with 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.
day one will end in (expired on 2018-07-25 18:30:00)
- skitter30 v/la Fridays & Saturdays
- quack
So this is the only part of Brass's post that I think needs clarification:In post 47, brassherald wrote:Enigma, I know nothing about, but BuJaber's stark insistence that they all chose different numbers actually, in my opinion, opens up a possibility that he could be on a scum team that suggested that. I need more time to read BuJaber, but, I do want to note that later on, if he ends up being scum, I would not count out Enigma or two of Ceejay/Sando/ofrhz being scum partners with him. (Again, you guys can add myself and Ausuka to the list to analyze)
Town it looks like to meIn post 75, BuJaber wrote:@Sando - what is CJ?
I went looking to confirm the signup post had the "I'm gonna pick 1" thing, and it doesn't, it got edited, I wasn't sure if it was ok to post outside info.In post 88, skitter30 wrote:In post 9, Sando wrote:
VOTE: VulkanLogician
Tautologies must die
kinda surprised you didn't comment on the ruru-1 thing above?
i mean, i can understand what you're saying in a broad context but i didn't really get this sort of vibe from ofrhz's post; it's more of a playstyle thing from him i think. like i'm saying that i doubt he had any sort of nefarious intent behind that post; i think he just posts that way in a general senseIn post 120, BuJaber wrote:But to answer the question I find it scummy to disagree with someone who has shared their opinion and given reasons for their opinion without also stating why you disagree.
- it might be laziness
- it might be a way to reduce the person's influence
- it might be a way to make them change the subject (especially if they are on the right track)
- it might be a way to discourage them from sharing their thoughts (this one is rare I don't think people do this often but there is definitely an advantage for scum if town talk less and when a towny's arguments are met with just 'no' / 'wrong' etc, it can be disheartening) now I'm not discouraged by things like that but unless they're an alt they haven't played with me before and thus wouldn't know this about me.
you also said you didn't say anything that gameIn post 122, ruru wrote:Technically suiciding and venging town is my scum meta nowIn post 119, skitter30 wrote:barring a marathon game last week
i'm low-key getting the vibe from 115 and 116 that oka is trying to find reasons to find the pgo thing scummy?In post 126, ruru wrote:Hmm
Town: ofrhz, skitter, brass, maybe AP
Lacks town: invis
Feels forced: oka
Possible svs: enigma/bujaber
Of those four I actually scumread bujaber least
i really want that scum PT to be opened up ....In post 127, Sando wrote:I very much doubt CJ is partnered with ofrhz, and I know he's not partnered with me. CJ is a very blasé scum when it comes to using powers or plans etc, and basically peaces out of that part of the game, I can't see him going along with this plan and being part of the double up. He would happily let his partners do what they want, so he could be solo to the 3's or the 6's, but I doubt he'd be partnered with a double up.
I'm actually basing this off a newbie I played with him.In post 128, skitter30 wrote:i really want that scum PT to be opened up ....
It's probably a better indicator yeah. Newbie with me the cop was basically a single word short of hard-claiming cop, CJs partner noticed it (as did pretty much everyone) and posted in scum pt during twilight of his lynch that CJ should kill the person. CJ was like "nah fuck it, ima kill this other guy", completely missing the cop thing entirely.In post 130, skitter30 wrote:got it, my one and only game with him is jungle republic and all i can base my understanding of that assessment on is how he reacted to ap's plan in thread after the guilty
i'll check out that link at some point.
wait scum have doubled up before?In post 135, Sando wrote:94.5% to be exact.In post 134, OkaPoka wrote:90% scum wouldn't want to double up
cuz i'm still getting a feel for things and not sure where i want to vote yet; i often don't vote (or don't vote seriously) till later on during day1In post 131, OkaPoka wrote:@skitter30 why aren't you voting someone?
also to everyone, meta changes lets not let it be our guiding reason to scumread/townread someone. especially if you think someone is not capable of doing x because of y game, they can improve and be able to do x in this game.
i get what you're saying but idk if i would go so far to rule him out from potentially pairing up because of this tbhIn post 132, Sando wrote:It's probably a better indicator yeah. Newbie with me the cop was basically a single word short of hard-claiming cop, CJs partner noticed it (as did pretty much everyone) and posted in scum pt during twilight of his lynch that CJ should kill the person. CJ was like "nah fuck it, ima kill this other guy", completely missing the cop thing entirely.In post 130, skitter30 wrote:got it, my one and only game with him is jungle republic and all i can base my understanding of that assessment on is how he reacted to ap's plan in thread after the guilty
i'll check out that link at some point.
Basically, CJ strikes me as a great scum in game, but not one for following da plan, hence I think he wouldn't be part of a pair that picked the same number, but I think he wouldn't mind if his two partners paired up their numbers and left him solo.
Not starting wagons, calling for lynches.In post 120, BuJaber wrote:Why is starting wagons a bad thing, stargazer ? Or whoever asked
i call for lynches all the time as townIn post 138, Skygazer wrote:Not starting wagons, calling for lynches.In post 120, BuJaber wrote:Why is starting wagons a bad thing, stargazer ? Or whoever asked
Yep, once that I can see.In post 136, OkaPoka wrote:wait scum have doubled up before?In post 135, Sando wrote:94.5% to be exact.In post 134, OkaPoka wrote:90% scum wouldn't want to double up
This early?In post 140, OkaPoka wrote:i call for lynches all the time as town
maybe not this early but the point is calling for lynches can be done by townIn post 142, Skygazer wrote:This early?In post 140, OkaPoka wrote:i call for lynches all the time as town
Ok her scum play is sooooooooo very different to what we see here. As scum she posted meaningful discussions and fake analysis. Here, it sounds like she has a posting restriction ... it is so different that it seems almost forced.In post 119, skitter30 wrote:viewtopic.php?f=90&t=75474
i'm having a lot of trouble seeing the person who kept posting to herself 'i am town' in her scum pt (i'm pretty sure this is last scumgame on site barring a marathon game last week) trying to pull any of these things off as scum tbh
It's game theory ... its not weird!In post 113, OkaPoka wrote:sounds like he was doing some weird probability calculations/rvs vote. I don't think that is inherently scummy at this phase of the game, it was like a semi-rvs vote. It's not like BuJaber is going to be lynched this quick in the game.