Pikmin Mafia - Game over

windkirby · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:40 am

Oh, and what is the primary reason then? I'm curious.

To be frank, I find the hammer disgusting no matter how many times people pretend ZS's behavior didn't signify a power role. I wasn't even aware he was at L-1 by the time GS laid the hammer. Not how a lynch should go down.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:57 am

Vote Count!
With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch

6 Greasy Spot (windkirby, Kison, PyroDwarf, hasdgfas, Blazerunner, Gorrad)
5 JDodge (windkirby, Kison, Gorrad, PyroDwarf, Blazerunner)
5 Gorrad (JDodge, UROE, armlx, hasdgfas, Claus)
4 Sonickid (JDodge, UROE, Gorrad, skitzer)
4 JamesThePhox (GhostWriter, Xdaamno, JDodge, armlx)
3 Claus (UROE, PyroDwarf, Blazerunner)
3 Kison (JDodge, GhostWriter, JamesThePhox)
2 GhostWriter (Claus, Kison)
1 Blazerunner (hasdgfas)
1 hasdgfas (GhostWriter)
1 armlx (Xdaamno)
1 Xdaamno (JDodge)
1 Pyrodwarf (Greasy Spot)
Not voting: UltimaAvalon, sonickid01,

Deadline: May 6, Tuesday at 11:59 PM EST.

armlx · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:00 am

This is the issue with multivote days: I see no reason for Claus or Jdodge to have votes right now.

JDodge · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:03 pm

It's worth noting that three out of the five people on my wagon are those whom I have had votes on today.

But I suppose I have had votes on about half the town by now, so that's not that odd.

Claus · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:13 pm

I particularly find the vote count to be amusing.

windkirby · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:25 am

My vote's on JDodge because it seems like he's looking for excuses to give out votes. I mean, if you have so many votes everywhere, what's the point? If he neared a lynch though, I'd probably consider unvoting.

Greasy Spot · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:04 am

windkirby wrote:My vote's on JDodge because it seems like he's looking for excuses to give out votes. I mean, if you have so many votes everywhere, what's the point? If he neared a lynch though, I'd probably consider unvoting.

Spoken from a man with multiple votes in place.

Gorrad · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:33 am

Windkirby has two votes in place. JDodge has five.

Greasy Spot · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:42 am

Gorrad wrote:Windkirby has two votes in place. JDodge has five.

And you have 3. Does that make one of them more scummy than you?

Gorrad · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:43 am

No, I never said that. I'm just saying you're making a comparison here to try and draw attention to Windkirby in an illogical way.

Confirm vote: Greasy Spot

Greasy Spot · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:49 am

Gorrad wrote:No, I never said that. I'm just saying you're making a comparison here to try and draw attention to Windkirby in an illogical way.

Confirm vote: Greasy Spot

ooh! I can do that too.

confirm vote: Gorrad

. Wow! Now I feel really special and powerful.

Greasy Spot · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:56 am

windkirby wrote:My vote's on JDodge because it seems like he's looking for excuses to give out votes. I mean, if you have so many votes everywhere, what's the point? If he neared a lynch though, I'd probably consider unvoting.

Why would you call out someone for multiple voting but then say you would unvote him to stop a lynch? Hypocrite? or just scum?

Gorrad · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:57 am

Greasy Spot wrote:
windkirby wrote:My vote's on JDodge because it seems like he's looking for excuses to give out votes. I mean, if you have so many votes everywhere, what's the point? If he neared a lynch though, I'd probably consider unvoting.
Why would you call out someone for multiple voting but then say you would unvote him to stop a lynch? Hypocrite? or just scum?

Seriously. Can we lynch this guy yet?

Claus · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:16 am

If by this guy you mean you yourself, sure.

JDodge · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:15 am

windkirby wrote:My vote's on JDodge because it seems like he's looking for excuses to give out votes. I mean, if you have so many votes everywhere, what's the point? If he neared a lynch though, I'd probably consider unvoting.

There's no point in voting someone in this situation if you don't want them lynched. I'm voting every person who I think would make a good lynch for today, and no more. Either commit and say you're willing to lynch me or unvote now.

JamesThePhox · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:31 am

JDodge makes a good point.

Vote: JDodge

JDodge · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:32 am

It's 4 out of 6 now. Hell, 3 of them are current votes.

How odd.

armlx · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:04 am

The last several posts have made me very happy with my current votes.

Windkirby would be my third suspect, but the logic backing his votes seems reasonable enough for now, though they are in scummy places.

windkirby · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:25 am

JDodge wrote:
windkirby wrote:My vote's on JDodge because it seems like he's looking for excuses to give out votes. I mean, if you have so many votes everywhere, what's the point? If he neared a lynch though, I'd probably consider unvoting.
There's no point in voting someone in this situation if you don't want them lynched. I'm voting every person who I think would make a good lynch for today, and no more. Either commit and say you're willing to lynch me or unvote now.

How do I know why you're voting? You refuse to tell us your reasoning for some of them, and yet you act as if I should trust you enough to believe that every single person you're voting for you have a sound case against.

The closer you get to a lynch, the more I will consider my vote, of this you have my word, but I don't like Greasy Spot, the way you tried to brush away his slip, or the way you started out with four votes with minimal explanation, so I believe my votes are currently fine the way they are.

Xdaamno · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:11 am

Unvote JamesThePhox, armlx

Vote: Greasy Spot

Greasy Spot · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:15 am

Xdaamno wrote:
Unvote JamesThePhox, armlx

Vote: Greasy Spot

Nice...no reasons given. This is the best kind of vote to get.

armlx · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:17 am

Xdaamno wrote:
Unvote JamesThePhox, armlx

Vote: Greasy Spot

.........

Gorrad · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:07 am

This is L-2. Traditionally, GS, now is the time to claim.

JDodge · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:58 pm

Don't claim. This is a horrid bandwagon and I'm pretty sure I know now why you're coming across as scummy. In 24 hours, I will be voting everyone who is voting Greasy Spot unless they move their votes. It should be incredibly obvious that he's town by now to anyone paying attention to this game.

hasdgfas · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:08 pm

JDodge wrote:Don't claim. This is a horrid bandwagon and I'm pretty sure I know now why you're coming across as scummy. In 24 hours, I will be voting everyone who is voting Greasy Spot unless they move their votes. It should be incredibly obvious that he's town by now to anyone paying attention to this game.

You need to explain this better than "It should be incredibly obvious why he is town" because there is no way I can see the obviousness of his townieness in basically anything he's done, and there's also no reason that you should vote for every single person voting for him. Just because you see that him being town is "incredibly obvious" doesn't mean that it is to the rest of us. I see someone who is being quite scummy, not "obvious town."