Which post from Ircher is this?In post 69, UnrealSeal wrote:Damn, did not expect this to start up so quickly. Anyways, hey all.
Golden Robster and Espeonage good posts, Ircher's latest "You're scum for secret RVS reasons" is most likely a reaction test and I'm going to VOTE: joral because I don't see any other good reasons to vote anything else
This is not an excuse when we're talking about 4 pages.In post 152, Espeonage wrote:I haven't been reading. There's quote chains so I skipped the pages except on a skim.
In post 171, Tommy Egan wrote:Also, i'd need to look back to remind myself who it was but a couple players jumped on Creature accusing this of being his scum play. It's far to early in the game to know that and the Creature slot will determine itself as the game goes on. I didn't want to jump on it at the time as I wanted to see if anyone else would try push the same rhetoric so i'll be keeping an eye on the players who pushed Creature as scum for meta reasons for now until we can see which Creature we have here.
Why this vote?In post 177, Performer wrote:I don't think so. Pp was trying to get wagons going at the very start, and that's a great way to move the game.In post 113, Creature wrote:joral, what do you think about PP doing absolutely nothing?
VOTE: creature
You say that's what we get when we look at your town meta.In post 192, PenguinPower wrote:Hi! Busy today, so I'm only going to interact with something substantive (especially since Espeonage is ignoring me).In post 189, Ircher wrote:PenguinPower (-31%) - His interactions with Kublai were weird, and I'll leave them at that. 54 feels strange: Penguin finds Espeonage's post to be great, yet Penguin did not (at least, I presume that he not) think that he was forcing Creature (and others) to choose between one of two wagons. Like, what is great about the post? 65 just seems strange and too much on the shady side of things. Then, as a whole, the ISO just feels... off..., so I'm not sure if this is just more the way Penguin plays or if Penguin is playing some kind of weird scum theatrics right now. (That probably isn't the correct use of terminology, but whatever.)
Do you know the concept of sarcasm? 54 was sarcasm. I'm not sure how you interpreted it differently.
For anyone who has played with me in the past, or cares to research my town meta, I'm a sarcastic ass all of D1...and usually into later days as well, but less so.
Really just wanted to clear up the lack of your understanding re: sarcasm. I'll read through the rest later.
Pretty sure you've played with me before...so...
Someone should check this out.In post 215, PenguinPower wrote:I hard bus my partners and/or tend to actively lurk for the majority of the game. I think I've done that in every single scum game except for one.In post 210, Hopkirk wrote:What do we get when we look at your scum meta?
But, I could be lying right?
Don't really get why that's a good idea.
In post 224, Performer wrote:Hey all, been busy. Today and tomorrow will be fairly busy (tomorrow is a cousin's graduation). Will have to catch up later, hopefully by Friday at latest.
I interpreted this as Performer coming in without reading anything. He literally only 'missed' a page and a half of content.In post 226, ByronVilla wrote:Tommy Egan wrote:@performer - Have you ever played with Not Mafia before?Err, Performer why did you literally just blank Egan's question? Would've took such little time to answer the question that I feel ignoring it was purposeful.Performer wrote:Hey all, been busy. Today and tomorrow will be fairly busy (tomorrow is a cousin's graduation). Will have to catch up later, hopefully by Friday at latest.
Also if it means anything Performer and Espeonage have played together before, but that was in 2015 so take it with a grain of salt.
(This was more of a prod dodge post than anything, but I'm still interested in why Performer completely blanked Egan beforehand, unless he was so busy he didn't have time to look at even the most recent post which is fair)
If NM flips VT we lynch Seal for lying.In post 448, JarJarDrinks wrote:I accounted for that in my theory when I said that he pretends it was a gambit.In post 447, Hopkirk wrote:@JJ- that plan falls apart when we hit massclaim numbers and he doesn't have a partner alive to fakeclaim. NM/US loses unless people buy NM's second claim as far as I can tell.
But hey as long people agree to lynch Seal if it turns out he was lying even if NM is scum then I'm cool.
In post 451, Performer wrote:I agree with jar. We lynch nm, if he still magically turns out town, lynch unreal. By the looks of things, I think that's unlikely but I've considered it as well.
I still think it's way more likely that nm is mafia, while unreal is town.
Why would I?In post 561, Hiraki wrote:Why didn't you vote?
I don't know why you didn't quote the part where I said we likely win by resolving night actions. That would have answered your question.In post 636, Hiraki wrote:No one cases why people are town when no one thinks they're scumIn post 633, Hopkirk wrote:Notice, nobody gave any reasons to townread you, then I voted you.
PM wasn't even on your list so you can stop acting like you know what's going on here now