Open 727 - 09:12 Night 3


Locked
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Wed May 23, 2018 1:07 am

Post by Green Crayons »

VOTE: Hiraki

Scum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #10 (isolation #1) » Wed May 23, 2018 1:28 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Stuttering is alignment indicative.

Lock ‘em up, boys.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #16 (isolation #2) » Wed May 23, 2018 3:21 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Hi Not_Mafia. Living up to your name this game, I see.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #38 (isolation #3) » Wed May 23, 2018 9:12 am

Post by Green Crayons »

What is all this discussion about NM and L-1 that I don't understand?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #44 (isolation #4) » Wed May 23, 2018 9:45 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I don't believe you.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #45 (isolation #5) » Wed May 23, 2018 9:45 am

Post by Green Crayons »

And that's directed to both of you.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #65 (isolation #6) » Wed May 23, 2018 3:09 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

UNVOTE: Hiraki

VOTE: AP
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #66 (isolation #7) » Wed May 23, 2018 3:11 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 43, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 42, Hiraki wrote:
In post 37, ManWithNoName wrote:So, Hiraki, if that is your real name, why shouldn't I just hammer and proceed to the night phase?
I'm the deputy
I don't get it.
So how big of a lie was this post?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #68 (isolation #8) » Wed May 23, 2018 3:27 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

I like that response.

How do you feel about AP and why aren't you voting him yet?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #69 (isolation #9) » Wed May 23, 2018 3:28 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:I like that response.
I don't really know what I expected tbh but I liked what I got.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #78 (isolation #10) » Thu May 24, 2018 2:31 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 77, ManWithNoName wrote:What is bothering you about AP, Green Crayons?
This at the end of a 5-post catch-up intro:
In post 62, AP wrote:Now the problem is you guys robbed me off my right to RVS. I wanted to vote Invisibility with the reason being: a shot in the dark. Consider it's been done and treat it as such, please.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #97 (isolation #11) » Thu May 24, 2018 9:17 am

Post by Green Crayons »

AP/Dino scum team spotted.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #165 (isolation #12) » Thu May 24, 2018 2:57 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

very confused about the unvotes and the still there in spirit
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #166 (isolation #13) » Thu May 24, 2018 2:58 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

any pre-claim hammer would be quick lynched tomorrow.

ez
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #167 (isolation #14) » Thu May 24, 2018 2:59 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 162, AP wrote:I don't think Dino sheeps you (although he voted first) as scum
why not?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #168 (isolation #15) » Thu May 24, 2018 2:59 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 162, AP wrote:theoretically Green Crayons could be scum, but I don't think he would park his vote on me of this lot if he was
why not?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #169 (isolation #16) » Thu May 24, 2018 3:01 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 125, Hiraki wrote:Mylo I'm about to join except I don't know how high your wagon is rn
what tf is with everyone ghost voting in this game
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #171 (isolation #17) » Thu May 24, 2018 3:05 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 96, ManWithNoName wrote:"There's a way to win this setup optimally for town" says town Mathdino, who still hasn't arrived.
Is this something you actually saw Dino say at one point?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #172 (isolation #18) » Thu May 24, 2018 3:06 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Honestly if we make the lynch pool ghost voters I wouldn't be too upset about it.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #173 (isolation #19) » Thu May 24, 2018 3:07 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

@mod:
i'm going to nyc for a long weekend (Fri-Mon) and so will be V/LA during that time.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #175 (isolation #20) » Thu May 24, 2018 3:08 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh that makes sense that that's what he was referring to.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #176 (isolation #21) » Thu May 24, 2018 3:09 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

that that that
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #188 (isolation #22) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:06 am

Post by Green Crayons »

idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #189 (isolation #23) » Fri May 25, 2018 2:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 184, Myloninja13 wrote:So... is this a reaction wagon on AP or is there something suspicious in his play? IDK, it just seemed like he got to L-1 pretty fast here lol.
Why did you roll scum this game? :(
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #222 (isolation #24) » Sat May 26, 2018 1:11 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 190, Hiraki wrote:
In post 188, Green Crayons wrote:idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
His jokes are the most important part?
Are you asking or telling?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #223 (isolation #25) » Sat May 26, 2018 1:13 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 193, AP wrote:
In post 166, Green Crayons wrote:any pre-claim hammer would be quick lynched tomorrow.

ez
Try to get that point across to N_M
as either alignment
. (Hint: He'll do it anyway, and assuming he is Town here you would have exhausted the 2 mislynches we're allowed in this setup and we would already be in LyLo).
Then how do you feel about tw’s I vote and then nearly immediate recite after some minor cajoling?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #224 (isolation #26) » Sat May 26, 2018 1:14 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Unvote and revote

Phone posting is hard.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #225 (isolation #27) » Sat May 26, 2018 1:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 210, the worst wrote:
In post 209, the worst wrote:how do ppl feel abt Mylo claiming scum?
this is particularly probably @ GC & Vizzy tbh
I don’t really think mylo is scum. Him “claiming” it is not scummy.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #226 (isolation #28) » Sat May 26, 2018 1:18 am

Post by Green Crayons »

UNVOTE: AP

VOTE: the worst

Asking for permission to vote. Twice.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #227 (isolation #29) » Sat May 26, 2018 1:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 200, AP wrote:Green Crayons I don't have much meta on. All I can say is he doesn't like my playstyle in general, but I can't really say anything beyond that.
This is bad reading comprehension of my posts about you, ftr.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #234 (isolation #30) » Sat May 26, 2018 7:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Okay, AP.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #235 (isolation #31) » Sat May 26, 2018 7:09 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 223, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 193, AP wrote:
In post 166, Green Crayons wrote:any pre-claim hammer would be quick lynched tomorrow.

ez
Try to get that point across to N_M
as either alignment
. (Hint: He'll do it anyway, and assuming he is Town here you would have exhausted the 2 mislynches we're allowed in this setup and we would already be in LyLo).
Then how do you feel about tw’s I vote and then nearly immediate recite after some minor cajoling?
I meant mwnn here.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #236 (isolation #32) » Sat May 26, 2018 7:10 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 229, the worst wrote:
In post 226, Green Crayons wrote:UNVOTE: AP

VOTE: the worst

Asking for permission to vote. Twice.
uh

where?
why did you feel the need to explain this?
AP and mylo

“It’s suspicious that you have a brief reason for your vote.”

Really?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #248 (isolation #33) » Sun May 27, 2018 3:29 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh hi I have a laptop briefly.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #250 (isolation #34) » Sun May 27, 2018 3:34 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 226, Green Crayons wrote:UNVOTE: AP

VOTE: the worst

Asking for permission to vote. Twice.
Was asked to point out where, so:
Spoiler: tw looking for permission to vote AP
In post 127, the worst wrote:I heard there's a cool new AP wagon coming out soon
If you pre order now you get a 20% discount
In post 128, Mathdino wrote:oh good call

his ISO has nothing town in it

VOTE: AP
In post 134, the worst wrote:okkkkkk fine

VOTE: AP

you have sold me on my own wagon
next step: ice to the Eskimos

pedit: nearly all of my posting is phone posting :P


Spoiler: tw looking for permission to vote mylo
In post 210, the worst wrote:
In post 209, the worst wrote:how do ppl feel abt Mylo claiming scum?
this is particularly probably @ GC & Vizzy tbh
In post 211, Invisibility wrote:okay i feel good about AP now
In post 212, the worst wrote:how do you feel about Mylo?
In post 215, the worst wrote:
In post 214, Invisibility wrote:
In post 212, the worst wrote:how do you feel about Mylo?
leanscum
throw some reasoning to me
In post 216, Invisibility wrote:
In post 215, the worst wrote:
In post 214, Invisibility wrote:
In post 212, the worst wrote:how do you feel about Mylo?
leanscum
throw some reasoning to me
184, 213

also generally has a nervous tone

i'm not very familiar with his meta so i might be overreading
In post 217, the worst wrote:VOTE: Myloninja13

sheep Invisibility into certain
doom
fun
oblivion?
something!
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #251 (isolation #35) » Sun May 27, 2018 3:35 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 229, the worst wrote:
In post 226, Green Crayons wrote:UNVOTE: AP

VOTE: the worst

Asking for permission to vote. Twice.
uh

where?
why did you feel the need to explain this?
Also the bolded italics of this quote is lolscum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #254 (isolation #36) » Sun May 27, 2018 4:14 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh i do like "town GC can't be bad at the game" stage in the conversation. Glad we got here faster than usual.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #255 (isolation #37) » Sun May 27, 2018 4:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Also lol if you think that is a case. It's page 11, son. You asked for a reason why I voted you and I gave it.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #256 (isolation #38) » Sun May 27, 2018 4:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Let me amend the record: you asked me to clarify my reason for voting you after I had already given a reason for my vote and after you threw shade at me for stating that reason.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #257 (isolation #39) » Sun May 27, 2018 4:18 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 252, the worst wrote:You should write a wiki article on how to form awful reachy misdirected cases
On further reflection the hypersensitivity of thinking this is a "case" of any sort, misdirected or otherwise, is telling.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #261 (isolation #40) » Sun May 27, 2018 9:58 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 258, Invisibility wrote:250 is gross

i can see spoiler one slightly but like spoiler two i really can't justify

VOTE: GC
Be a better player. Thanks.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #265 (isolation #41) » Sun May 27, 2018 10:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

You still haven’t explained your vote.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #267 (isolation #42) » Sun May 27, 2018 10:20 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Also

“Planning”
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #283 (isolation #43) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 281, Myloninja13 wrote:I guess I'm okay with taking a policy lynch, but could we actually like, use this day period? We've still got 8 days left lol.
Seriously I need 20 pages just to yawn and stretch. V confused about how some folks are talking like we got a 50 Page game under our belts already.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #284 (isolation #44) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:09 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 282, ManWithNoName wrote:I'm still scumlean on Mathdino. He is obvtown when he's town and I'm not seeing it.

Gc could be scum, looking back, pushing a few easy wagons so far and not much else, but I'm not sure Mathdino busses day 1 even with permission when there are just two scum.

Invisibility is town.

Hiraki is null to me, note to self reread his ISO.

I'm sorting this day phase, if you tried to Mylo, you would not be a policy lynch in my book.
Do the rest. Do the rest.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #285 (isolation #45) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:11 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 270, Invisibility wrote:like i am legitimately confused.
How long have you been playing Mafia?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #288 (isolation #46) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:18 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Not really sure how that’s implied when players you talk about include those who you haven’t changed your read on.


But oooookay.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #290 (isolation #47) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

When we have two mislynches before game over why do you think a policy Lynch is good in this setup?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #291 (isolation #48) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

^^^ that was to MWNN
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #293 (isolation #49) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:22 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 289, Invisibility wrote:
In post 285, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 270, Invisibility wrote:like i am legitimately confused.
How long have you been playing Mafia?
slightly longer than joindate
Okay well the thing that’s hard (at least it is was for me) is to distinguish between a player being wrong and a player doing something alignment indicative.

Not that I was wrong. Because I wasn’t. But you obviously thought so. You need to then to decide whether you think that wrongness denotes a certain alignment. That was the point.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #295 (isolation #50) » Mon May 28, 2018 2:22 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 292, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 290, Green Crayons wrote:When we have two mislynches before game over why do you think a policy Lynch is good in this setup?
Because the mafia is not going to kill Mylo ever, and if we go to LYLO, I'd rather him not be there.
Well they certainly won’t kill him with that attitude.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #314 (isolation #51) » Tue May 29, 2018 12:39 am

Post by Green Crayons »

@Invisibility:
so why are you voting mylo?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #329 (isolation #52) » Tue May 29, 2018 6:38 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 318, Invisibility wrote:
In post 314, Green Crayons wrote:
@Invisibility:
so why are you voting mylo?
i've already explained that
Well, it appears that you sure did. I had caught only your original mylo vote explanation.

Can you explain
In post 216, Invisibility wrote:also generally has a nervous tone
?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #330 (isolation #53) » Tue May 29, 2018 6:39 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 325, the worst wrote:there's almost certainly some red in {NM, MWNN}
How did you come to this scum pool?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #331 (isolation #54) » Tue May 29, 2018 6:40 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 322, Hiraki wrote:
Unvote
In post 323, Hiraki wrote:My feet are very cold.
You never shared your super secret reason for voting tw.

Mind doing so?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #333 (isolation #55) » Tue May 29, 2018 7:05 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Word.

Is cold feet because of your concerns re: MWNN or something more/else?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #334 (isolation #56) » Tue May 29, 2018 7:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 268, the worst wrote:I have another issue with his response which I am intentionally withholding
Also are you going to divulge what this problem was?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #335 (isolation #57) » Tue May 29, 2018 7:09 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I used the term "also" because I am just thinking about the game generally, 334 was obviously directed at tw and not Hiraki.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #342 (isolation #58) » Tue May 29, 2018 7:51 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 341, Invisibility wrote:Hiraki and AP are probably both town
Cosigned.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #369 (isolation #59) » Wed May 30, 2018 12:10 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 368, Myloninja13 wrote:Hiya guys, just a heads up I'm at L-1 lol.
Oh so you did roll scum?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #370 (isolation #60) » Wed May 30, 2018 12:11 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 330, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 325, the worst wrote:there's almost certainly some red in {NM, MWNN}
How did you come to this scum pool?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #374 (isolation #61) » Wed May 30, 2018 12:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Wait you really have only been playing mafia on this site since 2018? I thought I played with you years ago. lol okay


And anyways your description of you rolling scum fits your play here: not wanting to play? idg what you’re 372 is supposed to convince me of other than you are playing to your scum game. Unless are you saying you get even more inactive and non-voting when scum?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #375 (isolation #62) » Wed May 30, 2018 12:20 am

Post by Green Crayons »

For real tho vote someone and give a reason plz and thx
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #377 (isolation #63) » Wed May 30, 2018 12:23 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 346, the worst wrote:
In post 264, Invisibility wrote:
In post 263, the worst wrote:
In post 258, Invisibility wrote:250 is gross

i can see spoiler one slightly but like spoiler two i really can't justify

VOTE: GC
Explain in detail please.
spoiler one i can get because you only voted after math responded

spoiler two doesn't seem like you planning to vote at all, unless i'm missing something
oh yeah, I actually feel like this is completely backwards?

First one I literally told Math I'd be wagoning AP when I got off my current wagon. if anyone unironically thinks I was sheeping Math here they need to repeat primary school.

The second one I was actually sheeping a vote, primarily bc I had no strong SRs and wagons ftw. That = the post you seem to hate Hiraki.

I think you need to play with me a few more times. This is a situation I'm quite good at avoiding as scum. :P
The first scenario is still asking for permission to vote. “Hey Player A I’m going to vote Player B! Tell me if you think this is a good idea. Oh you think it is? Okay I will vote Player B now!”
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #379 (isolation #64) » Wed May 30, 2018 12:29 am

Post by Green Crayons »

@MWNN:


I’m confused about why you voted and then would shortly thereafter unvote Dino:
In post 303, ManWithNoName wrote:Fine but I'm going to be grumpy about it.

VOTE: Mathdino
Why the on and quickly off vote?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #444 (isolation #65) » Wed May 30, 2018 2:11 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

AP actively trying to lose his towncred.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #445 (isolation #66) » Wed May 30, 2018 2:12 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

How this wasn’t a MWNN v tw head-to-head ijdk
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #446 (isolation #67) » Wed May 30, 2018 2:13 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 439, Mathdino wrote:That's true
I retract my frustration with the lolhammer

Well done boys, solid policy lynch
Oh boy I’m so glad we cleared our throats in a 9 person game. :roll:
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #447 (isolation #68) » Wed May 30, 2018 2:15 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

For real tho Dino please game solve early D2.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #538 (isolation #69) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:01 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Nights have lasted way too long so all I remember is that mwnn or tw were my primary suspects, but I haven’t evaluated the game yet with the red flip. So I’ll do that today or tomorrow.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #546 (isolation #70) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 539, the worst wrote:are you fucking serious

your main suspects are me, who lurked d1 due to v/la and the town cop who died last night
lol look at this person who thinks i remember anything about this game except my d1 suspects

i'm vt
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #547 (isolation #71) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:17 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 542, Not_Mafia wrote:appears to have not read day 2 fully
skimmed it like four irl days ago so, basically, yup
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #550 (isolation #72) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 548, Not_Mafia wrote:Are you confessing?
only to skimming D2.

and being vt.

and being awesome.

ya got me.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #552 (isolation #73) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:28 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 542, Not_Mafia wrote:I don't see the worst or AP making the mistake of killing him
Wait you think I legitimately am incompetent at being scum? NM that hurts.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #554 (isolation #74) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:34 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 187, Hiraki wrote:I dunno how to feel about AP. AP is scummy but AP was also scummy like this in another game we played together, where he was town.

viewtopic.php?f=51&t=76247

He even made the same kind of cheeky posts.
In post 188, Green Crayons wrote:idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
In post 190, Hiraki wrote:
In post 188, Green Crayons wrote:idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
His jokes are the most important part?
In post 228, Hiraki wrote:
In post 222, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 190, Hiraki wrote:
In post 188, Green Crayons wrote:idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
His jokes are the most important part?
Are you asking or telling?
Telling. Confused how we're not vibing there. Since you voted the worst, I'm OK again.

Vote: The worst
In post 322, Hiraki wrote:
Unvote
In post 323, Hiraki wrote:My feet are very cold.
More inclined to think that Hiraki-scum waffles and defends AP-town and then votes and unvotes tw-scum partner. But honestly I could see it going either way.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #555 (isolation #75) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:35 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 553, Not_Mafia wrote:No I think you skimmed d2 saw me and Espe were both PRs and picked Espe
...and thus was incompetent.

I'm never going to forgive you for this sleight, NM.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #557 (isolation #76) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:41 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 487, Hiraki wrote:i literally JUST explained that in my post where I had to use the deputy card in order to get my super fast early wagon off me, people even asked if that was a claim:
In post 44, Green Crayons wrote:I don't believe you.
Also a post in my favor. Scum pointing to scum to validate their weak ass crumb?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #558 (isolation #77) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:43 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 506, Hiraki wrote:I mean, I am scum here but the fact that TW is acting like he's smart here when I just did the setup but switched me and N_M's roles is ridiculously stupid

N_M's version of the setup didn't even work and people still bought it using the setup mechanics, that's impressive
Throwing shade at tw for personality? Sour grapes Hiraki? I don't recall Hiraki being all sour in the last game we just played.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #559 (isolation #78) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:46 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 464, Espeonage wrote:Just checked the clock. Yeah don't need to wait for a claim. I'm the tracker. Let's goooooooo.

Worst went no where btw.

vote hiraki[/b
In post 521, Espeonage wrote:I am p sure we're in 1 o'clock.
In post 522, the worst wrote:oh did you actually lie
Actually putting the pieces together here, I'm guessing Espe actually investigated tw which means he got a clear.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #560 (isolation #79) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:46 am

Post by Green Crayons »

So that makes it AP.

VOTE: AP
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #562 (isolation #80) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:48 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 561, Not_Mafia wrote:I could vote AP today, I don't see Hiraki and the worst EoD2 interaction as scum scum
It's either AP or me so town won. Please vote scum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #563 (isolation #81) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:48 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Also lol:
In post 4, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Hiraki

Scum.
In post 65, Green Crayons wrote:UNVOTE: Hiraki

VOTE: AP
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #565 (isolation #82) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:52 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 564, Not_Mafia wrote:Nope, Mafia Goon comes up Vanilla to Vanilla Cop, same as VT does. It's basically guaranteed you made that NK at this point
lol okay

scum GC does not look up roles and slots himself into an (apparently incorrect) auto death 50/50 with another player

or

vt GC does not look up roles and slots himself into an (apparently incorrect) auto death 50/50 with another player
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #566 (isolation #83) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:53 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In which case

UNVOTE: AP
VOTE: tw

Ride or die.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #567 (isolation #84) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:56 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 556, Not_Mafia wrote:Why would the worst NK Espe?
hm.

QUERY: does the PR scum have to choose between using his PR and killing? Or can the same scum use both his PR and make the kill?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #569 (isolation #85) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:09 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh i see there are two mafia rolecops on the clock. Well, taking Esp at face value, would mean that tw was partially cleared if Esp was actually tracker and if the PR can use his power and make the NK, and why chance it again? I guess if Hiraki didn't use his power last night that would take out the question I have about mafia PR/kill mechanics, but I don't think you'd waste a PR on a N1.

Alternatively, if tw DID make a kill N1, so he knew Esp was lying about his role (because tw did make the kill) but not about his target, tw would know that Esp could not have been the RBer, Jailkeeper, Follower. Meaning, if tw-scum did make a N1 kill, he needed to think Esp was a doc, rolecop, babysitter, or vanilla cop. Are any of those more dangerous than NM who was either a follower, tracker, or rolecop? IDK!
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #570 (isolation #86) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:11 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 568, Not_Mafia wrote:Why is that relevant?
Because if Hiraki-scum could both use his PR and make the kill, his partner may not have done anything. Meaning, if tw-scum had not made the kill but was cleared by a tracker/follower/RBer/Jailkeeper, then that would play into whether he wanted to kill that town PR to help prove his "innocence" or either minimize the chance of being targeted again.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #571 (isolation #87) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:13 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I don't think the night kill is indicative of tw being scum. I just don't think it's inconsistent with tw being scum. There's too many unknowns.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #572 (isolation #88) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

That's all I got for now. I think Hiraki defending AP and then voting tw when he had few votes, then unvoting tw when he was L-1, and then getting into a lolpissing match with tw in D2 twilight, is more indicative of Hiraki/tw than Hiraki/AP.

Plus Dino said AP is town.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #582 (isolation #89) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 579, the worst wrote:GC is literally scumclaiming
*watches GC learn PRs in this game in real time D3*

oh yes this is obviously scum and not vt who hadn't had a reason to give a shit about PRs before now, mhm.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #583 (isolation #90) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 581, the worst wrote:There isn't a stronger case on Hiraki/anyone than there is on Hiraki/GC so he's throwing shade. lynching GC today almost certainly wins us the game.
*sees case made for Hiraki/tw*

nah you guys it's totally this case of Hiraki/GC

*does not make case for Hiraki/GC*
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #585 (isolation #91) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Also your D1 attitude makes so much more sense now that you are basically confirmed scum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #586 (isolation #92) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 584, the worst wrote:literally more fakable content itt
lol what
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #588 (isolation #93) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:17 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 554, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 187, Hiraki wrote:I dunno how to feel about AP. AP is scummy but AP was also scummy like this in another game we played together, where he was town.

viewtopic.php?f=51&t=76247

He even made the same kind of cheeky posts.
In post 188, Green Crayons wrote:idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
In post 190, Hiraki wrote:
In post 188, Green Crayons wrote:idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
His jokes are the most important part?
In post 228, Hiraki wrote:
In post 222, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 190, Hiraki wrote:
In post 188, Green Crayons wrote:idrc about his jokes. I care about his five post intro followed by a ghost vote.
His jokes are the most important part?
Are you asking or telling?
Telling. Confused how we're not vibing there. Since you voted the worst, I'm OK again.

Vote: The worst
In post 322, Hiraki wrote:
Unvote
In post 323, Hiraki wrote:My feet are very cold.
More inclined to think that Hiraki-scum waffles and defends AP-town and then votes and unvotes tw-scum partner. But honestly I could see it going either way.
In post 572, Green Crayons wrote:That's all I got for now. I think Hiraki defending AP and then voting tw when he had few votes, then unvoting tw when he was L-1, and then getting into a lolpissing match with tw in D2 twilight, is more indicative of Hiraki/tw than Hiraki/AP.

tw: FAKE NEWS
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #590 (isolation #94) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:18 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 587, the worst wrote:
In post 583, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 581, the worst wrote:There isn't a stronger case on Hiraki/anyone than there is on Hiraki/GC so he's throwing shade. lynching GC today almost certainly wins us the game.
*sees case made for Hiraki/tw*

nah you guys it's totally this case of Hiraki/GC

*does not make case for Hiraki/GC*
why should I case it? o.0
tw: you guys the best case is obviously Hiraki/GC

also tw: what why should I show a case for why Hiraki/GC?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #591 (isolation #95) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 589, the worst wrote:It's literally just GC, I have a good nose for bad scummy pushes and this is one.
tw: pushes on me are scummy.

mhm, mhm.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #593 (isolation #96) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:26 am

Post by Green Crayons »

"it's interesting that you voted scum-Hiraki D1, scum-potential-AP D1, scum-potential-tw D1, missed the 24 irl hour D2, and now *i refuse to explain how you are the most obvious partner but calling out that refusal is scummy*"
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #594 (isolation #97) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:26 am

Post by Green Crayons »

tw I'm sorry you're scum my man.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #611 (isolation #98) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:41 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

This is just painful.

Please kill the obvscum tw tomorrow you dolts.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #614 (isolation #99) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:44 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 606, AP wrote:
In post 75, Iconeum wrote:
Vote Count 1.1


Hiraki (3): the worst,
Not_Mafia, Mathdino
(L-2)
Mathdino (2):
ManWithNoName,
Hiraki

Not_Mafia (0)
Green Crayons (0)
Myloninja13 (0)
ManWithNoName (0)
Invisibility (0)
AP (1): Green Crayons
the worst (1):
Invisibility


Not voting: AP,
Myloninja13

This tells me the duck is likely town. There was no need for bussing that early and even if there was it would be the other way around (the PR bussing the Goon)
This is horrible CVA. He voted Hiraki as first game vote and then invited and voted mylo 20ish posts after this VC.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #619 (isolation #100) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:51 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Great. Now kill tw tomorrow.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #620 (isolation #101) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:52 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Y’all dumb.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #621 (isolation #102) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:52 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

</3
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #625 (isolation #103) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:53 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh wow I’m so surprised tw was lurking for twilight.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #627 (isolation #104) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:54 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Sorry gotta pick on scum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #629 (isolation #105) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:58 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

You are not good with the forced chill posts. Sorry my man.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #634 (isolation #106) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:22 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

wow AP you’re even worse with twilight talk
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #635 (isolation #107) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:22 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Like it might really be AP
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #637 (isolation #108) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:22 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 631, AP wrote:
In post 624, the worst wrote:green crayon flips red crayon

if not its AP
I was like 100% sure the game was over until you posted this. *Gulp*

tw... are you.. perhaps.. trolling ME?? IN THIS DAY???
Like holy shit this is forced
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #638 (isolation #109) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:23 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 637, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 631, AP wrote:
In post 624, the worst wrote:green crayon flips red crayon

if not its AP
I was like 100% sure the game was over until you posted this. *Gulp*

tw... are you.. perhaps.. trolling ME?? IN THIS DAY???
Like holy shit this is forced
AP town doesn’t really have a basis for this post. At all.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #640 (isolation #110) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:24 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 636, Invisibility wrote:do me next!
AP also votes for GC based on a single VCA for a VCA analaysis. And then instantly starts laying basics to vote tw in twilight.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #641 (isolation #111) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:26 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 639, Invisibility wrote:that's kind of how AP writes
(Shrug) okay I’ll stop trying to give you thoughts for tomorrow. Best of luck.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #649 (isolation #112) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 1:41 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 555, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 553, Not_Mafia wrote:No I think you skimmed d2 saw me and Espe were both PRs and picked Espe
...and thus was incompetent.

I'm never going to forgive you for this sleight, NM.
You’ll never warm my heart again, NM.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #653 (isolation #113) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:06 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

tw is my final vote for tomorrow. don't fuck it up Invisible.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #654 (isolation #114) » Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:06 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

</3 ---> <3
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #663 (isolation #115) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 12:24 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 5, the worst wrote:VOTE: Hiraki
gj with the n0 guilty, GC
In post 7, the worst wrote:
In post 6, Hiraki wrote:Ego
mmm evasive
page 1 red flip anyone?
In post 12, Invisibility wrote:VOTE: tw
twuh
In post 13, the worst wrote:Invisibility is clever. I thought I did a good job distancing from my caught scumbuddy. Ah well. Gg all.
A little too on the nose, don’t you think tw?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #665 (isolation #116) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 12:25 am

Post by Green Crayons »

So glad the theory was that I didn’t bother to learn power roles as scum during these excessively long day/night cycles.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #666 (isolation #117) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 12:25 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 664, Invisibility wrote:are you actually getting mad at him for that
like seriously
Why would I get mad at him being scum?

I’ve found scum for you. There’s nothing to get mad about.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #668 (isolation #118) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 12:28 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh my sweet summer child. Please try to think like scum when you’re lookin for them.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #670 (isolation #119) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 12:33 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Maybe take a breath and consider if scum use jokes tactically.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #671 (isolation #120) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 12:34 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Also I’ve made several posts about how I got to tw = scum. My case doesn’t hinge on his first few game posts. Those are just icing on the scum cake.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #674 (isolation #121) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:10 am

Post by Green Crayons »

And invisibility thinks I don’t know how to make people laugh.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #677 (isolation #122) » Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:34 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Nobody likes the narrator. He’s first course.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #682 (isolation #123) » Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:38 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

The mod has abandoned the game.

tw you can reveal your scum role now.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #739 (isolation #124) » Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:33 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 719, Myloninja13 wrote:And this was near the end of day 3:

WHAT ARE YOU DOING GC!?!?!
Being wrong. It's how I roll. Sup?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Locked

Return to “Completed Open Games”