1 - is this sarcasm? i'm not sure where this is coming from. what have i said or done that's made you say this?In post 733, BuJaber wrote:Let's talk about this game. We know your stance on sajj. And now that I've had a glimpse into the version of reality you live in I don't envy the difficult position you must put yourself before any vote. The decision on who to vote for at any time in any game must be agonizing to you if you are considering every possibility no matter how improbable it is. 1 But I want to know what you think of duck and aa9. 2 I want to know why you made the conscious choice of derailing two healthy counterwagons that split up pretty much the entire playerbase and why you made this decision less than 4 days before deadline. Do you really townread them so strongly? Do you think if sajj is scum they have to be town? Why is a sajj lynch so urgent? 3
2 - i think uglyduck is probably town. i'm not really sure on arcangel. i don't really townread her, but obviously i'd rather not lynch her today.
3 - i didn't make the conscious choice to derail anything, i made the conscious choice to push my top scumread. it has nothing to do with my reads on them. i think uglyduck is town regardless of scioness' alignment, and for arcangel i really have no idea. i think for arcangel it's worth mentioning that the times scioness has rolled scum she very much looks for support from her scumbuddies in the scum PT - you can check this for yourself in the newbie 1851 and open 721 scum threads.
initially i was going to say that that probably points towards a non-lurker scumbuddy but i guess there's nothing to really imply that. that is, if scioness were to be scum, i don't think i could tell the difference between scioness who had an active partner to talk to and scioness who had a lurker partner.