So, Survivor: Ghost Island aside, it seems like MS historically has more divisive Tribal Councils than the show does. For example, having a zero vote finalist is relatively rare on MS, while it's almost a standard on Survivor.
If you agree with the above, why do you think that is? My initial thought is that there's more pressure on jurors on the show to be "right", and that, conversely, on MS, there's almost no true "accountability" for jury votes. What do you think?
Jury Voting Philosophies
- PrivateI
-
PrivateI The Real Friend
- PrivateI
- PrivateI
-
PrivateI The Real Friend
- PrivateI
- The Real Friend
- The Real Friend
- Posts: 826
- Joined: October 29, 2013
With respect, isn't Survivor already a game of whoever can best manipulate the idiosyncrasies of any particular voting system?In post 31, Drench wrote:
i hate to say it but as much as i love a good rank, it's just too convoluted to really fit with the vibe of survivorIn post 29, Cephrir wrote:We were going to try RCV in disney but we kinda forgot
my great fear is that in implementing it you just make it a game of whoever can best manipulate the idiosyncrasies of any particular voting system - PrivateI
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.