauris ac, imperdiet rhoncus purus. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus.
Fourth comment.

Quote5 wrote:Praesent rhoncus luctus elit, vitae tempor felis pulvinar ac. Vivamus quis ligula ante. Nullam ac molestie urna. Sed vitae ipsum varius, tincidunt mauris in, ultricies quam. Phasellus vel mi ut enim pellentesque tincidunt. Nulla facilisi. Cras eu pulvinar felis. Vestibulum efficitur ullamcorper nunc, sed efficitur sem tempor a. Sed ac consequat nulla, ut tempus tellus. Cras in sem hendrerit, placerat tellus in, efficitur velit. Vivamus rhoncus, arcu sed sodales laoreet, urna lorem feugiat ante, lacinia volutpat libero nisi nec purus.
Fifth comment.

Quote6 wrote:In aliquet convallis sodales. Mauris mollis vel lacus vitae semper. Cras vitae libero non nisi viverra venenatis id sit amet ipsum. In viverra faucibus ligula mollis porta. Mauris sed ligula nunc. Pellentesque pretium venenatis orci. Nullam condimentum sed mauris eget condimentum. Vestibulum maximus non sapien eget mollis. Integer lacinia purus sit amet dolor mollis, sit amet auctor nibh egestas. Suspendisse tincidunt in elit non viverra.
Sixth comment.

Quote7 wrote:Nulla nec velit hendrerit, cursus lectus semper, pulvinar ante. Cras accumsan felis vel dolor convallis pulvinar. Nunc id tortor sed eros suscipit scelerisque. Etiam ultrices fermentum condimentum. Aliquam vulputate vehicula nulla, ut aliquam erat tempus et. Maecenas consequat neque eget ante tristique mattis. Aenean vitae dignissim justo. Nulla imperdiet dictum odio ac venenatis. Proin sit amet lorem lorem. Morbi rhoncus faucibus neque at tempor.
Seventh comment.

Quote8 wrote:Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Donec nec gravida justo. Curabitur scelerisque elit ligula, vitae pretium sapien venenatis non. Cras id ultricies dui. In nisi massa, rutrum id luctus fringilla, malesuada non est. Suspendisse faucibus risus in ligula consectetur sagittis a ut erat. In congue eros nec nunc feugiat rhoncus. In cursus, orci at pharetra vulputate, justo urna volutpat diam, vitae imperdiet purus urna nec leo. Donec vel auctor tellus. Pellentesque nisi enim, maximus at sagittis ut, semper a sapien. Vestibulum convallis dui et magna tempus, in dapibus risus commodo. Sed nec leo neque. Etiam neque ligula, lobortis eu nulla non, luctus vehicula risus. Duis euismod, enim a auctor scelerisque, quam risus ultricies justo, varius iaculis purus mauris rutrum augue. Pellentesque ornare turpis neque, sit amet ultrices leo ultrices ut. Sed tristique eu diam scelerisque feugiat.
Eight comment.

Quote9 wrote:Nunc porttitor diam lacus, ut mollis nunc porta ac. Vivamus lacinia ipsum at dui rhoncus posuere. Morbi sit amet aliquet eros, quis ultrices nisi. Nullam nec metus sagittis, tempor dui ac, rutrum turpis. Donec elementum nisi at mauris bibendum, in dapibus lectus hendrerit. Suspendisse tincidunt nisi rhoncus odio blandit venenatis. Duis neque lacus, bibendum nec risus at, molestie interdum quam. Aliquam non diam vel nisl consequat auctor. Nulla elementum nisi vestibulum ligula condimentum pretium. Curabitur commodo eget ligula sit amet tincidunt. Donec a nisl sit amet felis pulvinar fringilla. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.
Ninth comment.

Quote10 wrote:In porta quam ac quam imperdiet luctus. Donec ullamcorper aliquet tempus. Aenean ultricies non leo condimentum ullamcorper. Aliquam tempor nunc ut urna finibus malesuada. Suspendisse nisl turpis, ornare nec tristique quis, imperdiet eu augue. Nam dignissim nibh ac purus ultricies consequat quis et dolor. Pellentesque non dolor in ligula suscipit sollicitudin eget ac turpis. Curabitur rutrum leo sit amet justo cursus iaculis. Praesent consectetur est pretium iaculis interdum. Maecenas ultrices leo justo, eu finibus massa posuere sed. Vivamus nibh nulla, gravida quis malesuada finibus, rhoncus quis enim. Maecenas ullamcorper lorem vitae lorem mollis ultrices. Fusce pharetra euismod neque vel pretium.
Tenth comment.

<<< As long as the total of "Comment", "Second comment", "Third comment", "Fourth comment", "Fifth comment", "Sixth comment", "Seventh comment", "Eighth comment", "Ninth comment", and "Tenth comment" is under 500 words, this is a valid post. >>>

Example Post CComment.
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote2 wrote:Pellentesque pulvinar, lectus in facilisis blandit, orci libero tempor erat, sed auctor tortor lectus in felis. Aenean fermentum consequat pretium. Praesent bibendum rutrum metus, sit amet tempor ex pharetra sit amet. Nulla vehicula, mauris sit amet venenatis consequat, urna urna rhoncus libero, vitae faucibus nisl nunc et libero. Sed id enim orci. Etiam viverra purus erat, convallis porta massa facilisis et. Aenean mattis, nisl vitae facilisis laoreet, tortor mauris tristique tellus, sed ultrices tellus quam at ex. Quisque consequat neque nulla, quis tristique neque faucibus ut. Donec accumsan justo elit, eu efficitur risus sagittis in. Vestibulum aliquet lectus in convallis fringilla. Nam sed augue vel elit viverra dictum. Nunc semper arcu eu vulputate ultricies. Sed sapien nisl, fringilla a elit ac, gravida mattis erat.

Quote3 wrote:In non congue lorem. Curabitur semper lectus vel ipsum suscipit pellentesque. Nunc semper aliquet erat sed placerat. Ut gravida accumsan dolor ut rhoncus. Praesent id dapibus elit. Integer at felis condimentum, malesuada tellus in, pharetra risus. Vivamus tempor dignissim arcu, non semper purus ultricies et. Cras ipsum eros, fermentum ac vehicula sit amet, rhoncus id tortor.

<<< As long as "Comment" is under 500 words, this is a valid post. >>>

Example Post D
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote2 wrote:Pellentesque pulvinar, lectus in facilisis blandit, orci libero tempor erat, sed auctor tortor lectus in felis. Aenean fermentum consequat pretium. Praesent bibendum rutrum metus, sit amet tempor ex pharetra sit amet. Nulla vehicula, mauris sit amet venenatis consequat, urna urna rhoncus libero, vitae faucibus nisl nunc et libero. Sed id enim orci. Etiam viverra purus erat, convallis porta massa facilisis et. Aenean mattis, nisl vitae facilisis laoreet, tortor mauris tristique tellus, sed ultrices tellus quam at ex. Quisque consequat neque nulla, quis tristique neque faucibus ut. Donec accumsan justo elit, eu efficitur risus sagittis in. Vestibulum aliquet lectus in convallis fringilla. Nam sed augue vel elit viverra dictum. Nunc semper arcu eu vulputate ultricies. Sed sapien nisl, fringilla a elit ac, gravida mattis erat.

Quote3 wrote:In non congue lorem. Curabitur semper lectus vel ipsum suscipit pellentesque. Nunc semper aliquet erat sed placerat. Ut gravida accumsan dolor ut rhoncus. Praesent id dapibus elit. Integer at felis condimentum, malesuada tellus in, pharetra risus. Vivamus tempor dignissim arcu, non semper purus ultricies et. Cras ipsum eros, fermentum ac vehicula sit amet, rhoncus id tortor.
Comment.

<<< As long as "Comment" is under 500 words, this is a valid post. >>>

Example Post E
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.
Comment.
I repeat.
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.
Comment.
<<< As long as "Comment", "I repeat," "Comment" totaled up is under 500 words, this is an acceptable post. Repetition once or twice is a valid form of emphasis.

And you should
only
need to use the same exact quote in one spot 2-3 times at maximum. Thus, >>>

Example Post F
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

<<< While this post follows the letter of the rule, not only does it violate the spirit, but it is also obnoxious and would be appropriately warned. >>>

Example Post GComment.
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

<<< Even if "Comment" is under 500 words, this still violates the same spirit of the rule and is still inappropriate. >>>

Example Post H
Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.

Quote1 wrote:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce consequat eu elit porttitor ornare. Proin eget diam arcu. Phasellus hendrerit placerat diam, eget malesuada sem malesuada a. Nunc elementum orci nec aliquet cursus. Praesent sodales velit id neque semper, ac tincidunt ante volutpat. Sed sed dui velit. Nunc luctus neque erat, vitae maximus nisl faucibus id. Nunc fringilla ante vitae ligula condimentum aliquam eget sed lacus. Suspendisse consequat non turpis a elementum. In bibendum facilisis molestie. Duis quis blandit quam. Aliquam dignissim pulvinar maximus. Phasellus vitae tincidunt eros, et molestie nisl. Nam suscipit nisl non risus euismod molestie. Donec et enim sit amet ante pretium egestas vel ut orci. Nulla non tellus et nulla aliquam venenatis.
Comment.

<<< Changing the location of where "Comment" is does not change that this is still violating the spirit of the rule.

Be succinct; don't spam. Take a look at these rules to get a better idea: >>>

In post 0, mastina wrote:
Rules
Follow implicit game rules, e.g.
<<< not faking mod content >>>
.

Ask questions! I answer.
Infractions
Attempts to abuse the system aren't tolerated; moderator discretion applies. I reserve the right to harsher or more lax punishment as I see fit.

<<< It is generally fairly apparent when loophole abuse is being attempted. If you are ever unsure if your post is acceptable, then you can simply ask and I will tell you. >>>

The irony is that this post flagrantly violates the spirit AND letter of the rule as only Mastina could do.

Pine · Post Post #52 (isolation #8) » Wed May 30, 2018 5:29 am

I was with you on AA9, Wis, but she's got a point. With English not a first language, being explicit in confirming oppressive post restrictions is prudent. It probably could have been a PM, but *shrug*

Pine · Post Post #74 (isolation #9) » Wed May 30, 2018 3:12 pm

In post 72, TheBrie wrote:A single vote isn't going to accidentally lynch someone in 13 player.

Well, you say that.

I'm getting some scumvibes from Kokichi, but that just may be me being salty.

Pine · Post Post #122 (isolation #10) » Fri Jun 01, 2018 3:01 am

In post 120, LuckyOtter wrote:you.

Why?

Pine · Post Post #123 (isolation #11) » Fri Jun 01, 2018 3:02 am

In post 120, LuckyOtter wrote:Y'all. Can we get some more votes on Eevee please?

Eevee, my last post was directed at you.

Why?

Not sure why the quote fucked up there.

Pine · Post Post #147 (isolation #12) » Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:32 am

Don't blame me. I'm unabashedly active-lurking.

Pine · Post Post #149 (isolation #13) » Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:35 am

Nah this is WisTown

Pine · Post Post #151 (isolation #14) » Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:56 am

So does Fuzzy. Laying low after worthy suspicion

Pine · Post Post #171 (isolation #15) » Sat Jun 02, 2018 5:38 pm

Gut/Meta TR on Wis, Otter.

Pine · Post Post #182 (isolation #16) » Sun Jun 03, 2018 11:17 am

Awww, Brie

Pine · Post Post #193 (isolation #17) » Sun Jun 03, 2018 3:11 pm

In post 192, Momrangal wrote:More curious to why you have pine as town. He seems kinda Iioa-y though I am inclined to be a tad lenient that still lightly pings.

The word you're looking for is 'lazy'.

Gotta say I'm not digging the misrep. I mean, I haven't done much, but it's def not been IIOA. I don't do that even when scum. It's bad play.

Pine · Post Post #231 (isolation #18) » Tue Jun 05, 2018 9:22 am

I feel like this is not the ruleset for Hiraki and Wisdom. They keep coming up against their quota.

They can both be Town for now though. Wis stronger I think. Otter might be Town. Brie's replace-out feels Town, but is probably NAI. Dunn is lurking, which I don't think is good for him. Fuzzy is still hoping we'll get bored with his wagon and move on. I'm not letting up.

Pine · Post Post #250 (isolation #19) » Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:39 am

In post 246, Momrangal wrote:Oh also, Dunn is a tentative and careful town read at the moment.

Also, Pine. I'm not vibing you this game and you're one of the few people I want to get a solid read on so I guess stop being lazy!

Hard pass.

I usually suck when I try to engage on D1, so I'm trying a "sit back and observe" methodology.

Pine · Post Post #262 (isolation #20) » Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:35 pm

Doublevote: Fuzzy

Also feeling mildly suspicious of Mathblade after that unbidden self-meta, and slightly Townish vibes from AA9.

Pine · Post Post #277 (isolation #21) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 7:28 am

In post 276, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 274, LuckyOtter wrote:I think there is scum within {Fuzzy, Fitz, Math, Kokichi, Hiraki}.
When you do a group this large it looks like you're just lining up lynches

That is not what lining up lynches looks like.

Why are you always scum, Kokichi?

Pine · Post Post #285 (isolation #22) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:33 pm

I'm thinking Lucky Town.

Fuzzy hardcore scum though.

Pine · Post Post #288 (isolation #23) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:41 pm

In post 287, Wisdom wrote:Lucky is town
Math, saying scum is in a subset means you townread everyone else. Its not saying nothing.

Well

Not to split hairs, but that isn't true. Saying "I think scum is in {here}" does not explicitly mean a TR of everyone else. It could be construed as an implication, but I've thought I had the scum narrowed down without solid reads on other players before. It's the difference between scumhunting and townhunting.

This game I'm mostly townhunting. Some games just lend themselves to it, and there's people obvtowning all over the damn place.

Pine · Post Post #290 (isolation #24) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 6:25 pm

Okay.

VOTE: Kokichi

Pine · Post Post #305 (isolation #25) » Fri Jun 08, 2018 5:46 am

I'm happy with my Kokichi vote. My initial "Why are you always scum" was mostly meme-y, but it's going to stick.

I'm not forgetting about Fuzzy though, esp after the couple of bad posts he's done recently.

Pine · Post Post #311 (isolation #26) » Fri Jun 08, 2018 9:33 am

Whoa red flag

"Why don't you think Fuzzy is scum" is a hell of a loaded question from Lucky Otter

Pine · Post Post #313 (isolation #27) » Fri Jun 08, 2018 9:35 am

I'm not saying Town doesn't ask loaded questions, but damn. Otter!scum probably means Eevee!town and Fuzzy!town

PE: Oh. Hmm. I'll have to think about it

Pine · Post Post #315 (isolation #28) » Fri Jun 08, 2018 9:55 am

No, Dunn is right. I misread that. The Eevee quote changes the context of the Otter question.

Red flag rescinded, ignore my last few posts

Pine · Post Post #335 (isolation #29) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 6:27 am

^Goodposting

Mom can be Town for now.

Pine · Post Post #352 (isolation #30) » Mon Jun 11, 2018 12:01 pm

I’m fine with a deadline.

VOTE: Fuzzy

I’d like to revisit Kokichi on D2

Pine · Post Post #363 (isolation #31) » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:54 am

If Fuzzy were Town, he'd be lynched by now.

Pine · Post Post #365 (isolation #32) » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:56 am

In fact, I'm guessing one scum each on either CW.

Fitz is a CW, so he's prob Town. Wis is Town this game.

{Fuzzy, Dunn, Mom}?

Pine · Post Post #368 (isolation #33) » Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:20 am

In post 366, Wisdom wrote:you are forcing conclusions and making me suspect you

base your scumreads on counterwagons when you have a flip, not before

Ehhhh, that’s fair.

Pine · Post Post #373 (isolation #34) » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:09 am

I actually did explain them.

1) I’m reading Fuzzy as scum.
2) I’m reading the Eevee and Fitz counterwagons as Town.
3) My guess is that there’s one scum on each CW. This is the part that’s a stretch, and is a blind guess. Wis is right that it’s not really good scumhunting.
4) I’m reading Fitz and Wis as Town.
5) That leaves two in {Mom, Cakez, Dunn}
6) Cakez seems to want to solve.
7) Dunn and Mom are scum with Fuzzy. Gamesolve.

Frankly, Dunn trying to paint that read as baseless suggests I hit a nerve.

Pine · Post Post #382 (isolation #35) » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:30 am

In post 379, Momrangal wrote:Pine is held to higher standards

Flattered. *blush*

In post 375, Momrangal wrote:
In post 365, Pine wrote:In fact, I'm guessing one scum each on either CW.

Fitz is a CW, so he's prob Town. Wis is Town this game.

{Fuzzy, Dunn, Mom}?
Why is the converse not true?

Also why noting the Fitz wagon and not the eevee one?

I did assume the Eevee wagon. However, Eevee isn't in the PoE to find the scum on one of the CWs.

Again, easily-disproved and one-dimensional discrediting of my reads makes me think I'm on to something.

Pine · Post Post #385 (isolation #36) » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:34 am

In post 380, Wisdom wrote:no its because arc isnt trying to push narratives
pine literally made up three scumreads based on it and proposed its the scumteam

You've got the order of operations flipped, bro. I made assessments, those gave me scumreads.

This is like...normal stuff. I didn't really do anything weird here. Disagree with me, sure, my logic may be (probably is) flawed, but it's at least orderly.

Pine · Post Post #387 (isolation #37) » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:35 am

Besides, I don't do that even when I am scum...it's way more efficient and stealthy to latch on to weak Townies than go the hard route of inventing deduction.

PE: Associatives are completely unnecessary.

Pine · Post Post #409 (isolation #38) » Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:16 am

In post 408, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 365, Pine wrote:In fact, I'm guessing one scum each on either CW.

Fitz is a CW, so he's prob Town. Wis is Town this game.

{Fuzzy, Dunn, Mom}?
Did you not just say I was scum?

It was a lazy, eyerolling kind of comment on your play style more than a read.

Pine · Post Post #411 (isolation #39) » Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:24 am

In post 410, Momrangal wrote:Pine also said I was town a page prior.

I feel like he's purposefully tugging at people to see what happens

Obviously.

Thanks for blowing up my spot

Pine · Post Post #416 (isolation #40) » Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:49 am

In post 415, Momrangal wrote:I am far more intimate with him than you probably will ever be

...hot?

Pine · Post Post #419 (isolation #41) » Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:10 am

In post 418, mastina wrote:A votecount was requested.
Generating.

False.

Pine · Post Post #422 (isolation #42) » Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:15 am

Booooooooo

I propose a vote of no confidence in Mastina!

Pine · Post Post #437 (isolation #43) » Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:59 am

In post 436, Wisdom wrote:crazy idea kokichi; fuzzy is also lynchbait

He good kind of lynchbait. The kind that rolled scum.

Pine · Post Post #441 (isolation #44) » Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:38 pm

I like you well enough, Math.

Pine · Post Post #446 (isolation #45) » Thu Jun 14, 2018 3:27 pm

Play nice, children.

Pine · Post Post #460 (isolation #46) » Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:11 am

I endorse a deadline as well.

Momrangal you're off the hook. I overestimated the value of the Fitz wagon as a counter to Fuzzy; it's looking Town-driven and independent to me now. I still think Fitz is Town, but I have an absolutely atrocious record of reading him, almost as bad as Mastina's record against me.

The Eevee wagon is still godawful bad though.

Pine · Post Post #463 (isolation #47) » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:20 am

In post 461, Wisdom wrote:as is the one on fuzzy

bite meeeeee

Pine · Post Post #465 (isolation #48) » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:38 am

VOTE: Dunnstral

I'll 1v1 you, bish. Bring it.

Pine · Post Post #468 (isolation #49) » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:45 am

In post 466, EeveeLution Army wrote:Nice plurshift to me pine

With no deadline set, that's not a thing anyway.

Pine · Post Post #470 (isolation #50) » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:51 am

In post 469, LuckyOtter wrote:Hey y'all. Closing on a house today, adulting to the max. I think I have a big chunk of free time in the morning, so I will be catching up then.

Congrats! That is, by a wide margin, the third most adult thing one can do.

<<<

INFRACTION

: Fifth post on a page in under 24 hours; user has been warned. >>>

Pine · Post Post #504 (isolation #51) » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:16 pm

Yeah I'm still thinking Fuzzy. Maybe Dunn too whatever I don't care rn.

Pine · Post Post #516 (isolation #52) » Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:37 pm

I'll 1v1 you tomorrow then

VOTE: Fuzzy

Pine · Post Post #518 (isolation #53) » Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:47 pm

In post 515, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: EeveeLution Army

fake

Pine · Post Post #523 (isolation #54) » Sun Jun 17, 2018 7:51 pm

Lynchbait doesn’t make them not scum. I think Fuzzy is scummy on top of being an easy target.

Pine · Post Post #526 (isolation #55) » Mon Jun 18, 2018 5:16 am

Happy scumday, Cakez!

"Needs to flip before endgame" is code for "Perfect D1 lynch"

Pine · Post Post #545 (isolation #56) » Tue Jun 19, 2018 6:17 am

In post 532, Wisdom wrote:who is scum when Fuzzy flips green, math?

In post 537, ArcAngel9 wrote:Hiraki.. If eeve flips town, who is scum?

I’ve always found this question to be unfairly loaded.

Pine · Post Post #548 (isolation #57) » Tue Jun 19, 2018 6:44 am

It forces them to build reads on a premise they don't believe. It's unnecessarily glib and not likely to elicit an honest response.

Pine · Post Post #557 (isolation #58) » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:16 pm

In post 552, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:
Vote Sir Cake

out of everyone here he seems to ring the most scummiest, I can not see anyone that reads 525 and not get atleast a tinge of scum

Opportunism

Not sure why you're so adamant against a Fuzzy lynch, Wis

Pine · Post Post #561 (isolation #59) » Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:05 pm

I do what I want, Wis

Pine · Post Post #564 (isolation #60) » Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:48 am

I can do what I want because I’m Town. So can you, in fact, but you ooze scum when you do it.

Pine · Post Post #567 (isolation #61) » Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:16 am

Yeah tbh I'm not sure what I was thinking there. Thought there was some momentum against Cakez for some reason. W/e

Pine · Post Post #607 (isolation #62) » Fri Jun 22, 2018 5:18 am

Yeah I don't buy the cop claim. It feels like a transparent attempt to draw the real cop into a counterclaim.

@Real!Cop please don't fall for it.

Pine · Post Post #633 (isolation #63) » Sat Jun 23, 2018 4:39 am

In post 629, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Actually I expected a unvote and than a push/pressure to see if I was the cop. I was not wanting or expecting a cc. That is the right move in this situation I was hoping that someone would put pressure on me for my claim in order to see if I was the cop after I stupidly blurted out me role......

@ Math
I am actually pretty insulted........... Really you think I am going to play this bad as scum? I won the ending in three games by outsmarting several people. I am surprise that think I am the same player that outsmarted you in the Ending in three game and yet is likely to be lynched on day 1 ,,,,,,, Thought you would give me a bit more credit.

well town need to decide if they should lynch me or Fritz as we are the two most viable candidate. I dont see a no lynch as being helpful or even a remotely smart move. Whoever gets lynched we should push everyone on that wagon ( assuming Fritz flips town also)

Wis, HOW are you opposed to lynching this? Fakeclaimed cop to weasel out of the lynch, transparently fishes for a real!cop CC, on and on.

You’re too invested in this “too scummy to be scum” narrative. Occam says this is just actually scum.

Pine · Post Post #649 (isolation #64) » Sat Jun 23, 2018 9:11 pm

Yeah, no extension for replacements is pretty weak.

Pine · Post Post #717 (isolation #65) » Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:55 am

/blatant prodge

I'll catch up in a bit

Pine · Post Post #733 (isolation #66) » Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:47 pm

In post 725, EeveeLution Army wrote:1) cause honestly i dont see why mom got killed at all
2) his iso bothered me. He wanted to 1v1 two different people then insisted on the the copclaim dying
3) honestly for now pine and another person insisting on the cop dying but not all 3 scum would push it

I insisted on the copclaim dying because I didn't believe it. I've seen it happen where scum at the end of their rope fakeclaims a Town PR to draw out a counterclaim. It frankly happens a lot - not all the time, but not infrequently. I usually refuse to go archive diving for examples, but this one is fresh in my mind. I'd just done a full reread and ISO analysis, and pulled a reversal which nailed scum to the wall. We rapidly ramped up a wagon, and Hello123Math claimed Doc to get out of it. She then hammered a flashwagon on the ACTUAL Doctor.

So I don't view roleclaims as sacrosanct. When it looks especially convenient and suspiciously-timed, I trust my own instincts over conservative meta. That didn't serve me well here, but I'd do it again in similar circumstances.

Pine · Post Post #741 (isolation #67) » Mon Jul 02, 2018 4:16 am

In post 740, Umlaut wrote:Oh, Eevee actually did say a little more about her Pine scumread. That's not a bad reason at all, though it seems like several people wanted to lynch the cop claim. Fuck if I understand why but we still have to pick out which of those people are scummier.

Is Pine the kind of player who would play more orthodox as scum to avoid sticking out, or the kind of player who would just do what he likes as scum (like lynching a Cop) and then figure out how to excuse it?

Both. I try to process "what would I do as Town" and do that. However, I also let objectives affect my process. They aren't mutually-exclusive. For that matter, neither is the lynch-or-don't attitude regarding PR claims - each game is different. I'll admit that the recent game I linked is probably influencing my decision-making process, but I could probably find half a dozen examples for either side of the argument in my archive of 50+ games over the last seven years. Most people aren't ironclad consistent, and if they are they probably suck at the game.

At the risk of going off on a tangent, I kind of find the whole "prove it in your meta" attitude to be inherently disingenuous - every decent player grows and evolves, and most of them are also in tune with their meta and actively manipulate it. Pretty much the only consistent thing you'll find in my background is that I detest bussing as a scum strategy. Even then, there are abundant counter-examples, as it can be a game-winner in the right situation. I just despise players who show up in the scum thread and say "hey all, I'm going to be bussing this game." Anyway, I find any argument that begins with "Well in XXXX game you did this..." to be bullshit from the start. Different games are different, for all they may influence the present and future. It's just more complicated than a black-and-white analysis for most self-aware players.

FWIW, I don't begrudge you the impulse though. If you feel like sifting through 13-14k posts in my game history to find nuggets of insight, be my guest. But I don't lie about my meta (why bother?), and am willing to discuss it.

Pine · Post Post #743 (isolation #68) » Mon Jul 02, 2018 4:51 am

1:1 is always a good idea.

In the linked game, you'll notice I was Town and called bullshit on it. As an IC in a Newbie game, though, I went easier on the Newbie claiming than here, so it's probably a poor example either way.

And uh...Town didn't win that game, I did. Unabomah was off his game and Espeonage died N1. The Town newbies did adequately for newbies, but were outplayed by the newbie scum. Between the D1 blunder and a Townie self-hammer (iirc), it was a close thing.

Pine · Post Post #748 (isolation #69) » Mon Jul 02, 2018 7:40 am

Nah Math is Town. I don't think he's this hardheaded stubborn as scum.

Pine · Post Post #775 (isolation #70) » Tue Jul 03, 2018 6:18 pm

In post 769, MafMen wrote:whats up

In post 770, MafMen wrote:ill read like the last 10 pages but i dont have the capacity for more

In post 771, MafMen wrote:no ill just iso people

who should i do

In post 773, MafMen wrote:
In post 772, Dunnstral wrote:You already broke a rule

Don't post 3 times in a row, don't post more than 4 times in a page
what where does it say that

In post 774, MafMen wrote:oh shit i see it ill stop

Pine · Post Post #777 (isolation #71) » Tue Jul 03, 2018 6:28 pm

Ummmm Wisdom has a pretty decent analysis of the game. Mathblade is a lunatic, but has a coherent different view. Eevee has been a popular topic, you should form an opinion there. LuckyOtter or Umlaut would be a good read. Do me while you're at it. I've mostly been dicking around, but I'm not going to send you to read others without submitting to inspection myself.

Pine · Post Post #810 (isolation #72) » Fri Jul 06, 2018 4:09 am

Blatant prodge. I really ought to have been V/LA this week, training was even busier than expected.

Pine · Post Post #840 (isolation #73) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 7:21 am

Reeeeally suspicious of the Math wagon tbh.

Pine · Post Post #842 (isolation #74) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 11:29 am

Ehhhh.

My reads are mostly TRs, but they're useful in PoE. Of the people I don't have TRs on, I like Hiraki the most for scum. Umlaut is also giving me vibes, but has been playing a tight game so *shrug*

Yeah, I'll put my vote where my mouth is.

VOTE: Hiraki

Pine · Post Post #846 (isolation #75) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 1:21 pm

A "tight game" is shorthand for someone who has been playing things pretty close to the vest, not really giving anything away. Being obvTown is fine if you can manage it, but it's not really positive long-term in that it gets you killed. So playing tight suggests someone who has the discipline to avoid dropping tells at all, but remains involved and active. It

usually

implies Town, but can also be talented scum. Given my lack of history with you, I'm not sure which. My paranoia makes me want to lynch any player skilled enough that I can't read them, but if you're Town that's a major net loss. So I'll prefer Hiraki today.

Pine · Post Post #848 (isolation #76) » Sun Jul 08, 2018 4:02 pm

Yeeeeah, no. I may be lowkey here, but I'm not so careless as to just plain make shit up.

Pine · Post Post #919 (isolation #77) » Fri Jul 13, 2018 5:33 am

Mehhhhhh I'm here-ish. Camp is over in a few hours, I'll spend the evening catching up.

Pine · Post Post #936 (isolation #78) » Sat Jul 14, 2018 1:09 pm

Mathwagon is a bad wagon

Eeveewagon is a bad wagon

Otter wagon is a bad wagon

Hiraki is a good lynch. Dunn is a good lynch. Will support either.

Pine · Post Post #940 (isolation #79) » Sat Jul 14, 2018 4:14 pm

Yeah. The first three are Town, the latter two are not. Keep up.

Pine · Post Post #950 (isolation #80) » Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:48 am

There is no case on me, Umlaut. It's based entirely on me disagreeing with their/your bad reads. There's nothing to engage or dispute, so I don't bother.

This is a pretty blatant lynchbait move, predicated on me not being all that active to derail it.

I'd give you credit for having cold feet, but you still aren't making a better vote.

Pine · Post Post #954 (isolation #81) » Sun Jul 15, 2018 11:50 am

In post 952, Umlaut wrote:
In post 950, Pine wrote:There is no case on me, Umlaut. It's based entirely on me disagreeing with their/your bad reads. There's nothing to engage or dispute, so I don't bother.

This is a pretty blatant lynchbait move, predicated on me not being all that active to derail it.

I'd give you credit for having cold feet, but you still aren't making a better vote.
So your read of the situation is that I’m scum, my case in 903 is entirely without merit, and the reason I’m pushing a case on you in particular is because you’re so low-activity that I don’t expect you to bother rebutting it? Or if not, who is it that you think is making the “lynchbait move” you describe?

I just want to be sure I’m understanding you correctly here. You haven’t expressed any prior suspicion of me so I don’t want to assume.

@MafMen, @Dunnstral

WHERE YOU AT

That is not, in fact, what I said. I remain on the fence about you.

Pine · Post Post #958 (isolation #82) » Sun Jul 15, 2018 4:11 pm

In post 957, Dunnstral wrote:Pine you need to get on eevee

I don't vote for people I think are Town, and I don't appreciate the implied threat there.

Pine · Post Post #969 (isolation #83) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 1:05 am

In post 966, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 958, Pine wrote:
In post 957, Dunnstral wrote:Pine you need to get on eevee
I don't vote for people I think are Town, and I don't appreciate the implied threat there.

intent

Sigh

You fuckers

I'm the doctor. Back off

Pine · Post Post #971 (isolation #84) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:36 am

Because you're a knob

<<<

INFRACTION

: Fifth post on a page in under 24 hours; user has been warned. >>>

Pine · Post Post #979 (isolation #85) » Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:09 am

...Mastina's a knob too

(j/k ilu friendo u n me 5eva)

Pine · Post Post #999 (isolation #86) » Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:32 am

Eh, I withheld it because I didn't want to give too much away, but you're right, it does deserve an explanation given antipathy for Follow the Cop on the part of reviewers.

I have an X-shot modifier. I'd rather not disclose how many shots I had, but it's few enough that I didn't use it N1.

Pine · Post Post #1001 (isolation #87) » Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:46 am

Not really. You just pointed out the most obvious way to water down a straight Doctor.

Pine · Post Post #1002 (isolation #88) » Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:47 am

Really, if I were going to invent something, I'd go with something more obscure and creative, like a Weak Doctor or something.

Pine · Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:21 am

In post 997, EeveeLution Army wrote:
In post 972, MathBlade wrote:
In post 610, Wisdom wrote:What the fuck is wrong with all of you

We let him live, if hes cop scum kill him, if not hes forced to conftown someone

We absolutely dont lynch a cop claim
Wisdom: What the fuck is wrong with you? Don’t lynch an uncc’d claim.
Wisdom keeps his vote on an uncc’d counterclaim on a wagon with no reasons behind it.

Jesus Wisdom is obvScum or just a hypocrite.

A cop living is much more valuable than a doc living with nothing to protect. We already lost cop docs dead tonight either way might as well lynch him ourselves.

In post 1003, EeveeLution Army wrote:Yeah but why hide your number of protects. Not like you'll get a chance to use them.

Real doc doctor me imo since ill pushing pine for ya so you dont have to cc so early

Okay, this cogdis as me convinced.

VOTE: Eevee

Pine · Post Post #1014 (isolation #90) » Tue Jul 17, 2018 2:48 pm

In post 1013, Dunnstral wrote:UNVOTE:

OK, Pine, who did you protect?

Eevee, why did you pick Wisdom? Why did you wait until you were being wagoned to claim jailkeeper today?

I already said I didn't. I have a low-number limited-shot, and N1 is the night where protectives are least likely to be useful. They get more efficient (and better at guessing) as days go on.

Pine · Post Post #1044 (isolation #91) » Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:53 am

Yeah, hi. I'm sorry, but the cogdis coming from Eevee is ridiculous, and should make this easymode. I get that I'm biased due to knowing the truth, but seriously, guys.

I'm fine with tabling the issue, as now that I'm outed, they have to kill me. My flip should just simply serve as a guilty on Eevee.

Pine · Post Post #1097 (isolation #92) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 5:08 am

Hi friends. I have been V/LA for a couple of days and will continue to be until tomorrow evening.

I feel my case regarding Eevee vs myself is solid and speaks for itself. The prosecution rests.

Pine · Post Post #1099 (isolation #93) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:51 am

Your blatant cognitive dissonance is enough case for anyone imo.

The best case there though is checking my role PM and seeing mod confirmation that you're a lying scumfuck who lies like a lying liar.

Pine · Post Post #1108 (isolation #94) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 3:15 pm

Yeah I'm looking at Wisdom next for his implausible certainty.

Pine · Post Post #1120 (isolation #95) » Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:02 pm

What! How the fuck is this possible! Moderator lies! Bastard game!

VOTE: Mastina

Say what you want. I went from L-1 and flushing out the Doc and getting her lynched in my place.

*Mic drop*

Pine · Post Post #1133 (isolation #96) » Sat Jul 28, 2018 3:54 am

Guys

I'm not scum

The Doc claim was an elaborate gambit

Scum is obv Jingle Math and Mastina

Pine · Sat Jul 28, 2018 10:36 am

I surrender to you personally, Lucky, O Wise Otterly One.

Pine · Post Post #1153 (isolation #98) » Sun Jul 29, 2018 7:08 pm

Because he scum, fool.

Check your role PM again, he's listed as our buddy.

Oh shit my bad wrong thread.

Pine · Post Post #1160 (isolation #99) » Sun Jul 29, 2018 7:36 pm

Why not lynch Jingle today? You've got one scum caught, why not drive this second one home while you have the momentum and leadership to do so? I guarantee my buddies shoot to fragment this unity tonight.