Jury Voting Philosophies

For large social games such as Survivor where the primary mechanic is social interaction.
Post Reply
User avatar
Haschel Cedricson
Haschel Cedricson
Mr. Know It All
User avatar
User avatar
Haschel Cedricson
Mr. Know It All
Mr. Know It All
Posts: 2954
Joined: May 14, 2007
Location: Cascadian Subduction Zone
Contact:
Contact Haschel Cedricson

Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Tue Jul 17, 2018 2:03 pm

Post by Haschel Cedricson »

The lack of prize is a big part of it; on the show ultimately the jurors are answering "Who do you think deserves a million dollars?" whereas here we're answering "Who deserves to win the game?" And we have an incredibly wide range of attitudes here about what The Game actually is. Some jurors here are all about social play while others are more willing to reward strategically sound moves that backstabbed them.
Top
User avatar
Haschel Cedricson
Haschel Cedricson
Mr. Know It All
User avatar
User avatar
Haschel Cedricson
Mr. Know It All
Mr. Know It All
Posts: 2954
Joined: May 14, 2007
Location: Cascadian Subduction Zone
Contact:
Contact Haschel Cedricson

Post Post #21 (isolation #1) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:08 am

Post by Haschel Cedricson »

Either way I think this is why the perfect jury starting point is at F11 since that works for both an F2 and an F3.

Would it be problematic if the FIC wasn't specifically called out as being the FIC in an F3 setup?
Top
Post Reply
Isolate Users

Return to “ORGs and Large Social Games”