stalker
VOTE: Performer
I'm so confused. Why are you taking Ircher calling Kublai scum seriously on page three of RVS?In post 65, PenguinPower wrote:Ok. Just know it's suspect, and I'll call it out later.
You don't have any empirical reasons so it's all gut right now. To me right now, it feels like:In post 64, Ircher wrote:I think I will choose to keep my reasons confidential at the moment.
Why are you trying to shrug off my question with another question; we're on page three of (kind of) RVS and Ircher straight up says KK is scum.In post 71, PenguinPower wrote:Why are you taking me calling Ircher calling Kublai scum suspect as serious but not Ircher calling Kublai scum as serious when we're on page three of RVS?In post 68, Golden Robster wrote:I'm so confused. Why are you taking Ircher calling Kublai scum seriously on page three of RVS?
What's the point of this post?In post 65, PenguinPower wrote:Ok. Just know it's suspect, and I'll call it out later.
Why are their opening posts scummy?In post 94, Tommy Egan wrote:Penguin can be town for now, I didn't like how Espeonage jumped on Penguins posts when Penguin was only doing something I definitely see at least moderately often in RVS.
Scum!Espeonage spews scum!Seal from Seals opening post.
What are your thoughts about other players?In post 150, Espeonage wrote:Nah I was annoyed at PP. And then decided to vote him for being mafia.
There's like four/five pages of relevant discussion and semi-decent content.In post 152, Espeonage wrote:I haven't been reading. There's quote chains so I skipped the pages except on a skim.
Why aren't you voting him if he feels weird?In post 143, joral wrote:Byron... Feels weird. Nothing I can point to directly, gut feel is saying off, especially on the wagon comment. Did not feel it was picking up any steam at the time.
Talk me through why you have zero townreads and think PP is scum.
Think it's L-2 actually; why does it feel like you're rushing this right now?In post 183, Performer wrote:I believe that's L-1. @ esp
Isn't this game all about finding motivation, contradictions and forming your own arguments?In post 163, joral wrote:What good does it do to needlessly ruffle feathers? Hoping to provoke a reaction? My experience is you get the hot heads who don't reread before they post, but for me it has not been a decent scum indication.
Since you've returned to posting, I assume that you think we're out of the normal RVS fluffposting? What reads do you have aside from me?
Cool, so if you're not negligent then I'm guessing that you've read through most of the content. Post thoughts please.In post 190, Espeonage wrote:I'm skimming. I'm not negligent.
Never had mason tracker in a game before but seems super strong; UnrealSeal, am confused, why didn't you just ask for his reads before his claim?In post 379, UnrealSeal wrote:why don't you give us some reads.
Think the other mason is creature since they posted within a minute of one another day start but am not sure.In post 411, Ircher wrote:While it may not be in town's long term interest, I want the other mason to claim to verify Seal's claim.
Do you really think Seal is lying right now?In post 410, Ircher wrote:Not if the role in question is suspect...
I agree with this; I feel like N_M quick hammering was kind of a last ditch effort. Feel like last scum was probably off this wagon and not participating that much.In post 397, JarJarDrinks wrote:I kinda doubt there's any scum besides N_M on the wagon.ByronVilla (7) - Kublai Khan, Hopkirk, Golden Robster, JarJarDrinks, Performer, Ircher, Not_Mafia
Tomorrows lynch should definitely be from the people not voting scum day 1.
In post 426, Performer wrote:What are your reads for instance?In post 422, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm town though
In post 427, Not_Mafia wrote:Believe it bitch
In post 339, ByronVilla wrote:In terms of possible scum if I'm wrong, Ircher pinged me with just wanting to rush the day and get it over and done with. I don't see a reason to rush the day at all right now.
Khan/Golden have also been hard for me to get a read on. They've done some good stuff but also some things that have raised my eyebrow so that's kinda null for me.
Hopkirk/JJD/Performer are a townread for me, I'd be very surprised if they were scum.
if we're talking about potential lynches then I'd add these two to the table tomorrowIn post 187, ByronVilla wrote:Yeah I don't really get why everyone jumped on Espeonage. I mean sure they haven't been the most active so far
PJ probably town for similar reason; byron felt new and I don't think he'd list both his scumpartners + PJ's opening post was decent as well. Byron votes Joral instead of N_M just because N_M is scumbuddy:In post 187, ByronVilla wrote:VOTE: Creature
My bad vibes that I was on about before that I were feeling were from a frustrated town have turned a lot more in the scummy direction. This post in particular really pings me as an almost OMGUS play on the whole town:
Creature wrote:
tbh I don't see any players here who played well enough to be able to flawlessly read me.
Haven't liked his play so far, as it feels like he's caused a lot more disruption than contribution to the discussions at hand through off-handed comments and a lack of any real content to his posts. (The man hasn't even made a post consisting of more than two lines of his own)
In post 264, ByronVilla wrote:I've got my eyes on both Joral & Not_Mafia right now, they've both done virtually nothing in the game so far, and if the game is being stalled by mafia then it's likely being done by at least one of these two.
In post 271, ByronVilla wrote:Joral hasn't done anything for the past 4 days, that's hardly communicating. Sure beforehand he was making some good posts but it feels like he's just dodged the last 4 days and that doesn't sit well with me. The thing is the way Espeonage has acted has made me read his slot as town, as I'm getting that frustrated town read on him due to the nature of his posts. However I feel Joral, whilst doing more stuff than Espeonage, still isn't doing a lot and he still feels really defensive as a player.
Why though?In post 484, Ircher wrote:Here’s a guideline I think town should start employing after a D1 scumlynch: ignore the associatives associated with said Lynch.